The Role of P4C Practices in Sustainability and Environmental Awareness Among Middle School Students

Öz

This study investigates the impact of Philosophy for Children (P4C) practices on middle school students’ sustainability and environmental awareness. While the literature highlights the positive effects of P4C in areas such as democratic culture and moral reasoning, the dimension of environmental ethics has received relatively little attention. A quasi-experimental design was employed in this study, involving 58 fifth-grade students from the Bursa province. Sustainability-themed P4C sessions were conducted over three months, and environmental awareness was measured using the Environmental Awareness Scale. The analysis utilized the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The findings revealed a significant increase in environmental awareness scores following the P4C intervention (Z = -6.36; p < 0.001; r = 0.86). P4C demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing students’ sustainability awareness, creating a transformative impact—particularly among socio-economically disadvantaged groups. Given the complexity of the environmental crisis, it is recommended that educational models based on philosophical inquiry be implemented from an early age.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Philosophy for Children
• Critical thinking
• Sustainability
• Environmental awareness
• Middle school students

P4C Uygulamalarının Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Sürdürülebilirlik ve Çevre Bilinci Üzerindeki Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışma, Çocuklar için Felsefe (P4C) uygulamalarının ortaokul öğrencilerinin sürdürülebilirliği ve çevresel farkındalığı üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktadır. Literatür, demokratik kültür ve ahlaki akıl yürütme gibi alanlarda P4C'nin olumlu etkilerini vurgulasa da, çevresel etik boyutu nispeten az dikkat çekmiştir. Bu çalışmada Bursa eyaletinden 58 beşinci sınıf öğrencisini içeren yarı-deneysel bir tasarım kullanıldı. Sürdürülebilirlik temalı P4C oturumları üç ay boyunca gerçekleştirildi ve çevresel farkındalık Çevresel Farkındalık Ölçeği kullanılarak ölçülmüştür. Analiz, Wilcoxon imzalı rütbe testi, Mann-Whitney U testi ve Kruskal-Wallis H testini kullandı. Bulgular, P4C müdahalesinin ardından çevresel farkındalık puanlarında önemli bir artış ortaya koydu (Z = -6,36; p < 0,001; r = 0,86). P4C, öğrencilerin sürdürülebilirlik farkındalığını artırmada etkili olduğunu gösterdi ve özellikle sosyo-ekonomik olarak dezavantajlı gruplar arasında dönüştürücü bir etki yarattı. Çevresel krizinin karmaşıklığı göz önüne alındığında, felsefi sorgulamaya dayalı eğitim modellerinin erken yaşlardan itibaren uygulanması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çocuklar için felsefe
• Eleştirel Düşünme
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Çevre farkındalığı
• Ortaokul öğrencileri

Kaynakça

1. Atabek-Yiğit, E., & Balkan Kıyıcı, F. (2022). The environmental awareness in the context of sustainable development: A scale development study. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 12(3), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1167444
2. Cam, P. (2023). Acts of thought. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 10(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.46707/jps.v10i2.197
3. Chance, P. (1986). Thinking in the classroom: A survey of programs. Teachers College Press.
4. Childress, R. B. (1978). Public school environmental education curricula: A national profile. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED255386.pdf
5. Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLOS ONE, 12(5), Article e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
6. Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2020). The debunking handbook 2020. https://www.skepticalscience.com/docs/DebunkingHandbook2020.pdf
7. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath & Co.
8. Elliott, J. (1999). Sustainable society and environmental education: Future perspectives and demands for the educational system. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764990290303

9. Fisher, R. (1990). Teaching children to think. Basil Blackwell.
10. Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford University Press.
11. Gregory, M., & Brubaker, N. (2008). Philosophy for children: A practitioner handbook. Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children, Montclair State University.
12. Gregory, M. R. (2002). Constructivism, standards, and the classroom community of inquiry. Educational Theory, 52(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2002.00397.x
13. Gregory, M. R. (2014). The practice of philosophy with children. In S. Goering, N. J. Shudak, & T. E. Wartenberg (Eds.), Philosophy in schools: An introduction for philosophers and teachers (pp. 139–150). Routledge.
14. Hannam, P., & Echeverria, E. (2010). Philosophy with teenagers. Continuum.
15. Haynes, J., & Murris, K. (2012). Picturebooks, pedagogy and philosophy. Routledge.
16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
17. Kennedy, D. (2004). The role of the facilitator in the community of philosophical inquiry. Analytic Teaching, 24(2), 77–88. https://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/at
18. Kim, H., Prust, C., & Sukopp, T. (2022). Philosophising with children worldwide about nature, natural values, and pollution. Synthesis Philosophica, 36(2), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp36208
19. Kizel, A. (2016). Philosophy with children in a democratic society: The "community of philosophical inquiry" as a cultural and social practice. Springer.
20. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
21. Law, S. (2024). Philosophy and raising good citizens. Think, 23(67), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477175623000519
22. Lewis, L., & Chandley, N. (2012). Philosophy for children through the secondary curriculum. Bloomsbury Publishing.
23. Lim, T. K. (1994). Philosophy for children: Training of teachers for the Singapore programme. Analytic Teaching, 14(2), 53–56. https://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/at/article/view/605
24. Lipman, M. (1982). Philosophy for children. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 3, 35–44.
25. Lipman, M. (1984). The cultivation of reasoning through philosophy. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 51–56.
26. Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking: What can it be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38–43.
27. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press.
28. Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Temple University Press.
29. Matthews, G. B. (1980). Philosophy and the young child. Harvard University Press.
30. Murris, K. (1997). Philosophy with children: More basic than the basics. Analytic Teaching, 18(3), 129–140. https://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/at
31. Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. Inquiry, 16(1–4), 95–100.
32. O'Riordan, N. J. (2016). Swimming against the tide: Philosophy for children as counter-cultural practice. Education 3-13, 44(6), 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2014.991415
33. Oyler, J. (2016). Philosophy with children: The Lipman-Sharp approach to philosophy for children. In M. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_226-2
34. Peirce, C. S. (1955). How to make our ideas clear. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 23–41). Dover Publications.
35. Splitter, L. (2020). Inquiry without standards: A reply to Hand. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.46707/jps.v7ii.121
36. Stapp, W. B. (1974). Historical setting of environmental education. In J. A. Swan & W. B. Stapp (Eds.), Environmental education: Strategies toward a livable future. Sage.
37. Sterling, S. (2010). Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education. Environmental Education Research, 16(5–6), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505427
38. Stevenson, R. B. (2007). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701295726
39. Topping, K. J., Trickey, S., & Cleghorn, P. (2020). Philosophy for children. International Academy of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373403
40. Turgeon, W. C. (2015). Philosophy for children and environmental philosophy: Whys and wherefores. Retrieved October 26, 2024, from https://www.academia.edu/35059083/Philosophy_for_Children_and_Environmental_philosophy_docx
41. UNESCO. (1977). Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education, Tbilisi, USSR, 1977: Final report. UNESCO.
42. Wartenberg, T. E. (2009). Big ideas for little kids. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.