BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2015, , 39 - 53, 10.04.2015

Yasemin Demiraslan Çevik , Sibel Barın

https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.88439
Cited By: 1

Öz

    The  purpose  of  this  study  is  to  examine  a  group  of  university  students’  views  on  the  use  of  Turnitin®   to   identify   and   prevent   plagiarism.   The   participants   consist   of   120   students  (female  =  68,  male  =  52,  mean  age  =  21.7)  out  of  155  who  responded  to  survey  and  taking  Instructional  Design,  Teaching  Methods  II  and  Teaching  Practice  courses  in  the  department  of  Computer  Education  and  Instructional  Technology  at  Hacettepe  University  in  2014  spring  semester.  The  survey  included  20  items  related  to  students’  prior  knowledge  on  academic  honesty  and  their  experiences  on  Turnitin®  use  (i.e.,  ease  of  use  of  the  system,  effects  of  Turnitin®  use  on  preventing  plagiarism).  Descriptive  statistics  (percentages  and  frequencies)  were   used   to   analyze   the   data.   The   study   revealed   that   the   participants   were   aware   that  plagiarism   was   wrong,   they   had   positive   opinions   on   the   use   of   Turnitin®   to   prevent  plagiarism,  but  some  of  the  participants  were  worried  about  the  use  of  Turnitin®.    

Anahtar Kelimeler

 academic  honesty;  plagiarism;  Turnitin®    

Kaynakça

  • Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin® to Fight Plagiarism among University Students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1-12.
  • Betts, L. R., Bostock, S. J., Elder, T. J., & Trueman, M. (2012). Encouraging good writing practice in first-year Psychology students: An intervention using Turnitin®. Psychology Teaching Review, 18(2), 74-81.
  • Carbone, N. (2001). Turnitin®.com: A Pedagogic Placebo for Plagiarism. TechNotes, http://bedfordstmartins.com/technotes/techtiparchive/ttip060501.htm adresinden 21 Şubat 2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Carroll, J., & Oxford Centre for Staff Development. (2002). A handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
  • Cohen, J. (2010). Using Turnitin® as a formative writing tool. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (2).
  • Dahl, S. (2007). Turnitin®: The student perspective on using plagiarism detection software. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 173-191.
  • Demiraslan Çevik, Y., İltüzer, Y., & Barın, S. (Nisan 2014). Aşırmacılığı Önlemede Turnitin® Kullanımına İlişkin Öğrenci Bakış Açılarının İncelenmesi. International Conference on New Trends in Educational Technology (INTET2014), Famagusta, Kıbrıs.
  • Guader, H. (2004). The Hunt for Plagiarism. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 8(4), 27-41.
  • Hill, J. D. & Page, E. F. (2009). An Empirical Research Study of the Efficacy of Two Plagiarism-Detection Applications. Journal of Web Librarianship, 3(3), 169-181.
  • International Center for Academic Integrity (2014). http://www.academicintegrity.org/icai/home.php adresinden 20 Mart 2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Jenson, J. & De Castell, S. (2004). 'Turn it in': technological challenges to academic ethics. Education, Communication & Information, 4(2-3), 311-330.
  • Ledwith, A. & Risquez, A. (2008). Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 371-384.
  • Park, C. (2003). In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by University Students - Literature and Lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488.
  • Renard, L. (2000). Cut and paste 101: Plagiarism and the net. Educational Leadership, 57(4), 38-42.
  • Rolfe, V. (2011). Can Turnitin® be used to provide instant formative feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 701-710.
  • Selwyn, N. (2008). ‘Not necessarily a bad thing’: a study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 465-479.
  • Stappenbelt, B., Rowles, C. & May, E. (2009). Cultural influence on attitudes to plagiarism. In Teaching and learning for global graduates. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 29-30 January 2009. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. http://otl.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2009/refereed/stappenbelt.html
  • Szabo, A. & Underwood, J. (2004). Cybercheats: Is Information and Communication Technology Fuelling Academic Dishonesty? Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 180-199.
  • Underwood, J. & Szabo, A. (2003). Academic Offences and E-learning: Individual Propensities in Cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 467-77.
  • Wilson, R. (1999). Colleges urged to better define academic integrity and to stress its importance. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(8), p. A18.

AŞIRMACILIĞI ÖNLEME VE AKADEMİK DÜRÜSTLÜĞÜ SAĞLAMADA TURNİTİN® KULLANIMINA İLİŞKİN ÖĞRENCİ GÖRÜŞLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2015, , 39 - 53, 10.04.2015

Yasemin Demiraslan Çevik , Sibel Barın

https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.88439
Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir grup üniversite öğrencisinin aşırmacılığı tespit etme ve önlemede Turnitin® kullanımı ile ilgili görüşlerini incelemektir. Araştırmanın katılımcıları, 2014 Bahar döneminde Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü’nde Öğretim Tasarımı, Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri II ve Öğretmenlik Uygulaması derslerini alan toplam 155 öğrenci arasından anketi yanıtlayan 120 (Kız=68, Erkek=52, Yaş ortalaması=21,7) öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplamak amacıyla oluşturulan ankette öğrencilerin Turnitin®  kullanmadan önce akademik dürüstlük hakkındaki bilgileri ve sistemi kullanma sürecindeki deneyimleri (örn. sistemin kullanım kolaylığı, sistemi kullanmanın aşırmacılığı önlemedeki etkileri) ile ilgili görüşlerini soran toplam 20 soru yer almaktadır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde betimsel istatistikler kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, katılımcıların aşırmacılığın yanlış bir şey olduğuna dair farkındalıklarının olduğunu, aşırmacılığı önlemede Turnitin® sisteminin kullanımına dönük olumlu görüşlere sahip olduklarını fakat Turnitin® kullanımının bazı katılımcıları endişelendirdiğini ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

akademik dürüstlük aşırmacılık Turnitin®

Kaynakça

  • Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin® to Fight Plagiarism among University Students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1-12.
  • Betts, L. R., Bostock, S. J., Elder, T. J., & Trueman, M. (2012). Encouraging good writing practice in first-year Psychology students: An intervention using Turnitin®. Psychology Teaching Review, 18(2), 74-81.
  • Carbone, N. (2001). Turnitin®.com: A Pedagogic Placebo for Plagiarism. TechNotes, http://bedfordstmartins.com/technotes/techtiparchive/ttip060501.htm adresinden 21 Şubat 2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Carroll, J., & Oxford Centre for Staff Development. (2002). A handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
  • Cohen, J. (2010). Using Turnitin® as a formative writing tool. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (2).
  • Dahl, S. (2007). Turnitin®: The student perspective on using plagiarism detection software. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 173-191.
  • Demiraslan Çevik, Y., İltüzer, Y., & Barın, S. (Nisan 2014). Aşırmacılığı Önlemede Turnitin® Kullanımına İlişkin Öğrenci Bakış Açılarının İncelenmesi. International Conference on New Trends in Educational Technology (INTET2014), Famagusta, Kıbrıs.
  • Guader, H. (2004). The Hunt for Plagiarism. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 8(4), 27-41.
  • Hill, J. D. & Page, E. F. (2009). An Empirical Research Study of the Efficacy of Two Plagiarism-Detection Applications. Journal of Web Librarianship, 3(3), 169-181.
  • International Center for Academic Integrity (2014). http://www.academicintegrity.org/icai/home.php adresinden 20 Mart 2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Jenson, J. & De Castell, S. (2004). 'Turn it in': technological challenges to academic ethics. Education, Communication & Information, 4(2-3), 311-330.
  • Ledwith, A. & Risquez, A. (2008). Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 371-384.
  • Park, C. (2003). In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by University Students - Literature and Lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488.
  • Renard, L. (2000). Cut and paste 101: Plagiarism and the net. Educational Leadership, 57(4), 38-42.
  • Rolfe, V. (2011). Can Turnitin® be used to provide instant formative feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 701-710.
  • Selwyn, N. (2008). ‘Not necessarily a bad thing’: a study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 465-479.
  • Stappenbelt, B., Rowles, C. & May, E. (2009). Cultural influence on attitudes to plagiarism. In Teaching and learning for global graduates. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 29-30 January 2009. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. http://otl.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2009/refereed/stappenbelt.html
  • Szabo, A. & Underwood, J. (2004). Cybercheats: Is Information and Communication Technology Fuelling Academic Dishonesty? Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 180-199.
  • Underwood, J. & Szabo, A. (2003). Academic Offences and E-learning: Individual Propensities in Cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 467-77.
  • Wilson, R. (1999). Colleges urged to better define academic integrity and to stress its importance. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(8), p. A18.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yasemin Demiraslan Çevik

Sibel Barın

Yayımlanma Tarihi 10 Nisan 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015

Kaynak Göster

APA Demiraslan Çevik, Y., & Barın, S. (2015). AŞIRMACILIĞI ÖNLEME VE AKADEMİK DÜRÜSTLÜĞÜ SAĞLAMADA TURNİTİN® KULLANIMINA İLİŞKİN ÖĞRENCİ GÖRÜŞLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram Ve Uygulama, 5(2), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.88439

Cited By

Türkiye’de Yayınlanan Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Konulu Makalelerin İncelenmesi (1993-2022)
MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1340104