A RESEARCH ON THE ANTECEDENTS OF CONSUMER BOYCOTT BEHAVIOR: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF WORD OF MOUTH

Öz

In addition to making purchases to meet their needs, today's consumers can increase or decrease their purchasing amounts in order to support businesses whose business policies they like or, on the contrary, to penalize businesses whose business policies do not like. If consumers' evaluations about business practices are completely negative, they may stop purchasing business products. Thus, consumers are effective on business practices with their economic power. The aim of this study is to determine the determinants of consumer boycott behavior and to analyze whether word-of-mouth has a mediating effect between determinants and boycott behavior. The sample of the study consists of 418 participants living in the Marmara region. The data used in the analyzes were collected through an online survey. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to test the research model. It has been determined that consumers' perceptions of environmental value, ethical values and political efficacy thoughts have an impact on boycott behavior. It has been determined that word of mouth, which is a mediator variable, has a mediating effect of variables of environmental value perception, ethical value perception and political efficacy on boycott behavior.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Boycott,
• Environmental and Ethical Values
• Word of Mouth

TÜKETİCİ BOYKOT DAVRANIŞININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA: AĞIZDAN AĞIZA İLETİŞİMİN ARACILIK ROLÜ

Öz

Günümüz tüketicileri ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak amacıyla satın alma yapmanın yanında, işletme politikalarını beğendikleri işletmeleri desteklemek ya da aksine işletme politikalarını beğenmedikleri işletmeleri cezalandırmak amacıyla satın alma miktarlarını arttırıp azaltabilirler. Tüketicilerin işletme uygulamaları hakkındaki değerlendirmeleri tümüyle olumsuz ise işletmeye ait ürünleri satın almaktan vazgeçebilirler. Böylelikle, tüketiciler ekonomik güçleriyle işletme uygulamaları üzerinde etkili olmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı tüketici boykot davranışının belirleyicilerini tespit etmek ve ağızdan ağıza iletişimin belirleyiciler ile boykot davranışı arasında aracılık etkisinin olup olmadığını analiz etmektir. Çalışmanın örneklemi Marmara bölgesinde yaşayan 418 katılımcıdan oluşmaktadır. Analizlerde kullanılan veriler online olarak tasarlanan anket aracılığı ile toplanmıştır. Araştırma modelinin test edilmesinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (YEM) kullanılmıştır. Tüketicilerin çevresel değer algılarının, etik değer algılarının ve politik etkililik değerlendirmelerinin boykot davranışı üzerinde etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Aracı model olan ağızdan ağıza iletişimin çevresel değer algısı, etik değer algısı ve politik etkililik değişkenlerinin boykot davranışı üzerindeki etkisine aracılık ettiği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Satın Almama (Boykot)
• Çevresel ve Etik Değerler
• Ağızdan Ağıza İletişim

Kaynakça

1. Adugu, E. K. (2008). Factors Associated with Engagement in Political Consumption. Sociology, Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi. Ohio State University Columbus.
2. Aish, E. A., Mckechnie, S., Abosag, I., & Hassan, S. (2013). The mystique of macro-boycotting behaviour: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 165 171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01108.x
3. Andersen, JG, Tobiasen, M (2004) Who are these political consumers anyway? Survey evidence from Denmark. In: Micheletti, M, Follesdal, A, Stolle, D (eds) Politics, Products, and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 203–222.
4. Arndt, J. (1967). Role Of Product-Related Conversations İn the Diffusion of a New Product, Journal of Marketing Search, Sayı 4, No 3, s. 291.
5. Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer Satisfaction and Word-of-Mouth, Journal of Service Research, 1:1, 1998, 2-14.
6. Arnett, D. B., S. D. German ve S. D. Hunt (2003) The Identity Salience Model of Relationship Marketing Success: The Case of Nonprofit Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 67 (April), 89-105.
7. Auger, P., T. M. Devinney ve J. J. Louviere (2007). Using best–worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(3), 299-326.
8. Balıkçıoğlu, B., A. Koçak ve A. Özer (2007). Şiddet İçermeyen Bir Eylem Olarak Dolaylı Tüketici Boykotları, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Sayı:3, 79-100

9. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
10. Barkmann H. ve M. Micheletti (2007). Buying welfare friendly food – a case of political consumerism? Proceedings of the Nordic Consumer Policy Research Conference, Helsinky, October 3-5, 2007. 1-19
11. Belk, R.W. (1985). Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3). 265–280.
12. Berry, L. and Parasuraman, A. (1991), Marketing Services: Competing Through Quality, Free Press, New York, NY.
13. Brinkman J. (2004). Looking at consumer behavior in a moral perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 51(2): 129–141.
14. Campbell, A., G. Gurin ve W., Miller (1954). The Voter Decides. Evanston, Ill: Row Peterson.
15. Carrigan, M. ve Attalla, A. (2001), "The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase behaviour?", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 560-578.
16. Carroll, A. B. (2003). The Four Faces of Corporate Citizenship, Business and Society Review, Volume 100, Issue 1, s.1–7.
17. Chatzidakis, Andrea ve Michael S.W. Lee. 2013. Anti-Consumption as the Study of Reasons Against. Journal of Macromarketing, 33 (3): 190–203.
18. Chiu, H. K. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting consumer boycott behavior in Taiwan: Food oil incidents and the resulting crisis of brand trust. International Journal of Business and Information, 11(1).
19. Cooper-Martin, E. ve M.B. Holbrook (1993). Ethical Consumption Experiences and Ethical Space. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 1993, pp. 113–118
20. Copeland, L. (2014). Value change and political action: Postmaterialism, political consumerism, and political participation. American Politics Research, 42(2), 257–282
21. Çakır, H.Ö. (2010). Tüketici Boykotlarının Kriz İletişimi Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2. 121-136
22. Çetinkaya, Y. D. (2004). 1908 Osmanlı boykotu: bir toplumsal hareketin analizi (Vol. 161). İletişim. İstanbul
23. Dietz, T., A. Dan ve R. Shwom. (2007). Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Structural Influences. Rural Sociology. 72(2). 185-214
24. Dwyer F.R., Schurr P.H. and Oh S. (1987), “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, n.5 April, pp.11-27.
25. Elkington, J. and Hailes, J. (1988), The Green Consumer Guide, Victor Gollanz, London.
26. Ferrell O.C. ve L. Ferrell (2005). Ethics and Marketing Education. Marketing Education Review, 14 (3). 71-79.
27. Fletcher K.P. ve Peters L.D. (1997), “Trust and Direct Marketing Environments: a Consumer Perspective”, Journal of Marketing Management, n.13, pp. 523-539.
28. Friedman, M. (1985). Consumer Boycotts in the United States, 1970-1980: Contemporary Events in Historical Perspective, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 19 (1), 96-117.
29. Friedman, M. (1995). American Consumer Boycotts in Response to Rising Price. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18(1), 55-72
30. Friedman, M. (1999). Consumer Boycotts: Effecting Change Through the Marketplace and the Media. Routledge, New York.
31. Gerede, E. (1999). Tüketici Boykotu Kavramı ve Özellikleri. Pazarlama Dünyası, 13(76), 9-15.
32. Gülmez, M. ve C. Yılmaz (2009). Etnosentrik tüketicilerin yerli ürün satın alma eğilimleri üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir analiz, 14. Uluslararası Pazarlama Kongresi, Bozok Üniversitesi, 14-17 Ekim, Yozgat. 279-288
33. Hoffmann, S., ve Müller, S. (2009). Consumer boycotts due to factory relocation. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 239-247.
34. Hekimci, F. (2010). Ekonominin Yükselen Değerleri; Etik Tüketicilik ve Etik Ticaret. (Ed.: Babaoğul, Müberra; Şener, Arzu) Tüketici Yazıları(II) TÜPADEM. 47-66.
35. Hui, M.K., X. Zhao, X. Fan, ve K. Au (2004). When Does the Service Process Matter? A Test of Two Competing Theories, Journal of Consumer Research, 465-475.
36. Inglehart, R. (1981). Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American Political Science Review, 75(4), 880-900.
37. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey.
38. Ismail, H. ve M. F. A. K. Panni (2008). Consumers Perceptions on the Consumerism Issues and Their Influence on Their Purchasing Behavior: A View from Ma-laysian Food Industry, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 11(1), 43-64.
39. İslamoğlu, A.H. ve R. Altunışık (2013). Tüketici Davranışları. 4. Baskı. İstanbul: Beta.
40. Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. 5. Baskı. Ankara: Asil Yayın.
41. Kanstperger, R. ve H. W. Kunz (2010). Consumer Trust in Service Companies: A Multiple Mediating Analysis, Managing Service Quality, 20(1), 4-25.
42. Kelley, F. (1899), “Aims and Principles of the Consumers’ League.” The American Journal of Sociology 5:289–304.
43. Kitapçı, O. (2008). Restoran Hizmetlerinde Müşteri Şikâyet Davranışları: Sivas İlinde Bir Uygulama, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31, 111-120.
44. Koos, S. (2012). What drives political consumption in Europe? A multi-level analysis on individual characteristics, opportunity structures and globalization. Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1177 /0001699311431594
45. Lantz, G. ve S. Loeb (1996). Country of Origin and Ethnocentrism: An Analysis of Canadian and American Preferences Using Social Identity Theory. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 374-378
46. Micheletti, M. (2003). Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Morgan, R. M. ve S. D. Hunt (1994), “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, 58 (3): 20-38.
48. Moorman, C., G. Zaltman ve R. Desphande (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 314-328.
49. Muncy, J.A. ve S.J. Vitell (1992). Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of the Final Consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24 (4). 297-311.
50. Neilson, L. A. (2010). Boycott or buycott? Understanding political consumerism. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(3), 214-227.
51. Odabaşı, Y.( 2008). Siyasallaşan Tüketiciliğin Demokratik Denetim Gücü. Türkiye'de Siyasetin Dinamikleri Sempozyumu, Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, 4-5 Nisan. 1-12
52. Orman, S. (2009). İktisat, Ahlak ve Yönetim. İşletmelerde İş Etiği, (Ed.:Orman,Sabri; Parlak,Zeki), “İşletmelerde İş Etiği”, İto Sosyal Yayınlar, İstanbul, ss. 12-27.
53. Parıltı, N., B. K. Demirgüneş ve B. Özsaçmacı (2014). Ethical Issues in Marketing: An Application for Understandıng Ethical Decision Makıng. İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 36(2), 275-298.
54. Peattie, K., ve A. Crane (2005). Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 8 Iss: 4. 357 - 370
55. Peterson, S.A. (1990). Political behavior: Patterns in everyday life. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56. Persson, L. (2008). Ethics and Environment in the Coffee Sector – Linking CSR to the Consumer's Power in the Context of Sustainable Development, A case study of Löfbergs Lila. D-level Degree Project Honours Program in Environmental Science Karlstad University Faculty of Social and Life Sciences Department of Environment and Health, 1-81.
57. Pinkleton, B. E., N. Um ve E.W. Austin (2002). An Exploration of the Effects of Negative Political Advertising on Political Decision Making, Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 13-25.
58. Pojman, L. P. (2001). Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong. (4th edn.) Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
59. Raimondo, M. A. (2000, September). The measurement of trust in marketing studies: a review of models and methodologies. In 16th IMP-conference, Bath, UK.
60. Robin, D. P. ve R. E. Reidenbach (1987). Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gaps between Concept and Application, Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 44–58.
61. Rose, M., G. M. Rose ve A. Shoham (2009). The impact of consumer animosity on attitudes towards foreign goods: a study of Jewish and Arab Israelis, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 26 No. 5, 330-339.
62. Shimp, T. ve S. Sharma (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, Cilt 24, Sayı 8, 280-289.
63. Schoene, M. (2016). Urban continent, urban activism? European cities and social movement activism. Global Society, 31(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2016.1203295
64. Sjödin, H. (2007). Upsetting brand extensions: an enquiry into current customers’ inclination to spread negative word of mouth. Journal of Brand Management, 15/4: 258-271.
65. Stolle, D., ve Hooghe, M. (2004). Consumers as political participants? Shifts in political action repertoires in Western societies. In: Micheletti, M, Follesdal, A, Stolle, D (eds) Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 265-288.
66. Stolle, D., M. Hooghe ve M. Micheletti (2005). Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation, International Political Science Review, 26 (3), 245-269
67. Solomon, M. (2004), Consumer Behavior, 6th ed., PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
68. Sullivan, J. ve E. Riedel (2001).Efficacy: Political. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier Science Ltd. pp. 4353-4356.
69. Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways a Study of the Soiological Importance of Usages Manners Customs Mores and Morals. New York: Ginn and Company
70. Torunoğlu, E. (2013). Çevre politikaları, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
71. Uydacı, M. (2002): Yeşil Pazarlama, İş ahlakı Ve Çevresellik Açısından Yaklaşımlar, Türkmen Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2002.
72. Verhoef, P. C., P. H. Franses, ve J. C. Hoekstra (2002). The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals and number of services purchased from a multiservice provider: does age of relationship matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30(3) 202-216.
73. Walker, L. J., H. (2001). The Measurement of Word of Mouth Communication and An İnvestigation of Service Quality and Customer Commitment As Potential Antecedents, Journal Of Service Research, Vol.4, No.1, 60-75.
74. Yeniçeri, T., E. Yaraş ve A.Y. Zengin (2009). Kola markası tercihlerini tüketicilerin etnosentrik ve sosyo-psikolojik özelliklerine göre tahminleme, 14. Uluslararası Pazarlama Kongresi Bozok Üniversitesi, 14-17 Ekim, Yozgat. 266-278
75. Yılmaz, E. (1998): Çevre Korumada Alternatif Üretim: Temiz Üretim, Tübitak Bilim ve Teknik Dergisi, Sayı: Kasım.1-5. Yuksel, Ulku ve Victoria Mryteza. 2009. An Evaluation of Strategic Responses to Consumer Boycotts. Journal of Business Research, 62 (2): 248–259.
76. (http://www.haberturk.com/ekonomi/makro-ekonomi/haber/69287-pirincte-boykot-tuttu). 22 Nisan 2008 tarihindeki habere 23.04.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
77. (https://www.zmescience.com/science/nestle-company-pollution-children/) 28 Ocak 2020 tarihindeki habere 23.04.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
78. http://www.tdk.gov.tr adresinden 10.10.2016 tarihinde erişilmiştir.