JOSEPH RAZ'DA HUKUKİ OTORİTE KAVRAMI

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 37 - 63, 15.05.2006

Sevtap Metin

Öz

Bu makalenin yayınlanma tarihi itibariyle öz bölümü bulunmamaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Joseph Raz, Hukuki otorite, İtaat Yükümlülüğü

The Concept Of Legal Authority As Interpreted By Joseph Raz

Öz

As of the publication date, this article does not have an abstract section.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Legal Authority, Joseph Raz, Obligation to obedience

Kaynakça

• Alyar, S.: “The Problem of Law's Authority: John Finnis and Joseph Raz on Legal Obligation”, Law and Philosophy: An International Journal for Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy, Vol: 19, Issue: 4, Netherlands,Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2000, s. 465-489,
• Aktaş Sururi: “Hart ve Dworkin'e Karşı Otorite Olarak Hukuk”, AÜEHED, C.VTI, S.3-4, 2004, s. 3-21.
• Bittner, Rüdiger : “ Stronger Reasons”, Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, Edited: Lukas H. Meyer, Stanley L. Paulson, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, s.17-23.
• Bowden, Geoffrey. C.: “The Complexities of Perfectionist Theories of Toleration”, http://www.daneprairie.com, Çevrimiçi, 12.01.2005.
• Dumning, Patric : “Joseph Raz and the Instrumental Justification of a Duty to Obey ihe Law”, Law and Philosophy: An Imternational Journal for Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy, Vol: 22, Issue: 61, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2003, s. 597-620.
• Harris, JW.: Legal Philosophies, Second Edition, London, Butterworihs, 1997.
• Heuer, Oo Ülrike: “Raz On Values and Reasons”, (o (Çevrimiçi) http://www.phil. upenn.edu/ <ulrike, 31.11.2004.
• Kramer, Matthew H. : “Reguirements , Reasons, and Raz:Legal Positivism and Legal Duties”, Ethics, Volume:109, January 1999, 5.375-407.
• Kymlicka, Will: Çağdaş Siyaset Felsefesine Giriş, Çev: Ebru Kılıç, İstanbul, İs- tanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2004.
• Leiter, Brian : “The Naturalistic Turn in Legal Philosophy”, APA Newsletters, Spring 2001, Volume:0O, Number:2, s.1-9, Lukes, 5. : “Perspectives on Authority”, Authority, Edited by:Joseph Raz, Oxford, Basil Blackwell Ltd, 1990, s. 203-217.
• Marmor, Andrei :İnterpretation and Legal Theory, Oxford , Oxford University Press, 1996.
• Marmor, Andrei: “Authority, Eguality and Democracy”, www.as.huji.ac.i/Marmorauthority eguality and democracy.pdf, 12. 01.2005.
• May, Thomas : “On Raz and ihe Obligation to Obey the Law”, Law and Philosophy, Volume:16, Issue:i, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publis- her, 1997, s.19-36,
• Mendel, Gerard: Bir Otorite Tarihi: Süreklilikler ve Değişiklikler. Çev: Işık Ergüden, İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları, 2005.
• Mulhall, Stephen and Swift, Adam: Liberals and Communitarians, Oxford, Blackwell Publishes, 1997.
• Patrick, Neal : “Perfectionism with a Liberal Face? Nervous Liberal and Raz's Political Theory”, Social Theory &Practice, Spring 94, Vol:20, Issue:1, s. 25-35.
• Patterson, Dennis M.: “Dworkin on the Semantics of Legal and Political Concepts”, htttp:/www.law.upenn.edu/academics/institutes/ilp/200405papers, Çevrimiçi;03.04.2005.
• Raz, Joseph : “Authority and Justification”, Authority, Edited by:Joseph Raz, Oxford, Basil Blackwell Ltd, 1990, s. 115-141.
• Raz, Joseph : “The Practice of Oo Value”, hitp:// WWW. tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/Raz. 02,pdf, Çevrimiçi; 12.01.2005.
• Raz, Joseph : Value, Respect and Attachment, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
• Raz, Joseph : Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000.
• Raz, Joseph : Ethics in Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, Revised Edition, Clarendon Press, 1996.
• Raz, Joseph : The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Edited by: Joseph Raz, Oxford, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1979.
• Raz, Joseph : Morality of Freedom, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1988.
• Raz, Joseph : “İncorporation by Law”, Legal Theory, Nr:10, Yıl:2004, s.1-17.
• Rentto, Juha Pekka : “Obligation to Obey”, ARSP :Law and State in Modern Times, Beiheft.Nr:42. Stuttgart 1990, s. 193-205.
• Roberson, Christopher : “The State as Rational Authority, An Anarchist Justification of Government”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Yıl: 1998, 18 (4), s.617-630.
• Simmel, Georg: “Tahakküm”. Çev: Serkan Gölbaşı, İÜHFM, C. LXIL, S.1-2, İstanbul 2004, s.489-514.
• Tebbit, Mark: Philosophy of Law: An Introduction, London and NewYork, Routledge, 2000.
• Uygur, Gülriz: “Hukuki Pozitivizmin Değişen Yüzü mü”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi”, Cilt: 52, Sayı:3, s. 145-176.
• Üskül, Zeynep Özlem : Bireyciliğe Tarihsel Bakış, İstanbul, Büke Yayıncılık, 2003.
• Waldron. Jeremy : “Authority for Oficials”, Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, Edited: Lukas H. Meyer. Stanley L. Paulson, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, s.45-69.
• Waldron. Jeremy : Law and Disagreement, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1999.