Yıl 2020, Cilt 19 , Sayı 74, Sayfalar 828 - 837 2020-03-23

BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ

Mustafa TEKKE [1] , Atilla YILDIZ [2]


In this study, the relationship between the intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy and self-esteem, which constitute the personality character, and the openness to the experience in the Big Five are examined. As a result of the study, it was determined that the relationship between intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy and self-esteem and openness to experience was over ()0.20.  It was seen in related field that the openness to the experience increased as the self-factors of the individuals increased. The relationship between openness to experience and self factors was investigated through systematic review / meta-analysis. At the end of the study, the studies found a positive relationship between self related factors and openness to experience. Together this, the studies were found to be compatible with each other. Future study possibilities and limitations of this study are discussed.
deneyime açıklık, benlik saygısı, özyeterlilik, içsel motivasyon, Beş Büyük
  • Adams, S.G., & Gullotta T. (1989). Adolescent Life Experiences. New York: Brooks Cole.Aghababaei, N., Błachnio, A., Arji, A., Chiniforoushan, M., Tekke, M., & Mehrabadi, A. F. (2016). Honesty–humility and the HEXACO structure of religiosity and well-being. Current Psychology, 35(3), 421-426.Aghababaei, N., Wasserman, J. A., & Hatami, J. (2014). Personality factors and attitudes toward euthanasia in Iran: Implications for end-of-life research and practice. Death Studies, 38, 91-99. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2012.731026Ashton, M., & Lee, K. (2010). Trait and source factors in HEXACO‐PI‐R self‐ and observer reports. European Journal of Personality. 24. 278 - 289. 10.1002/per.759.Bandura, A. (1994) Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4, VS Ramachaudran (Ed), New York: Academic.Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Basım, N.H., Çetin, F., & Tabak, A. (2009). Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Kişilerarası Çatışma Çözme Yaklaşımlarıyla İlişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 20- 34.Bassili, J. N. (2006). Promotion and prevention orientations in the choice to attend lectures or watch them online. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 444-455.Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational research, 64(3), 363-423.Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2008).Personality: Theory and research (10th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Clark, M.H., & Schroth, C.A. (2010). Examining Relationships Between Academic Motivation and Personality Among College Students. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 19-24.Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Coşkun, D. Y., & Demirel, M. (2012) Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 42, 108-120.
  • Decay, J., & Kenny, M.(1994). Adolescent Development. Madison: Brown- Benchmark.
  • Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum
  • Eggers, J. H. (2000). Five-factor theory of personality: A new and useful lens to explore enterpreneurial action, or another useless dead-end? Journal of Private Equity, 4(1), 59-63.Erdle, S., & Rushton, J. P. (2011). Does self-esteem or social desirability account for a general factor of personality (GFP) in the Big Five? Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 1152-1154.Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G.(1969). Personality structure and measurement. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity: 272–296. New York: Cambridge University.Hart, J., Stasson, M., M. Mahoney, J., & Story, P. (2007). The big five and achievement motivation: Exploring the relationship between personality and a two-factor model of motivation. Individual Differences Research. 5. 267-274.Hirsh, J., Deyoung, C., & Peterson, J. (2009). Metatraits of the Big Five Differentially Predict Engagement and Restraint of Behavior. Journal of personality. 77. 1085-102.Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (1985). Molivational process in cooperalive, competitive and individualistic learning siluations. İn C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.). Research on motivation in edııcalion. USA: Academic.Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big Five Personality Traits as the Predictors of Creative Self-Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity: Does Gender Matter?. The Journal of creative behavior. 47. 215-232. 10.1002/jocb.32.
  • Kelly, W., & L. Johnson, J. (2006). Time Use Efficiency and the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Education. 125, 511-514.Komarraju M., & Karau S.J. (2005). The Relationship Between The Big Five Personality Traits and Academic Motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 557-567.
  • Komarraju, M., Karau, S.J., & R. Schmeck, R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences – Learn Individ Differ. 19. 47-52. 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001.
  • Korkmaz, A. (2003). Kariyer Yönetimi ve Kariyer Planlama (Yüksek lisans tezi, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi).Lee, K., & C. Ashton, M. (2004). Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research - Multivariate Behavres. 39. 329-358.
  • McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52, 1258-1265.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 227–232.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1991). The NEO Personality Inventory: Using the five-factor model in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 367-372.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • McRae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personalities: Theoretical contexts for the fivefactor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York: Guilford.
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
  • Neff, K. D., Hseih, Y., & Dejitthirat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4, 263–287.
  • O'Neil, H. F. & Drillings, M. (1994). Motivation: Theory and Research, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Peterson, E. R., & Whiteman, M. C. (2007). ‘‘I think I can, I think I can…’’: The interrelationships among self-assessed intelligence, self-concept, self-efficacy and the personality trait intellect in university students in Scotland and New Zealand. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 959–968.Polat, S. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının çok kültürlü eğitime yönelik kişilik özellikleri (Probationary teachers’ level of inclination to multi-cultural education). International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 154-164Recepoğlu, E., & Çağatay K., A. & Şahin, F. & Er, E. (2013). Öğretim Elemanlarının Kişilik Özellikleri ile Örgütsel Bağlılık Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişki. Turkish Studies. 8. 603-617.Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. New York: Princeton University.Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classicd efinitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., Kaistaniemi, L., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1999). Self-evaluated self-esteem, peer-evaluated self-esteem, and defensive egotism as predictors of adolescents’ participation in bullying situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1268-1278.Sanchez-Cardona, I., Rodriguez-Montalbán, R., Acevedo-Soto, E., Lugo, K. N., Torres-Oquendo, F., & Toro-Alfonso, J. (2012). Self-efficacy and openness to experience as antecedent of study engagement: An exploratory analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2163-2167.Schmitt, F., & Lahroodi, R. (2008). The epistemic value of curiosity. Educational Theory. 58. 125 - 148.Sung, S. & Choi, J. (2009). Do Big Five Personality Factors Affect Individual Creativity? The Moderating Role Of Extrinsic Motivation. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 37. 10.2224/sbp.2009.37.7.941.Thoms, P., S. Moore, K., & S. Scott, K. (1996). The relationship between self-efficacy for participating in self-managed work groups and the Big Five personality dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 17. 349 - 362.Trapnell, P.D., & Campbell, J. (1999). Private Self-Consciousness and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Distinguishing Rumination from Reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 76. 284-304. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.284.Ulu, M., & Bulut, M. (2017). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kişilik Özelliklerinin Hexaco İle Ölçülmesi. Bilimname. 2, 443-463.Village, A. (2011). Outgroup prejudice, personality, and religiosity: Disentangling a complex web of relationships among adolescents in the UK. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3(4), 269–284. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D.S. (2003). Measurement error in “big five factors” personality assessment. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Score reliability-contemporary thinking on reliability issues (pp. 245-257). California: Sage Publications.Wasti, S., Lee, K., Ashton, M., & Somer, O. (2008). Six Turkish Personality Factors and the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology. 39. 665-684. 10.1177/0022022108323783.Yelboğa, A. (2006). Kişilik Özellikleri ve İş Performansı Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. İş Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 8(2), 196-211.Zeigler-Hill V., Holden C. J., Enjaian B., Southard A. C., Besser A., Li H., & Zhang Q. (2015). özyeterlilik instability and personality: The connections between feelings of self-worth and the five dimensions of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 183–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167214559719 Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 82-91.
Birincil Dil tr
Konular Psikoloji, Ortak Disiplinler
Yayımlanma Tarihi BAHAR
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0003-0412-4353
Yazar: Mustafa TEKKE (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0003-2822-2601
Yazar: Atilla YILDIZ
Kurum: DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Tarihler

Başvuru Tarihi : 12 Kasım 2019
Kabul Tarihi : 14 Şubat 2020
Yayımlanma Tarihi : 23 Mart 2020

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { esosder645766, journal = {Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi}, issn = {1304-0278}, address = {}, publisher = {Özel Akademi}, year = {2020}, volume = {19}, pages = {828 - 837}, doi = {10.17755/esosder.645766}, title = {BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ}, key = {cite}, author = {TEKKE, Mustafa and YILDIZ, Atilla} }
APA TEKKE, M , YILDIZ, A . (2020). BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , 19 (74) , 828-837 . DOI: 10.17755/esosder.645766
MLA TEKKE, M , YILDIZ, A . "BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ". Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 19 (2020 ): 828-837 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/esosder/issue/53245/645766>
Chicago TEKKE, M , YILDIZ, A . "BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ". Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 19 (2020 ): 828-837
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ AU - Mustafa TEKKE , Atilla YILDIZ Y1 - 2020 PY - 2020 N1 - doi: 10.17755/esosder.645766 DO - 10.17755/esosder.645766 T2 - Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 828 EP - 837 VL - 19 IS - 74 SN - 1304-0278- M3 - doi: 10.17755/esosder.645766 UR - https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.645766 Y2 - 2020 ER -
EndNote %0 Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ %A Mustafa TEKKE , Atilla YILDIZ %T BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ %D 2020 %J Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi %P 1304-0278- %V 19 %N 74 %R doi: 10.17755/esosder.645766 %U 10.17755/esosder.645766
ISNAD TEKKE, Mustafa , YILDIZ, Atilla . "BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ". Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 19 / 74 (Mart 2020): 828-837 . https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.645766
AMA TEKKE M , YILDIZ A . BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2020; 19(74): 828-837.
Vancouver TEKKE M , YILDIZ A . BENLİK SAYGISI, ÖZYETERLİLİK VE İÇSEL MOTİVASYON İLE DENEYİME AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: META-ANALİZ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2020; 19(74): 837-828.