HABITS OF SHARING AND FOLLOWING CURRENT NEWS IN SOCIAL MEDIA

Öz

İnsanlar sosyal varlıklar olarak çevrelerinde olup bitenleri öğrenmeye ve edindikleri bilgileri başkalarıyla paylaşmaya hep ihtiyaç duymuşlardır. Tarihsel süreç göz önüne alındığında mağara duvarlarına çizilen figürler, tabletler, ahşap baskılar gibi ilkel tekniklerle başlayan iletişim yöntemleri, yerini dijital teknolojilerin internet tabanlı anlık iletişimine olanak sağlayan cihazlara bırakmıştır. İnternet teknolojileri ile birlikte kullanılmaya başlanan cihazlar, alışılagelmiş tek yönlü iletişim yerine interaktif ses, sinema, metin, resim ve videoyu mobil hale getirmiştir. 1995 yılı itibari ile popüler hale gelen internet teknolojisi, medyada önemli ve tamamlayıcı bir unsur olarak toplumsal hayatta yerini almıştır. Böylece iletişim yöntemi video ve ses kayıtları ile eş zamanlı olarak gerçekleştirilebilmiştir. İnternet tabanlı iletişim yöntemlerinin yaygınlaşması, medya kuruluşlarının yapılarında da değişikliklere neden olmuştur. Sosyal medya platformları güncel haberlerin paylaşılmasında ve takibinde önemli araçlar haline gelmişlerdir. Çalışmada, insanların haberler ve toplumdaki gelişmeler hakkında sosyal medya paylaşımlarının iletişimde nasıl bir rol oynadığı incelenmeye çalışılacaktır. Bu bağlamda, sosyal medya araçlarından düzenli olarak Facebook ve Twitter’ı kullanan kişilerin davranış biçimleri incelenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Çalışmada 8’i kadın, 9’u erkek olmak üzere 17 kişi ile görüşmeler yapılacaktır. Yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme kullanılan araştırmada gönüllülük esasına dayanılarak haber alımında sosyal medyanın takibinin ve kullanımının sıklığı, sebepleri ve önemi araştırılacaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Toplum, Günlük yaşam, Haber paylaşımı ve takibi, Toplumsal İletişim, Sosyal Medya

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Toplum
• Günlük Yaşam
• Haber Kullanımı
• Toplumsal İletişim
• Sosyal Medya

HABITS OF SHARING AND FOLLOWING CURRENT NEWS IN SOCIAL MEDIA

Öz

People have always eager to learn what is going on around them, share, and follow information they obtain with others. Considering historical process, communication, started with primitive techniques such as figures drawn on cave walls, tablets, papyrus have left their place to devices, allowing internet-based instant communication provided by digital technologies. Devices, used with internet have made interactive audio, motion picture, text, picture, video mobile instead of conventional communication. Becoming popular as of 1995, internet has taken its place in social life as important and complementary element in media. Thus, communication has become simultaneously realizable with video and audio records. Popularization of internet-based communication methods causes changes in structures of media agencies. Social media platforms have become important tools in terms of sharing and following current news. In this study, role of social media sharing about news and developments in society will be studied. In this context, behaviors of people, regularly using Facebook and Twitter are to examine. Interviews will be conducted with 17 people, 8 women and 9 men. In the study, in which semi-structured interviews wil be used, frequency, reasons and importance of follow-up and use of social media in receiving news will be investigated on voluntary basis. Keywords: Society, Daily Life, Sharing and following of News, Community Communication, Social Media

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Society
• Daily Life
• News Usage
• Community
• Communication
• Social Media

Kaynakça

1. Al-Rawi, Ahmed. 2017.“Viral News on Social Media.”Digital Journalism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1387062.
2. Baym, Nancy, and danah, boyd.2012. “Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56 (3): 320–329.
3. Bentley, Clyde. 2001. “No Newspaper is No Fun–Even Five Decades Later.” Newspaper Research Journal22 (4): 2–15.
4. Berelson, Bernard. 1949. “What “Missing the Newspaper” Means.” In CommunicationsResearch, 1948–1949, edited by Paul Lazarsfeld and Frank Stanton, 111–129. New York:Harper.
5. Boczkowski, Pablo. 2010. “The Consumption of Online News at Work: Making Sense of Emerging Phenomena and Rethinking Existing Concepts.”Information, Communication& Society13 (4): 470–484.
6. Bogart, Leo.1989. Press and Public: Who Reads What, When, Where, and Why in American Newspapers. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Bright, Jonathan. 2016. “The Social News Gap: How News Reading and News SharingDiverge.” Journal of Communication 66 (3): 343–365.
8. Couldry, Nick, Sonia Livingstone, and Tim Markham.2007. Media Consumption and Public Engagement: Beyond the Presumption of Attention. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

9. Costera Meijer, I., & Groot Kormelink, T. (2015). Checking, sharing, clicking and linking. Digital Journalism, 3(5), 664–679. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.937149
10. Crawford, Kate.2009. “Following you: Disciplines of Listening in Social Media.” Continuum:Journal of Media & Cultural Studies23 (4): 525–535.
11. Dahlgren, Peter.2009. Media and Political Engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Dimmick, John, John Christian Feaster, and Gregory J. Hoplamazian.2011. “News in the Interstices: The Niches of Mobile Media in Space and Time.” New Media & Society13 (1): 23–39.
13. Ekstro¨m, Mats.2016. “Young People’s Everyday Political Talk: A Social Achievement of Democratic Engagement.”Journal of Youth Studies19 (1): 1–19.
14. Gauntlett, David, and Annette Hill.1999. TV Living: Television, Culture and Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
15. Gleason, B. (2013). #Occupy wall street: Exploring informallearning about a social movement on twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 966–982. doi:10.1177/ 0002764213479372.
16. Goh, Debbie, Richard Ling, Liuyu Huang, and Doris Liew.2017. “News Sharing As Reciprocal Exchanges In Social Cohension Maintenance.”Information, Communication & Society:1–17.
17. Granovetter, Mark.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology78 (6):1360–1380. Harcup, Tony, and Deirdre O’Neill. 2001.“What is News? Galtung and Ruge Revisited.”Journalism Studies2 (2): 261–280.
18. Hermida, Alfred, Fred Fletcher, Darryl Korell, and Donna Logan. 2012. “Share, Like, Recommend. Decoding the Social Media News Consumer.” Journalism Studies 13 (5–6): 815–824.
19. Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. 1990. “The Politics of Polysemy: Television News, Everyday Consciousness and Political Action.”Media, Culture and Society12 (1): 57–77.
20. Heikkila¨, Heikki, and Laura Ahva. 2015. “The Relevance of Journalism: Studying News Audiences in a Digital Era.”Journalism Practice9 (1): 50–64.
21. Hermida, Alfred.2014. Tell Everyone: Why We Share and Why It Matters. Toronto: Doubleday Canada. Klinger, Ulrike. 2013.“Mastering the Art of Social Media: Swiss Parties, the 2011 National Election and Digital Challenges.”Information, Communication & Society 16 (5): 717–736.
22. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh (NC), 591–600. doi:10.1177/ 1753193410369989.
23. Larsen, Bent Steeg.2000. “Radio as Ritual: An Approach to Everyday Use of Radio.” Nordicom Review2: 259–275.
24. Lee,E.,&Oh,S.Y.(2013). Seek and you shall find? How need fororientation moderates knowledge gain from twitter use. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 745–765. doi:10.1111/ jcom.12041.
25. Lull, James.1980. “The Social uses of Television.” Human Communication Research6 (3): 197–209. McCollough, Kathleen, Jessica Crowell, and Philip Napoli.2017. “Portrait of the Online Local News Audience.”Digital Journalism5 (1): 100–118.
26. Mindich, D. T. Z. (2005). Tuned out: Why Americans underdon’t follow the news. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
27. Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David Levy, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen.2017. “Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017.” https://reutersinstitute.politics. ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf.
28. Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis, and Kim Christian Schrøder. 2014. “The Relative Importance of Social Media for Accessing, Finding, and Engaging with News: An Eight-country Cross-media Comparison.” Digital Journalism 2 (4): 472–489.
29. Picone, Ike, Ralf De Wolf, and Sarie Robijt.2016. ““Who Shares What With Whom and Why? News Sharing Profiles Amongst Flemish News Users.”Digital Journalism4 (7): 921–932.
30. Stieglitz, Stefan, and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2013.“Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media– Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems 29 (4): 217–248.
31. Trilling, Damian, Peter Tolochko, and Bj€ orn Burscher. 2016. “From Newsworthiness to Shareworthiness: How to Predict News Sharing Based on Article Characteristics.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94 (1): 38–60.
32. Türnüklü, A. (2000). Eğitim Bilim Araştırmalarında Etkin Olarak Kullanılabilecek Nitel Bir Araştırma Tekniği: Ölçme. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 6(24), 543-559.
33. Wang, S. (2017, December 18). How much news makes it into people’s Facebook feeds? Our experiment suggests not much.NiemanLab, http://www.niemanlab.org/2017/12/ how-much-news-makes-it-into-peoples-facebook-feedsour-experiment-suggests-not-much/
34. Wennekers, Annemarie, Dunya van Troost, and Peter Wiegman. 2016. “Media:Tijd 2015.” http://www.mediatijd.nl/images/pdf/MediaTijd_RapportWEB.pdf.
35. Williams, Raymond. 1977. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University.
36. Wiebe, Janyce, Theresa Wilson, Rebecca Bruce, Matther Bell, and Melanie Martin. 2004. “Learning Subjective Language.”Computational Linguistics30 (3): 277–308.