The Metaphoric Perceptions Of Students That Study In Different High School Types Towards The Concept Of ‘University’

Öz

This study aims to analyse high school final year students’ views on the concept of university through metaphors. The study group was composed of 268 high school students. In the study, the students were asked to produce metaphors for the concept of university. The data were collected via a semi-structured interview form. The data were analysed with content analysis, which is one of the qualitative approach techniques. 229 valid metaphors were collected. The metaphors created were mostly in the categories of “freedom”, “guiding the future” and “informing and developing”. Besides, the categories of “freedom”, “turning point” and “life” were found to be the most frequently used metaphors. According to school type, the views of science high school students were mostly collected in the “informing and developing” category, the views of Anatolian high school students were “freedom”, and the views of Religious vocational high school students were in “instrument” category.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• High school
• student
• university
• metaphor

Farklı Lise Türlerinde Öğrenim Gören Öğrencilerin ‘Üniversite’ Kavramına Yönelik Metaforik Algıları

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı lise türlerinde öğrenim gören lise son sınıf öğrencilerinin üniversite kavramına ilişkin görüşlerinin metaforlar aracılığıyla incelenmesidir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu lise son sınıfta öğrenim gören 268 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Çalışmada öğrencilerden üniversite kavramına yönelik metaforlar üretmeleri istenmiştir. Çalışma verileri yarı-yapılandırılmış bir form aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Çalışma verileri nitel yaklaşım tekniklerinden içerik analizi ile çözümlenmiştir. Çalışmada 229 metafor üretilmiştir. Üniversite kavramının tanımlanmasında üretilen metaforların en çok “özgürlük”, “geleceğe yön veren” ve “bilgi veren ve geliştiren” kategorileri altında yer aldığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca “özgürlük”, “dönüm noktası”, “hayat” ve “gelecek” ifadeleri de en sık kullanılan metaforlar olarak göze çarpmıştır. Metaforlar okul türüne göre analiz edildiğinde; Fen Lisesi öğrencilerinin görüşlerinin çoğunlukla “bilgi veren ve geliştiren”, Anadolu Lisesi öğrencilerinin “özgürlük” ve İmam-Hatip Lisesi öğrencilerinin ise “araç” kategorilerinde yer aldığı görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Lise
• öğrenci
• üniversite
• metafor

Kaynakça

1. Akbaba-Altun, S., & Apaydın, Ç. (2013). Metaphorical perception on the concept of “education” of prospective girls and men teachers. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 19(3), 329-354.
2. Akgün E. (2016). Prospective pre-school teachers’ metaphors about the concept of “child” and “pre-school teacher”. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 1652-1672.
3. Ataman, A. B. (2008). Study of the family environment of gifted children in relation to some demographic variables perspectives: İstanbul BILSEM. Master Dissertation. Yeditepe University Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul.
4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz Ş., & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.
5. Ciğerci, C. Z. (2006). To compare selfs-esteem, being perceived by others and pyschologic indications in adolescents who are gifted or not. Master Dissertation. Sakarya University Social Sciences Institute, Sakarya.
6. Çetinsaya, G. (2014). Büyüme, kalite, uluslararasılaşma: Türkiye yükseköğretimi için bir yol haritası. Eskişehir: Yükseköğretim Kurulu.
7. Çocuk, H. E., Yokuş, G., & Tanrıseven, I. (2015). Pedagogical formation students’ self-efficacy and metaforic perceptions related to teaching profession. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 12(32), 373-387.
8. Devecioğlu, Y. (2015). Öğrencilerin gözüyle ‘yeni üniversite’ kavramı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 21(3), 319-344.

9. Dinç Altun, Z., & Uzuner, F. G. (2017). Fine arts high school students’ metaphoric perceptions for the concept of university. Journal of Education and Humanities, 8(16), 60-83.
10. Dikbıyık, C. (2016). Eyüp kız anadolu imam hatip lisesi son sınıf öğrencilerinin üniversite yönelimleri üzerine bir değerlendirme. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(33), 183-200.
11. Eraslan Çapan, B. (2010). Teacher candidates’ metaphoric perceptions of gifted students. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(12), 140-154.
12. Erickson, L. B., & Pinnegar, S. (2016). Consequences of personal teaching metaphors for teacher identity and practice. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 106-122.
13. Gültekin, M. (2017). Metaphoric perceptions of primary school teachers on the concept of curriculum. Journal of Education and Future year, 11, 51-73.
14. Günay, R., Aydın, H., & Koç Damgacı, F. (2015). Metaphoric perceptions of faculty members’ regarding multicultural education. Çankırı Karatekin University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 6(1), 291-312.
15. Hamilton, E. R. (2016). Picture This: Multimodal representations of prospective teachers' metaphors about teachers and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 33-44.
16. Karateke, T. (2020). The university tendency of the female students at the last grade at the imam hatip high school: the sample of Elazıg province. Bozok University Journal of Faculty of Theology, 17, 221-239.
17. Kasoutas, M., & Malamitsa, K. (2009). Exploring Greek teachers' beliefs using metaphors. Australasian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 64-83.
18. Kirwan, W. E. (2007). Higher education’s “accountability” imperative: How the university system of Maryland responded? Change, 39(2), 21-25.
19. Koç, E. S. (2014). The metaphorical perceptions of classroom teacher candidates regarding teacher and teaching profession concepts. İnönü University Journal of The Faculty of Education, 15(1), 47-72.
20. Koçak, R., & İçmenoğlu, E. (2012). Emotional intelligence and creativity as predictors of life satisfaction among gifted students. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(37), 73-85.
21. Korkmaz, F., & Bağçeci, B. (2013). An examination of high school students’ metaphoric perceptions on the concept of “university”. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 2(1), 187-204.
22. Korkmaz, M. (2013). The preferences process of İmam hatip schools students to this school. Erciyes Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 16, 7-40.
23. Koşar, D. (2016). The metaphorical perceptions of teacher candidates towards the concepts "university" and "Academic Staff". International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(3), 1-15.
24. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
25. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic.
26. Ministry of National Education (2017). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Ortaöğretim Kurumları Yönetmeliği.https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=18812&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5
27. Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2008). “A language teacher is like…”: Examining malaysian students’ perceptions of language teachers through metaphor analysis. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 192-205.
28. Olthouse, J. (2014). How do preservice teachers conceptualize giftedness? A metaphor analysis. Roeper Review, 36(2), 122-132.
29. Ortaş, İ. (2004). Üniversite özerkliği nedir? Üniversite ve Toplum, 4(1), 1-7.
30. Oyman, N., & Şentürk, İ. (2015). The metaphoric perceptions of teacher candidates and faculty members towards “university” concept. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 21(3), 367-394.
31. Örücü, D. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ metaphors towards school, school administrators and Turkish education system. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 20(3), 327-358.
32. Özdemir, E. (2010). Üniversiteye girişte katsayı uygulamasına ilişkin YÖK ve Danıştay kararları hakkında inceleme ve değerlendirme. http://www.tobb.org.tr/AvrupaBirligiDairesi/Dokumanlar/RaporlarYayinlar/KATSAYI_SORUNU.pdf.
33. Özdemir, S. M. (2012). Metaphoric perceptions of prospective teachers regarding the concept of curriculum. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 5(3), 369-393.
34. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri (3. baskıdan çeviri) (Çev. Ed. M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
35. Polat, S. (2011). Organizational image of Kocaeli university for university students. Education and Science, 36(160), 105-119.
36. Saban, A., Koçbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2006). An investigation of the concept of teacher among prospective teachers through metaphor analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2), 461-522.
37. Saban, A. (2008). Metaphors about school. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 55, 459-496.
38. Sakınç, S., & Bursalıoğlu, S. A. (2012). A global change in higher education: entrepreneurial university model. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2(2), 92-99.
39. Thayer-Bacon, B. J. (2000). Transforming critical thinking: Thinking constructively. New York: Teachers College.
40. Thomson, M. M. (2016). Metaphorical images of schooling: Beliefs about teaching and learning among prospective teachers from the United States displaying different motivational profiles. Educational Psychology, 36(3), 502-525.
41. TTKB (2013). İmam Hatip Lisesi haftalık ders çizelgesi. https://www.ogretmenler.com/dokumanlar/finish/734-lise/8265-imam-hatip-lisesi-ve-anadolu-imam-hatip-lisesi-9-siniflarina-ait-haftalik-ders-cizelgelerinde-degisiklik/0.html.
42. Uğurlu, Z. (2018). The metaphors teacher candidates produced concerning university notion. Journal of Contemporary Administrative Science, 5(1), 80-93.
43. UNESCO (2000). Yirmi birinci yüzyılda yükseköğretim, vizyon ve eylem (Çev. G. A. Baskan). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 6(22), 167-189.
44. Ünikampüs (2018). Yıllara göre üniversite sınavına (YGS-LYS-YKS) başvuru sayıları. https://www.unikampus.net/yillara-gore-universite-sinavina-ygs-lys-yks-basvuru-sayilari/.
45. Yob, I. M. (2003). Thinking constructively with metaphors. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22(2), 127-138.
46. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
47. Yılmaz, M. K., & Kaynak, S. (2011). The role of our university and the expectations of the local people in the socio-economic transformation process of Bayburt. Bayburt University Bulletin, 2(4), 44-47.
48. Yükseköğretim Kanunu (1981). Retrieved from http://mevzuat.basbakanlik.gov.tr/Metin.Aspx?MevzuatKod=1.5.2547&MevzuatIliski=0&sourceXmlSearch.
49. Yükseköğretim Kurumları Sınavı (YKS) (2018). 2018 YKS değerlendirme raporu. Retrieved https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2018/GENEL/YKSDegrapor06082018.pdf.