ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW

Gülen Soyaslan

ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW

Öz

Yayım yılı sebebiyle bu makalede öz bölümü bulunmamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Adli ve Önleme Aramaları Yönetmeliği [A.Ö.A.Y.] [The Regulation on Investigative and Preventive Searches], R.G.: 01.06.2005 S: 25832.
Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu [CMK] [Criminal Procedure Code], Kanun no (Law no): 5271 R.G. (Official Gazette): 17.12.2004 Sayı: 25673 Kabul Tarihi (enacted): 4.12.2004.
Gümrük Yönetmeliği [The Customs Regulations], R.G.: 07.10.2009 S: 27369.
Polis Vazife ve Selahiyetleri Kanunu [P.V.S.K.] [The Statute on Duties and Powers of the Police], Kanun No: 2751, Tarih: 14 Temmuz 1934.
The Turkish Constitution
The United States Constitution
Türk Ceza Kanunu [T.C.K.] [Criminal Code], Kanun no: 5237 R.G.: 12.10.2004.
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasasının Bazı Maddelerinde Değişiklik Yapılması Hakkında Kanun [The Statute Amending Some of tlıe Articles of tlıe Constitution], Kanun no: 5982 Tarih: 07.05.2010.

Yakalama, Gözaltına Alma ve İfade Alma Yönetmeliği [The Regulation on Arrest and Custodial Interrogation] R.G.: 01.06.2005 S: 25832.
Aguilarv. Texas, 84 S. Ct. 1509 (1964).
Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009).
Arizona v. Hicks, 107 S. Ct. 1149 (1987).
Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979).
Atwaterv. Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001).
Bd. Of. Educ. Of Indep. Sch. Dist. No.92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls, 122 S. Ct. 2559 (2002).
Berghuis v. Thompkins, 130 S. Ct. 2250 (2010).
Berkemerv. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984).
Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532 (1897).
Brinegarv. United States, 69 S. Ct. 1302 (1946).
Califonıia v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991).
Califonıia v. Beheler, 463 U.S. 420 (1984).
Califonıia v. Hodari D., 111 S. Ct. 1547 (1991).
Illegally Obtained Evidence in American and Turkish Criminal Procedure Law
California. v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986).
California. v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988).
Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583 (1974).
Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925).
Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970).
Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969).
Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986).
Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994).
Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981).
Florencev. Bd. ofChosenFreeholders, 132 S. Ct. 1510 (2012).
Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000).
Florida v. Jardines, 133 S. Ct. 1409 (2013).
Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248 (1991).
Florida. v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445 (1989).
Georgia v. Randolph, 126 S. Ct. 1515 (2006).
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989).
Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990).
Howes v. Fields, 132 S. Ct. 1181 (2012).
Illinois v. Caballes, 125 S. Ct. 834 (2005).
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).
Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990).
Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990).
Illinois. v. Lidster, 124 S. Ct. 885 (2004).
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
Kentucky v. King, 131 S. Ct. 1849 (2011).
Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 26 (2001).
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).
Maryland. v. Buie, 110 S. Ct. 1093 (1990).
Mich. Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 110 S. Ct. 2481 (1990).
Minnesota v. Dickerson, 113 S. Ct. 2130 (1993).
Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990).
Minnick v. Mississippi, 111 S. Ct. 486 (1990).
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (1986).
New Jersey v. TL.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985).
North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369 (1979).
O'Connorv. Ortega, 107 S. Ct. 1492 (1987).
Oliverv. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984).
Oregon v. Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039 (1983).
Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 (1969).
Payton v. New York, 100 S. Ct. 1371 (1980).
Pennsylvania v. Minuns, 434 U.S. 106 (1977).
Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 (1980).
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973).
ERÜHFD, C. VIII, S. 2, (2013)
Silverthome Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920).
Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979).
Spinelli v. United States, 89 S. Ct. 584 (1969).
Steagald v. United States, 101 S. Ct. 1642 (1981).
Tennessee v. Gamer, 471 U.S. 1 (1985).
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 (1983).
Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99 (1995).
United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002).
United States v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (1991).
United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977).
United States v. Drayton, 536 U.S. 194 (2002).
United States v. Jacobsen, 104 S. Ct. 1652 (1984).
United States v. Martinez Fuerte, 96 S. Ct. 3074 (1976).
United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974).
United States v. Miller, 96 S. Ct. 1619 (1976).
United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983).
United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973).
Illegally Obtained Evidence in American and Turkish Criminal Procedure Law United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982).
United States v. Watson, 96 S. Ct. 820 (1976).
United States v. White, 401 U.S. 616 (1971).
Warden Md. Penitentiary v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967).
Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914).
Winston v. Lee, 105 S. Ct. 1611 (1985).
Wyomingv. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295 (1999).
AYM., Siyasi Parti Kapatma Davası [The Case of Political Party Closure], T: 22.6.2001 E: 1999/2 K: 2001/2.
D. 10.D. E: 2005/6392 K: 2007/948 T: 13.03.2007.
D. IDDK. E: 2007/2257 K: 2012/1117 T: 14.09.2012.
Y. 1. CD. E: 2003/3819 K: 2004/299 T: 16.2.2004.
Y. l.CD. E: 2005/1478 K: 2005/3290 T: 16.11.2005.
Y. 8. CD. E: 1999/9021 K: 1999/9538 T: 09.06.1999.
YCGK. E: 1994/6-322 K: 1994/343 T: 19.12.1994.
YCGK. E: 1995/6-163 K: 1996/66 T: 26.3.1996.
YCGK. E: 1995/6-238 K: 1995/305 T: 24.10.1995.
YCGK. E: 2005/7-144 K: 2005/150 T: 29.11.2005.
Erdagoz v. Turkey, Eur. Ct. H. R., Eur. Ct. H.R., Application no. 21890/93, 1997, §51, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{ "fulltext": ["erdag%F6z"], "do cumentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001- 58108"]} (last visited Sept. 10, 2014).
European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 5- Right to Liberty and Security, 2012, s. 13, http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_5_ENG.pdf (last visited Sept. 10, 2014).
Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. United Kingdom, Eur. Ct. H.R., Application no. 12244/86-12245/86- 12383/86, 1991, § 32, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/ search.aspx?i=001-5772l#{"itemid":["001-57721"]} (lastvisited Sept. 10, 2014).
HIRBY J., Defini ti ons of Probable Cause v. Reasonable Suspicion, The Law Dictionary (featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd edition), http://thelawdictionary.org/article/ definitions-of-probable-cause-vs-reasonable-suspicion/ (last visited Sept. 16, 2014).
MACOVEİ Monica, The Right to Liberty and Security of the Person, Council of Europe, 2002, https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDC TMContent?documentld=090000168007ff4b (last visited Sept. 10, 2014).
ŞEN Ersan, "Araç Araması" [Search of Cars], August 2013, http://www.haber7.com/ yazarlar/prof-dr-ersan-sen/1065968-arac-aramasi (last visited Sept. 15, 2014).
ALLEN Ronald Jay - STUNTZ William J. - HOFFMANN Joseph L. - LİVİNGSTON Debra A. - LEİPOLD Andrew D., Criminal Procedure: Investigation and Right to Counsel, Wolters KluwerLaw & Business, 2 nd ed., New York, 2011.
CENTEL Nur - ZAFER Hamide, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku [Criminal Procedure Law], Beta, 10. Bası, İstanbul, 2013.
ÇINARA. Rıza, "Hukuka Aykırı Kanıtlar" [illegal Evidence], TBB Dergisi, Sayı 55, Ankara, 2004.
DRESSLER Joshua - MICHAELS Alan C., Understanding Criminal Procedure: Investigation, Lexis Nexis, 5. Bası, 2010.
KERR Orin S., The Case far the Third Party Doctrine, 107 MiCH. L. REv. 561 (2009).
KUNTER Nurullah - YENİSEY Feridun - NUHOĞLU Ayşe, Muhakeme Dalı olarak Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku [Criminal Procedure Law], Beta, 16.Bası, Istanbul, 2008.
ROCHE Brien A. - ROCHE John K. - ROCHE Sean P., Law 101, Sphinx, 2. Bası, Illinois, 2009.
SOYASLAN Doğan, "İdari Denetim ve Aramalar" [Administrative Searches], Prof. Dr. Fırat Öztan'a Armağan, Turhan, 2. Bası, Ankara, 2010.
SOYASLAN Doğan, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku [Criminal Procedure Law], Yetkin, 4. Bası, Ankara, 2010.
YENİSEY Feridun, Turkish Criminal Procedure Code [Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu], Beta, 1. Bası, İstanbul, 2009

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ceza Muhakemeleri Usulü

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Gülen Soyaslan
United States

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Aralık 2013

Gönderilme Tarihi

9 Eylül 2013

Kabul Tarihi

4 Kasım 2013

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2013 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA23HX33TT

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Soyaslan, G. (2013). ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 723-770. https://izlik.org/JA23HX33TT

AMA

1.Soyaslan G. ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW. ERÜHFD. 2013;8(2):723-770. https://izlik.org/JA23HX33TT

Chicago

Soyaslan, Gülen. 2013. “ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 8 (2): 723-70. https://izlik.org/JA23HX33TT.

EndNote

Soyaslan G (01 Aralık 2013) ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 8 2 723–770.

IEEE

[1]G. Soyaslan, “ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW”, ERÜHFD, c. 8, sy 2, ss. 723–770, Ara. 2013, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA23HX33TT

ISNAD

Soyaslan, Gülen. “ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 8/2 (01 Aralık 2013): 723-770. https://izlik.org/JA23HX33TT.

JAMA

1.Soyaslan G. ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW. ERÜHFD. 2013;8:723–770.

MLA

Soyaslan, Gülen. “ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 8, sy 2, Aralık 2013, ss. 723-70, https://izlik.org/JA23HX33TT.

Vancouver

1.Gülen Soyaslan. ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW. ERÜHFD [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2013;8(2):723-70. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA23HX33TT