TÜRKİYE’NİN KÜRESEL FİNANSAL KRİZE MAKRO EKONOMİK TEPKİSİ: AMPİRİK BİR UYGULAMA

Öz

2008 yılı son çeyreğinde hemen tüm dünyayı etkisi altına alan küresel finans krizi, uluslararası piyasalarda ciddi bir durgunluğa neden olmuştur. Krizin etkileri krizin baş gösterdiği Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD) başta olmak üzere birçok gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkede olduğu gibi Türkiye’de de hissedilmiştir. Bu çalışmada 2008 küresel finans krizinin Türkiye’ye yansımaları makro iktisadi bir bakış açısı ile ele alınmıştır. Bu bağlamda, öncelikle kamu ve özel sektörün dış borç stoku, borsa endeksi, döviz kuru, Brent petrol fiyatı, ithalat, ihracat, cari işlemler dengesi, kısa ve uzun vadeli yabancı sermaye yatırımları ve GSYH büyümesinin gelişimi incelenmiştir. Ardından da, Borsa İstanbul Ulusal 100 endeksi (bist), faiz oranı (faiz), ihracat (ihr) ve Amerikan Doları (usd) göstergelerinin ekonomik büyüme (gdp) ile etkileşimi ampirik analizler ile sorgulanmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre, Borsa İstanbul Ulusal 100 endeksi orta ve uzun dönemde, faiz oranı kısa ve orta dönemde, ihracat ise orta ve uzun dönemde ekonomik büyümeye neden olmaktadır. Ekonomik büyüme ise, kısa dönemde ihracatın nedenidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Küresel Finans Krizi,Türkiye Ekonomisi,Lee-Strazicich,Frequency Domain Nedensellik Testi

THE MACROECONOMIC REACTION OF TURKEY TO GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: AN EMPIRICAL APPLICATION

Öz

Global financial crisis has been affected the whole world in the last quarter of 2008, has led to a severe recession in the international markets. Crisis effects started in the USA and has affected many developed and developing countries, including Turkey. In this study, the effects of 2008 global financial crisis on Turkey were examined with macro- economic respects. In this context, primarily the public and private sector external debt stock, stock indexes, foreign exchange, Brent oil prices, imports, exports, current account balance, short-and long -term foreign capital investment and GDP growth are analyzed. Then, examined the interaction between Istanbul Stock Exchange National 100 Index (bist), interest rates (faiz), export (ihr) and U.S. Dollars (usd) indicators with economic growth (gdp) via empirical methods. According to the findings of the study, Istanbul Stock Exchange National 100 index in the medium and long-term, interest rates in the short and medium term, exports in the medium and long-term causes on the economic growth. In addition to these findings, economic growth cause export in the short term.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Global Financial Crisis,Turkish Economy,Lee-Strazicich,Frequency Domain Casuality Test

Kaynakça

1. Berkmen, P., Gelos, G., Rennhack, R., Walsh, J.P., (2012), The global financial crisis: explaining cross-country differences in the output impact, J. Int. Money Finance 31 (1), 42–59.
2. Breitung, J. Candelon B. (2001), Testing for Short and Long Run Causality: The Case of the Yield Spread and Economic Growth, Discussion Papers 96, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
3. Breitung, J. Candelon B. (2006), Testing for Short and Long-Run Causality: A Frequency Domain Approach, Journal of Econometrics, 132, 363−378.
4. Cecchetti, S., King, M., Yetman, J., (2011), Weathering the Financial Crisis: Good Policy or Good Luck?. BISWorking Papers, No. 351.
5. Cheung, Yin-Wong, Kon S. Lai (1995), Lag Order and Critical Values of the Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test, American Statistical Association, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13(3), 277-280.
6. Dickey, David .A., Wayne A. Fuller, (1979), Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.
7. Dufour, J. M., Renault E. (1998), Short Run and Long Run Causality in Time Series: Theory, Econometrica, Econometric Society, 66(5), 1099-1126.
8. Energy Information Administration, www.eia.gov, Erişim: 01.09.2016.

9. Frankel, J.A., Saravelos, G., (2012), Can leading indicators assess country vulnerability? Evidence from the 2008–09 global financial crisis. J. Int. Econ. 87 (2), 216–231.
10. Geweke J. (1982), Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series, Journal of American Statistical Association, 77, 304–313.
11. Giannone, D., Lenza, M., Reichlin, L., (2011), Market freedom and the global recession. IMF Econ. Rev. 59, 111–135.
12. Glynn J, Perera N, Verma R, (2007), Unit Root Tests and Structural Breaks: A Survey with Applications, Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 63-79.
13. Hosaya Y. (1991), The Decomposition and Measurement of the Interdependence between Second-Order Stationary Process, Probability Theoryand Related Fields, 88, 429-444.
14. Jordà, O., Schularick, M., Taylor, A.M., (2011), Financial crises, credit booms, and external imbalances: 140 years of lessons. IMF Econ. Rev. 59 (2), 340–378.
15. Lane, P.R., Milesi-Ferretti, G.M., (2011), The cross-country incidence of the global crisis, IMF Econ. Rev. 59, 11–110.
16. Lee, J, Strazicich M.C., (2003), Minimum LM Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks, Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, 1082-1089.
17. Lee, J, Strazicich M.C., (2004), Minimum LM Unit Root Test with One Structural Breaks, Appalachain State University, Department of Economics, Working Paper.
18. Lumsdaine R. L., Papell D.H. (1997), Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit Root Hypothesis, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212-218.
19. Mian, A., Sufi, A., 2011. House prices, home equity-based borrowing, and the US household leverage crisis,. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 2132–2156.
20. Narayan, P.K, Smyth R, (2005), Electricity Consumption Employment and Real Income in Australia Evidence from Multivariate Granger Causality Tests, Energy Policy, 33, 1109-1116.
21. Perron P. (1989), The Great Crash the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis, Econometrica, 57(6), 1361-1401.
22. Rose, A.K., Spiegel, M.M., (2009), Cross-country Causes and Consequences of the 2008 Crisis: EarlyWarning. NBER Working Paper,15358.
23. Sevüktekin, M., & Nargeleçekenler. M. (2010). Ekonometrik Zaman Serileri Analizi Eviews Uygulamalı, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
24. Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası (TCMB), Elektronik veri tabanı, evds.tcmb.gov.tr, Erişim: 01.09.2016.
25. Waheed, M, Alam T, Ghauri S.P. (2006), Structural Breaks and unit Root: Evidence from Pakistani Macroeconomic Time Series, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Paper No. 1797, 1-18.
26. Yavuz, N.Ç. (2006), Türkiye’de Turizm Gelirlerinin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisinin Testi: Yapısal Kırılma ve Nedensellik Analizi, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(2), 162-171.
27. Yılancı V. (2009), Yapısal Kırılmalar Altında Türkiye için İşsizlik Histerisinin Sınanması, Doğuş üniversitesi Dergisi, 10(2), 324-335.
28. Yıldırım S., Yıldırım Z. (2012), Reel Efektif Döviz Kuru Üzeinde Kırılmalı Birim Kök Testleri ile Türkiye için Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi Hipotezinin Geçerliliğinin Sınanması, Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 33(2), 221-238.
29. Zivot E, Andrews D. W. K. (1992), Further Evidence on the Great Crash the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.