Alternatif Konut Finansmanı Modelleri: Finansallaşma, Eşitsizlik ve Sürdürülebilirlik Sorunlarına Karşı Kooperatif ve Mikrofinans Yaklaşımları

Öz

Bu çalışma, konut sistemlerinin finansallaşmasıyla birlikte derinleşen üç temel ve birbiriyle ilişkili sorunu ele almaktadır: konutun erişilebilirliğinin azalması, kuşaklar arası eşitsizliğin artması ve çevresel sürdürülebilirliğin zayıflaması. Bu sorunlar birbirinden bağımsız krizler olarak değil, kesişen yapısal dönüşümler olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma, bu kapsamda kooperatif konutlar ile mikrofinans temelli finansman modellerinin daha adil, kapsayıcı ve iklim duyarlı konut sistemlerinin inşasına nasıl katkı sağlayabileceğini inceleyen bütüncül bir analitik yaklaşım benimsemektedir. Karşılaştırmalı vaka analizleri ve politika literatürüne dayanan inceleme, her iki modelin de finansal erişimi genişletme, mülkiyet yapısını demokratikleştirme ve sürdürülebilir inşaat ile mülkiyet biçimlerini destekleme potansiyelini değerlendirmektedir. Analiz kapsamında, bu modellerin ölçeklenebilirliğini ve uzun vadeli dayanıklılığını mümkün kılan kurumsal koşullar ve politika araçları sosyal teminat mekanizmaları, dijital finans teknolojileri ve harmanlanmış finansman stratejileri ayrıntılı biçimde ele alınmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda, çalışma; topluluk temelli yönetişim, çok boyutlu etki ölçüm sistemleri ve önleyici, kolaylaştırıcı ve düzeltici konut politikalarını bir araya getiren hibrit bir kuramsal çerçeve önermektedir. Her ne kadar keşifsel nitelikte olsa da bu yaklaşım, konut finansmanını toplumsal adalet ve çevresel sürdürülebilirlik hedefleriyle uyumlu hale getirmek için hem kavramsal bir zemin hem de somut politika önerileri sunmaktadır. Çalışma, bu boyutları bir araya getirerek konutu kısa vadeli finansal kazanç amacıyla kullanılan bir varlık olmaktan çıkarıp, uzun vadeli toplumsal yatırımın, eşitliğin ve sürdürülebilirliğin temel bir aracı olarak yeniden konumlandırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu yaklaşım özellikle Türkiye gibi dönüşüm sürecindeki ülkeler için kritik önemdedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• konutun finansallaşması
• kooperatif konut
• konut mikrofinansı
• hibrit konut finansmanı
• konut erişilebilirliği
• kuşaklararası eşitlik
• sürdürülebilirlik
• kapsayıcı konut

Alternative Housing Finance Models: Cooperative and Microfinance Approaches Countering Financialization, Inequality, and Unsustainability

Öz

This study addresses three interconnected challenges exacerbated by the financialization of housing systems: declining affordability, deepening intergenerational inequality, and environmental unsustainability. Rather than approaching these crises in isolation, the paper adopts a unified analytical perspective to evaluate how cooperative housing and microfinance-based financing models can contribute to more equitable, inclusive, and climate-conscious housing systems. Drawing on comparative case studies and policy literature, it assesses each model's potential to enhance financial access, democratize ownership, and support sustainable construction and tenure. The analysis highlights institutional conditions and policy instruments such as social guarantees, digital finance tools, and blended funding strategies that enable the scalability and resilience of these models. Based on these findings, the study proposes a hybrid framework integrating community governance, multi-dimensional impact metrics, and typologies of preventive, enabling, and corrective housing policies. While the study is exploratory in scope, it offers a conceptual foundation and practical recommendations for aligning housing finance with broader goals of social justice and sustainability. By integrating these dimensions, the paper aims to reframe housing finance as a tool for long-term social investment, equity, and sustainability, repositioning housing as a public good rather than a speculative asset, particularly in contexts like Türkiye.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• housing financialization
• cooperative housing
• housing microfinance
• hybrid housing finance
• housing affordability
• intergenerational equity
• sustainability
• inclusive housing

Kaynakça

1. Alkay, E., & Övenç, G. (2019). Farklı gelir gruplarının konut satın alabilirliğinde bölgesel farklılıkların incelenmesi. Uluslararası Siyaset Bilimi ve Kentsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1).
2. Araji, S. Z., & Shahin, B. R. (2021). Identification of effective integrated indicators for sustainable affordable housing provision. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 856(1), 012055.
3. Aydoğuş, S. (2012). Housing co-operatives in Turkey. In Profiles of a Movement: Co-operative Housing around the World. Brussels: ICA Housing.
4. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2015). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.
5. Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency. (2023, February 24). Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurulu Kararı (konut kredilerinde azami kredi tutarı/LTV—enerji sınıfı ayrımı). Retrieved April 12, 2025, from https://www.bddk.org.tr/Mevzuat/DokumanGetir/1164
6. Basse, T., Desmyter, S., Saft, D., & Wegener, C. (2023). Leading indicators for the US housing market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102765.
7. Bateman, M. (2010). Why doesn’t microfinance work? The destructive rise of local neoliberalism. London, UK: Zed Books.
8. Berberoğlu, M. G. (2005). Konut finansmanı ve Türkiye'ye uygun bir model önerisi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

9. Black, R., Jaszczolt, K., & Lee, M. (2000). Solving the housing problem: Lessons from Poland and Hungary in creating a new housing finance system. Central Europe Regional Urban Development Office.
10. Boardman, B., Darby, S., Killip, G., Hinnells, M., Jardine, C., Palmer, J., & Sinden, G. (2005). 40% House. ECI Research Report 31, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.
11. Boyack, A. J. (2018). Sustainable affordable housing. Arizona State Law Journal, 50, 456–497.
12. Buckley, R. M., & Kalarickal, J. (2004). Shelter strategies for the urban poor: Idiosyncratic and successful, but hardly mysterious (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3427). Washington, DC: World Bank.
13. Buckley, R. M., & Kalarickal, J. (Eds.). (2006). Thirty years of World Bank shelter lending: What have we learned? Washington, DC: World Bank.
14. Buckley, R. M., & Mayo, S. K. (1989). Housing policy in developing economies: Evaluating the macroeconomic impacts. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 1(2), 27–47.
15. Byrne, M., & McArdle, R. (2022). Generation rent and housing inequality: Social and spatial dimensions of homeownership decline. Urban Studies.
16. CGAP. (2023). Measuring the impact of microfinance. CGAP Working Study Series. Retrieved April 15, 2025, from https://www.cgap.org/
17. Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye. (2022, July 4). Box 1.1: Macroprudential measures in housing loans (LTV differentiation, June 2022). Retrieved January 29, 2025, from https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/01670d57-4bd2-4e31-9200-05313a15bade/Box_1.1_2022_iii.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
18. Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye. (2025a). Residential Property Price Index (RPPI)—Monthly statistics (2023=100). Retrieved March 7, 2025, from https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/Statistics/Real+Sector+Statistics/Residential+Property+Price+Index/
19. Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye. (2025b). Summary of the Monetary Policy Committee Meeting, No:2025-43. Retrieved September 7, 2025, from https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/Announcements/Press+Releases/2025/ANO2025-43
20. Chowdhury, A. (2012). Microfinance as a poverty reduction tool—A critical assessment (UN-DESA Working Study No. 89). New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
21. Christophers, B. (2021). A tale of two inequalities: Housing-wealth inequality and tenure inequality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(3), 573–594.
22. Cities Alliance. (2022). Strategic Plan 2022–2025: Delivering for the Urban Poor. Retrieved September 7, 2025, from https://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/citiesalliance_strategicplan_2022-2025_r.pdf
23. Debrunner, G. & Hartmann, T. (2020). Strategic use of land policy instruments for affordable housing – Coping with social challenges under scarce land conditions in Swiss cities. Land Use Policy, 99, 104993
24. Demir, H. S. (2024). Konut kira bedeli artışında belirlenen yasal üst sınırın anayasal hak ve ilkeler bakımından değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 73(1), 621–669.
25. Escobar, L., & Grubbauer, M. (2021). Housing microfinance, saving and credit cooperatives, and community development in low-income settings in Mexico. Community Development Journal, 56(1), 141–160.
26. Farahani, I., & Clark, E. (2016). Financialisation of built environments: Urban governance, social geographies and sustainability (FESSUD Working Paper No. 168). Lund University.
27. Ferguson, B. (2004). Key importance of housing microfinance. In F. Daphnis & B. Ferguson (Eds.), Housing microfinance: A guide to practice (pp. 15–33). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
28. Ferguson, B. (2008). The viability of housing microfinance: Financial institutions and public-private partnerships. Environment and Urbanization, 20(1), 185–201.
29. Ferguson, B., & Haider, E. (2000). Mainstreaming microfinance of housing. Housing Finance International, 15(1), 3–10.
30. Fernández, A., Haffner, M., & Elsinga, M. (2025). Three contradictions between ESG finance and social housing decarbonisation. Housing Studies, 40(2), 391–417.
31. Firestone, S., Goodman, L. S., & Zandi, M. (2023). Housing finance reform: Assessing risks and the role of the GSEs. Journal of Structured Finance, 28(1), 12–27.
32. Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2016). The city as a commons. Yale Law & Policy Review, 34(2), 281–349.
33. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. (2025). Special issue: Beyond ownership—Innovative housing finance models. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7, Article 119043.
34. Gaiha, R., & Thapa, G. (2007). Does microfinance reduce poverty in India? A cross-sectional analysis (Asia Research Centre Working Paper No. 20). Perth, WA: Murdoch University.
35. GBV. (2023). GBV-Verbandsstatistik 2023. Gemeinnützige Bauvereinigungen. Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/gemeinnuetzige/viz/GBV_Verbandsstatistik2023/Uebersicht
36. Ghising, T. (2022). Social performance management and sustainability of microfinance institutions. International Research Journal of MMC, 3(4), 70–83.
37. Gotyi, Z. G., & Majee, W. (2025). Empowering communities: The role of housing cooperatives in alleviating urban housing crisis. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7, Article 1519100.
38. Grubbauer, M. (2018). Building home futures: Materialities of construction and meanings of home in self-help building practices. In D. Sage & C. Vitry (Eds.), Societies under construction (pp. 123–143). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
39. Grubbauer, M., & Mader, P. (2021). The financialization of housing: A comparative urban analysis. Housing, Theory and Society, 38(1), 1–18.
40. Gunawan, I., & Nurchasanah. (2024). Exploring factors influencing the microfinance program sustainability. SN Business & Economics, 4(9), Article 101.
41. Habitat for Humanity. (2023). Shelter report: The state of housing microfinance. Habitat for Humanity International. Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://www.habitat.org
42. Hasan, N., Singh, A. K., Agarwal, M. K., & Kushwaha, B. P. (2022). Evaluating the role of microfinance institutions in enhancing the livelihood of urban poor. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 41(1), 114–131.
43. HDB Singapore. (2023). Smart public housing blueprint. Housing & Development Board. Retrieved March 10, 2025, from https://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/about-us/our-role/smart-and-sustainable-living
44. Hick, R., & Stephens, M. (2023). Housing and social citizenship: Exploring the role of housing in the post-pandemic welfare state. Critical Social Policy, 43(1), 6–26.
45. Housing Australia. (2024). ESG financing tools and affordable housing. Housing Policy Reports.
46. Housing Europe. (2025, March). Housing cooperatives in Europe: Resilience and adaptation to changing needs. Housing Europe. Retrieved June 10, 2025, from https://www.housingeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Housing-Cooperatives_2025_DIGITAL.pdf.
47. Howard, A., Hochstenbach, C., & Ronald, R. (2023). Rental sector liberalization and the housing outcomes for young urban adults. Urban Geography, 45(7), 1173–1194.
48. HUD. (2016). Rapid re-housing for homeless families demonstration programs evaluation: Final report. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. Retrieved March10, 2025, from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/rapid-rehousing-program.html
49. International Finance Corporation.IFC. (2023). Her Home II: Housing finance for women in Ghana, Senegal, and Indonesia. International Finance Corporation. Retrieved March 18, 2025, from https://www.ifc.org/en/insights-reports/2023/housing-finance-for-women-in-ghana-senegal-and-indonesia
50. International Finance Corporation. IFC. (2022). Central Asia housing finance gap analysis. Retrieved February 10, 2025, from https://documents.worldbank.org/pt/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/102911468011725397/central-asia-housing-finance-gap-analysis
51. IMF. (2011). Housing finance and financial stability—Back to basics? In Global financial stability report, April (pp. 111–143). International Monetary Fund. Retrieved May 18, 2025, from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfsr/2011/01/index.htm
52. International Co-operative Alliance—Housing. (2012). Profiles of a movement: Co-operative housing. Retrieved March 18, 2025, from https://www.housinginternational.coop/wp-content/uploads/drupal/Profiles%20of%20a%20movement%20final%20web%20ISBN.pdf
53. Jones, C. M., & Kammen, D. M. (2014). Spatial distribution of U.S. household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(2), 895-902.
54. Kadi, J., Musterd, S., & van Gent, W. P. (2022). Financialization and the production of inequality in Amsterdam’s rental sector. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(1), 80–96.
55. Kempeneer, L., De Wilde, P., & Ruck, B. (2021). Human–building interaction for energy efficiency: A critical review. Sustainability, 13(6), 3239.
56. Lang, R., & Stoeger, H. (2020). The role of cooperative housing in addressing urban challenges in Europe. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(2), 177–192.
57. Lang, R., & Novy, A. (2013). Cooperative Housing and Social Cohesion: The Role of Linking Social Capital. European Planning Studies, 22(8), 1744–1764.
58. Lang, R., & Giovannini, M. (2025). Housing needs and cooperative housing models: A scoping review (Euricse Working Paper Series, 136/25). Trento: Euricse. Retrieved 10 September, 2025, from https://euricse.eu/en/publications/wp-136-25-housing-needs-and-cooperative-housing-models-a-scoping-review/
59. Lehner, J. M., & Gerscovich, A. (2021). Contrasting housing microfinance with the social production of habitat in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. International Journal of Housing Policy, 21(4), 592-611.
60. Lux, M., & Sunega, P. (2023). Housing wealth inequality, intergenerational transfers and young households in the super-homeownership system. International Journal of Housing Policy, 25(2), 349–371.
61. Maclennan, D., & Miao, J. (2017). Housing and capital in the 21st century: Macro-economic impacts of housing wealth, housing systems and housing policies. Critical Housing Analysis, 4(1), 16–25.
62. Mahmoud, S., El-Araby, A., & Farag, H. (2022). Revitalizing cooperative housing in Egypt: Policy tools and community models. International Journal of Housing Policy, 22(3), 245–267.
63. Madell, C., & Karam, A. (2025). Inclusionary housing policy and practice in South African cities: Planning as a spatial transformation tool. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment.
64. Maxwell, D., Gulyani, S., & Talukdar, D. (2008). Shelter from the storm: Upgrading housing in urban Africa. World Bank Working Paper No. 12. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
65. Mckee, K., Moore, T., Soaita, A., & Crawford, J. (2017). ‘Generation rent’ and the fallacy of choice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(2), 318–333.
66. McKnight, A., & Karagiannaki, E. (2013). The wealth effect: How parental wealth and own asset-holdings predict future advantage. Wealth in the UK: Distribution, Accumulation, and Policy, 119.
67. Meen, G., & Whitehead, C. (2020). Understanding affordability: The economics of housing markets. Bristol University Press.
68. Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2009). Performance and trade-offs in microfinance institutions—Does ownership matter? Journal of International Development.
69. Mesarina, N., & Stickney, C. (2007). Getting to scale in housing microfinance (CGAP Occasional Paper No. 26). Consultative Group to Assist the Poor.
70. MicroLoan Foundation. (2024). Annual impact report. MicroLoan Foundation.
71. Ministry of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change (Türkiye). (2023, December 18). Türkiye bina sektörü karbonsuzlaşma yol haritası [Building sector decarbonization roadmap]. Retrieved June 19, 2025, from https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/meslekihizmetler/menu/turkiye_bina_sektoru_karbonsuzlasma_yol_haritasi_-v1_20231218095757.pdf
72. MIX Market. (2021). Microfinance benchmarking indicators. Retrieved June 19, 2025, from https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0038647/mix-market
73. Mosley, P., & Hulme, D. (1998). Microenterprise finance: Is there a conflict between growth and poverty alleviation? World Development, 26(5), 785–798.
74. Nakagami, H., Murakoshi, C., & Iwafune, Y. (2016). Energy efficiency strategies for buildings in Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2640–2649.
75. Norris, M., & Lawson, J. (2023). Tools to tame the financialisation of housing. New Political Economy, 28(3), 363–379.
76. OECD. (2022). Brick by brick: Building better housing policies. OECD Publishing. Retrieved June 19, 2025, from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/d9b43d8c-en.pdf?expires=1678822000&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=CF698D0726B1E37B34F1A52F75E26E51
77. Official Gazette of the Republic of Türkiye. (2022, June 11). Law No. 7409: Amendments to the Attorneyship Law and the Turkish Code of Obligations (Temporary Art. 1 on rent increases), No. 31863. Retrieved June 19, 2025, from https://www.verginet.net/Dokumanlar/2022/7409-SAYILI-KANUN.pdf
78. Oliver, P. (2003). Dwellings: The vernacular house worldwide. Phaidon Press.
79. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
80. Parajuli, R. (2024). An exploration on success and failure of cooperatives and microfinance. The Journal of Economic Concerns, 15(1), 116–129.
81. Perucca, J., Freeman, S., & Farha, L. (2023). The True Cost of Financialization: Housing, Human Rights, and Climate Change. Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy, 2(1), 20-36.
82. Pathak, R., & Mishra, A. K. (2022). Women empowerment through micro finance: A boon for development. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD), 7(2), 51–55
83. Purtik, H., Hauser, J., & Franz, Y. (2024). Urban carbon reduction through cooperative housing: The case of the 2000-Watt Society. In Hauser, J., & Purtik, H. (Eds.), Cooperative housing for sustainable cities (pp. 173–175). Springer.
84. Revington, N., & Benhocine, C. (2023). Financializing through crisis? Student housing and studentification during the Covid‐19 pandemic and beyond. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 114(5), 415–430.
85. Ronald, R. (2018). The evolution of 'Generation Rent' in Japan and the UK: Contextualising youth housing precarity. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 1–25.
86. Rowlingson, K., Joseph, R., & Overton, L. (2017). Inheritance and inequality across generations: What is the evidence? London: British Academy.
87. Ryan-Collins, J. (2019). Why can't you afford a home? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
88. Saha, S. (2021). Housing quality and microfinance in rural India. Indian Journal of Development Studies. Sanchez Bajo, C., & Roelants, B. (2023). Cooperatives as shock absorbers: Housing cooperatives during market downturns. International Journal of Housing Policy, 23(2), 187–205.
89. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
90. Sierra, M., Delgado, C., & Singh, R. (2024). Measuring multidimensional housing sustainability in cooperative and microfinance contexts: Frameworks and field trials. Sustainable Cities and Society, 93, 104750.
91. Silva, L. P. P., Najjar, M. K., Da Costa, B. B. F., Amario, M., Vasco, D. A., & Haddad, A. N. (2024). Sustainable affordable housing: State-of-the-art and future perspectives. Sustainability, 16(10), 4187.
92. Soaita, A. M., & Searle, B. A. (2018). Homeownership-based welfare? wealth options of owner-occupiers and tenants in Great Britain. Generational Interdependencies. The Social Implications for Welfare, 79-102.
93. Soaita, A. M., Searle, B. A., & McKee, K. (2022). Property-based welfare and housing financialisation: Homeowners’ practices and rationales. Housing, Theory and Society.
94. Stephens, M., Burns, N., & MacKay, L. (2002). Social market or safety net? British social rented housing in a European context. University of Glasgow.
95. Statistics Canada. (2024). New housing supply: Urban sprawl and densification. Retrieved 12 May 2025, from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/46-28-0001/article/00003-eng.htm
96. Stone, M. E. (2006). What is housing affordability? The case for the residual income approach. Housing Policy Debate, 17(1), 151–184.
97. T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı. (2023). On İkinci Kalkınma Planı (2024–2028) Konut Politikaları Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. Ankara.
98. TOKİ—Housing Development Administration of Türkiye. (2025). Key figures (completed dwellings, as of August 2025).
99. Tranøy, B. S., Stamsø, M. A., & Hjertaker, I. (2020). The asset-based welfare state: A historical sociology of housing markets, homeownership and welfare in Norway. In B. Bengtsson & R. Ronald (Eds.), Housing and home unbound (pp. 35–60). Springer.
100. Tummers, L. (2016). The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2023–2040.
101. Turkish Statistical Institute. (TUIK) (2024, October 10). Intergenerational transmission of disadvantages, 2023 (Revised). Retrieved June 19, 2025, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?dil=2&p=Intergenerational-Transmission-of-Disadvantages-2023-53842
102. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2025, August 12). Household consumption expenditures, 2024. Retrieved September 19, 2025, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/en/news/press-release/?p=Household-Consumption-Expenditures-2024-53957
103. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2025, February 6). Statistics on family, 2024. Retrieved June 19, 2025, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/en/news/press-release/?p=Statistics-on-Family-2024-53898
104. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2025, August 27). Construction Cost Index, July 2025. Retrieved September 19, 2025, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/en/news/press-release/?p=Construction-Cost-Index-July-2025-54142
105. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2025, June 26). House sales statistics, May 2025. Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/en/news/press-release/?p=House-Sales-Statistics-May-2025-54140
106. UK Parliament. (2021). Energy efficiency of existing homes (House of Commons Library Briefing Study CBP-8830). Retrieved May 19, 2025, from http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8830/CBP-8830.pdf
107. UNCDF. (2023). Digital finance for urban resilience: Inclusive infrastructure models. United Nations Capital Development Fund. Retrieved May 19, 2025, from https://www.uncdf.org/article/8422/digital-finance-for-urban-resilience-inclusive-infrastructure-models.
108. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2005). Guidelines on social housing: Principles and examples. Geneva, Switzerland: UNECE.
109. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2011). Enabling shelter strategies: Review of experience from two decades of implementation. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-Habitat.
110. UN-Habitat. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Retrieved June 19, 2025, from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3905819
111. Vestbro, D. U. (2012). From collective housing to cohousing—A summary of research. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17(2), 164–178.
112. Waldron, R. (2021). Generation rent and housing precarity in ‘post-crisis’ Ireland. Housing Studies. Wells, K. J. (2015). A housing crisis, a failed law, and a property conflict: The US urban speculation tax. Antipode, 47(5), 1043–1061.
113. Wijburg, G. (2021). The de-financialization of housing: towards a research agenda. Housing studies, 36(8), 1276-1293.
114. Winston, N. (2021). Environmental sustainability and urban housing systems. Routledge.
115. Yaron, J., Benjamin, M. P., & Piprek, G. L. (1997). Rural finance: Issues, design, and best practices. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved March 11, 2025, from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/680961468136490369/pdf/multi0page.pdf
116. Yates, J., Milligan, V., & Gabrielle, S. (2008). Housing affordability: A 21st-century problem (AHURI Final Report Series No. 105). Retrieved June 15, 2025, from https://www.ahuri.edu.au/sites/default/files/migration/documents/AHURI_Final_Report_No105_Housing_affordability_a_21st_century_problem.pdf
117. Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523.
118. Zeller, M., & Meyer, R. L. (Eds.). (2002). The triangle of microfinance: Financial sustainability, outreach, and impact. International Food Policy Research Institute.