Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ESTABLİSHMENT OF THE URBAN COMPETITIVENESS INDEX WITH THE ECONOPHYSICS APPROACH

Yıl 2018, , 549 - 560, 15.04.2018
https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.344601

Öz











Many economic
methods have been used for the analysis of urban economic problems. Nowadays, a
different approach, the econophysic method and the laws that constitute the
bases of physics, will be valid in the economy. Urban competitiveness index was
established by considering the parameters that are important for urban
competitiveness. However, it is seen that urban population density among these
parameters is not effective in urban economy and accordingly urban
competitiveness index. In this study, it was aimed to eliminate the uncertainty
and imbalance of urban competitiveness indexes created by the econophysic approach
and by using statistical physics method, which is one of the theories of
econophysic, tangible results were obtained for future periods in the urban
economy. This study shows that the uncertainty and the diminution of the
imbalance in the economy of the cities will be stronger than other cities.

Kaynakça

  • Arouri, M. H., Youssef, A.B., Viet, C., & Soucat, A. (2014). Effects of Urbanization on Economic Growth and Human Capital Formation in Africa. HAL archives-ouvertes, 1-22
  • Bruneckiene, J., Guzaivicius, A., & Cincikaite, R. (2010). Measurement of Urban Competitiveness in Lithuania. Engineering Economics, 21(5), 493-508.
  • Du, Q., Wang, Y., Ren, F., Zhao, Z., Liu, H., Wu, C., Li, L., & Shen, Y. (2014) Measuring and Analysis of Urban Competitiveness of Chinese Provincial Capitals in 2010 under the Constraints of Major Function-Oriented Zoning Utilizing Spatial Analysis. Sustainability. 6, 3374-3399.
  • Egger, P. (2002). The Economic View on the Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potential. The World Economy. 25(2), 297-312
  • Gallegati, M., Keen, S., Lux, T. & Ormerod, P. (2006). Worrying trends in econophysics, Physica A 370, 1–6. 

  • Hajkova, V. & Hajek, P. (2014). The efficiency of Knowledge Bases in Urban Population and Economic Growth-Evidence from European Cities. Cities, 40, 11-22
  • Keen, S. (2003). Standing on the toes of pygmies: why econophysics must be careful of the economic foundations on which it builds, Physica A. 324, 108-116.
  • Mantegna, R.N. & Stanley, H.E. (2000). An Introduction to Econophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Matyas, L. (2003). The Gravity Model: Some Econometric Considerations. The World Economy. 21(3), 397-401
  • Pengfei, N. & Kresl, P.K., (2014). Global Urban Competitiveness Report (2011-2012). Research Report Series, 1-38
  • Pengfei, N. & Qinghu, H., (2006). Comparative Research on the Urban Competitiveness. Chinese Academy for Social Science.
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009). Which are the largest city economies in the world and how might this change by 2025? UK Economic Outlook.
  • Sarker, S., Khan, A. & Mannan, M.M. (2016). Urban Population and Economic Growth: South Asia Perspective. European Journal of Government and Economics, 5(1), 64-75.
  • Schinckus, C. (2009). Economic uncertainty and econophysics. Physica A, 388, 4415-4423
  • Shalizi, R. (2007). Why, oh why, can't we have better econophysics? Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan.
  • Stanley, H., Amaral, L., Gopikrishnan, P., Lee, Y. & Liu, Y. (1999). Econophysics: Can physicists contribute to the science of economics? Physica A 269, 156–169. 

  • Viorica, E.D. (2012). Econometric Estimation of a Gravity Model for the External Trade of Romania. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business & Economics, 1-9.
  • Webster, D. & Muller, L. (2000). Urban Competitiveness Assessment in Developing Country Urban Regions: The Rod Forward. The World Bank, Washington D.C.

EKONOFİZİK YAKLAŞIMI İLE KENTSEL REKABETÇİLİK İNDEKSİNİN OLUŞTURULMASI

Yıl 2018, , 549 - 560, 15.04.2018
https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.344601

Öz

Kentsel ekonomi problemlerinin
analizi için birçok ekonomik metotlar kullanılmıştır. Ancak günümüzde daha
farklı bir yaklaşım olan ekonofizik metodu ile fiziğin temellerini oluşturan
yasaların ekonomide de geçerli olacağı, yapılan bilimsel araştırmalar sonucu
somut bir şekilde ortaya konulmuştur. 
Kentsel rekabetçilik için önemli olan parametreler dikkate alınarak
kentsel rekabetçilik indeksi oluşturulmuştur. Ancak bu parametreler arasında
yer alan kent popülasyon yoğunluğunun kent ekonomisinde ve buna bağlı olarak
kentsel rekabetçilik indeksinde etkili olmadığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada,
ekonofizik yaklaşımı ile oluşturulan kentsel rekabetçilik indekslerinin kent
ekonomilerinde olan belirsizliğin ve dengesizliğin giderilmesi amaçlanmış olup,
ekonofiziğin kuramlarından olan istatistiksel fizik yöntemiyle sayısal veriler
kullanılarak kent ekonomisinde gelecek dönemler için somut bir sonuç elde
edilmiştir. Kentlerin ekonomisinde belirsizliğin ve dengesizliğin azalmasıyla,
diğer kentler ile rekabette daha güçlü olacakları bu çalışma ile ortaya
konulmuştur. 

Kaynakça

  • Arouri, M. H., Youssef, A.B., Viet, C., & Soucat, A. (2014). Effects of Urbanization on Economic Growth and Human Capital Formation in Africa. HAL archives-ouvertes, 1-22
  • Bruneckiene, J., Guzaivicius, A., & Cincikaite, R. (2010). Measurement of Urban Competitiveness in Lithuania. Engineering Economics, 21(5), 493-508.
  • Du, Q., Wang, Y., Ren, F., Zhao, Z., Liu, H., Wu, C., Li, L., & Shen, Y. (2014) Measuring and Analysis of Urban Competitiveness of Chinese Provincial Capitals in 2010 under the Constraints of Major Function-Oriented Zoning Utilizing Spatial Analysis. Sustainability. 6, 3374-3399.
  • Egger, P. (2002). The Economic View on the Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potential. The World Economy. 25(2), 297-312
  • Gallegati, M., Keen, S., Lux, T. & Ormerod, P. (2006). Worrying trends in econophysics, Physica A 370, 1–6. 

  • Hajkova, V. & Hajek, P. (2014). The efficiency of Knowledge Bases in Urban Population and Economic Growth-Evidence from European Cities. Cities, 40, 11-22
  • Keen, S. (2003). Standing on the toes of pygmies: why econophysics must be careful of the economic foundations on which it builds, Physica A. 324, 108-116.
  • Mantegna, R.N. & Stanley, H.E. (2000). An Introduction to Econophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Matyas, L. (2003). The Gravity Model: Some Econometric Considerations. The World Economy. 21(3), 397-401
  • Pengfei, N. & Kresl, P.K., (2014). Global Urban Competitiveness Report (2011-2012). Research Report Series, 1-38
  • Pengfei, N. & Qinghu, H., (2006). Comparative Research on the Urban Competitiveness. Chinese Academy for Social Science.
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009). Which are the largest city economies in the world and how might this change by 2025? UK Economic Outlook.
  • Sarker, S., Khan, A. & Mannan, M.M. (2016). Urban Population and Economic Growth: South Asia Perspective. European Journal of Government and Economics, 5(1), 64-75.
  • Schinckus, C. (2009). Economic uncertainty and econophysics. Physica A, 388, 4415-4423
  • Shalizi, R. (2007). Why, oh why, can't we have better econophysics? Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan.
  • Stanley, H., Amaral, L., Gopikrishnan, P., Lee, Y. & Liu, Y. (1999). Econophysics: Can physicists contribute to the science of economics? Physica A 269, 156–169. 

  • Viorica, E.D. (2012). Econometric Estimation of a Gravity Model for the External Trade of Romania. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business & Economics, 1-9.
  • Webster, D. & Muller, L. (2000). Urban Competitiveness Assessment in Developing Country Urban Regions: The Rod Forward. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Cem Çağri Donmez 0000-0003-3289-7134

Abdulkadir Atalan 0000-0003-0924-3685

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Nisan 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 16 Ekim 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018

Kaynak Göster

APA Donmez, C. Ç., & Atalan, A. (2018). EKONOFİZİK YAKLAŞIMI İLE KENTSEL REKABETÇİLİK İNDEKSİNİN OLUŞTURULMASI. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(66), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.344601

   21765     

Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Electronic Journal of Social Sciences), Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

ESBD Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Electronic Journal of Social Sciences), Türk Patent ve Marka Kurumu tarafından tescil edilmiştir. Marka No:2011/119849.