Değişime Yön Vermek: Kentsel Ortamlarda Uyarlanabilir Sahil Tasarımları Hazırlamak için Bir Çerçeve

Öz

Sahiller kültür, iş ve eğlence merkezleri olarak önemli bir değere sahiptir; yine de iklim değişikliği, nüfus artışı ve gelişen kentsel taleplerden kaynaklanan zorluklarla karşılaşıyorlar. Bu çalışma, kentsel ortamlarda nitelikli ve uyarlanabilir kıyı mimarisi geliştirmek için kapsamlı bir çerçeve önererek bu alanların uyarlanması konusundaki acil gereksinimleri ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, özellikle kıyı alanlarına odaklanarak modülerlik, karma kullanım entegrasyonu, ekolojik dayanıklılık ve topluluk katılımı gibi esnek tasarım kavramlarını birleştiren pragmatik bir çerçeve oluşturmaktır. Bu çalışma, kıyı tasarımının teorik temellerini araştırmak için disiplinler arası bir metodoloji kullanmaktadır. Dünyanın dört bir yanından çeşitli vaka çalışmalarının analizi ile bulgular elde edilmiştir. Eyleme dönüştürülebilir öngörüler elde etmek için teorik çerçeve modelleri kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmada önerilen çerçeve, 21. yüzyılda kıyılarda karşılaşılan çeşitli sorunların üstesinden gelmek için stratejik bir öneri sunmaktadır. Kent planlamacıları, mimarlar ve politikacılar esnek tasarım konseptlerini birleştirerek, değişen kentsel dinamikler karşısında dayanıklı ve başarılı olan kıyı alanları geliştirebilirler. Bu çalışma, tasarımların yerel nüfusun özel gereksinimleri ve istekleriyle uyumlu olmasını sağlamada toplum katılımının değerini vurguluyor ve dolayısıyla kapsayıcı kentsel gelişimin önemini güçlendiriyor. Bu araştırmada sunulan öneriler, kentsel paydaşlara kıyı alanlarının dayanıklılığını, sürdürülebilirliğini ve yaşanabilirliğini iyileştirmede önemli bir araç sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kıyı
• Uyarlanabilirlik
• Esneklik
• Modülerlik
• Kentsel Tasarım

Navigating Change: A Framework for Crafting Adaptable Waterfront Designs in Urban Environments

Öz

Waterfronts possess significant value as vibrant centers of culture, business, and recreation; nonetheless, they encounter escalating challenges arising from climate change, population expansion, and evolving urban demands. This study aims to address the urgent requirement of adapting these areas by proposing a comprehensive framework for developing robust and adaptable waterfront architecture in urban settings. The objective of this study is to establish a pragmatic framework that incorporates flexible design concepts, namely modularity, mixed-use integration, ecological resilience, and community engagement, with a particular focus on waterfront areas. This study employs an interdisciplinary methodology to investigate the theoretical underpinnings of waterfront design. It conducts an analysis of several case studies from across the world. Theoretical framework models are employed in order to gain actionable insights. The framework proposed in this study offers a strategic methodology for tackling the various issues encountered by waterfronts in the 21st century. By incorporating flexible design concepts, urban planners, architects, and policymakers can develop waterfront areas that possess resilience and thrive in the face of shifting urban dynamics. This study highlights the value of community engagement in ensuring that designs are in line with the specific requirements and ambitions of the local population, hence reinforcing the importance of inclusive urban development. The methodology presented in this research provides a significant tool for urban stakeholders to improve the resilience, sustainability, and livability of waterfront areas.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Waterfront
• Adaptability
• Flexibility
• Modularity
• Urban Design

Kaynakça

1. Aerts, J. C., & Wouter Botzen, W. (2011). Flood-resilient waterfront development in New York City: Bridging flood insurance, building codes, and flood zoning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1227(1), 1-82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06074.x
2. Agardy, T., & Alder, J. (2010). Coastal Systems. In P. Dayton, S. Curran, A. Kitchingman, M. Wilson, A. Catenazzi, J. Restrepo, . . . C. Vorosmarty, Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends (pp. 513-550). Washington, DC: Island Press.
3. Ahern, J. (2011). From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 341-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
4. Ahern, J. (2012). Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1203–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
5. Avni, N., & Fischler, R. (2019). Social and Environmental Justice in Waterfront Redevelopment: The Anacostia River, Washington, D.C. Urban Affairs Review, 56(6), 1779-1810.
6. Aytac, D. O., Arslan, T. V., & Durak, S. (2016). Adaptive Reuse as A Strategy Toward Urban Resilience. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(4), 523. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p523
7. Balsas, C. J. (2022). Qualitative planning philosophy and the governance of urban revitalization, a plea for cultural diversity. Urban Governance, 2(2), 247-258.
8. Bonney, P., Reeves, J., & Yarnda, T. C. (2023). Navigating Local Pathways to Sustainability Through Environmental Stewardship: A Case Study in East Gippsland, Australia. In B. Edmondson, Sustainability Transformations, Social Transitions and Environmental Accountabilities. Palgrave Studies in Environmental Transformation, Transition and Accountability (pp. 231–263). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18268-6_9

9. Borggren, J., & Ström, P. (2014). On the waterfront: Studying the development of residences and workplaces at Norra Älvstranden, Gothenburg, Sweden. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 29(4-5), 429-452.
10. Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2011). Sustainable Transport in Freiburg: Lessons from Germany's Environmental Capital. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5(1), 43-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568311003650531
11. Chen, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). How Do Ecological and Recreational Features of Waterfront Space Affect Its Vitality? Developing Coupling Coordination and Enhancing Waterfront Vitality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021196
12. Deal, B., Pan, H., Pallathucheril, V., & Fulton, G. (2017). Urban Resilience and Planning Support Systems: The Need for Sentience. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1285018
13. Doka, S. E., Minns, C. K., Valere, B. G., Cooke, S. J., Portiss, R. J., Sciscione, T. F., & Rose, A. (2022). An Ecological Accounting System for Integrated Aquatic Planning and Habitat Banking with Case Study on the Toronto Waterfront, Ontario, Canada. Environmental Management, 69, 952–971.
14. Fernandes, A., de Sousa, J. F., & Salvador, R. (2017). The Cultural Heritage in the Postindustrial Waterfront: A Case Study of the South Bank of the Tagus Estuary, Portugal. Space and Culture, 21(2), 170-191.
15. Garcia, P. R. (2021). The Lisbon Waterfront: Perspectives on Resilience in the Transition from the Twentieth to the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Urban History, 47(2), 373–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144219879915
16. Green, S. (2023). Reconnecting Communities to the River: Exploring Barriers to Benefits of a Restored Waterfront in a Post-Industrial Community. University of Minnesota ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
17. Gunay, Z., & Dokmeci, V. (2012). Culture-led regeneration of Istanbul waterfront: Golden Horn Cultural Valley Project. Cities, 29(4), 213-222.
18. Guo, Y. (2023). The importance of multi-sensory interactive waterfront landscape design. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 6(13), 101-104. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2023.061316
19. Guvenbas, G., & Polay, M. (2020). Post-occupancy evaluation: A diagnostic tool to establish and sustain inclusive access in Kyrenia Town Centre. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(10), 1620-1642.
20. Hagerman, C. (2007). Shaping neighborhoods and nature: Urban political ecologies of urban waterfront transformations in Portland, Oregon. Cities, 24(4), 285-297.
21. Hoyle, B. (1999). Scale and sustainability: The role of community groups in Canadian port-city waterfront change. Journal of Transport Geography, 7, 65-78.
22. Jeong, S., Baek, Y., & Son, S. H. (2021). Distributed Urban Platooning towards High Flexibility, Adaptability, and Stability. Sensors, 21(8), 2684. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082684
23. Jun, J. (2023). Towards Sustainable Urban Riverfront Redevelopment: Adaptability as a Design Strategy for the Hangang Riverfront in Seoul. Sustainability, 15(12), 9207.
24. Kathijotes, N. (2013). Keynote: Blue Economy - Environmental and Behavioural Aspects Towards Sustainable Coastal Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 7-13. Latip, N. S., Shamsudin, S., & Liew, M. S. (2012). Functional Dimension at ‘Kuala Lumpur Waterfront’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49, 147–155.
25. Le, T. D. (2020). Climate change adaptation in coastal cities of developing countries: characterizing types of vulnerability and adaptation options. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 25, 739–761.
26. Lin, R., Yen, C.-C., & Chen, R. (2014). From Adaptive Design to Adaptive City-Design in Motion for Taipei City. In P. Rau (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Design. CCD 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 8528. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07308-8_61
27. Ling, T.-Y., Yen, N., Lin, C.-H., & Chandra, W. (2021). Critical thinking in the urban living habitat: Attributes criteria and typo-morphological exploration of modularity design. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 103278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103278
28. Liu, Y., Badham, M., & Redfern, D. (2022). Huaniao Island Public Art Festival: A Site for Social Encounter and Cultural Exchange. Public Art Dialogue, 12(2), 200-221.
29. McGovern, S. J. (2008). Mobilization on the Waterfront: The Ideological/Cultural Roots of Potential Regime Change in Philadelphia. Urban Affairs Review, 44(5), 663-694.
30. Miloš, M., & Dragana, V. (2021). Mythology as a Driver of Creative Economy in Waterfront Regeneration: The Case of Savamala in Belgrade, Serbia. Space and Culture.
31. Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
32. Moore, K. R. (2016). Public Engagement in Environmental Impact Studies: A Case Study of Professional Communication in Transportation Planning. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(3), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2583278
33. Niedziółka, K. R., Grochulska-Salak, M., & Maciejewska, E. (2021). Resilience of riverside areas as an element of the green deal strategy – Evaluation of waterfront models in relation to re-urbanization and the city landscape of Warsaw. Desalination and Water Treatment, 232, 357–371. https://doi.org/doi: 10.5004/dwt.2021.27588
34. Ravagnan, C., Rossi, F., & Amiriaref, M. (2022). Sustainable Mobility and Resilient Urban Spaces in the United Kingdom. Practices and Proposals. Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 164-171.
35. Sealey, K. S., Andiroglu, E., Lamere, J., Sobczak, J., & Suraneni, P. (2021). Multifunctional Performance of Coastal Structures Based on South Florida Coastal Environs. Journal of Coastal Research, 37(3), 656-669.
36. Shah, S., & Roy, A. K. (2017). Social Sustainability of Urban Waterfront- The Case of Carter Road Waterfront in Mumbai, India. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 37, 195-204.
37. Teixeira, C. P., Fernandes, C. O., & Ahern, J. (2022). Adaptive planting design and management framework for urban climate change adaptation and mitigation. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 70, 127548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127548
38. Theodora, Y., & Spanogianni, E. (2022). Assessing coastal urban sprawl in the Athens’ southern waterfront for reaching sustainability and resilience objectives. Ocean & Coastal Management, 222.
39. Tian, Y., & Yang, L. (2020). Cultural and Artistic Design of Coastal Cities Based on Marine Landscape. Journal of Coastal Research, 106(SI), 431-434.
40. Üzümcüoğlu, D., & Polay, M. (2022). Urban Waterfront Development, through the Lens of the Kyrenia Waterfront Case Study. Sustainability, 14(15). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159469
41. Zakirzianova, Z. (2021). New York City Waterfront Development in the Post-Sandy Era: The East Side Coastal Resiliency Project and Community Response. Fordham University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.