POSTKOLONYAL KURAM ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER DİSİPLİNİNİ DEKOLONİZE ETMEK

Öz

Postkolonyal kuram, Uluslararası İlişkiler (Uİ) disiplininde uzun yıllar hâkim olmuş rasyonalist/pozitivist geleneğin temel savlarına eleştirel bir bakış açısıyla karşı çıkma iddiasında bulunan ve sahip olduğu yöntembilimsel (metodolojik)/epistemolojik duruşa bağlı olarak postpozitivist/reflektivist/yorumsamacı/yapısal olarak nitelendirilebilecek, ana akım olmayan bir Uluslararası İlişkiler kuramıdır. Bu makale, postkolonyal kuramı, Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplininin tarihi akışı içindeki gelişimini göz önünde bulundurarak; kökleri, verdiği temel eserler ve mevcut Uluslararası İlişkiler kuramlarına getirdiği eleştiriler çerçevesinde değerlendirmeyi ve böylelikle post kolonyal kurama ait yazının ve Türkçe terminolojinin daha iyi bir şekilde anlaşılmasını sağlamayı amaçlamıştır. Makale, gelişimi devam eden postkolonyal kuramın, ana akım Uluslararası İlişkiler kuramlarına yönelik güçlü bir eleştirel bakış açısı sunmakta olduğunu iddia etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. Acharya, A.(2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian
2. Regionalism. International Organization, 58(2):239-275. Acharya, A. ve Buzan, B (2007). Why There is no non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction.
3. International Relations of the Asia-Pasific, 7(3): 287-312
4. Adler, E.(19979. Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations. 3(3): 319-363
5. Agathangelou, A.M. ve Ling, L.H.M. (2009). Transforming World Politics: From Empire to Multiple Worlds. Routledge.
6. Ahluwalia, P.(2001). Politics and Post-Colonial Theory: African Inflections, Routledge: London and New York.
7. Anghie, A.(2006). Decolonizing the Concept of ‘Good Governance (ss.109-130). Branwen Gruffydd Jones (der),
8. Decolonizing International Relations, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Ashcroft, B. ve diğerleri. (1998). Key Concepts in Post-Colonial Studies, London and New York: Routledge.

9. Ashcroft, B. ve diğerleri. (2002). The Empire Writes Back, London and New York: Routledge.
10. Ashcroft, B. ve diğerleri. (2003). The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, USA and Canada: Routledge.
11. Bhabba, H.K. (1996). The Other Question: Difference, Discrimination and the Discourse of Colonialism (ss. 87-106).
12. Houston A. Baker, Manthia Diawara ve Ruth H. Lindeborg (der.), Black British Cultural Studies: a Reader. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1996.
13. Bhabba, H.K.(1996). Unpacking my Library…Again. (ss. 199-211). Iain Chambers ve Lidia 1996, Curti (der.), The Post
14. Colonial Question: Common Skies, Divided Horizons. London and New York: Routledge. Bhabba, H.K. (1994). The Location of Culture, London and New York: Routledge.
15. Bianca, I. (2008). Contested Nationalities and Postcolonial IR theory: The Aprés Coup as an Approach to Historical
16. Injustice. 26 Mart 2008, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA’s 49th Annual Convention, Bridging Multiple
17. Divides, Hilton San Francisco, USA, (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Kasım 2009).
18. Bilgin, P.(2008). Thinking past ‘Western’ IR?, Third World Quarterly, 29(1): 5-23.
19. Booth, K. (1995). Human Wrongs and International Relations. International Affairs. 71(1):103-126
20. Carby, H.V, (1996). White Women Listen Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood. (ss. 61-86). Houston A.
21. Baker, Manthia Diawara ve Ruth H. Lindeborg (der.), Black British Cultural Studies: a Reader, Chicago: University of Chicago. Césaire, A. (1972). Discourse on Colonialism, çev. Joan Pinkham, London and New York: Monthly Review Press.
22. Chakrabarty, D. (1992). Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for ‘Indian’ Pasts?. Representations, 37:1
23. Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24. Checkel, J.T. (1998). The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. Reviews: National Interests in
25. International Society by Martha Finnemore; The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics by Peter Katzenstein; Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid by Audie Klotz, World Politics, 50(2): 324-334. Ching-Chang, C. (2011), The absence of non-western IR theory in Asia reconsidered. International Relations of the Asia- Pacific. 11(1):1-23
26. Dunn, K.C. (2001). Introduction: Africa and International Relations Theory. (ss. 1-8). Kevin C. Dunn ve Timothy M. Shaw
27. (der.), Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory, Palgrave. Fanon, F. (2008). Black Skin, White Masks, Pluto Press,
28. Fanon, F. (1963). The Wretched of the Earth, New York, Grove Press,
29. Grovogui, S.N. (2001). Sovereignty in Africa: Quasi-Statehood and Other Myths in International Theory. (ss. 29-45).
30. Kevin C. Dunn ve Timothy M. Shaw (der.), Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory, Houdmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave. Halperin, S. (2006). International Relations Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity. (ss. 43-63).
31. Hart, J. ve Goldie, T. (1993). Post-Colonial Theory. (ss. 155-158). Irene Rima Makaryk (der.), Encyclopedia of
32. Contemporary Literary Theory: Approaches, Scholars, Terms, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Hoffmann,S.(1977). An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus, 106(3): 41-60
33. Holsti, K.J. (1996). The State, War and the State of War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
34. Huddart, D. (2006). Homi K. Bhabba, London and New York: Routledge,
35. Jones, B.G. (2006). Introduction: International Relations, Eurocentrism, and Imperialism. (ss. 1-19). Branwen Gruffydd
36. Jones (der.), Decolonizing International Relations, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Korany,B.(1986). Strategic Studies and the Third World: A Critical Evaluation. International Social Science Journal, 38(4): 547 – 562.
37. Krishna, S.(1993). The Importance of Being Ironic: A Postcolonial View on Critical International Relations Theory.
38. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 18(3): 385-417. Krishna,S (2006). Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations. (ss. 89-108). Branwen Gruffydd Jones
39. (der.), Decolonizing International Relations, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Malaquias, A. (2001), Reformulating International Relations Theory: African Insights and Challenges. (ss. 11-28). Kevin C.
40. Dunn ve Timothy M. Shaw (der.), Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory, Houdmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, Mearsheimer, J.(1995), The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19(3): 5-49.
41. Memmi, A. (2006). Decolonization and the Decolonized, çev. Robert Bononno, Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press,
42. Memmi, A. (2003). The Colonizer and the Colonized, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd,
43. Mgonja, B.E.S. ve Makombe, I.A.M. (2009). Debating international relations and its relevance to the third world. African
44. Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 3(1): 27-37. Mills, S. (1998). Post-colonial Feminist Theory. (ss. 98-112). Stevi Jackson ve Jackie Jones (der.), Contemporary
45. Feminist Theories, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998,
46. Moore-Gilbert, B. (1997). Postcolonial Theory: Context, Practices, Politics, London and New York: Verso,
47. Morgenthau, H. (11973). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Peace and Power, New York: Knopf,
48. Neuman, S.G. (1998). International Relations Theory and the Third World: An Oxymoron? (ss. 1-30). Stephanie G.
49. Neuman (der.), International Relations Theory and the Third World, New York: St. Martin’s Press, Nkiwane,T.C.(2001). The End of History? African Challenges to Liberalism in International Relations. (ss. 103-111). Kevin
50. C. Dunn ve Timothy M. Shaw (der.), Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory, Palgrave. Rukundwa, L.S. ve Van Aarde, A.G. (2007). The Formation of Postcolonial Theory, HTS, 63(3): 1171-1194.
51. Rumelili, B. (2009). Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorisinde Yerel-Görüşlülük ve Doğu’nun Özneselliği. Uluslararası İlişkiler. 6(23): 45
52. Said, E.W. (1979). Orientalism, New York: Vintage Books,
53. Sartre, J.P. (2003). Introduction. (ss. 17-25). Albert Memmi, The Colonizer and the Colonized, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 1
54. Saurin, J. (2006). International Relations as the Imperial Illusion; or, the Need to Decolonize IR. (ss. 23-42). Branwen
55. Gruffydd Jones (der.), Decolonizing International Relations, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Seth, S. (2011), Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations. Millenium - Journal of International Studies. 40(1): 167-183.
56. Smedley, A. (1998). ‘Race’ and the Construction of Human Identity. American Anthropologis. (100)3: 694-695.
57. Smith, S. (1997). New Approaches to International Theory. (ss. 165-190). John Baylis and Steve Smith (der.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
58. Smith, S.(2000). The discipline of international relations: still an American social science?. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2(3): 374-402.
59. Spivak, G.C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak?. Cary Nelson and Lawrance Grossberg (der.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press,
60. Spivak, G.C. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present, Cambridge,
61. Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press, Sudbury, J. (2000). Feminism: Black British. (ss. 721-722). Kramarae ve Dale Spender (der.), Routledge International
62. Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women’s Issues and Knowledge, Cilt 2: New York, Routledge, Thompson,P.S (2002). Negritude and a New Africa: An Update. Research in African Literatures.33(4): 143-153.
63. Tickner, A.(2003). Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World. Millenium Journal of International Studies, 32(2): 295-3
64. Tiffin, H. (2003). Post-colonial Literatures and Counter-discourse. (ss.95-98). The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, USA and Canada: Routledge,
65. Vasquez, J. A. (1998), The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Waever, O. (1998). The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in
67. International Relations. International Organization. 52(4): 687-727. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics, London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,
68. Wendt, A. (1995). Constructing International Politics. International Security. 20(1): 71-81.
69. Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
70. Young, R.J.C. (1995). Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race, London and New York: Routledge,
71. Young, R.J.C. (2003): Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Young, R.J.C. (2004). White Mythologies, London and New York: Routledge,