The Potential of Artificial Intelligence as the Learning Ecosystem of the Future in Adult Religious Education

Öz

In today's information society, the rapid pace of technological advancements and the increasing complexity of information processing necessitate that individuals acquire a broader and more diverse set of skills. In this dynamic environment, adopting innovative approaches in education has become essential for individuals to develop their competencies and keep pace with the demands of the era. This study aims to examine the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in adult religious education and to evaluate how these technologies can contribute to learning processes. The research investigates whether AI systems function as mechanisms that completely replace the roles of religious educators or as tools that enhance existing educational processes. The study employs a qualitative methodology to understand the impact of AI in adult religious education. Initially, a detailed review of literature in cognitive sciences, AI technologies, computer sciences, and adult religious education was conducted. This review provided a comprehensive understanding of the development and applications of AI technologies in education while also identifying existing research gaps. The literature review also covered the historical role of AI in education and the innovations it offers today. Furthermore, the study analyzed the effectiveness of innovative applications such as intelligent tutoring systems, personalized learning platforms, gamification tools, and virtual reality technologies. The degree to which these systems address the individual needs of adult learners was evaluated through detailed analysis. The research also placed special emphasis on ethical considerations, addressing issues such as data privacy, human-machine interaction, and the limitations of AI in transmitting values. Proposed solutions to mitigate these challenges were presented. These ethical discussions also encompassed the question of how technology can align with a human-centered approach, forming an integral part of the study. All data were evaluated using thematic analysis, providing a comprehensive understanding of the role of AI in religious education. The findings indicate that AI technologies hold significant potential in adult religious education. However, these technologies cannot fully replicate the indispensable roles of human educators, such as fostering empathy, providing ethical guidance, and offering spiritual support. The most effective use of AI in education lies in its role as a complementary tool that enhances existing processes. Technological innovations, particularly gamification and virtual reality applications, demonstrate significant potential to make learning experiences more engaging. However, challenges were observed regarding adult learners’ adaptation to these innovations. Personalized learning platforms offer structured support in areas such as text interpretation, exploring ethical issues, and learning ritual practices, effectively addressing individual learning needs. Nonetheless, the importance of human-centered pedagogical approaches in developing emotional intelligence, social belonging, and critical thinking has been reaffirmed. Therefore, AI technologies demonstrate potential in supporting personalized learning and enhancing student engagement in religious education. However, their integration must prioritize the preservation of pedagogical values and the reinforcement of educators’ guiding roles. This ensures that technological advancements can be utilized while maintaining the human-centered nature of education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Religious Education
• Adult Religious Education
• Artificial Intelligence in Education
• Personalized Learning Platforms
• Digital Transformation in Education
• Ethical Dimensions of AI

Yetişkin Din Eğitiminde Geleceğin Öğrenme Ekosistemi Olarak Yapay Zekanın Potansiyeli

Öz

Günümüz bilgi toplumunda teknolojik gelişmelerin hız kazanması ve bilgi işlem süreçlerinin karmaşıklaşması, bireylerin daha geniş ve çeşitli becerilere sahip olmasını gerektirmektedir. Bu dinamik ortamda, bireylerin kendilerini geliştirebilmeleri ve çağın gerekliliklerine ayak uydurabilmeleri için eğitim alanında yenilikçi yaklaşımların benimsenmesi önem kazanmıştır. Bu araştırma, yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin yetişkin din eğitimine sunduğu olanakları, sağladığı katkıları ve taşıdığı sınırlılığı ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bunun yanı sıra yapay zekâ sistemlerinin din eğitmenlerinin rollerini bütünüyle dönüştüren bir mekanizma mı yoksa mevcut eğitim süreçlerini zenginleştiren ve geliştiren bir araç mı olduğu sorusu da ele alınmıştır. Çalışmada nitel bir yöntem kullanılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında öncelikle bilişsel bilimler, yapay zekâ teknolojileri, bilgisayar bilimleri ve yetişkin din eğitimi alanlarındaki literatür detaylı bir şekilde incelenmiştir. Bu tarama, yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin gelişim süreci ve eğitimdeki uygulamalarıyla ilgili genel bir anlayış sunarken, aynı zamanda var olan araştırma boşluklarını belirlemeye olanak tanımıştır. Literatür incelemesi, yapay zekânın eğitim alanında tarihsel olarak nasıl bir rol oynadığını ve günümüzde hangi yenilikleri sunduğunu da kapsamaktadır. Ayrıca çalışma kapsamında akıllı öğretim sistemleri, kişiselleştirilmiş öğrenme platformları, oyunlaştırma araçları ve sanal gerçeklik teknolojileri gibi yenilikçi uygulamaların etkinliği incelenmiştir. Araştırmada ayrıca etik boyutlara özel bir vurgu yapılmış; veri gizliliği, insan-makine etkileşimi ve yapay zekânın değer aktarımındaki yetersizlikleri gibi konular ele alınmış ve bu sorunları gidermeye yönelik çözüm önerileri sunulmuştur. Etik boyutlara dair bu tartışmalar, teknolojinin insan merkezli bir yaklaşımla nasıl uyum sağlayabileceği sorusunu da kapsamış ve çalışmanın önemli bir bileşenini oluşturmuştur. Tüm bu veriler tematik analiz yöntemiyle değerlendirilerek yapay zekânın din eğitimindeki rolü hakkında kapsamlı bir anlayış elde edilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular, yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin yetişkin din eğitiminde çok yönlü bir potansiyele sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak bu teknolojiler, insan öğreticilerin empati kurma, etik rehberlik sağlama ve manevi destek sunma gibi vazgeçilmez rollerini tam anlamıyla yerine getirememektedir. Yapay zekânın eğitimde en etkili kullanım alanı, mevcut süreçleri tamamlayıcı bir araç olarak hizmet vermesidir. Teknolojik yenilikler, özellikle oyunlaştırma ve sanal gerçeklik uygulamaları sayesinde öğrenme deneyimlerini daha ilgi çekici hale getirme potansiyeli sunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, yetişkin öğrenicilerin bu yeniliklere adaptasyonu konusunda bazı zorluklar ortaya çıkmıştır. Kişiselleştirilmiş öğrenme platformları, metin yorumlama, etik meselelerin incelenmesi ve ritüel uygulamalarının öğrenilmesi gibi alanlarda yapılandırılmış bir destek sunarak bireysel öğrenme ihtiyaçlarına etkin bir şekilde yanıt vermektedir. Ancak duygusal zekâ, sosyal aidiyet ve eleştirel düşünce gibi unsurların geliştirilmesinde insan merkezli pedagojik yaklaşımların önemi bir kez daha vurgulanmıştır. Dolayısıyla yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin din eğitiminde bireyselleştirilmiş öğrenmeyi destekleme ve öğrenci katılımını artırma potansiyeli taşıdığı görülmektedir. Fakat bu teknolojilerin entegrasyonunda pedagojik değerlerin korunması ve eğitimcilerin rehberlik rollerinin desteklenmesi esas alınmalıdır. Böylelikle hem teknolojik yeniliklerden yararlanılabilir hem de eğitimin insan merkezli yapısı sürekli kılınabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Din Eğitimi
• Yetişkin Din Eğitimi
• Eğitimde Yapay Zekâ
• Kişiselleştirilmiş Öğrenme Platformları
• Eğitimde Dijital Dönüşüm
• Yapay Zekânın Etik Boyutları

Kaynakça

1. Altmeyer, Peter. “Mustererkennung (Pattern-Recognition)”. Dermatologische Differenzialdiagnose: Der Weg zur klinischen Diagnose, (2007), 475-518.
2. Anke, Jürgen, Uwe Fischer - René Lemke. “Integration digitaler Sprachassistenten in den Kundenservice am Beispiel der Stadtwerke Leipzig Integration of Digital Voice Assistants in Customer Service: The Example of Stadtwerke Leipzig”. Digitalisierung von Staat und Verwaltung. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.. PISSN: 1617-5468. Münster. (2019), 25-36.
3. Apt, Wenke - Priesack, Kai. “KI und Arbeit – Chance und Risiko zugleich AI and Work – Both an Opportunity and a Risk”. (Hrsg. Prof. Dr. Volker Wittpahl), iit-Themenband Künstliche Intelligenz Technologie | Anwendung | Gesellschaft, (Springer Vieweg), (2019), 221-238.
4. Barberi, Alessandro, Missomelius, Petra - Swertz, Christian. “Editorial 1/2018: Educational Data Mining und Learning Analytics: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Vermessung des digitalen Lernens Editorial 1/2018: Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: Opportunities and Limitations of Measuring Digital Learning”. Medienimpulse 56.1, (2018), 1-14.
5. Bormann, Mark, Heyligers, Katharina, Kerres, Michael - Niesenhaus, Jörg. “Spielend Lernen! Spielend Lernen? Eine empirische Annäherung an die Möglichkeit einer Synthese von Spielen und Lernen Learning Through Play! Learning Through Play? An Empirical Approach to the Possibility of Synthesizing Play and Learning”. Workshop Proceedings der Tagungen Mensch & Computer, DeLFI und Cognitive Design, Berlin: Logos Verlag. ISBN: 978-3-8325-2007-6, (2008), 339-343.
6. Bresinsky, Philip, Hans-Christian Gräfe - Michael Schiessl. “Wie die Maschine uns narrt How the Machine Deceives Us”. Transfer 4, 112-116.
7. Buchberger, Ernst. Sprachverstehen in der Artificial Intelligence Language Understanding in Artificial Intelligence. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1984.
8. Buntins, Katja, Reichow, Insa - Rashid, Faisal. “Eine Typologie zur Analyse des Einsatzes von KI-Methoden in der beruflichen Bildung A Typology for Analyzing the Use of AI Methods in Vocational Education and Training”. BWP 53-1, 13-17. www.bwp-zeitschrift. de/dienst/publikationen/de/19392

9. Burkert, Andreas. “Die Ethik und die Gefahren der künstlichen Intelligenz The Ethics and Dangers of Artificial Intelligence”. ATZ-Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift 119.11, (2017), 8-13.
10. Büching, Corrine, Mah, Dana-Kristin, Otto, Stephan, Paulicke, Prisca - Hartman, Ernst A. “Learning Analytics an Hochschulen Learning Analytics in Higher Education”. (Hrsg. Wittpahl, Volker) Künstliche Intelligenz (Berlin: Springer), (2019), 142-160.
11. Chen, Lijia, Pingping Chen - Zhijian Lin. “Artificial intelligence in education: A review”. Ieee Access 8, (2020), 75264-75278.
12. Çakmak, Ahmet, vd. “Din Eğitimi Biliminin Temel Konularında ChatGPT Yapay Zeka Uygulama Verilerinin Güvenirliliği The Reliability of ChatGPT Artificial Intelligence Application Data on Fundamental Topics of the Science of Religious Education”. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi 24/3 (Aralık 2024), 325-357. https://doi.org/10.33415/daad.1590460
13. Çorbacı, Osman Kamil. “Din Eğitiminde Yapay Zekâ Uygulamalarına İlişkin Teknolojik Ve Pedagojik Yaklaşımlar: Zeki Öğretim Sistemleri (ZÖS) Örneği Technological and Pedagogical Approaches to Artificial Intelligence Applications in Religious Education: The Example of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) ”. Din Eğitiminde Birey ve Ahlak, Ed. H. Er (İstanbul, 2023), 23-45.
14. Dam, Hasan. “Yetişkinlere Göre Yetişkin Din Eğitimi Adult Religious Education from the Perspective of Adults”. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi 1.4, (2003), 31-54.
15. Dohmen, Günther. “‘Zum Verhältnis von “natürlichem” und organisiertem Lernen in der Erwachsenenbildung On the Relationship Between "Natural" and Organized Learning in Adult Education”, Kommunikation in Lehr-Lern-Prozessen mit Erwachsenen (Paedagogische Arbeitsstelle des DVV Frankfurt/M.), (1991), 133-147.
16. Efe, Ahmet. “Yapay Zekâ Risklerinin Etik Yönünden Değerlendirilmesi An Ethical Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Risks”. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi 3/1 (Haziran 2021), 1-24.
17. Engelbart, Douglas C. “Augmenting human intellect: A conceptual framework”. Augmented Education in the Global Age, (Routledge), (2023), 13-29.
18. Erpenbeck, John - Sauter, Werner. So werden wir lernen!: Kompetenzentwicklung in einer Welt fühlender Computer, kluger Wolken und sinnsuchender Netze This Is How We Will Learn!: Skill Development in a World of Sentient Computers, Smart Clouds, and Meaning-Seeking Networks. Berlin, 2013.
19. Europäische Kommission, Generaldirektion Bildung, Jugend, Sport und Kultur. “Ethische Leitlinien für Lehrkräfte über die Nutzung von KI und Daten für Lehr- und Lernzwecke Ethical Guidelines for Educators on the Use of AI and Data for Teaching and Learning Purposes”. Amt für Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Union, (2022). https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/494
20. Europäische Kommission, Generaldirektion Kommunikationsnetze, Inhalte und Technologien. “Ethik-leitlinien für eine vertrauenswürdige KI Ethical Guidelines for Trustworthy AI”. Publications Office, (2019). https://data.europa.eu/ doi/10.2759/22710
21. Franz, Julia - Robak, Steffi. “Digitalisierung in der Erwachsenenbildung – zur Einleitung in den Themenschwerpunkt Digitalization in Adult Education: An Introduction to the Thematic Focus”. Hrsg. Franz, Julia, vd., Digitalisierung in der Erwachsenenbildung, (Hessische Blätter für Volksbildung 3), (2020), 4-10.
22. Fricke, Laura - Zeller, Lena. “Tutorielle Begleitung als Element der propädeutischen Lehr-Lerneinheit ‘Wissen schafft Praxis Tutoring Support as an Element of the Propaedeutic Teaching-Learning Unit 'Knowledge Creates Practice'”. (Hrsg.Klages, Benjamin [Hrsg.]; Bonillo, Marion, Reinders, Stefan, Bohmeyer, Axel) Gestaltungsraum Hochschullehre. Potenziale nicht-traditionell Studierender nutzen, Berlin: Budrich UniPress Ltd., (2015), 253-266. URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-114466 -
23. Friedl, Gunther. “Künstliche Intelligenz im Controlling Artificial Intelligence in Controlling”. Controlling 31.5, (2019), 35-38.
24. Furgel, Igor. “Künstliche Intelligenz als System Artificial Intelligence as a System”. 2022. 1-36. http://furgel.com/index-Dateien/Page336.html
25. Görgülü, Ülfet - Sena Ayık. "Yapay Zekâ Robotlara Ahlâki ve Hukuki Statü Tanınması Problematiği-İslam Ahlâkı ve Hukuku Açısından Bir Değerlendirme The Problematics of Granting Moral and Legal Status to Artificial Intelligence Robots: An Evaluation from the Perspective of Islamic Ethics and Law". Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 20 (2021): 37-65.
26. Graesser, Arthur C. “Conversations with AutoTutor help students learn”. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26, (2016), 124-132.
27. Güneş, Firdevs –Deveci, Tanju. "Yetişkin Eğitimi Ve Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Adult Education and Lifelong Learning". Ankara: Pegem Akademi (2020).
28. Hartmann, Daniela. “Künstliche Intelligenz im DaF-Unterricht? Disruptive Technologien als Herausforderung und Chance Artificial Intelligence in Teaching German as a Foreign Language (DaF): Disruptive Technologies as a Challenge and Opportunity”. Informationen Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 48(6), (2021), 683-696.
29. Herber, Erich, Schmidt-Hertha, Bernhard - Zauchner-Studnicka, Sabine. “Erwachsenen- und Weiterbildung. Technologieeinsatz beim Lernen und Lehren mit Erwachsenen Adult and Continuing Education: The Use of Technology in Adult Learning and Teaching”. (Hrsg. Ebner, Martin, Schön, Sandra), Lehrbuch für Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien, (2013), 385-393.
30. Hertzberg, Joachim. “Was ist KI und welche ethischen Fragen stellt ihre Anwendung? What is AI, and What Ethical Questions Does Its Application Raise” (Hrsg. Otten, Gabriele - Jutta Paessens), Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) und Human Enhancement, (2022), 9-13.
31. Hesse, Wolfgang. “Das Zerstörungspotenzial von Big Data und Künstlicher Intelligenz für die Demokratie The Destructive Potential of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence for Democracy”. Informatik Spektrum 43.5, (2020), 339-346.
32. Jahn, Robert W. “Rekonstruktion der Kommunikation des betrieblichen Ausbildungspersonals in Online-Foren. Eine computerlinguistische Analyse des Online-Forums foraus.de Reconstruction of Communication by Vocational Training Personnel in Online Forums: A Computational Linguistic Analysis of the Online Forum foraus.de”. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, (2024), 1-25.
33. Kerres, Michael - Burtins, Katja Buntins. “Erwachsenenbildung in der digitalen Welt: Handlungsebenen der digitalen Transformation Adult Education in the Digital World: Action Levels of Digital Transformation”. (Hrsg. Franz, Julia, vd.), Digitalisierung in der Erwachsenenbildung-Hessische Blätter für Volksbildung 3, (2020), 11-23.
34. Kılavuz, M. Akif. “Yetişkinlik ve Yaşlılık Döneminde Eğitim ve Din Eğitiminin Önemi The Importance of Education and Religious Education in Adulthood and Old Age”. Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 11.2, (2002), 59-72.
35. Kirste, Moritz. “Augmented Intelligence – Wie Menschen mit KI zusammen arbeiten Augmented Intelligence: How Humans Collaborate with AI”. (Hrsg. Volker Wittpahl), iit-Themenband Künstliche Intelligenz Technologie | Anwendung | Gesellschaft, Berlin: Springer Vieweg, (2019), 58-71.
36. Kirste, Moritz - Markus Schürholz. “‘Einleitung: Entwicklungswege zur KI.’ Künstliche Intelligenz: Technologie | Anwendung | Gesellschaft Introduction: Development Paths to AI Artificial Intelligence: Technology | Application | Society”. (Hrsg. Volker Wittpahl), iit-Themenband Künstliche Intelligenz Technologie | Anwendung | Gesellschaft, Berlin: Springer Vieweg, (2019), 21-35.
37. Klinge, Denise. “Lehrende Algorithmen – spielend-behavioristische Lernanregungen von Apps als digitale Technologien Teaching Algorithms: Playfully Behaviorist Learning Stimuli from Apps as Digital Technologies”. (Hrsg. Franz, Julia, vd.), Digitalisierung in der Erwachsenenbildung-Hessische Blätter für Volksbildung 3, (2020), 65-76.
38. Knaus, Thomas. “Künstliche Intelligenz und Pädagogik – ein Plädoyer für eine Perspektiverweiterung Artificial Intelligence and Pedagogy: A Plea for a Broader Perspective”. Ludwigsburger Beiträge zur Medienpädagogik 24, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:30908
39. Knöfel, Sven - Oliver Seils. “Szenarien für die Entwicklung der Erwachsenenbildung: Ein Ausblick auf das Interaktionsdesign im Jahr 2025 Scenarios for the Development of Adult Education: A Look at Interaction Design in 202”. (Hrsg. Schönebeck - Manfred-Pellert Ada), Von der Kutsche zur Cloud – globale Bildung sucht neue Wege, (Das Beispiel der Carl Benz Academy), (2016), 295-313.
40. Le, Son - Peter Weber. “Game-Based Learning-Spielend Lernen? Game-Based Learning: Learning Through Play”. Lehrbuch für Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien, (Berlin: epubli GmbH), (2011), 219-229.
41. Lipp, Silvia, Gernot Dreisiebner - Michaela Stock. “Das Potenzial von Learning Analytics in der Berufsbildung The Potential of Learning Analytics in Vocational Education and Training”. 50 Jahre Berufsbildungsforschung im Spannungsfeld von Wissenschaft, Politik und Praxis, (Hrsg. Löffler, Roland; Schlögl, Peter; Schmölz, Alexander), (wbv Media GmbH & Co. KG, Bielefeld), (2021), 173-187.
42. Lübcke, Maren, Schrumpf, Johannes, Seyfeli-Özhizalan, Funda - Wannemacher, Klaus. “Künstliche Intelligenz zur Studienindividualisierung Der Ansatz von SIDDATA Artificial Intelligence for Individualizing Studies: The SIDDATA Approach”. (Hrsg. Schmohl, Tobias, Watanabe, Alice, Schelling, Kathrin), Künstliche Intelligenz in der Hochschulbildung. Chancen und Grenzen des KI-gestützten Lernens und Lehrens, (Bielefeld: Hochschulbildung: Lehre und Forschung, 2023), 213-226.
43. Meier, Christoph, Sabine Seufert - Josef Guggemos. “Arbeitswelt 4.0 und Smart Machines: Augmentation als Herausforderung für die Personalentwicklung Work 4.0 and Smart Machines: Augmentation as a Challenge for Human Resource Development”. HMD Prax. Wirtsch. 56.4, (2019), 823-839.
44. Meixner, Uwe. “Bewusstseinsintelligenz und Künstliche Intelligenz Conscious Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence”. (Hrsg. Joachim Rathmann - Uwe Voigt), Natürliche und Künstliche Intelligenz im Anthropozän, (wbg Academic, 2021), 13-32.
45. Mersch, Dieter. “Kreativität und Künstliche Intelligenz: Einige Bemerkungen zu einer Kritik algorithmischer Rationalität Creativity and Artificial Intelligence: Some Remarks on a Critique of Algorithmic Rationality”. Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft 11.21-2, (2019), 65-74.
46. Meyer, Franziska. “Sprachmodelle im Natural Language Processing Language Models in Natural Language Processing”. Seminararbeit, (2020), 1-22. https://www.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~graebe/Texte/ Meyer-20.pdf
47. Minsky, Marvin. “Why People Think Computers Can’t.” AI Magazine 3.4, (1982), 3-15.
48. Netz, Gabi - Claudia Zanker. “’Tutorielle Begleitung im vhs-Lernportal: Online lernen–aber nicht allein.’ weiter bilden Tutoring Support in the vhs Learning Portal: Learning Online—But Not Alone”. Die Zeitschrift für Erwachsenenbildung 30.1, (2023), 37-39.
49. Pinkwart, Niels - Susan Beudt. “Künstliche Intelligenz als unterstützende Lerntechnologie Artificial Intelligence as a Supportive Learning Technology”. Fraunhofer-Institut für Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation IAO, (2020), 1-26.
50. Pollok, Falk, Ulrik Schroeder - Mohamed Amine Chatti. “PalmQA: Ein Frage-Antwort-Ensemble für selbstgesteuertes Lernen PalmQA: A Question-Answer Ensemble for Self-Directed Learning”. Gesellschaft für Informatik, (2017), 51-62.
51. Ponsold, Una. “Planung, Entwicklung und Einsatz von Serious Games in der beruflichen Weiterbildung Planning, Development, and Use of Serious Games in Vocational Training”. Magazin erwachsenenbild.at 44/45, (2022), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.25656/ 01: 244 87
52. Rathmann, Joachim. “Künstliche Intelligenz im Umweltschutz: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen Artificial Intelligence in Environmental Protection: Opportunities and Limitations”. (Hrsg. Joachim Rathmann - Uwe Voigt), Natürliche und Künstliche Intelligenz im Anthropozän, (wbg Academic, 2021), 253-275.
53. Reger-Wagner, Kathrin - Kruschel, Sven. “Humanoide Roboter: Vom Maschinenwesen über Dialogpartner zum Markenbotschafter Humanoid Robots: From Mechanical Beings to Dialogue Partners and Brand Ambassadors”. Jenaer Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, (2020/1). 1-17.
54. Rich, Elaine - Knight, Kevin. Artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991. Schäffer, Utz. “KI sehe ich als zweite Welle der Digitalisierung I see AI as the second wave of digitalization”. Controlling & Management Review 63, (2019), 18-23.
55. Schmohl, Tobias, Watanabe, Alice -Schelling, Kathrin. “Künstliche Intelligenz in der Hochschulbildung: Chancen und Grenzen des KI-gestützten Lernens und Lehrens Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Opportunities and Limitations of AI-Supported Learning and Teaching”. (Hrsg. Schmohl, Tobias, Watanabe, Alice, Schelling, Kathrin), Künstliche Intelligenz in der Hochschulbildung. Chancen und Grenzen des KI-gestützten Lernens und Lehrens, (Bielefeld: Hochschulbildung: Lehre und Forschung, 2023), 7-25.
56. Schröder, Jürgen. “J. Searles Kritik am Funktionalismus — Eine Untersuchung des Chinesischzimmers J. Searle's Critique of Functionalism: An Examination of the Chinese Room”. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22, (1991), 321-336.
57. Schröter, Jens. Das Netz und die virtuelle Realität: Zur Selbstprogrammierung der Gesellschaft durch die universelle Maschine The Web and Virtual Reality: On Society's Self-Programming Through the Universal Machine. Transcript Verlag, 2004.
58. Searle, John. R. “Minds, Brains, and Programs”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3), (1980), 417-457.
59. Stubbe, Julian, Wessels, Jan - Zinke, Guido. “Neue Intelligenz, neue Ethik? New Intelligence, New Ethics?”. (Herausgeber Prof. Dr. Volker Wittpahl), iit-Themenband Künstliche Intelligenz Technologie | Anwendung | Gesellschaft, (Springer Vieweg), (2019), 239-254.
60. Şenocak, Deniz “Açık ve uzaktan öğrenme ortamlarında yapay zekâ: Sunduğu fırsatlar ve yarattığı endişeler Artificial Intelligence in Open and Distance Learning Environments: Opportunities and Concerns”, Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 6/3 (2020), 56- 78
61. Treumann, Klaus Peter, Sonja Ganguin, - Markus Arens. E-Learning in der beruflichen Bildung E-Learning in Vocational Education and Training. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2012.
62. Turing, Alan Mathison. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”. Mind 59/October, (1950), 433-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lix.236.433
63. Turing, Alan Mathison. “On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem”. J. of Math 58.345-363: 5, (1936), 230-265.
64. Ünal, Sevim. “İbadetlerle İlgili Fetvalar Ve Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz Fatwas on Worship and Artificial Intelligence Applications: A Comparative Analysis”. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi 24/3 (Aralık 2024), 161-192. https://doi.org/10.33415/daad.1580752.
65. Weber, Mathias, - Florian Buschbacher. Künstliche Intelligenz–Wirtschaftliche Bedeutung, gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen, menschliche Verantwortung Artificial Intelligence: Economic Significance, Societal Challenges, and Human Responsibility. (Bitkom e. V., DFKI, Berlin, Kaiserslautern), 2017.
66. Zehner, Fabian. “Künstliche Intelligenz in der Bildung. Ihr Potenzial und der Mythos des Lehrkraftroboters Artificial Intelligence in Education: Its Potential and the Myth of the Teacher Robot”. Schulmanagement 50-2, (2019), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:17562