Referans Parametreleri ile Biçimlendirilmiş Kavram Latislerinin Bilgisayarlı Gerçekleştirimi

Öz

Zihinsel işlevlerin şekillenmesinde ve yorumlanmasında, bir anlam ilişkisi olan dil önemli bir olgudur. Söylemlerin geçek çıkarımlarına ulaşmada ontoloji kullanımı ise bir gerekliliktir. Ontolojiler  insan zihninin projekte edilmiş halleri olduğundan ontolojiler ile dil arasında bir ilişkinin kurulması gerekir. Bu bağlamda, Biçimsel Kavram Analizi Kuramı çerçevesinde tematik referans parametreleriyle bilgisayar ortamında hazırlanan modeller, bir ontoloji prototipi  gibi ele alınabilir. Oluşturulan bu modeller elektronik ortamdaki çeviri sistemleri ve sözcüklerin sınıflandırılma işlemleri için önemli bir kaynak teşkil ederken, Türkçe'nin anlamsal çözümlenmesine de katkı sağlar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biçimsel Kavram Analizi,Tematik İlişkiler,Biçimsel Ontoloji

Computerized Implementation of Concept Lattices Formed with Reference Parameters

Öz

The human mind has a structure that covers the high-level processes of the brain (thinking, perception, etc.). Language plays a key role in the formation and interpretation of these mental functions. The semantic analysis of language especially requires using a model of reality. The most general models created by the human mind are ontologies.  Ontologies, due to their large sizes in nature, they contain the potential of errors and omissions. This requires that ontologies should be created in computer environment using a formal language. In this context, the lattice models prepared in computer media with thematic reference parameters within the framework of Formal Concept Analysis Theory can be treated as an ontology prototype. While these models created constitute an important source for the processes of translation systems in the electronic media and the classification of words, they also contribute to the semantic analysis of Turkish.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Formal Concept Analysis,Thematic Relations,Formal Ontology,Semantic Structures

Kaynakça

1. Barwise, J., Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Butt, M. (2005). Theories of Case. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
3. Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
4. Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection, Language, vol. 67, no. 3, s. 547-619.
5. Fırat, Y., Kılıçaslan, Y., Uçar, Ö. 2013. Bilgisayar Ortamında Biçimsel Ontoloji Oluşturulması, Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi/Journal of Higher Education and Science, vol. 3, no. 1, s. 80-84.
6. Fırat, Y., Uçar, Ö., Kılıçaslan, Y. 2014. Semantic Analysis with a Lattice-Based FrameNet, Journal of International Scientific Publications:Language, Individual & Society, vol. 8, Bulgaria, s. 512-518.
7. Fillmore, C. J., "Frame semantics and the nature of language". In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech, Vol. 280, s. 20-32, 1976.
8. Foley, W. A., Van Valin, R. D. jr. (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

9. Ganter, B., Wille, R. (1999). Formal Concept Analysis Mathematical Foundation, Berlin: Springer, Verlag.
10. Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in Lexical Relations, MIT Dissertation, Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, [Reprint 1970].
11. Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Jackendoff, R. 1987. The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory, Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 18, no. 3,s. 369-411.
13. Jackendoff, R. 1993. On the Role of Conceptual Structure in Argument Selection, A Reply to Emonds, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol.11, no.2, s. 279-312.
14. Kasper, S. (2008). A comparison of ‘thematic role’ theories. Unpublished master thesis, The Philips University of Malburg.
15. Kılıçaslan, Y., Uçar, Ö., Özkan, Y., 2012. FrameNet Tekniği ile İki Dilli Ontoloji Hizalaması, NWSA-Engineering Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, s. 505-520.
16. Kılıçaslan, Y., Tuna, G., 2015. Linking FrameNet and Natural Languages via Thematic Role Structures, International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, Vol. 1, No. 3, s. 158-163.
17. Levin, B. (2009). Lexical Semantics of Verbs, Course LSA 116, LSA Linguistic Institute, University of California, Berkeley.
18. Wille, R. (1982). Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies on concepts. ed. (I. Rival), in Ordered Sets, s. 445-470, Dordrecht-Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.