Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE iN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 723 - 770, 30.12.2013

Öz

Yayım yılı sebebiyle bu makalede öz bölümü bulunmamaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Adli ve Önleme Aramaları Yönetmeliği [A.Ö.A.Y.] [The Regulation on Investigative and Preventive Searches], R.G.: 01.06.2005 S: 25832.
  • Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu [CMK] [Criminal Procedure Code], Kanun no (Law no): 5271 R.G. (Official Gazette): 17.12.2004 Sayı: 25673 Kabul Tarihi (enacted): 4.12.2004.
  • Gümrük Yönetmeliği [The Customs Regulations], R.G.: 07.10.2009 S: 27369.
  • Polis Vazife ve Selahiyetleri Kanunu [P.V.S.K.] [The Statute on Duties and Powers of the Police], Kanun No: 2751, Tarih: 14 Temmuz 1934.
  • The Turkish Constitution
  • The United States Constitution
  • Türk Ceza Kanunu [T.C.K.] [Criminal Code], Kanun no: 5237 R.G.: 12.10.2004.
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasasının Bazı Maddelerinde Değişiklik Yapılması Hakkında Kanun [The Statute Amending Some of tlıe Articles of tlıe Constitution], Kanun no: 5982 Tarih: 07.05.2010.
  • Yakalama, Gözaltına Alma ve İfade Alma Yönetmeliği [The Regulation on Arrest and Custodial Interrogation] R.G.: 01.06.2005 S: 25832.
  • Aguilarv. Texas, 84 S. Ct. 1509 (1964).
  • Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009).
  • Arizona v. Hicks, 107 S. Ct. 1149 (1987).
  • Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979).
  • Atwaterv. Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001).
  • Bd. Of. Educ. Of Indep. Sch. Dist. No.92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls, 122 S. Ct. 2559 (2002).
  • Berghuis v. Thompkins, 130 S. Ct. 2250 (2010).
  • Berkemerv. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984).
  • Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532 (1897).
  • Brinegarv. United States, 69 S. Ct. 1302 (1946).
  • Califonıia v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991).
  • Califonıia v. Beheler, 463 U.S. 420 (1984).
  • Califonıia v. Hodari D., 111 S. Ct. 1547 (1991).
  • Illegally Obtained Evidence in American and Turkish Criminal Procedure Law
  • California. v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986).
  • California. v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988).
  • Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583 (1974).
  • Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925).
  • Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970).
  • Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969).
  • Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986).
  • Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994).
  • Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981).
  • Florencev. Bd. ofChosenFreeholders, 132 S. Ct. 1510 (2012).
  • Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000).
  • Florida v. Jardines, 133 S. Ct. 1409 (2013).
  • Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248 (1991).
  • Florida. v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445 (1989).
  • Georgia v. Randolph, 126 S. Ct. 1515 (2006).
  • Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989).
  • Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990).
  • Howes v. Fields, 132 S. Ct. 1181 (2012).
  • Illinois v. Caballes, 125 S. Ct. 834 (2005).
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).
  • Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990).
  • Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990).
  • Illinois. v. Lidster, 124 S. Ct. 885 (2004).
  • Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
  • Kentucky v. King, 131 S. Ct. 1849 (2011).
  • Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 26 (2001).
  • Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).
  • Maryland. v. Buie, 110 S. Ct. 1093 (1990).
  • Mich. Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 110 S. Ct. 2481 (1990).
  • Minnesota v. Dickerson, 113 S. Ct. 2130 (1993).
  • Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990).
  • Minnick v. Mississippi, 111 S. Ct. 486 (1990).
  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
  • Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (1986).
  • New Jersey v. TL.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985).
  • North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369 (1979).
  • O'Connorv. Ortega, 107 S. Ct. 1492 (1987).
  • Oliverv. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984).
  • Oregon v. Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039 (1983).
  • Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 (1969).
  • Payton v. New York, 100 S. Ct. 1371 (1980).
  • Pennsylvania v. Minuns, 434 U.S. 106 (1977).
  • Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 (1980).
  • Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973).
  • ERÜHFD, C. VIII, S. 2, (2013)
  • Silverthome Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920).
  • Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979).
  • Spinelli v. United States, 89 S. Ct. 584 (1969).
  • Steagald v. United States, 101 S. Ct. 1642 (1981).
  • Tennessee v. Gamer, 471 U.S. 1 (1985).
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
  • Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 (1983).
  • Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99 (1995).
  • United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002).
  • United States v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (1991).
  • United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977).
  • United States v. Drayton, 536 U.S. 194 (2002).
  • United States v. Jacobsen, 104 S. Ct. 1652 (1984).
  • United States v. Martinez Fuerte, 96 S. Ct. 3074 (1976).
  • United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974).
  • United States v. Miller, 96 S. Ct. 1619 (1976).
  • United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983).
  • United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973).
  • Illegally Obtained Evidence in American and Turkish Criminal Procedure Law United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982).
  • United States v. Watson, 96 S. Ct. 820 (1976).
  • United States v. White, 401 U.S. 616 (1971).
  • Warden Md. Penitentiary v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967).
  • Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914).
  • Winston v. Lee, 105 S. Ct. 1611 (1985).
  • Wyomingv. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295 (1999).
  • AYM., Siyasi Parti Kapatma Davası [The Case of Political Party Closure], T: 22.6.2001 E: 1999/2 K: 2001/2.
  • D. 10.D. E: 2005/6392 K: 2007/948 T: 13.03.2007.
  • D. IDDK. E: 2007/2257 K: 2012/1117 T: 14.09.2012.
  • Y. 1. CD. E: 2003/3819 K: 2004/299 T: 16.2.2004.
  • Y. l.CD. E: 2005/1478 K: 2005/3290 T: 16.11.2005.
  • Y. 8. CD. E: 1999/9021 K: 1999/9538 T: 09.06.1999.
  • YCGK. E: 1994/6-322 K: 1994/343 T: 19.12.1994.
  • YCGK. E: 1995/6-163 K: 1996/66 T: 26.3.1996.
  • YCGK. E: 1995/6-238 K: 1995/305 T: 24.10.1995.
  • YCGK. E: 2005/7-144 K: 2005/150 T: 29.11.2005.
  • Erdagoz v. Turkey, Eur. Ct. H. R., Eur. Ct. H.R., Application no. 21890/93, 1997, §51, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{ "fulltext": ["erdag%F6z"], "do cumentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001- 58108"]} (last visited Sept. 10, 2014).
  • European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 5- Right to Liberty and Security, 2012, s. 13, http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_5_ENG.pdf (last visited Sept. 10, 2014).
  • Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. United Kingdom, Eur. Ct. H.R., Application no. 12244/86-12245/86- 12383/86, 1991, § 32, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/ search.aspx?i=001-5772l#{"itemid":["001-57721"]} (lastvisited Sept. 10, 2014).
  • HIRBY J., Defini ti ons of Probable Cause v. Reasonable Suspicion, The Law Dictionary (featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd edition), http://thelawdictionary.org/article/ definitions-of-probable-cause-vs-reasonable-suspicion/ (last visited Sept. 16, 2014).
  • MACOVEİ Monica, The Right to Liberty and Security of the Person, Council of Europe, 2002, https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDC TMContent?documentld=090000168007ff4b (last visited Sept. 10, 2014).
  • ŞEN Ersan, "Araç Araması" [Search of Cars], August 2013, http://www.haber7.com/ yazarlar/prof-dr-ersan-sen/1065968-arac-aramasi (last visited Sept. 15, 2014).
  • ALLEN Ronald Jay - STUNTZ William J. - HOFFMANN Joseph L. - LİVİNGSTON Debra A. - LEİPOLD Andrew D., Criminal Procedure: Investigation and Right to Counsel, Wolters KluwerLaw & Business, 2 nd ed., New York, 2011.
  • CENTEL Nur - ZAFER Hamide, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku [Criminal Procedure Law], Beta, 10. Bası, İstanbul, 2013.
  • ÇINARA. Rıza, "Hukuka Aykırı Kanıtlar" [illegal Evidence], TBB Dergisi, Sayı 55, Ankara, 2004.
  • DRESSLER Joshua - MICHAELS Alan C., Understanding Criminal Procedure: Investigation, Lexis Nexis, 5. Bası, 2010.
  • KERR Orin S., The Case far the Third Party Doctrine, 107 MiCH. L. REv. 561 (2009).
  • KUNTER Nurullah - YENİSEY Feridun - NUHOĞLU Ayşe, Muhakeme Dalı olarak Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku [Criminal Procedure Law], Beta, 16.Bası, Istanbul, 2008.
  • ROCHE Brien A. - ROCHE John K. - ROCHE Sean P., Law 101, Sphinx, 2. Bası, Illinois, 2009.
  • SOYASLAN Doğan, "İdari Denetim ve Aramalar" [Administrative Searches], Prof. Dr. Fırat Öztan'a Armağan, Turhan, 2. Bası, Ankara, 2010.
  • SOYASLAN Doğan, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku [Criminal Procedure Law], Yetkin, 4. Bası, Ankara, 2010.
  • YENİSEY Feridun, Turkish Criminal Procedure Code [Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu], Beta, 1. Bası, İstanbul, 2009
Yıl 2013, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 723 - 770, 30.12.2013

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Adli ve Önleme Aramaları Yönetmeliği [A.Ö.A.Y.] [The Regulation on Investigative and Preventive Searches], R.G.: 01.06.2005 S: 25832.
  • Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu [CMK] [Criminal Procedure Code], Kanun no (Law no): 5271 R.G. (Official Gazette): 17.12.2004 Sayı: 25673 Kabul Tarihi (enacted): 4.12.2004.
  • Gümrük Yönetmeliği [The Customs Regulations], R.G.: 07.10.2009 S: 27369.
  • Polis Vazife ve Selahiyetleri Kanunu [P.V.S.K.] [The Statute on Duties and Powers of the Police], Kanun No: 2751, Tarih: 14 Temmuz 1934.
  • The Turkish Constitution
  • The United States Constitution
  • Türk Ceza Kanunu [T.C.K.] [Criminal Code], Kanun no: 5237 R.G.: 12.10.2004.
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasasının Bazı Maddelerinde Değişiklik Yapılması Hakkında Kanun [The Statute Amending Some of tlıe Articles of tlıe Constitution], Kanun no: 5982 Tarih: 07.05.2010.
  • Yakalama, Gözaltına Alma ve İfade Alma Yönetmeliği [The Regulation on Arrest and Custodial Interrogation] R.G.: 01.06.2005 S: 25832.
  • Aguilarv. Texas, 84 S. Ct. 1509 (1964).
  • Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009).
  • Arizona v. Hicks, 107 S. Ct. 1149 (1987).
  • Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979).
  • Atwaterv. Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001).
  • Bd. Of. Educ. Of Indep. Sch. Dist. No.92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls, 122 S. Ct. 2559 (2002).
  • Berghuis v. Thompkins, 130 S. Ct. 2250 (2010).
  • Berkemerv. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984).
  • Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532 (1897).
  • Brinegarv. United States, 69 S. Ct. 1302 (1946).
  • Califonıia v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991).
  • Califonıia v. Beheler, 463 U.S. 420 (1984).
  • Califonıia v. Hodari D., 111 S. Ct. 1547 (1991).
  • Illegally Obtained Evidence in American and Turkish Criminal Procedure Law
  • California. v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986).
  • California. v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988).
  • Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583 (1974).
  • Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925).
  • Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970).
  • Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969).
  • Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986).
  • Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994).
  • Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981).
  • Florencev. Bd. ofChosenFreeholders, 132 S. Ct. 1510 (2012).
  • Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000).
  • Florida v. Jardines, 133 S. Ct. 1409 (2013).
  • Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248 (1991).
  • Florida. v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445 (1989).
  • Georgia v. Randolph, 126 S. Ct. 1515 (2006).
  • Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989).
  • Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990).
  • Howes v. Fields, 132 S. Ct. 1181 (2012).
  • Illinois v. Caballes, 125 S. Ct. 834 (2005).
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).
  • Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990).
  • Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990).
  • Illinois. v. Lidster, 124 S. Ct. 885 (2004).
  • Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
  • Kentucky v. King, 131 S. Ct. 1849 (2011).
  • Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 26 (2001).
  • Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).
  • Maryland. v. Buie, 110 S. Ct. 1093 (1990).
  • Mich. Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 110 S. Ct. 2481 (1990).
  • Minnesota v. Dickerson, 113 S. Ct. 2130 (1993).
  • Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990).
  • Minnick v. Mississippi, 111 S. Ct. 486 (1990).
  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
  • Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (1986).
  • New Jersey v. TL.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985).
  • North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369 (1979).
  • O'Connorv. Ortega, 107 S. Ct. 1492 (1987).
  • Oliverv. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984).
  • Oregon v. Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039 (1983).
  • Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 (1969).
  • Payton v. New York, 100 S. Ct. 1371 (1980).
  • Pennsylvania v. Minuns, 434 U.S. 106 (1977).
  • Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 (1980).
  • Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973).
  • ERÜHFD, C. VIII, S. 2, (2013)
  • Silverthome Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920).
  • Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979).
  • Spinelli v. United States, 89 S. Ct. 584 (1969).
  • Steagald v. United States, 101 S. Ct. 1642 (1981).
  • Tennessee v. Gamer, 471 U.S. 1 (1985).
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
  • Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 (1983).
  • Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99 (1995).
  • United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002).
  • United States v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (1991).
  • United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977).
  • United States v. Drayton, 536 U.S. 194 (2002).
  • United States v. Jacobsen, 104 S. Ct. 1652 (1984).
  • United States v. Martinez Fuerte, 96 S. Ct. 3074 (1976).
  • United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974).
  • United States v. Miller, 96 S. Ct. 1619 (1976).
  • United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983).
  • United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973).
  • Illegally Obtained Evidence in American and Turkish Criminal Procedure Law United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982).
  • United States v. Watson, 96 S. Ct. 820 (1976).
  • United States v. White, 401 U.S. 616 (1971).
  • Warden Md. Penitentiary v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967).
  • Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914).
  • Winston v. Lee, 105 S. Ct. 1611 (1985).
  • Wyomingv. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295 (1999).
  • AYM., Siyasi Parti Kapatma Davası [The Case of Political Party Closure], T: 22.6.2001 E: 1999/2 K: 2001/2.
  • D. 10.D. E: 2005/6392 K: 2007/948 T: 13.03.2007.
  • D. IDDK. E: 2007/2257 K: 2012/1117 T: 14.09.2012.
  • Y. 1. CD. E: 2003/3819 K: 2004/299 T: 16.2.2004.
  • Y. l.CD. E: 2005/1478 K: 2005/3290 T: 16.11.2005.
  • Y. 8. CD. E: 1999/9021 K: 1999/9538 T: 09.06.1999.
  • YCGK. E: 1994/6-322 K: 1994/343 T: 19.12.1994.
  • YCGK. E: 1995/6-163 K: 1996/66 T: 26.3.1996.
  • YCGK. E: 1995/6-238 K: 1995/305 T: 24.10.1995.
  • YCGK. E: 2005/7-144 K: 2005/150 T: 29.11.2005.
  • Erdagoz v. Turkey, Eur. Ct. H. R., Eur. Ct. H.R., Application no. 21890/93, 1997, §51, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{ "fulltext": ["erdag%F6z"], "do cumentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001- 58108"]} (last visited Sept. 10, 2014).
  • European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 5- Right to Liberty and Security, 2012, s. 13, http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_5_ENG.pdf (last visited Sept. 10, 2014).
  • Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. United Kingdom, Eur. Ct. H.R., Application no. 12244/86-12245/86- 12383/86, 1991, § 32, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/ search.aspx?i=001-5772l#{"itemid":["001-57721"]} (lastvisited Sept. 10, 2014).
  • HIRBY J., Defini ti ons of Probable Cause v. Reasonable Suspicion, The Law Dictionary (featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd edition), http://thelawdictionary.org/article/ definitions-of-probable-cause-vs-reasonable-suspicion/ (last visited Sept. 16, 2014).
  • MACOVEİ Monica, The Right to Liberty and Security of the Person, Council of Europe, 2002, https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDC TMContent?documentld=090000168007ff4b (last visited Sept. 10, 2014).
  • ŞEN Ersan, "Araç Araması" [Search of Cars], August 2013, http://www.haber7.com/ yazarlar/prof-dr-ersan-sen/1065968-arac-aramasi (last visited Sept. 15, 2014).
  • ALLEN Ronald Jay - STUNTZ William J. - HOFFMANN Joseph L. - LİVİNGSTON Debra A. - LEİPOLD Andrew D., Criminal Procedure: Investigation and Right to Counsel, Wolters KluwerLaw & Business, 2 nd ed., New York, 2011.
  • CENTEL Nur - ZAFER Hamide, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku [Criminal Procedure Law], Beta, 10. Bası, İstanbul, 2013.
  • ÇINARA. Rıza, "Hukuka Aykırı Kanıtlar" [illegal Evidence], TBB Dergisi, Sayı 55, Ankara, 2004.
  • DRESSLER Joshua - MICHAELS Alan C., Understanding Criminal Procedure: Investigation, Lexis Nexis, 5. Bası, 2010.
  • KERR Orin S., The Case far the Third Party Doctrine, 107 MiCH. L. REv. 561 (2009).
  • KUNTER Nurullah - YENİSEY Feridun - NUHOĞLU Ayşe, Muhakeme Dalı olarak Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku [Criminal Procedure Law], Beta, 16.Bası, Istanbul, 2008.
  • ROCHE Brien A. - ROCHE John K. - ROCHE Sean P., Law 101, Sphinx, 2. Bası, Illinois, 2009.
  • SOYASLAN Doğan, "İdari Denetim ve Aramalar" [Administrative Searches], Prof. Dr. Fırat Öztan'a Armağan, Turhan, 2. Bası, Ankara, 2010.
  • SOYASLAN Doğan, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku [Criminal Procedure Law], Yetkin, 4. Bası, Ankara, 2010.
  • YENİSEY Feridun, Turkish Criminal Procedure Code [Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu], Beta, 1. Bası, İstanbul, 2009
Toplam 119 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ceza Muhakemeleri Usulü
Bölüm Kamu Hukuku
Yazarlar

Gülen Soyaslan

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

Chicago Soyaslan, Gülen. “ILLEGALL Y OBTAINED EVIDENCE IN AMERICAN AND TURKISH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 8, sy. 2 (Aralık 2013): 723-70.

Creative Commons Lisansı
Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.