A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis of Ethical Leadership Research: Insights From Scopus and Web of Science (2010-2024)

Öz

This research provides a bibliometric analysis of articles published between 2010 and 2024 on "Ethical Leadership" using Scopus and Web of Science databases. The analysis aims to see the status of the ethical leadership. Ethical leadership represents a crucial aspect of effective management, and it has been the subject of increasing interest from researchers. The investigation involved an examination of both Scopus and Web of Science. These databases are widely recognized as prominent sources of academic research. The comparative analysis is designed to provide detailed insight into the citation patterns, and collaborative networks associated with ethical leadership research. The search scope was narrowed by using the term "ethical leadership" as a keyword in both databases. Furthermore, other disciplines were excluded by entering "education" into the search filter. The term "Ethical Leadership" was entered into the search field. As a result, 122 articles obtained from the Web of Science database and 133 articles from Scopus. Different results were obtained from the data analyzed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• : Leadership
• Bibliometric analysis
• Scopus index
• Wos viewer

Etik Lı̇derlı̇k Araştırmalarının Karşılaştırmalı Bı̇blı̇yometrı̇k Analı̇zı̇: Scopus ve Web of Science Analizleri (2010-2024)

Öz

Bu makale, Scopus ve Web of Science veri tabanlarını kullanarak 2010-2024 yılları arasında “Etik Liderlik” üzerine yayınlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik bir analizini sunmaktadır. Analiz kapsamlıdır ve bu alandaki araştırmaların mevcut durumunun net bir şekilde anlaşılmasını sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Etik liderlik, etkili yönetimin kritik bir yönü olarak kabul edilmekte ve araştırmacılar ve uygulayıcılar tarafından giderek daha fazla ilgi görmektedir. Araştırma, önde gelen iki multidisipliner atıf veri tabanı olan Scopus ve Web of Science'ın ikili olarak incelenmesini içermektedir. Karşılaştırmalı analizin amacı, etik liderlik araştırmaları alanındaki kapsamın, atıf modellerinin ve işbirliği ağlarının ayrıntılı bir şekilde anlaşılmasını sağlamaktı Analiz edilen verilerden farklı sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Arama kapsamı, her iki veri tabanında da anahtar kelime olarak 'etik liderlik' kelimesinin kullanılmasıyla daraltılmıştır. Buna ek olarak, arama filtresine "eğitim" girilerek diğer alanlar çıkarılmıştır. Arama alanına 'Etik Liderlik' terimi girilmiş ve bunun sonucunda Web of Science veri tabanından 122, Scopus'tan ise 133 sonuç elde edilmiştir. Analiz edilen verilerden farklı sonuçlar elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Leadership
• Bibliometric analysis
• Scopus index
• Wos viewer

Kaynakça

1. Abhishek, V., & Hosanagar, K. (2007). Keyword generation for search engine advertising using semantic similarity between terms. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Electronic Commerce, (pp. 89–94). https://doi.org/10.1145/1282100.1282119
2. Alsharif, A., Salleh, N. Z. M., & Pilelienė, L. (2023). A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of FNIRS and FMRI technology in neuromarketing. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 70(3), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2023-0031
3. Bachmann, B. (2016). Literature review: the evolution of ethical leadership. In CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance (pp. 27–63). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42942-7_3
4. Badar, K., & Lasthuizen, K. (2023). Twenty years of Research on Millennials At Work: A Structural review using bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(9),7058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097058
5. Bashir, M., & Hassan, S. (2019). The need for ethical leadership in combating corruption. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(4),673–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318825386
6. Bhalotia, G., Hulgeri, A., Nakhe, C., Chakrabarti, S., & Sudarshan, S. (2003). Keyword searching and browsing in databases using BANKS. In Proceedings 18th International Conference on Data Engineering, (pp.431–440). https://doi.org/10.1109/icde.2002.994756 IEEE.
7. Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2014). Analyzing affiliation networks. In SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (pp. 417–433). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294413.n28
8. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002

9. Çelik, S., Dedeoğlu, B. B., & İnanir, A. (2015). Relationship between ethical leadership, organizational commitment and job satisfaction at hotel organizations. Ege Akademik Bakış, 15(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2015117999
10. Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2013). A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5). 18-26 https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
11. Crespi, G., D’Este, P., Fontana, R., & Geuna, A. (2011). The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Research Policy, 40(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.010
12. Darcy, K. T. (2010). Ethical Leadership: The past, present and future. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(3), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2010.12
13. De Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F. J., González-Molina, A., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach. Scientometrics, 73(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4
14. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
15. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
16. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2007). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. the FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf
17. Fulmer, R. M. (2004). The challenge of ethical leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 33(3), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.06.007
18. Gan, J. L., & Yusof, H. M. (2020). A global research trend on organizational citizenship behaviour: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies, 2(1), 55-71.
19. Gavel, Y., & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810865958
20. Guz, A. N., & Rushchitsky, J. J. (2009). Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals. International Applied Mechanics, 45(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-009-0189-4
21. Hartog, D. N. D. (2015). Ethical leadership. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111237
22. Hsieh, C., Tai, S., & Li, H. (2023). A Bibliometric Review of Ethical Leadership Research: Shifting focuses and theoretical insights. AERA Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231209266
23. Kimura, T., & Nishikawa, M. (2016). Ethical leadership and its cultural and institutional context: an empirical study in Japan. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(3), 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3268-6
24. Krauskopf, E. (2018). An analysis of discontinued journals by Scopus. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1805–1815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2808-5
25. Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2012).Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics,94(2), 589–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0784-8
26. Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004
27. Mikki, S. (2009). Google Scholar compared to Web of Science. A Literature Review. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 1(1). 41-51. https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v1i1.10
28. Moed, H. F. (2009). New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum Immunologiae Et Therapiae Experimentalis, 57(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5
29. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2015). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
30. Nejati, M., Shafaei, A., Salamzadeh, Y., & Daraei, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and universities: A study of top 10 world universities’ websites. African Journal of Business Management, 5(2), 440–447. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm10.554
31. Nicolaisen, J. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21181
32. Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.00
33. Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Hartog, D. N. D., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.627
34. Qiu, J., & Lv, H. (2014). An overview of knowledge management research viewed through the web of science (1993-2012). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(4), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-12-2013-0133
35. Remišová, A., & Lašáková, A. (2013). Ethical leadership styles of future managers in central and Eastern European countries. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics, 2(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijabe.2013010103
36. Resick, C. J., Hanges, P. J., Dickson, M. W., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2006). A Cross-Cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3242-1
37. Resick, C. J., Martin, G. S., Keating, M. A., Dickson, M. W., Kwan, H. K., & Peng, C. (2011). What ethical leadership means to me: Asian, American, and European perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0730-8
38. Singh, K. P., & Chander, H. (2014). Publication trends in library and information science: A bibliometric analysis of Library Management journal. Library Management, 35(3),134-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-05-2013-0039
39. Sulo, T., Kendagor, R., Kosgei, D., Tuitoek, D., & Chelangat, S. (2012). Factors affecting research productivity in public universities of Kenya: the case of MOI University, Eldoret. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(5),475–484. http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2434
40. Sweileh, W. M. (2018). Research trends on human trafficking: a bibliometric analysis using Scopus database. Globalization and Health, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0427-9
41. Tanijiri, J., Ohta, M., Takasu, A., & Adachi, J. (2016). Important word organization for support of browsing scholarly papers using author keywords. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/2960811.2967163
42. Thelwall, M. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006
43. Toor, S., & Ofori, G. (2009). Ethical Leadership: Examining the Relationships with Full Range Leadership Model, Employee Outcomes, and Organizational Culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0059-3
44. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
45. Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. a. N. F. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81(2), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2178-0
46. Xu, S., Yang, S., & Lau, F. (2010). Keyword extraction and headline generation using novel word features. Proceedings of the . . . AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 24(1), 1461–1466. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7511
47. Yang, K., & Meho, L. I. (2006). Citation analysis: A comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 43(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504301185
48. Yeung, A. W. K. (2019). Comparison between Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed and Publishers for Mislabelled Review Papers. Current Science, 116(11), 1909. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i11/1909-1914
49. Yu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Gu, Z., Zhong, H., Zha, Q., Yang, L., Zhu, C., & Chen, E. (2020). A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Annals of Translational Medicine, 8(13), 816. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4235
50. Zhao, L., Yang, M. M., Wang, Z., & Michelson, G. (2022). Trends in the Dynamic Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Leadership: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05035-y