BİR OPTİMAL PARASAL POLİTİKA İLKESİ OLARAK FRIEDMAN KURALI

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

BİR OPTİMAL PARASAL POLİTİKA İLKESİ OLARAK FRIEDMAN KURALI

Öz

Friedman kuralı (Friedman Rule, FR) son dönemde para politikası teorik tartışmalarının merkezine oturmuştur. Sıfır nominal faiz oranı ile zaman tercih oranında bir deflasyon olarak tanımlanan FR’nin kırkıncı yılına yaklaşırken yeniden gündeme gelmesinin altında önemli ölçüde dünyada enflasyon hedeflemesinin giderek yaygınlaşması ve görünürde FR’ye aykırı biçimde düşük ve pozitif düzeyde enflasyon oranlarının seçilmiş olması bulunmaktadır. Bu durum iki nedenle FR üzerinde yeniden durmayı gerektirmektedir. Birincisi, FR’nin gerçek anlamı ve koşulları belirlenmelidir. İkincisi enflasyon oranı yönünden FR’den sapma veri iken bu farklılığın teorik açıklaması bulunmalıdır. Bu makalede konunun ilk kısmıyla ilgilenilmektedir. Paranın rolünün alternatif modelleme biçimlerinin yer aldığı tam rekabetçi modellerde FR araştırılmaktadır. Makalede, FR’nin orijinal olarak aynı karar dengeye ait bir sonuç olduğu, Friedman’ın kendisinin aynı karar dışında enflasyon oranının pozitif olabileceğini reddetmediği, Friedman (1969)’dan sonra yapılan çalışmalarda aynı karar dışında FR’nin sınırlı koşullarda optimal bulunduğunun gösterildiği genel sonuçlarına ulaşılmaktadır. Dolayısıyla, teori gerçekle özünde bir çatışma içinde değildir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Optimal parasal politika, Friedman kuralı, enflasyon vergisi, paranın rolünün alternatif modelleme biçimleri

Kaynakça

1. ARUOBA, Borağan ve CHUGH, Sanjay K (2006), “Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy When Money is Essential”, www.econ.umd.edu~aruoba/papers/AC_WP_092606.pdf
2. ATKINSON, Anthony B. ve STIGLITZ, Joseph E. (1972), “The Structure of Indirect Taxation and Economic Efficiency”, Journal of Public Economics, 1, 97-119.
3. BARRO, Robert J. (1979), “On the Determination of the Public Debt”, Journal of Political Economy, 67, 940-947.
4. BEWLEY, Thomas (1980), “The Optimum Quantity of Money”, J. H. Kareken ve N. Wallece (ed) Models Of Monetary Economies içinde, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 169-210.
5. CHARI, Varadarajan V., CHRISTIANO, Lawrance J. ve KEHOE, Patrick J. (1991), “Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy: Some Resent Results”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, c. 23, no. 2, s: 519-539.
6. CHARI, Varadarajan V., CHRISTIANO, Lawrance J. ve KEHOE, Patrick J. (1993), “Optimality of the Friedman Rule in Economics with Distorting Taxes”, NBER Working Paper, no. 4443.
7. CHARI, Varadarajan V. ve KEHOE, Patrick J. (2006), “Modern Macroeconomics in Practice: How Theory is Shaping Policy”, NBER Working Paper, no.12476.
8. CHARI, Varadarajan V. ve KEHOE, Patrick J. (1999), “Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy”, Handbook of Macroeconomics, c. 1, J. B. Taylor ve M. Woodford (Der.), s: 1615-1669.

9. COLE, Harold L. ve KOCHERLAKOTA, Narayana (1998), “Zero Nominal Interest Rates: Why They’re Good and How to Get Them”, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 22 (2), 2-10.
10. CORREIA, Isabel., NICOLINI, Juan Pablo ve TELES, Pedro (2004), “Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy: Equivalence Results”, http://cep.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/19-10-04-TEL.pdf.
11. CORREIA, Isabel. ve TELES, Pedro (1996), “Is the Friedman Rule Optimal When Money is an Intermediate Goods?”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 38, 223-244.
12. CORREIA, Isabel ve TELES, Pedro (1997), “The Optimal Inflation Tax”, Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics and Federal Reserve Bank Of Minneapolis, Discussion Paper no. 123.
13. DA COSTA, Carlos ve WERNING, Ivan (2003), “On the Optimality of the Friedman Rule with Heterogeneous Agents and Non-linear Income Taxation”, www.MIT.edu. (15.11.2006).
14. DE FIORE, Fiorella ve TELES, Pedro (2003), “The Optimal Mix of Taxes on Money, Consumption and Income”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50 (4), 871-887.
15. DIAMOND, Peter ve MIRRLEES, James A. (1971), “Optimal Taxation and Public Production I: Production Efficiency”, American Economic Review, 61 (1), 8-27.
16. FRIEDMAN, Milton (1969), The Optimum Quantity of Money, Adline Publishing Company, Chicago.
17. FRIEDMAN, Milton (1971), “Government Revenue from Inflation”, Journal of Political Economy, 79, 846-856.
18. GOODFRIEND, Martin ve KING, Robert G. (2000), “The Case for Price Stability”, The First ECB Central Banking Conference, Why Price Stability?, Frankfurt, Novenber, 2000, 53-94.
19. HEAD, Allen ve KUMAR, Alok (2005), “Price Dispersion, Inflation and Welfare”, International Economic Review, 46 (2), 533-572.
20. IRELAND, Peter N. (2002), “Implementing the Friedman Rule”, NBER Working paper, no.8821.
21. KIMBROUGH, Kent P. (1986a), “The Optimum Quantity of Money Rule in the Theory of Public Finance”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 18, 277-284.
22. KIMBROUGH, Kent P. (1986b), “Inflation, Employment, and Welfare in the Presence of Transactions Costs”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 18 (2), 127-140.
23. KIYOTAKI, Nobuhiro ve WRIGHT, Randall (1989a), “A Contribution to the Pure Theory of Money”, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report, 123.
24. KIYOTAKI, Nobuhiro ve WRIGHT, Randall (1989b), “On Money as a Medium of Exchange”, The Journal of Political Economy, 97 (4), 927-954.
25. KIYOTAKI, Nobuhiro ve WRIGHT, Randall (1990), “Search for a Theory of Money”, NBER Working Paper, no.3482.
26. KIYOTAKI, Nobuhiro ve WRIGHT, Randall (1993), “A Search-Theoretic Approach to Monetary Economics”, American Economic Review, 83 (1), 63-77.
27. KOCHERLAKOTA, Narayana R. (2005a), “Optimal Monetary Policy: What we Know and What should we don’t Know”, International Economic Review, c. 46, no. 2, 2:715-729.
28. KOCHERLAKOTA, Narayana R. (2005b), “Advances in Dynamic Optimal Taxation”, Advances in Economics www.econ.umn.edu/~nkocher/london3.pdf Theory and Applications, Night World Congress Paper, I,
29. KYDLAND, Finn E. ve PRESCOTT, Edward C. (1977), “Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans”, Journal of Political Economy, 85 (3), 473-492.
30. KYDLAND, Finn E. ve PRESCOTT, Edward C. (1982), “Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations”, Econometrica, 50, 1345-1370.
31. LAGOS, Ricardo ve WRIGHT, Randall (2005), “A Unified Framework for Monetary Theory and Policy Analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, 113 (3), 463-484..
32. LUCAS, Robert E. (1976), “Economic Policy Evaluation: A Critique”, Carnegie-Rochester Conferences on Public Policy, 1, 19-46.
33. LUCAS, Robert E. (1986), “Principles of Fiscal and Monetary Policy”, Journal of Monetary Economics,17, 117-134.
34. LUCAS, Robert E. (2000), “Inflation and Welfare”, Econometrica, 68 (2), 247-274.
35. LUCAS, Robert E. ve STOKEY, Nancy L. (1983), “Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy in an Economy without Capital”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, s.55-93.
36. MIRRLEES , James A. (1971), “An Exploration in the Theory o Optimum Income Taxation”, The Review of Economic Studies, 38 (2), 175-208.
37. MISHKIN, Frederic S. (2007) “Will Monetary Policy Become More of a Sciences?” NBER Working Paper, no. 13566.
38. MORGİL, Orhan (1983) “Parasal Büyüme Modelleri ve Para Politikası”, H. Ü. İİBF Yayınları No.1, Ankara.
39. MULLIGAN, Casey B. ve SALA-I-MARTIN, Xavier X. (1997), “The Optimum Quantity of Money: Theory and Evidence”, NBER Working Paper, no. 5954.
40. PHELPS, Edmund S. (1973), “Inflation in the Theory of Public Finance”, Swedish Journal of Economics, c. 75, s: 67-82.
41. RAMSEY, Frank P. (1927), “A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation”, The Economic Journal, 37 (145), 47-6.
42. RITTER, Moritz (2006), “Fiscal Policy and the Friedman Rule”, www.economics.utoronto.ca.
43. ROCHETEAU, Guillaume ve WRIGHT, Randall (2005), “Money in Search Equilibrium, in Competitive Equilibrium and in Competitive Search Equilibrium”, Econometrica, 73, s.175-202.
44. SHI, Shouyong, (2006), “Viewpoint: A Microfoundation of Monetary Economics”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 39 (3), 643-688.
45. TELES, Pedro (2003), “The Optimal Price of Money”, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives, 2Q, 29-39.
46. TOWNSEND, Robert M. (1980), “Models of Money with Spatially Separated Agents”, J. H. Kareken ve N. Wallece (ed) Models Of Monetary Economies içinde, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 265-303.
47. WALLACE, Neil (2001), “Whither Monetary Economics?”, International Economic Review, 42 (4), 847- 869.
48. WOODFORD, Michael (1990), “The Optimum Quantity of Money”, Handbook of Monetary Economics II, (Der.) M. Friedman ve F. H.Hahn, Elsevier Science Publishers, 1068-1149.