ÖĞRETMEN DİJİTAL YETERLİK ÖLÇEĞİNİN ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARINA UYARLANMASI

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 49 - 78, 13.01.2026

Muhammet Yıldırım , Yılmaz Bahadır Kurtoğlu , İlknur Reisoğlu

https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.1702688

Öz

Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerindeki hızlı gelişim, eğitimde dijital dönüşümün önemini giderek artırmaktadır. Bu dönüşüm öğretmenlerin dijital yeterliliklere sahip olmasını zorunlu hale getirmiş olup, bu konuda birçok ulusal ve uluslararası kuruluş öğretmen dijital yeterlilikleri için çeşitli çerçeveler oluşturmuştur. Öğretmenlerin bu yeterliliklerini geliştirmeleri, yenilenen öğretim ve öğrenme stratejileri kullanılarak üretken öğrenme ortamları oluşturulmasında kritik öneme sahiptir. Geleceğin öğretmenleri olan öğretmen adaylarının dijital yeterlilik deneyimleri, mesleki yaşamlarında teknoloji kullanımını etkilemektedir. Bu nedenle, öğretmen eğitimindeki eksikliklerin belirlenmesi ve giderilmesinde dijital yeterlilik düzeylerinin belirlenmesi ve iyileştirilmesine yönelik adımlar atılması önemlidir. Bu amaçlar doğrultusunda, Gümüş ve Kukul (2023) tarafından geliştirilen dijital yeterlilik ölçeğinin öğretmen adayları üzerinde uygulanabilirliği çalışma kapsamında test edilmiştir. 46 maddeden oluşan ve 6 faktörlü yapıya sahip orijinal ölçek, 330 katılımcının verileriyle yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda 39 maddelik ve 5 faktörlü yapıya indirgenmiştir. Faktörlerin toplam varyansın %62,35'ini açıkladığı bulunmuştur. Daha sonra 514 katılımcı ile doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmış ve ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu kanıtlanmıştır. Elde edilen son uyum değerleri [x2/df=2,394; GFI=.909; NFI=.922; CFI=.953; RMSEA=.052; RMR=.033; SRMR=.043]'tür. Sonuç olarak 25 madde ve beş faktörden oluşan ölçek, hizmet öncesi öğretmenlerin dijital yeterliliğini ölçmede geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olarak sunulmuştur. Ölçeğin, öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının güncellenmesi ve geliştirilmesi süreçlerine de katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

dijital yeterlilik; , bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri; , öğretmen adayları; , dijital yeterlilik ölçeği

ADAPTATION OF THE TEACHER DIGITAL COMPETENCE SCALE TO PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS

Öz

The rapid development of information and communication technologies gradually increases the importance of digital transformation in education. This transformation has made it mandatory for teachers to have digital competences, and in this regard, many national and international organizations have created various frameworks for teacher digital competences. Teachers' development of these competences is critical in creating productive learning environments using renewed teaching and learning strategies. The digital competence experiences of preservice teachers, who are the future teachers, affect their use of technology in their professional lives. Therefore, taking steps to determine and improve digital competence levels is important in identifying and eliminating deficiencies in teacher education. For these purposes, the applicability of the digital competence scale developed by Gümüş and Kukul (2023) on preservice teachers was tested within the scope of the study. The original scale, which consisted of 46 items and had a 6-factor structure, was reduced to a 39-item and 5-factor structure as a result of exploratory factor analysis conducted with the data of 330 participants. It was found that the factors explained 62.35% of the total variance. Then, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted with 514 participants, and the scale was proven valid and reliable. The final fit values obtained are [x2/df=2.394; GFI=.909; NFI=.922; CFI=.953; RMSEA=.052; RMR=.033; SRMR=.043]. As a result, the scale comprising 25 items and five factors is presented as a valid and reliable tool for measuring the digital competence of preservice teachers. It is thought that the scale will also contribute to teacher training programs' updating and development processes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

digital competence , information and communication technologies , preservice teachers , digital competence scale

Kaynakça

• Almås, A. G., Bueie, A. A., & Aagaard, T. (2021). From digital competence to Professional Digital Competence: Teacher candidates’ experiences of and reflections on how teacher education prepares them for working life. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4233
• Aydin, M. K., Yildirim, T., & Kus, M. (2024). Teachers' digital competences: a scale construction and validation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1356573. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356573
• Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competences in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
• Behnamnia, N., & Hayati, S. (2025). Enhancing teacher confidence and competence: A case study of digital research skills training. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20427530251331085. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530251331085
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for the social sciences] (24. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
• Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., Rodríguez, A. P., & Llorente-Cejudo, C. (2020). Marcos de competencias digitales para docentes universitarios: Su evaluación a través del coeficiente competencia experta. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 23(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.413601
• Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DigCompEdu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
• Camilleri, P., Engen, B. K., Hatlevik, O. E., Rubio, J. C. C., & Gassó, H. H. (2021). Teacher candidates and their attitudes towards ICT: Lesson learned from three different countries. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4207
• Can, E. (2020). Coronavirüs (Covid-19) pandemisi ve pedagojik yansımaları: Türkiye’de açık ve uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 11-53. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/55662/761354
• Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). The digital competence framework for citizens. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842
• Council of Higher Education [YÖK]. (2018). Öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programları. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/AA_Sunus_%20Onsoz_Uygulama_Yonergesi.pdf
• Çebi, A., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2020). Digital competence: A study from the perspective of pre-service teachers in Turkey. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 9(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.583
• Davcik, N. S. (2014). The use and misuse of structural equation modeling in management research: A review and critique. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11(1), 47-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-07-2013-0043
• Dias-Trindade, S. & Moreira, J. A. (2020). Assessment of high school teachers on their digital competences. MAGIS, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 13, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m13.ahst
• Dolezal, D., Motschnig, R., & Ambros, R. (2025). Pre-service teachers’ digital competence: A call for action. Education Sciences, 15(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020160
• Edstrand, E., & Sjöberg, J. (2023). Professional digital competence (PDC) in teacher education – teacher candidates reasoning about programming when involved in problem-solving activities with digital tools. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(3), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2210317
• Eickelmann, B., & Drossel, K. (2020). Lehrer* innenbildung und Digitalisierung - Konzepte und Entwicklungsperspektiven. In Bewegungen. Beiträge zum 26. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft (pp. 349-362). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10h9fjc.28
• Eshet-Alkali, Y., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421
• Education and Training Foundation (2019). Digital Teaching Professional Framework. Taking Learning to the Next Level. JISC. https://www.et-foundation.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/181108-Digital-Teaching-Professional-Framework-Full-Document-final.pdf
• Elliot, J., Gorichon, S., Irigoin, M., & Maurizi, M. (2011). Competencias y Estándares TIC para la Profesión Docente. Ministerio de Educación.
• European Commission, Joint Research Centre. (2024). The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens (DigComp). https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/projects-and-activities/education-and-training/digital-transformation-education/digital-competence-framework-citizens-digcomp/digcomp-framework_en
• Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449-2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
• Fan, Y., Chen, J., Shirkey, G., John, R., Wu, S. R., Park, H., & Shao, C. (2016). Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review. Ecological Processes, 5, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0063-3
• Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010
• Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.003
• Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., & Redecker, C. (2012). Understanding digital competence in the 21st century: An analysis of current frameworks. European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 79-92). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_7
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
• García-Vandewalle García, J.M., García-Carmona, M., Trujillo Torres, J.M. & Moya Fernández, P. (2023). Analysis of digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu) in teacher trainees: the context of Melilla, Spain. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 28, 585–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09546-x
• Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Mayorga-Fernández, M. J. (2020). Prediction of factors that affect the knowledge and use higher education professors from Spain make of ICT resources to teach, evaluate and research: A study with research methods in educational technology. Education Sciences, 10(10), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100276
• Gümüş, M.M., & Kukul, V. (2023). Developing a digital competence scale for teachers: validity and reliability study. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 2747–2765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11213-2
• Gürbüz, S. (2021). AMOS ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (2. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Hanell, F. (2018). What is the ‘problem’that digital competence in Swedish teacher education is meant to solve. Nordic Journal of digital literacy, 13(03), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2018-03-02
• Haşlaman, T., Atman Uslu, N. & Mumcu, F. (2023). Development and in-depth investigation of pre-service teachers' digital competences based on DigCompEdu: a case study. Quality Quantity, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01674-z
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Herring, M. C., Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators. Routledge.
• Howard, S. K., & Gigliotti, A. (2016). Having a go: Looking at teachers’ experience of risk-taking in technology integration. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1351-1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9386-4
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information technologies, 21, 655-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
• Instefjord, E. (2015). Appropriation of digital competence in teacher education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10 (Jubileumsnummer), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-11
• Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 67, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016
• ISTE [The International Society for Technology in Education] (2021). ISTE standards for educators. https://iste.org/standards/educators
• Ivanov, A., Radonjić, A., Stošić, L., Krčadinac, O., Đokić, D. B., & Đokić, V. (2025). Teachers’ Digital Competencies Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 17(5), 2309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052309
• Jimarkon, P., Wanphet, P., & Dikilitas, K. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ digital experiences through digital pedagogical practices in Norway. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4230
• Karagöz, Y., & Bardakçı, S. (2020). Bilimsel araştırmalarda kullanılan ölçme araçları ve ölçek geliştirme [Measurement tools and scale development used in scientific research]. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Karakuş, İ., Sünbül, Ö., & Kılıç, F. (2022). Öğretmen Adayı Dijital Yeterlik Algısı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması [Pre-service Teacher Digital Competence Perception Scale: Validity and Reliability Study]. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(35), 935-956. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.883974
• Kelentrić, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A. T. (2017). Professional digital competence framework for teachers. The Norwegian Centre for ICT in education, 134(1), 1-74. https://www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/in-english/pfdk_framework_en_low2.pdf
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
• König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European journal of teacher education, 43(4), 608-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
• Lucas, M., Bem-Haja, P., Siddiq, F., Moreira, A., Redecker, C. (2021). The relation between in-service teachers’ digital competence and personal and contextual factors: What matters most? Computers & Education, 160, 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104052
• Lund, A., Furberg, A., Bakken, J., & Engelien, K. L. (2014). What does professional digital competence mean in teacher education?. Nordic journal of digital literacy, 9(4), 280-298. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-04
• Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing research: An applied orientation (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural equation modeling, 11(3), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
• McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315802510
• Méndez, V. G., Martín, A. R., & Rodríguez, M. D. M. (2017). La competencia digital en estudiantes de magisterio. Análisis competencial y percepción personal del futuro maestro. Educatio Siglo XXI, 35. 253-274. https://doi.org/10.6018/j/298601
• MENTEP [Mentoring Technology-Enhanced Pedagogy] (2018). Online Self-Assessment. http://mentep.eun.org/documents/2390578/2452293/Brochure_Mentep_2017.pdf
• Momdjian, L., Manegre, M., & Gutiérrez-Colón, M. (2024). Assessing and bridging the digital competence gap: a comparative study of lebanese student teachers and in-service teachers using the DigCompEdu framework. Discover Education, 3(1), 198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00308-2
• Momdjian, L., Manegre, M., & Gutiérrez-Colón, M. (2025). A study of preservice teachers’ digital competence development: Exploring the role of direct instruction, integrated practice, and modeling. Evaluation and Program Planning, 109, 102538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102538
• Moreira-Choez, J. S., Gómez Barzola, K. E., Lamus de Rodríguez, T. M., Sabando-García, A. R., Cruz Mendoza, J. C., & Cedeño Barcia, L. A. (2024). Assessment of digital competencies in higher education faculty: A multimodal approach within the framework of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1425487). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1425487
• Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610539
• Napal-Fraile, M., Peñalva-Vélez, A., & Mendióroz Lacambra, A. M. (2018). Development of digital competence in secondary education teachers’ training. Education Sciences, 8(3), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030104
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• OECD (2019). OECD Skills Outlook 2019: Thriving in a Digital World. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en
• Orçan, F. (2018). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Which One to Use First?. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 9(4), 414-421. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.394323
• Ortega-Sánchez, D., Gómez-Trigueros, I. M., Trestini, M., & Pérez-González, C. (2020). Self-perception and training perceptions on teacher digital competence (TDC) in Spanish and French university students. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(4), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4040074
• Özdamar, K. (2013). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi: MINITAB 16-IBM SPSS 21. Nisan Kitabevi.
• Párraga, L. M., Cejudo, C. L., & Osuna, J. B. (2022). Validation of the DigCompEdu Check-in Questionnaire through Structural Equations: A Study at a University in Peru. Education Sciences, 12(8), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080574
• Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8
• Quast, J., Rubach, C., & Porsch, R. (2023). Professional digital competence beliefs of student teachers, pre-service teachers and teachers: Validating an instrument based on the DigCompEdu framework. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2251663
• Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
• Reisoğlu, İ., & Çebi, A. (2020). How can the digital competences of pre-service teachers be developed? Examining a case study through the lens of DigComp and DigCompEdu. Computers & Education, 156, 103940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103940
• Reisoğlu, İ. (2022). How Does Digital Competence Training Affect Teachers' Professional Development and Activities?. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 27, 721–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09501-w
• Rizal, R., Setiawan, W., & Rusdiana, D. (2019). Digital literacy of preservice science teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), 022058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022058
• Sanders, R. D., Allen, D. N., Forman, S. D., Tarpey, T., Keshavan, M. S., & Goldstein, G. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Neurological Evaluation Scale in unmedicated schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 133(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2004.10.005
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784
• Schola Europaea, (2020). Digital Competence Framework for the European Schools. https://www.eursc.eu/BasicTexts/2020-09-D-51-en-2.pdf
• Siiman, L. A., Mäeots, M., Pedaste, M., Simons, R. J., Leijen, Ä., Rannikmäe, M., ... & Timm, M. (2016). An Instrument for Measuring Students’ Perceived Digital Competence According to the DIGCOMP Framework. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. LCT 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9753. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_22
• Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Incorporated.
• Sutton, S. (2011). The preservice technology training experiences of novice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784678
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Toker, T., Akgün, E., Cömert, Z., & Edip, S. (2021). Eğitimciler için dijital yeterlilik ölçeği: Uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 50(230), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.801607
• Tomte, C. E., Enochsson, A. B., Buskqvist, U., & Karstein, A. (2015). Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK-framework goes online. Computers & Education, 84, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.005
• Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & education, 59(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
• Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2023). Assessing teachers’ digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements for digital education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16017-16040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11848-9
• UNESCO [United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization] (2018). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. Version 3.0. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
• UNICEF, (2022). Educators' digital competence framework. https://www.unicef.org/eca/media/24526/file/Educators'%20Digital%20Competence%20Framework.pdf
• Yang, L., Martínez-Abad, F., & García-Holgado, A. (2022). Exploring factors influencing pre-service and in-service teachers perception of digital competencies in the Chinese region of Anhui. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12469-12494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11085-6
• Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(Özel Sayı), 74-85. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/369427