INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS' ATTENDANCE AND THE TIME SPEED IN THE COURSE IN THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT

Abstract

Concept of participation, which is defined as the presence of students in the course or following registered courses, is extremely important in distance education. It is seen that there are different factors affecting participation. Among these factors, there are elements such as teacher, teaching method, individual characteristics of students, and duration of course. It is seen that participation affects important areas such as student success, performance and dropping out of course. This study aims to determine tendencies of students who have to take courses with distance education during the pandemic period, by examining their records on online course platform. While determining general participation tendencies of students, duration of their stay in course was examined according to variables of course, department, gender and way course was presented. It was investigated whether there is a relationship between duration of delay to lesson and duration of stay in lesson. As a result of the research, it was seen that attendance to classes was higher in first weeks, and number of attendance was always lower in following weeks. It was observed that participants studying in Law, Finance and Agricultural Machinery departments, where participation times differ according to department, did not stay long in distance education courses. While participation time did not change according to gender, it was determined that participation time in synchronous TBTK courses took longer than courses with video surveillance. It has been observed that there is a moderate and negative significant relationship between the duration of the students' stay in the course and the delay to the course. At the end of the study, it is recommended to determine the reason for this issue and to carry out new studies in different courses so that the participation of the students does not decrease in the following weeks.

Keywords

• distance education
• attendance
• delay to class

ÇEVRİMİÇİ ORTAMDA ÖĞRENCİLERİN DERSE KATILIMLARINI VE DERSTE GEÇİRDİKLERİ SÜREYİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Öğrencilerin derste var olması ya da kayıtlı olan dersleri takip etmesi olarak nitelendirilen katılım kavramı uzaktan eğitim ortamında son derece önemlidir. Katılımı etkileyen farklı faktörler olduğu görülmektedir. Bu faktörler arasında öğretmen, öğretim yöntemi, öğrencilerin bireysel özellikleri, ders süresi gibi ögeler bulunmaktadır. Katılımının ise öğrenci başarısı, performansı ve dersi bırakması gibi önemli alanları etkilediği görülmektedir. Bu çalışma pandemi döneminde zorunlu olarak uzaktan eğitim ile ders almak durumunda kalan öğrencilerin online ders platformundaki kayıtlarının incelenerek, derslere katılımları ile ilgili eğilimlerini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Öğrencilerin genel katılım eğilimleri belirlenirken derste kalma süreleri, ders, bölüm, cinsiyet ve dersin sunum şekli değişkenlerine göre incelenmiştir. Derse gecikme süresi ile derste kalma süresi arasında ilişki olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda ilk haftalarda derslere katılımın daha fazla olduğu, ilerleyen haftalarda katılım sayısının hep daha düşük kaldığı görülmüştür. Bölüme göre katılım sürelerinin farklılık gösterdiği Hukuk, Maliye ve Tarım Makineleri bölümlerinde okuyan katılımcıların uzaktan eğitim derslerinde uzun süre kalmadıkları görülmüştür. Cinsiyete göre katılım süresi değişmezken, senkron olarak devam eden TBTK derslerinde katılım süresinin, video takibi olan derslere göre daha uzun sürdüğü belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin derste kalma süresi ile derse gecikme süresi arasında orta düzeyde ve negatif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışma sonunda öğrencilerin katılımının ilerleyen haftalarda azalmaması için bu konunun nedeninin belirlenmesi, farklı derslerde yeni çalışmaların gerçekleştirilmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• uzaktan eğitim
• derse katılım
• derse gecikme

Kaynakça

1. Bayburtlu, Y. S. (2020). Covid-19 pandemi dönemi uzaktan eğitim sürecinde öğretmen görüşlerine göre Türkçe eğitimi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 15(4), 131-151.
2. Chen, J., & Lin, T. F. (2008). Class attendance and exam performance: A randomized experiment. The Journal of Economic Education, 39, 213–227. doi:10.3200/JECE.39.3.213-227.
3. Chenneville, T., & Jordan, C. (2008). The impact of attendance policies on course attendance among college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(3), 29-35.
4. Choi-Lundberg, D. L., Al-Aubaidy, H. A., Burgess, J. R., Cliford, C. A., Cuellar, W. A., Errey, J. A., Harper, A. J., Malley, R. C., Ross, R. M., Williams, A. M., & Hays, R. (2020). Minimal efects of reduced teaching hours on undergraduate medical student learning outcomes and course evaluations. Medical Teacher, 42(1), 58–65.
5. Colman, D. (2013). MOOC interrupted: Top 10 reasons our readers didn’t finish a massive open online course, 11.08.2022 tarihinde http://www.openculture.com/2013/04/10_reasons_you_didnt_complete_a_mooc.html adresinden erişildi.
6. Cortright, R., Lujan, H., Cox, J., & DiCarlo, S. (2011). Does sex (female versus male) influence the impact of class attendance on examination performance? Advances in Physiology Education, 35, 416-420.
7. Credé, M., Roch, S. G., & Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 272–295.
8. Çoban, İ., Yücel, K., Baser, A., & Diniz, G. Investigation of online and offline participation of students in health sciences to distance anatomy education. 4. Uluslararası İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi Tıp Kongresi IMCIDU 2020, 17- 19 December 2020 Izmir.

9. Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00542.x.
10. Diaz, D. P. (2002). Online drop rates revisited. The Technology Source. 11.08.2022 tarihinde http://technologysource.org/article/online_drop_rates_revisited/ adresinden erişildi.
11. Eisen, D., Schupp, C., Isserof, R., Ibrahimi, O., Ledo, L., & Armstrong, A. (2015). Does class attendance matter? Results from a second-year medical school dermatology cohort study. International Journal of Dermatology, 54, 807-816.
12. El Said, G. R. (2017). Understanding how learners use massive open online courses and why they drop out: Thematic analysis of an interview study in a developing country. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(5), 724-752.
13. Erkoca, M. C. (2021). Uzaktan eğitim sürecinde öğrenci ilgisi–bir çalışma. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 148-163.
14. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. California: SAGE publications.
15. Flood, J. (2002). Read all about it: online learning facing 80% attrition rates. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 3(2).
16. Fryer, L. K., Ginns, P., Howarth, M., Anderson, C., & Ozono, S. (2018). Individual differences and course attendance: why do students skip class?. Educational Psychology, 38(4), 470-486.
17. Geri, N., Winer, A., & Zaks, B. (2017). Challenging the six-minute myth of online video lectures: Can interactivity expand the attention span of learners?. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management (OJAKM), 5(1), 101-111.
18. Göksu, İ., Ergün, N., Özkan, Z., & Sakız, H. (2021). Distance education amid a pandemic: Which psycho‐demographic variables affect students in higher education?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1539-1552. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12544
19. Guleker, R., & Keci, J. (2014). The effect of attendance on academic performance. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 961.
20. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference, pp. 41-50.
21. Karakose, T., Yirci, R., & Papadakis, S. (2021). Exploring the interrelationship between COVID-19 phobia, work–family conflict, family–work conflict, and life satisfaction among school administrators for advancing sustainable management. Sustainability, 13(15), 8654. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158654
22. Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, 20. Baskı, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
23. Kim, A. S., Shakory, S., Azad, A., Popovic, C., & Park, L. (2020). Understanding the impact of attendance and participation on academic achievement. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 6(4), 272-284.
24. Kirby, A., & McElroy, B. (2003). The effect of attendance on grade for first year economics students in University College Cork. The Economic and Social Review, 34, 311-326.
25. Kolari, S., Savander-Ranne, C., & Viskari, E-L. (2008). Learning needs time and effort: A time-use study of engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 483-498.
26. Lu, C., & Cutumisu, M. (2022). Online engagement and performance on formative assessments mediate the relationship between attendance and course performance. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 19(1), 1-23.
27. Lukkarinen, A., Koivukangas, P., & Seppälä, T. (2016). Relationship between class attendance and student performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 341-347.
28. Macquarie University Learning and Teaching Centre. (2009). Student engagement principles. 11.08.2022 tarihinde https://www.mq.edu.au/lih/pdfs/Engagement_Principles.pdf adresinden erişildi.
29. Manasrah, A., Masoud, M., & Jaradat, Y. (2021). “Short Videos, or Long Videos? A Study on the Ideal Video Length in Online Learning”. In 2021 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), pp. 366-370. doi: 10.1109/ICIT52682.2021.9491115.
30. Marburger, D. R. (2001). Absenteeism and undergraduate exam performance. The Journal of Economic Education, 32, 99-109.
31. Moore, R., Jensen, M., Hatch, J., Duranczyk, I., Staats, S., & Koch, L. (2003). Showing up: The importance of class attendance for academic success in introductory science courses. American Biology Teacher, 65, 325-329.
32. Newman-Ford, L. E., Fitzgibbon, K., Lloyd, S., & Thomas, S. L. (2008). A large-scale investigation into the relationship between attendance and attainment: A study using an innovative, electronic attendance monitoring system. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 699–717. doi:10.1080/03075070802457066
33. Nieuwoudt, J. E. (2018). Exploring online interaction and online learner participation in an online science subject through the lens of the interaction equivalence theorem. Student Success, 9(4), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v9i4.520
34. Nieuwoudt, J. E. (2020). Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors of academic success in online education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 15-25.
35. Offir, B., Lev, Y., & Bezalel, R. (2008). Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: Synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1172-1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.009
36. Öz, R., & Kayalar, M. T. (2021). A Comparative Analysis on the Effects of Formal and Distance Education Students' Course Attendance upon Exam Success. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(3), 122-131.
37. Perera, L., & Richardson, P. (2010). Students' use of online academic resources within a course web site and its relationship with their course performance: An exploratory study. Accounting Education: an international journal, 19(6), 587-600.
38. Qutishat, D., Obeidallah, R., & Qawasmeh, Y. (2022). An Overview of Attendance and Participation in Online Class During the COVID Pandemic: A Case Study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(4), 103-115.
39. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002.
40. Rissanen, A. (2018). Student engagement in large classroom: the effect on grades, attendance and student experiences in an undergraduate biology course. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(2), 136-153.
41. Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: are we failing our students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(2), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051 3.2013.847363
42. Skylar, A. A. (2009). A comparison of aysnchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 69-84.
43. St. Clair, K.L. (1999). A Case Against Compulsory Class Attendance Policies in Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 23, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942400812
44. Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
45. Wong, L. (2013). Student engagement with online resources and its impact on learning outcomes. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 129-146.
46. Zhu, L., Huang, E., Defazio, J., & Hook, S. A. (2019). Impact of the stringency of attendance policies on class attendance/participation and course grades. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(2), 130-140.