DETERMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN QUALITY OF TEACHING PROCESSES AND LEARNING RESOURCES WITH STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (THE SAMPLE OF GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY)

Öz

The purpose of the present study is to determine whether the level of academic achievement of B. A. students in Gaziantep University is a meaningful predictor of the quality of teaching processes and learning resources of their higher education institution in 2014-2015 educational year. The study is designed in the correlational survey model and the data are obtained by applying the scale to randomly selected 796 students. In data analysis, SPSS 20 program is used and Independent Samples T Test and Multiple Linear Regression among parametric analyses are applied to the data set showing normal distribution and .05 is accepted as the significance level. According to research findings, the participants’ views differ significantly in four of the sub-dimensions according to their gender and these sub-dimensions - career guidance services, teaching processes, campus life and assessment and evaluation - are found to predict about %15 of students’ grade point averages. It is extrapolated that some variables related to the teaching processes and learning resources in higher education institutions have a significant role in student achievement. The findings and results are discussed in parallel with similar researches and some recommendations are taken place in this respect.

Kaynakça

1. Ağıralioğlu, N. (2012). An approach to determine the quality of universities in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2(3), 147.
2. Altbach, P. G. Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. France: UNESCO.
3. Arslan, H. (2000). Academic quality assessment in Turkish undergraduate institutions. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). American University, Washington, D.C.
4. Bandevica, L., & Ligotne, A. (2014). Higher education study programme quality assessment. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 7(2), 6-18.
5. Bayrak, B. (2007). Yükseköğretim kurumlarından beklenen hizmet kalitesi ve hizmet kalitesinin algılanmasına yönelik bir araştırma. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
6. Brown, T. (1999). Challenging globalization as discourse and phenomenon. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18(1), 3-17.
7. Burgaz, B., & Şentürk, İ (2008). Küreselleşmenin eğitim fakültelerinin yönetim boyutundaki etkileri. Manas Journal of Social Studies, (19), 269-280.
8. Büyüköztürk, S., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, O. E., Karadeniz, S., ve Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (15. Baskı.) Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

9. Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The Art of making quality certain. New York: New American Library.
10. Çetinsaya, G. (2014). Büyüme, kalite, uluslararasılaşma: Türkiye Yükseköğretimi için bir yol haritası (2. Baskı). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Basımevi.
11. Demirel, O., & Kaya, Z. (2013). Eğitim bilimine giriş (8. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
12. Deveci, N. K. (2012). Türk yükseköğretiminde eğitim-öğretim hizmetlerinin
13. kalite düzeyinin ve kalite yükseltme çalışmalarının incelenmesi:
14. Türkiye’deki devlet ve vakıf üniversiteleri üzerinde bir saha çalışması. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
15. Ensign, J., & Woods, A. M. (2014). Strategies for increasing academic achievement in higher education, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 85(6), 17-22,
16. Erdem, A. R. (2012). Küreselleşme: Türk yükseköğretimine etkisi. Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 109-117.
17. Erdem, A. R. (2013). Bilgi toplumunda üniversitenin değişen rolleri ve görevleri. Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 109-120.
18. Gültekin, M., & Şengül, S. A. ( 2006). Avrupa Birliği’nin eğitimde kaliteyi belirleyici alan ve göstergeleri acısından Türk eğitim sisteminin durumu. Anadolu University Journal of Social Studies, (2), 145-170.
19. Hacıfazlıoğlu, O. (2006). Avrupa Birliği yükseköğretim kalite göstergeleri ve Türkiye örneği. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
20. Harris, B. L. (2002). A study of service quality: Gap analysis of expectations versus performance perceptions of junior, senior, and graduate students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Alabama, Birmingham.
21. Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–26.
22. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
23. Juran, J., & Godfrey, A. B. (1998). Juran’s quality handbook (5th Ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
24. Kanakana, M. G., Pretorius, J. H. C., & Van Wyk, B. J. (2012, May). Key aspects related to student achievement in engineering education. Oral Presentation, 2012 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research
25. Conference, Orlando, A.B.D.
26. Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (20. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel.
27. Kelso, R. S. (2008). Measuring undergraduate student perceptions of service quality in higher education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Florida.
28. Lagrosen, S., Seyyed-Hashemi, R., & Leitner, M. (2004). Examination of the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(2), 61-69.
29. Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K. Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York: Wallace Foundation.
30. Meraler, S. (2011). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin yükseköğretimde kaliteye ilişkin görüşlerinin belirlenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Harran Üniversitesi, Şanlıurfa.
31. Mishra, S. (2006). Quality assurance in higher education: An Introduction, India: National Printing Press.
32. National Survey of Student Engagement. (2012). Benchmarks of effective educational practice. http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/nsse_benchmarks.pdf obtained on January the 8th, 2015.
33. OECD (1996). The knowledge-based economy. www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/1913021.pdf obtained on January the 8th, 2015.
34. Owlia, M.S., & Aspinwall, E. M. (1996) Quality in higher education-A survey, Total Quality Management, 7(2),161-171.
35. Özer, M., Gür, B. S., & Küçükcan, T. (2010). Yükseköğretimde kalite güvencesi. Ankara: SETA Publications.
36. Palli, J., & Mamilla, R. (2012). Students' opinions of service quality in the field of higher education. Creative Education, 3(4), 430-438.
37. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50.
38. Rehber, E. (2007), Dünyada değişen yükseköğretim ve kalite anlayışı. İçinde Coşkun Can Aktan (Ed.), Değişim çağında yükseköğretim. (ss.211-243). İzmir: Yaşar Üniversitesi Yayınları.
39. Saad, B. (2013). Students’ perceptions of higher education quality at Notre Dame University-Louaize in Lebanon. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Saint Louis University, Missouri.
40. Sandmaung, M., & Khang, D. B. (2013). Quality expectations in Thai higher education institutions: Multiple stakeholder perspectives. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(3), 260-281.
41. Sarrico, C. S., Rosa, M. J., Teixeira, P. N., & Cardoso, M. F. (2010). Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: Worlds apart or complementary views? Minerva, 48(1), 35-54.
42. Srikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. (2003). Developing alternative perspectives for quality in higher education, International Journal of Educational Management, 17(3), 126-136.
43. Stukalina, Y. (2010). Using quality management procedures in education: Managing the learner‐centered educational environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), 75-93.
44. UNESCO. (2003). Synthesis report on trends and developments in higher education since the World Conference on Higher Education (1998-2003). http://www.unesco.org/ulis/cgi-bin/ulis.pl?catno=145529&set=00558BCFF0_1_401&gp=1&lin=1&ll=1 obtained on January the 8th, 2015.
45. Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. http://www.mcrel.org/products-and-services/products/product-listing/01_99/product-82 obtained on January the 8th, 2015.
46. Wittek, L., & Kvernbekk, T. (2011). On the problems of asking for a definition of quality in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55(6), 671-684.
47. World Bank. (1998). World development report. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org /handle/10986/5981 obtained on January the 8th, 2015.
48. Yamchuti, U. (2002). Factors influencing academic achievement of business administration department students in Thai private higher education institutions. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). İllionis State University, İllionis.
49. Yüksel, Y. D. (2011). Kalite ve kaliteli üniversite kavramlarına ilişkin üniversite öğrencilerinin algıları (Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Örneği). (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
50. Zineldin, M., Akdag, H. C., & Vasicheva, V. (2011). Assessing quality in higher education: New criteria for evaluating students’ satisfaction. Quality in Higher Education, 17(2), 231-243.
51. Zou, Y., Du, X., & Rasmussen, P. (2012). Quality of higher education: Organisational or educational? A content analysis of Chinese university self-evaluation reports. Quality in Higher Education, 18(2), 169-184.