A Field Study on Social Capital, Culture of Living Together and Neighborhood Relations

Öz

Turkey, which is the intersection of Europe, Asia and Africa, has been the main route of migration throughout human history. Forced migrants coming to Turkey have low-skilled labor and mostly consist of farmers engaged in agriculture in rural areas. Turkey settles migrants migrating from nearby geography in districts where agricultural production is carried out in rural areas and can employ these migrants in agricultural production. When the host community trusts the migrants, they can treat them warmly, neighborly relations begin and a culture of living together that is beneficial for both parties is formed. This study aimed to investigate on-site the contribution of social capital to the neighborhood relations and the culture of living together process established by Meskhetian Turks settled in Üzümlü District of Erzincan Province since 2016 with the residents of Üzümlü District. In line with this objective, a survey was conducted with 269 Meskhetian Turks migrating from the Russian Federation. In the analyses conducted with Structural Equation Modeling, it was determined that Meskhetian Turks developed very good neighborhood relations with the people of Üzümlü District of Erzincan Province and created a culture of living together. While the Bonding Social Capital contributed positively to this process, the Bridging Social Capital had a negative effect. The study approaches the issue of migration within the scope of “microeconomic migration theories”. The economic needs and desires of individuals are taken as basis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social Capital
• Neighborhood Relations
• Culture of Living Together
• Migration

Sosyal Sermaye, Birlikte Yaşama Kültürü ve Komşuluk İlişkileri Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması

Öz

Avrupa, Asya ve Afrika’nın kesişme noktası olan Türkiye, insanlık tarihiyle birlikte göçlerin ana güzergâhı olmuştur. Türkiye’ye gelen zorunlu göçmenler düşük vasıflı işgücüne sahiptir ve çoğunlukla kırsal alanlarda tarımla uğraşan çiftçilerden oluşmaktadır. Türkiye, yakın coğrafyadan göç eden göçmenleri kırsal alanlarda tarımsal üretimin yapıldığı ilçelerde iskân etmekte ve bu göçmenleri tarımsal üretimde istihdam edebilmektedir. Ev sahibi halk, göçmenlere karşı güven duyduğunda onlara sıcak davranabilmekte, komşuluk ilişkileri başlamakta ve iki taraf içinde faydalı olan birlikte yaşama kültürü oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışma, 2016 yılından itibaren Erzincan İli Üzümlü İlçesine yerleştirilen Ahıska Türklerinin Üzümlü İlçesi sakinleriyle kurdukları komşuluk ilişkileri ve birlikte yaşama kültürü sürecine sosyal sermayelerinin katkısını yerinde araştırmayı hedeflemiştir. Bu hedef doğrultusunda Rusya Federasyonu’ndan göç eden 269 Ahıska Türküyle anket yapılmıştır. Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile yapılan analizlerde Ahıska Türklerinin Erzincan İli Üzümlü İlçesi halkıyla çok iyi komşuluk ilişkileri geliştirdiği ve birlikte yaşama kültürü oluşturdukları tespit edilmiştir. Bağlayıcı Sosyal Sermaye bu sürece pozitif katkı verirken, Birleştirici Sosyal Sermaye negatif etkide bulunmuştur. Çalışma “mikro iktisat göç teorileri” kapsamında göç konusuna yaklaşmaktadır. Bireylerin ekonomik gereksinim ve istekleri temel alınmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal Sermaye
• Komşuluk İlişkileri
• Birlikte Yaşama Kültürü
• Göç

Kaynakça

1. Bordens, K., & Abbott, B. (2014). Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach. McGraw Hill.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. J. G. (Ed.) içinde, Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (s. 142-258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
3. Briggs, X. D. (2004). Social capital: Easy beauty or meaningful resource? Journal of the American planning Association, 70(2), 151-158. https://moodle.emu.edu/pluginfile.php/767741/course/section/257645/de%20Souza%20Briggs%202004.pdf?time=1611110289355
4. Brisson, D., & Roll, S. (2012). The effect of neighborhood on crime and safety: a review of the evidence. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 9(4), 333-350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2010.525407
5. Cater, J., & Jones, T. (1989). Social geography: an introduction to contemporary issues. London: LEdward Arnold.
6. Cheong, P. H., Edwards, R., Goulbourne, H., & Solomos, J. (2007). Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review. Critical social policy, 27(1), 24-49 https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018307072206
7. Clark, A. (2009). From neighbourhood to network: a review of the significance of neighbourhood in studies of social relations. Geography Compass, 3(4), 1559-1578. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00249.x
8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120. doi:https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/228943

9. Crowley, H., & Hickman, M. J. (2008). Migration, postindustrialism and the globalized nation state: Social capital and social cohesion re-examined. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(7), 1222-1244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701725904
10. Fox, J. (2002: 2). Structural equation models. Appendix to an R and S-PLUS Companion to Applied Regression. https://socialwork.wayne.edu/research/pdf/structural-equation-models.pdf
11. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & community, 2(4), 277-311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1535-6841.2003.00057.x
12. Hays, R. A. (2015). Neighborhood networks, social capital, and political participation. The relationships revisited. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37(2), 122-143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12137
13. Hendriks, M., & Burger, M. J. (2018). Happiness and migration. Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics (s. 1-23). içinde Cham: Springer International Publishing.
14. Kline, R. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
15. Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge university press.
16. Lis, C., & Soly, H. (1993). Neighbourhood social change in west European cities: sixteenth to nineteenth centuries. International review of social history, 38(1), 1-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000111757
17. Longo, I., Massari, S., & Spalletta, A. (2021). The neighbourhood home: An environments system from sharing to caring. DISCERN: International Journal of Design for Social Change, Sustainable Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 1-15. www.designforsocialchange.org/journal/index.php/DISCERN-J
18. Lőrincz, L., & Németh, B. (2022). How social capital is related to migration between communities?. European Journal of Population, 38(5), 1119-1143. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10680-022-09642-3
19. Łukaszewska-Bezulska, J. (2021). The role of social capital in labour-related migrations: the Polish example. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 22(3), 949-966. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12134-020-00776-z
20. Martinez, M. L., Black, M., & Starr, R. H. (2002). Factorial structure of the Perceived Neighborhood Scale (PNS): A test of longitudinal invariance. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 23-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.1048
21. Massey, D. S., & Aysa-Lastra, M. (2011). Social capital and international migration from Latin America. nternational journal of population research, 2011(1), 834145.
22. McLean, G. F. (2004). Persons, peoples and cultures: living together in a global age. Washington: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. https://www.crvp.org/publications/Series-I/I-29.pdf
23. Munshi, K., & Rosenzweig, M. (2016). Networks and misallocation: Insurance, migration, and the rural-urban wage gap. American Economic Review, 106(1), 46-98. doi:10.1257/aer.20131365
24. Nannestad, P., Lind Haase Svendsen, G., & Tinggaard Svendsen, G. (2008). Bridge over troubled water? Migration and social capital. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(4), 607-631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830801961621
25. Perkins, D. D., & Long, D. A. (2002). Neighborhood sense of community and social capital: A multi-level analysis. Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications (s. 291-318). içinde Bostan: MA: Springer US. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4615-0719-2_15
26. Portes, A. (2009). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Knowledge and social capital, 43-67. https://faculty.washington.edu/matsueda/courses/590/Readings/Portes%20Social%20Capital%201998.pdf
27. Prayitno, G., Matsushima, K., Jeong, H., & Kobayashi, K. (2014). Social capital and migration in rural area development. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 543-552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.067
28. Putnam, R. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political science & politics, 28(4), 664-683. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/420517
29. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simom and Schuster.
30. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. (2006). On multilevel model reliability estimation from the perspective of structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(1), 130-141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1301_7
31. Raza, M., Beaujot, R., & Woldemicael, G. (2013). Social capital and economic integration of visible minority immigrants in Canada. Journal of international migration and integration, 14, 263-285. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12134-012-0239-3
32. Robinson, D., & Reeve, K. (2006). Neighbourhood experiences of new immigration. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
33. Ruef, M., & Kwon, S. W. (2016). Neighborhood associations and social capital. Social Forces, 95(1), 159-190. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24754269
34. Saegert, S., & Winkel, G. (1996). Paths to community empowerment: Organizing at home. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 517-550. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02506795
35. Sampson, J. R. (2001). Crime and public safety: Insights from community-level perspectives on social capital. J. P. Saegert içinde, Social capital and poor communities (s. 89–115). New York:: Russell Sage Foundation.
36. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual review of sociology, 28(1), 443-478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114
37. Small, M. L. (2009). Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. Oxford University Press.
38. Stack, B. C. (1997). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper & Row.
39. Storper, M. (2018). Separate worlds? Explaining the current wave of regional economic polarization. Lonton: Routledge.
40. Tabachnick, B., Fidell, L., & Ullman, J. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5 b., s. 481-498). içinde Bostan: MA: pearson. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/preface/0/1/3/4/0134790545.pdf
41. Tselios, V., Noback, I., van Dijk, J., & McCann, P. (2015). Integration of immigrants, bridging social capital, ethnicity, and locality. Journal of Regional Science, 55(3), 416-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12160
42. Tuominen, M., Kilpi-Jakonen, E., García Velázquez, R., Castaneda, A., & Kuusio, H. (2023). Building social capital in a new home country. A closer look into the predictors of bonding and bridging relationships of migrant populations at different education levels. Migration Studies, 11(4), 598-630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnad022
43. Varady, D. P. (1986). Neighborhood confidence: A critical factor in neighborhood revitalization? Environment and Behavior, 18(4), 480-501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916586184004
44. Vollebergh, A. (2016). The other neighbour paradox: fantasies and frustrations of ‘living together’in Antwerp. Patterns of Prejudice, 50(2), 129-149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2016.1161957
45. Wang, P., Chen, X., Gong, J., & Jacques-Tiura, A. (2014). Reliability and validity of the personal social capital scale 16 and personal social capital scale 8: two short instruments for survey studies. Social Indicators Research, 119, 1133-1148. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0540-3
46. Weston, R., & Gore Jr, P. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The counseling psychologist, 34(5), 719-751. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345