Araştırma Makalesi

ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS

Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1 30 Nisan 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS

Öz

Over the last few decades, one of the most contentious issues of the international investment law has been the interpretation of the ‘umbrella clauses’. Since the umbrella clauses are generally vague, short and hidden in international investment agreements, the interpretation of the clause is in a controversial position and thereby having been subject to the scholarly interest. Should umbrella clauses in international investment agreements be enforceable by arbitration tribunals? Or to what extent investor’s claims stemming from a contractual bre-ach could be enforceable by arbitration tribunals? SGS v Pakistan and SGS v Philippines have addressed these questions and reached opposite decisions. This article aims to examine the contradictory arbitral deci-sions and to discuss broad and restrictive approaches. The article begins with a brief review of umbrella clauses. Then, it analyses leading arbitral cases with the help of scholar views in order to shed the light on critical aspects of the issue.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Bulunmamaktadır.

Etik Beyan

Bulunmamaktadır.

Teşekkür

Bulunmamaktadır.

Kaynakça

  1. SGS v. Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13 (6 Aug 2003), https://www.italaw.com/cases/1009, 07.03.2023.
  2. SGS v. Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6 (29 Jan 2004), https://www.italaw.com/cases/1018, 07.03.2023.
  3. Joy Mining Machinery Limited v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Award on Jurisdiction, (6 August 2004), https://www.italaw.com/cases/590, 07.03.2023.
  4. Salini Costruttori S.p.A. & Italstrade S.p.A. v. Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/13, Decision on Jurisdiction (9 Nov 2004), https://www.italaw.com/cases/954, 07.03.2023.
  5. CMS Gas Transmission Co. v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8 (12 May 2005), https://www.italaw.com/cases/288, 07.03.2023.
  6. Eureko v. Poland, Partial Award, (19 Aug 2005), https://www. ita-law.com/cases/412, 07.03.2023.
  7. Noble Ventures v. Romania, ICSID Case no. ARB/01/11 (12 Oct 2005), https://www.italaw.com/cases/747, 07.03.2023.
  8. El Paso Energy v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/15, Decision on Jurisdiction (27 April 2006), https://www.italaw.com /cases/382, 07.03.2023.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Uluslararası Tahkim

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

10 Mart 2023

Kabul Tarihi

18 Mart 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Günarslan, B. F. (2024). ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.58820/eruhfd.1475561
AMA
1.Günarslan BF. ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS. ERÜHFD. 2024;19(1):85-107. doi:10.58820/eruhfd.1475561
Chicago
Günarslan, Banu Fatma. 2024. “ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 19 (1): 85-107. https://doi.org/10.58820/eruhfd.1475561.
EndNote
Günarslan BF (01 Nisan 2024) ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 19 1 85–107.
IEEE
[1]B. F. Günarslan, “ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS”, ERÜHFD, c. 19, sy 1, ss. 85–107, Nis. 2024, doi: 10.58820/eruhfd.1475561.
ISNAD
Günarslan, Banu Fatma. “ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 19/1 (01 Nisan 2024): 85-107. https://doi.org/10.58820/eruhfd.1475561.
JAMA
1.Günarslan BF. ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS. ERÜHFD. 2024;19:85–107.
MLA
Günarslan, Banu Fatma. “ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 19, sy 1, Nisan 2024, ss. 85-107, doi:10.58820/eruhfd.1475561.
Vancouver
1.Banu Fatma Günarslan. ENFORCEABILITY OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES BY INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS. ERÜHFD. 01 Nisan 2024;19(1):85-107. doi:10.58820/eruhfd.1475561


Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.