BİLGİSAYAR VE ÖĞRETİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN ÖĞRETİM TASARIMI YETERLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2021, , 65 - 92, 28.01.2021

Yasin Yalçın , Ömer Faruk Ursavaş

https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.752853

Öz

Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Öğretmenliği (BÖTÖ) Programı mezunlarının öğretim tasarımı yeterliklerini de içine alan geniş bir yelpazede görevleri yerine getirmeleri beklenmektedir. Ancak BÖTÖ müfredatı içerisinde öğretim tasarımı yeterliklerine yoğunlaşan yalnızca bir ders bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle BÖTÖ programlarında öğretim tasarımı yeterliklerinin ne seviyede kazandırıldığı cevaplanması gereken sorulardan biridir. Bu araştırmada BÖTÖ programlarında okuyan öğrencilerin öğretim tasarımı yeterlikleri konusundaki algılarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda ibstpi® tarafından geliştirilen öğretim tasarımı standartları Türkçe’ye kazandırılmış ve geliştirilen ölçek yardımıyla BÖTÖ programlarında okuyan 820 üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıf öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular katılımcıların öğretim tasarımı yeterlikleri konusunda kendilerini genellikle orta derecede yeterli gördüklerini göstermektedir. Görsel, sözel ve yazılı olarak etkili bir şekilde iletişim kurma öğrencilerin kendilerini en yeterli gördüğü yeterlik olarak öne çıkmıştır. Bunun yanında öğretimsel olmayan müdahalelerin planlanmasını içeren yeterlik ise öğrencilerin kendilerini en az yeterli gördüğü yeterlik olmuştur. Öğretim Tasarımı dersi aldığını belirten katılımcıların %24’ü öğretim tasarımı sürecinde hiç görev almadığını, %30’u ise kısmen görev aldığını belirtmiştir. Bulgular BÖTÖ programlarının gelişimi açısından tartışılmış ve bazı öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öğretim tasarımı, yeterlik, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri

Destekleyen Kurum

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi

Proje Numarası

SBA-2019-997

Kaynakça

• AECT (2012). AECT Standards, 2012 version. Retrived from https://www.aect.org/docs/AECTstandards2012.pdf
• AECT Definition and Terminology Committee (2008). Definition. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murph, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., Pomerantz, J., Seilhamer, R., & Weber, N. (2019). Horizon report 2019 higher education edition. EDU19. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208644/
• ATD (2020a). ATD Competency Model. URL: https://www.td.org/certification/atd-competency-model
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Brill, J. M., Bishop, M. J., & Walker, A. E. (2006). The competencies and chracteristics required of an effective project manager: A web-based Delphi study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(2), 115–140.
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. doi:10.1177/135910457000100301
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4 ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
• Dabbagh, N., & English, M. (2015). Using student self-ratings to assess the alignment of instructional design competencies and courses in a graduate program. TechTrends, 59(4), 22–31.
• Dempsey, J. V., & Rasmussen, K. L. (1993). Instructional design and development competencies in a new academic program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 368347).
• Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The Systematic Design of Instruction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Fox, E. J., & Klein, J. D. (2003). What should instructional designers and technologists know about human performance technology? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16(3), 87–98.
• Gagné, R. M. (1969). Characteristics of instructional technologists. Paper presented at the Symposium on Instructional Technologists, American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.
• Gagné, R. M. (1970). The Conditions of Learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
• Giberson, T. R. (2010). Performance capabilities and competencies at the undergraduate and graduate levels for performance improvement professionals. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 22(4), 99–120. doi:10.1002/piq.20070
• ibstpi (2020a). About Us. URL: https://ibstpi.org/about-us/
• ibstpi (2020b). Instructional Designer Competencies. URL: https://ibstpi.org/instructional-design-competencies/
• ISPI (2020a). Certified Performance Technologist Standards. URL: https://ispi.org/page/CPTStandards
• ISPI (2020b). Certified Developer of Training (CDT). URL: https://ispi.org/page/CDT
• ISPI (2020c). Certified Facilitator of Training (CFT). URL: https://ispi.org/page/CFT
• Izmirli, O. S., & Kurt, A. A. (2009). Basic competencies of instructional technologists. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 998–1002. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.178
• Kang, Y., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2015). A job announcement analysis of educational technology professional positions: Knowledge, skills, and abilities. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(3), 231–256. doi:10.1177/0047239515570572
• Klein, J. D., & Fox, E. J. (2004). Performance improvement competencies for instructional technologists. TechTrends, 48(2), 22–25.
• Klein, J. D., & Jun, S. (2014). Skills for instructional design professionals. Performance Improvement, 53(2), 41–46. doi:10.1002/pfi
• Klein, J. D., & Kelly, W. Q. (2018). Competencies for instructional designers: A view from employers. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 31(3), 225–247. doi:10.1002/piq.21257
• Klein, J. D., & Richey, R. C. (2005). Improving individual and organizational performance: The case for international standards. Performance Improvement, 44(10), 9–14.
• Koszalka, T., Russ-Eft, D., & Reiser, R. (2013). Instructional designer competencies: The standards (4th ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
• Liu, M., Gibby, S., Quiros, O., & Demps, E. (2002). Challenges of being an instructional designer for new media development: A view from practioners. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(3), 195–219.
• MacLean, P., & Scott, B. (2011). Competencies for learning design: A review of the literature and a proposed framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 557–572. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01090.x
• Moallem, M. (1995). Analysis of job announcements and the required competencies for instructional technology professionals. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
• Reiser, R. A. (2018a). A history of instructional design and technology. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed., pp. 8–22). New York, NY: Pearson.
• Reiser, R. A. (2018b). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed., pp. 1–7). New York, NY: Pearson.
• Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
• Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Kumar, S. (2015). Knowledge and skills needed by instructional designers in higher education. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28(3), 51–69. doi:10.1002/piq.21196
• Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Martin, F. (2014). Development and validation of the educational technologist multimedia competency survey. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 13–33. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9325-2
• Ritzhaupt, A. D., Martin, F., & Daniels, K. (2010). Multimedia competencies for an educational technologist: A survey of professionals and job announcement analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(4), 421–449.
• Ritzhaupt, A. D., Martin, F., Pastore, R., & Kang, Y. (2018). Development and validation of the educational technologist competencies survey (ETCS): Knowledge, skills, and abilities. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 3–33. doi:10.1007/s12528-017-9163-z
• Sims, R. C., & Koszalka, T. A. (2008). Competencies for the new-age instructional designer. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 569–575). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Sugar, W., Brown, A., Daniels, L., & Hoard, B. (2011). Instructional Design and Technology professionals in higher education: Multimedia production knowledge and skills identified from a Delphi study. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 1(2), 30–46.
• Sugar, W., Hoard, B., Brown, A., & Daniels, L. (2012). Identifying multimedia production competencies and skills of instructional design and technology professionals: An analysis of recent job postings. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(3), 227–249. doi:10.2190/ET.40.3.b
• Sumuer, E., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2006). Current major competencies for instructional design and technology professionals. Paper presented at the ED-MEDIA 2006--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications, Orlando, FL.
• van Rooij, S. W. (2010). Project management in instructional design: ADDIE is not enough. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 852–864. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00982.x
• van Rooij, S. W. (2013). The career path to instructional design project management: an expert perspective from the US professional services sector. International Journal of Training and Development, 17(1), 33–53. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2012.00414.x
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). New York, NY: Routledge.