BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Referans Parametreleri ile Biçimlendirilmiş Kavram Latislerinin Bilgisayarlı Gerçekleştirimi

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 90 - 111, 28.06.2017

Öz

Zihinsel
işlevlerin şekillenmesinde ve yorumlanmasında, bir anlam ilişkisi olan dil
önemli bir olgudur. Söylemlerin geçek çıkarımlarına ulaşmada ontoloji kullanımı
ise bir gerekliliktir. Ontolojiler  insan
zihninin projekte edilmiş halleri olduğundan ontolojiler ile dil arasında bir
ilişkinin kurulması gerekir. Bu bağlamda, Biçimsel Kavram Analizi Kuramı
çerçevesinde tematik referans parametreleriyle bilgisayar ortamında hazırlanan
modeller, bir ontoloji prototipi  gibi ele
alınabilir. Oluşturulan bu modeller elektronik ortamdaki çeviri sistemleri ve
sözcüklerin sınıflandırılma işlemleri için önemli bir kaynak teşkil ederken,
Türkçe'nin anlamsal çözümlenmesine de katkı sağlar.

Kaynakça

  • Barwise, J., Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Butt, M. (2005). Theories of Case. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection, Language, vol. 67, no. 3, s. 547-619.
  • Fırat, Y., Kılıçaslan, Y., Uçar, Ö. 2013. Bilgisayar Ortamında Biçimsel Ontoloji Oluşturulması, Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi/Journal of Higher Education and Science, vol. 3, no. 1, s. 80-84.
  • Fırat, Y., Uçar, Ö., Kılıçaslan, Y. 2014. Semantic Analysis with a Lattice-Based FrameNet, Journal of International Scientific Publications:Language, Individual & Society, vol. 8, Bulgaria, s. 512-518.
  • Fillmore, C. J., "Frame semantics and the nature of language". In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech, Vol. 280, s. 20-32, 1976.
  • Foley, W. A., Van Valin, R. D. jr. (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Ganter, B., Wille, R. (1999). Formal Concept Analysis Mathematical Foundation, Berlin: Springer, Verlag.
  • Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in Lexical Relations, MIT Dissertation, Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, [Reprint 1970].
  • Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Jackendoff, R. 1987. The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory, Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 18, no. 3,s. 369-411.
  • Jackendoff, R. 1993. On the Role of Conceptual Structure in Argument Selection, A Reply to Emonds, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol.11, no.2, s. 279-312.
  • Kasper, S. (2008). A comparison of ‘thematic role’ theories. Unpublished master thesis, The Philips University of Malburg.
  • Kılıçaslan, Y., Uçar, Ö., Özkan, Y., 2012. FrameNet Tekniği ile İki Dilli Ontoloji Hizalaması, NWSA-Engineering Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, s. 505-520.
  • Kılıçaslan, Y., Tuna, G., 2015. Linking FrameNet and Natural Languages via Thematic Role Structures, International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, Vol. 1, No. 3, s. 158-163.
  • Levin, B. (2009). Lexical Semantics of Verbs, Course LSA 116, LSA Linguistic Institute, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Wille, R. (1982). Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies on concepts. ed. (I. Rival), in Ordered Sets, s. 445-470, Dordrecht-Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Computerized Implementation of Concept Lattices Formed with Reference Parameters

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 90 - 111, 28.06.2017

Öz

The human mind has a structure that covers the high-level processes of
the brain (thinking, perception, etc.).
Language plays a key role in the formation and interpretation of these
mental functions. The semantic analysis of language especially requires using a
model of reality. The most general models created by the human mind are
ontologies.  Ontologies, due to their
large sizes in nature, they contain the potential of errors and omissions. This
requires that ontologies should be created in computer environment using a
formal language. In this context, the lattice models prepared
in computer media with thematic reference parameters within the framework of
Formal Concept Analysis Theory can be treated as an ontology prototype. While
these models created constitute an important source for the processes of
translation systems in the electronic media and the classification of
words, they also contribute to the semantic analysis of Turkish.

Kaynakça

  • Barwise, J., Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Butt, M. (2005). Theories of Case. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection, Language, vol. 67, no. 3, s. 547-619.
  • Fırat, Y., Kılıçaslan, Y., Uçar, Ö. 2013. Bilgisayar Ortamında Biçimsel Ontoloji Oluşturulması, Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi/Journal of Higher Education and Science, vol. 3, no. 1, s. 80-84.
  • Fırat, Y., Uçar, Ö., Kılıçaslan, Y. 2014. Semantic Analysis with a Lattice-Based FrameNet, Journal of International Scientific Publications:Language, Individual & Society, vol. 8, Bulgaria, s. 512-518.
  • Fillmore, C. J., "Frame semantics and the nature of language". In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech, Vol. 280, s. 20-32, 1976.
  • Foley, W. A., Van Valin, R. D. jr. (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Ganter, B., Wille, R. (1999). Formal Concept Analysis Mathematical Foundation, Berlin: Springer, Verlag.
  • Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in Lexical Relations, MIT Dissertation, Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, [Reprint 1970].
  • Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Jackendoff, R. 1987. The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory, Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 18, no. 3,s. 369-411.
  • Jackendoff, R. 1993. On the Role of Conceptual Structure in Argument Selection, A Reply to Emonds, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol.11, no.2, s. 279-312.
  • Kasper, S. (2008). A comparison of ‘thematic role’ theories. Unpublished master thesis, The Philips University of Malburg.
  • Kılıçaslan, Y., Uçar, Ö., Özkan, Y., 2012. FrameNet Tekniği ile İki Dilli Ontoloji Hizalaması, NWSA-Engineering Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, s. 505-520.
  • Kılıçaslan, Y., Tuna, G., 2015. Linking FrameNet and Natural Languages via Thematic Role Structures, International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, Vol. 1, No. 3, s. 158-163.
  • Levin, B. (2009). Lexical Semantics of Verbs, Course LSA 116, LSA Linguistic Institute, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Wille, R. (1982). Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies on concepts. ed. (I. Rival), in Ordered Sets, s. 445-470, Dordrecht-Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yelda Fırat

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Haziran 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Fırat, Y. (2017). Computerized Implementation of Concept Lattices Formed with Reference Parameters. Erzincan University Journal of Science and Technology, 10(1), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.18185/erzifbed.285800