REGIONAL TALENT MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COOPERATION: A MODEL PROPOSAL

Öz

Qualified human resources and management of the human resource stand out as critical values in terms of the country’s economy and future in the age digital transformation and they are also important within university-industry cooperation and social contribution responsibilities which are both on the agenda of Turkish Republic Presidential Human Resources Office and universities. The expression of “qualified human resources” frequently expressed by those working in fields such as labor and employment is the basis of a country’s struggle for existence rather than competition. This study holds the potential to improve its success by supporting the application of yetenekkapisi.org implemented by Turkish Republic Presidential Human Resources Office and bringing student and graduate candidates with employers and universities together. It also introduces the regional talent management application model developed in the context of university-industry cooperation within the framework of talent management literature in human resources. Therefore, the study aims to present a permanent, sustainable model proposal integrating the practice with the scientific theoretical infrastructure that focuses on developing the strategy of regional development and assessment of competencies. It is proposed to develop the strategic management plan for developing and assessing regional competencies, as well as to attract, identify, develop and retain the skills needed by the region through the developed model. In the first part of the study, talent management, talent management process, applications and tools are explained within the historical development process, and in the second part the developed regional talent management implementation model is presented. The last part of the study includes suggestions for future studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Higher education
• Model Proposal
• Strategic talent management
• University-industry cooperation

Kaynakça

1. Ahat, K. (2018). Stratejik Şirket Birleşmeleri. Ankara: Sage.
2. Akar, F. (2015). Yetenek Yönetimi. Ankara: İmge Kitapevi.
3. Akar, F. (2012). Yetenek Yönetiminin Bazı Türk Üniversitelerinde Uygulanmasına İlişkin Öğretim Üyelerinin Görüş ve Önerileri. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
4. Akar, F. (2019). Üniversitede Akademisyen ve Yönetici Yetenekleri: Yetenek Yönetiminin Uygulanabilirliği Konusunda Bir İnceleme. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi - Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2), 514-541.
5. Aker, S. (2008). Yetenek Yönetimi: Yetenek Yönetilir mi? T. Solmuş (Ed.), İş ve Özel Yaşama Psikolojik Bakışlar (s. 15-24). İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınevi.
6. Alayoğlu, N. (2010). İnsan Kaynakları Yönetiminde Yeni Dönem: Yetenek Yönetimi. Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 68-97.
7. Altunoğlu, A. E., Atay, H., & Terlemez, B. (2015). İnsan Kaynakları Bakış Açısından Yetenek Yönetimi: Bankacılık Sektörü Uygulama Örneği. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B. Dergisi, 37(1), 47-70.
8. Atlı, D. (2012). Yetenek Yönetimi – İnsan Kaynakları Yönetiminin Yeni Vizyonu. İstanbul: Crea Yayıncılık.

9. Baltaş, A. (2017). Yöneticilere Koçluk. 01 Nisan 2020 tarihinde https://www.baltasgrubu.com/secilmis-yazilar/yoneticilere-kocluk.html adresinden erişildi.
10. Bersin, J. (2006). Why Talent Management is Key to Business-Focused Learning, Chief Learning Officer, 5(10), 17-18.
11. Blackman, C., & Segal, N. (1991). Access to skills and knowledge: Managing the relationships with higher education institutions. Technology Analysis ve Strategic Management, 3(3), 297-303.
12. Caloghirou, Y., Tsakanika, A., & Vonortas, N. S. (2001). University-industry cooperation in the context of the European framework programmes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 153-161.
13. Chambers, E. G., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., & Michaels, E. (1998). The war for talent. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 44-57.
14. Collings, D. G. (2014). Integrating global mobility and global talent management: Exploring the challenges and strategic opportunities. Journal of World Business, 49, 253–261.
15. Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic Talent Management: A Review and Research Agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304-313.
16. Deloitte (2011). Deloitte 2011 Annual Review. 01 Nisan 2020 tarihinde https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/gx-deloitte-2011-gir-annual-report.pdf adresinden erişildi.
17. Dulupçu, M. A., & Sungur, O. (2018). Üniversitelerin Misyon Farklılaşması: Bölgesel Kalkınmayı Yeniden Düşünmek, YÖK Yüksek Öğretim Dergisi, 7, 11-16.
18. Fang, L. F., & Devos, P. (2008). Talent management: Art or science: The invisible mechanism between talent and talent factory. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Kalmar, Sweden.
19. Faulkner, W., & Senker, J. (1994). Making sense of diversity: Public-private sector research linkage in three technologies. Research Policy, 23(6), 673-695.
20. Frank, A., Meyer-Guckel, V., & Schneider, C. (2007). Innovationsfaktor Kooperation: Bericht des Stifterverbandes zur Zusammenarbeit zwischen Unternehmen und Hochschulen. Essen: Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft.
21. Garrow, V., & Hirsh, W. (2008). Talent management: Issues of focus and fit. Public Personnel Management, 37(4), 389-402.
22. Goddard , J., & Vallance, P. (2013). The University and the City – Regions and Cities, Regional Studies Association. New York: Routledge.
23. Green, F. (2006). Demanding Work: The paradox of job quality in the affluent economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24. Gündüzalp, S., & Özan M. B. (2018). Yetenek savaşlarından yetenek yönetimine. Journal of Anatolian Education Research (JAER), 2, 14-46.
25. Keleş, H. N. (2011). Y Kuşağı Çalışanlarının Motivasyon Profillerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 129-139.
26. Kermally, S. (2004). Developing and managing talent. London: Thorogood Publishing.
27. KOP (2020). Hedeflenen KOP Bölgesi. 01 Nisan 2020 tarihinde http://www.kop.gov.tr/sayfalar/hedeflenen-kop-bolgesi/62 adresinden erişildi.
28. Koyuncuoğlu, Ö., & Tekin, M. (2019). Türkiye’de Girişimci ve Yenilikçi Üniversitelerin Gömülü Teoriye Göre Değerlendirmesi ve Bir Model Önerisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 41, 16-31.
29. Larsen, M. T. (2011). The implications of academic enterprise for public science: An overview of the empirical evidence. Research Policy, 40(1), 6-19.
30. Lang, H. (2013). Forschungskooperationen zwischen Universitäten und Industrie: Kooperationsentscheidung und Performance Management. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
31. Lee, Y. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 111–133.
32. Leys, J. C. (2005). Cours de gestion des ressources humaines (G.R.H.). Presse Universitaire, UMH, Mons.
33. Li, F. F., & Devos, P. (2008). Talent management: Art or science: The invisible mechanism between talent and talent factory. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Kalmar, Sweden.
34. McCauley, C., & Wakefield, M. (2006). Talent management in the 21st century: Help your company find, and keep its strongest workers. Journel for Quality ve Participation, 29(4), 4-7.
35. Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields, Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851.
36. Musaoğlu, N., Özatlı, İ., Evren, S., & Özden, S. (2017). Girişimci Üniversite’ Bağlamında Kırklareli Üniversitesi Kariyer Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi’nin Bölgesel Kalkınmaya Potansiyel Katkıları. E. Nişancı, Ü. İzmen, & S. H. Bostancı (Eds.), Trakya Üniversiteler Birliği Trakya Bölgesinde Üniversitelerin Bölgesel Kalkınmaya Etkisi (pp. 63-80).
37. Ortiz, A. (2013). Kooperation zwischen Unternehmen und Universitäten: Eine Managementperspektive zu regionalen Innovationssystemen. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
38. Perkmann, M., Neely, A., & Walsh, K. (2011). How should firms evaluate success in university-industry alliances? A performance measurement system. R ve D Management, 41(2), 202–216.
39. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
40. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280.
41. Rothwell, W. J. (2005). Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within (3rd ed.). USA: Amacom Books. Sart, G. (2013). Üniversitelerde Yetenek Yönetimi ve Liderlik için Kariyer Ofislerinin Önemi. Marmara Üniversitesi 8. Ulusal Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi, 07-09 Kasım 2013, İstanbul, 484-485.
42. Schmoch, U. (1999). Interaction of universities and industrial enterprises in Germany and the United States – A comparison. Industry and Innovation, 6(1), 51–68.
43. Schuler, R., & Tarique, I. (2012). Global Talent Management Literature Review. SHRM Foundation. Shaping the future of HR. September 15th.
44. Selznick, P. (1984). Leadership in Administration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45. Sparrow, P., Hird, M., & Balain, S. (2011). Talent management: Time to question the tablets of stone. Centre for Performance-led HR White Paper 11/01. Lancaster University Management School.
46. Stewart, T. A. (1997). Entelektüel Sermaye (N. Elhüseyin, Çev.). İstanbul: Mess Yayın No: 258.
47. Tansley, C., Harris, L., Stewart, J., Turner, P., Foster, C., & Williams, H. (2006). Talent management. Understanding the dimensions change agenda. Research Report for External Body. London: CIPD.
48. Thune, T. (2006). Formation of research collaborations between universities and firms: Towards an integrated framework of tie formation motives, processes and experiences. Sandvika: Norwegian School of Management BI.
49. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı (2018). Yükseköğretim Akademik Yılı Açılış Töreninde Yaptıkları Konuşma. 01 Nisan 2020 tarihinde https://www.tccb.gov.tr/konusmalar/ 353/99365/ yuksekogretim-akademik-yili-acilis-toreninde-yaptiklari-konusma adresinden erişildi.
50. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı İnsan Kaynakları Ofisi (2018). Yükseköğretimde Yetenek Yönetimi Sistemine Geçeceğiz. 01 Nisan 2020 tarihinde https://www.cbiko.gov.tr/haberler/yuksekogretimde-yetenek-yonetimi-sistemine-gececegiz adresinden erişildi.
51. UNİKOP (2020). KOP Bölgesi Üniversiteler Birliği. 01 Nisan 2020 tarihinde http://unikop.org/sayfalar/hakkimizda/1 adresinden erişildi.
52. Woll, S. A. (2013). Organisationales Lernen in Universität-Industrie-Forschungskooperationen: Eine lerntheoretische Betrachtung von Forschungskooperationen mit Universitäten aus Industrieperspektive anhand eines Fallbeispiels aus der deutschen Automobilbranche. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
53. YEK (2018). Yetenek Kapısı. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı İnsan Kaynakları Ofisi, 01 Nisan 2020 tarihinde https://www.cbiko.gov.tr/haberler/yetenek-kapisi adresinden erişildi.