BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Türk Öğretim Üyelerinin Elektronik Kitap Kullanim Durum ve Tercihleri

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 33 - 54, 01.04.2013
https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.84220

Öz

The purpose of this survey study is to determine the electronic book usage and preferences of Turkish lecturers. A questionnaire prepared by Neiman Library was used as a data collection instrument. The questionnaire, which was adapted into Turkish by making validity and reliability studies, was sent by e-mail to lecturers working in different universities in Turkey. Generalizable results were gained after analyzing the data obtained from valid responses. E-books are ranked third (74.8%) among electronic resources used by lecturers use and they are mostly used for research purposes. The preferred method of accessing e-books is via search-engines such as Google. Most of the lecturers stated that they would prefer reading a book in printed form, if given the option. What comes to the forefront in e-book reading preference is that lecturers read materials both from a monitor and in printed form (a combination of both media).

Kaynakça

  • Abdullah, N. & Gibb, F. (2008). Students’ Attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish Higher Education Institute: Part 2 Analysis of e-book usage. Library Review, 57(9) 676–689.
  • Abram, S. (2004). eBooks: Rumors of our death greatly exaggerated, Information Outlook, 8(2), 14–16.
  • Armstrong, C. & Lonsdale, R. (2010). E-book use by academic staff and students in UK universities: Focus Group Report, Retrieved September 23, 2010, from http://www.jiscebooksproject.org/wp-content/JC-IAL_AcademiceBookUseFinal_ Report_v1-01.pdf
  • Anuradha, K. T. & Usha, H. S. (2006). Use of e-books in an academic and research environment: A case study from the Indian Institute of Science Program. Electronic Library and Information Systems, 40(1), 48–62.
  • Ardito, S. (2000). Electronic books: To “e” or not to “e”; that is the question. Searcher, 8(4), 1–
  • Armatas, C., Holt, D. & Rice, M. (2003). Impacts of online-supported resource-based learning environment: Does one size fit all? Distance Education, 24(2), 141–158.
  • Bailey, T.P. (2006). Electronic book usage at a master’s level I university: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 52–59.
  • Bierman, J., Ortega, L. & Rupp-Serrano, K. (2010). E-book usage in pure and applied sciences. Science & Technology Libraries, 29, 69–91.
  • Brewer, S. & Milam, P. (2006). SLJ's Technology Survey 2006: New technologies—like blogs and wikis—are taking their place in the school media center. School Library Journal, 52(6), 45–49.
  • Buzzetto-More, N., Sweat-Guy, R. & Elobaid, M. (2007). Reading in a digital age: E-books are students ready for this learning object? Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Anket geliştirme, Retrieved April 18, 2011, from http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/arsiv/2005_cilt3/sayi_2/133-151.pdf .
  • Camacho, L. & Spackman, A. (2011). Transitioning to e-books: Usage and attitudes among business faculty. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16(1), 33–45
  • Christianson, M. & Aucoin, M. (2005). Electronic or print books: Which are used? Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 29, 71–81.
  • Chu, H. (2003). Electronic books: Viewpoints from users and potential users. Library Hi Tech 21(3), 340–346.
  • Erol, A. (2009). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Elektronik Yayıncılık. Thesis (PhD), Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi.
  • Fernandez, M., 2003. A usage comparison for print and electronic books at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. Thesis (PhD) University of North Carolina.
  • Foote, J.B. & Rupp-Serrano, K. (2010). Exploring e-book usage among faculty and graduate students in the geosciences: Results of a small survey and focus group approach. Science & Technology Libraries, 29, 216–234.
  • Guthrie, R. G. (2002). The e-book: Ahead of its time or a burst bubble? LOGOS: The Journal of a World Book Community, 13(1), 9–17.
  • Gürcan, H. İ. & Bayram, F. (2005). Yerel haberlerin internet ortamında görünümleri- Denizli, Eskişehir ve Erzurum örnekleminde bir değerlendirme. Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 3(4), 53–62.
  • Gregory, C.L. (2008). “But I want a real book” An investigation of undergraduates' usage and attitudes toward electronic boks. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 47(3), 266– 2
  • Hartley, J. (2002). Is judging text on screen different from judging text in print? A naturalistic e-mail experiment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 21–25. Hawkins, D. T. (2000). Electronic books: A major publishing revolution: Part 1: General considerations and issues. Online 24, 4, 14–28.
  • Hernon, P., Hopper, R., Leach, M.R., Saunders, L.L. & Zhang, J. (2006). E-book use by students: Undergraduates in Economics, Literature, and Nursing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(1), 3–13.
  • Jamali, H.R., Nicholas, D. & Rowlands, I. (2009). Scholarly e-books: the views of 16,000 academics- Results from the JISC National E-Book Observatory. New Information Perspectives, 61(1), 33–47.
  • Jung, S-M. ve Lim, K-B. (2009). Leading future education: Development of digital textbooks in Korea. 12th UNESCO-APEID International Conference Quality Innovations for Teaching and Learning, 24-26 March 2009, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Kropman, M., Schoch, H.P. & Teoh, H.Y. (2004). An experience in e-learning: using an electronic textbook. Retrieved June 25, 2012 from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/pdf/kropman.pdf .
  • Letts, M. (2001). E-textbooks test emerging platforms. E-books, 1(1), 25–30.
  • Levine-Clark, M. (2006). Electronic book usage: a survey at the University of Denver. PortalLibraries and the Academy, 6(3), 285–99.
  • Levine-Clark, M. (2007). Electronic books and the humanities: A survey at the University of Denver. Collection Building, 26(1), 7–14.
  • Littman, J. & Connaway, L.S. (2004). A circulation analysis of print and e-books in an academic research library. Library Resources and Technical Services, 48( 4), 256–62.
  • Mahajan, P. & Chakravarty, R. (2007). E-Books as a tool for scholarly communication: Emerging trends and Technologies. Proceedings of 5th International CALIBER, Chandigarh, 554-569.
  • McKnight, C. ve Dearnley, J. (2003). Electronic book use in a public library. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35(4), 235–242.
  • Monopoli, M, Nicholas D., Georgiou P. & Korfiati M. (2002). A user-oriented evaluation of digital libraries: Case study “Electronic Journals” services of the Library and Information Services of University of Patras. Aslib Proceedings, 54(2), 103–117.
  • Neiman Library of Exact Sciences & Engineering eBooks Survey, 2010. Retrieved April 15, 2011 from: http://blog.tau.ac.il/libraries/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/the-NeimanLibrary-eBooks-survey.pdf .
  • Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H.R., & Ollé, C. (2008). UK scholarly e-book usage: A landmark survey. Aslib Proceedings, 60 (4), 311–34.
  • NTVMSNBC (2012). E-kitap Türkiye’de olur mu?, Retrieved June 25, 2012 from: http://www.ntvmsnbc.com/id/25116494/#storyContinued .
  • Oxford Dictionaries (2011). E-book, Retrieved April 11, 2011 from: http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_us124296.
  • Önder, I. (2010). Elektronik kitap olgusu ve Türkiye’deki durum. Thesis (PhD), Ankara Üniversitesi.
  • Perkins, I.M. & Johanson, G. (2009). New texts in old pedagogies; use of electronic books by undergraduate. Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA) 14th Exhibition and Conference, 20-22 January, Sydney.
  • Rao, S. S. (2003). Electronic books: A review and evaluation. Library Hi Tech, 21(1), 85–93.
  • Ray, K. & Day, J. (1998). Student attitudes towards electronic information resources. Information Research, 4(2).
  • Rogers, M. (2001). Survey reveals college students’ growing preference for e-texts. Library Journal, 126(2), 31.
  • Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H.R. & Huntington, P. (2007). What do faculty and students really think about e-books? New Information Perspectives, 59(6), 489–511.
  • Rukancı, F. & Anameriç, H. (2003). E-kitap teknolojisi ve kullanımı. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 17(2), 147–166.
  • Shiratuddin, N., Landoni, M., Gibb, F. & Hassan, S. (2003). E-book technology and its potential applications in distance education. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4).
  • Smith, B.A. (2008). A quantitative analysis of the impact of e-book format on student acceptance, usage and satisfaction. Thesis (PhD), Capella University.
  • Soules, A. (2008). New types of e-books, e-book issues, and implications for the future. The Acquisitions Librarian, 19(3), 367–388.
  • Thurstun, J. (2000). Screenreading: Challenges of the new literacies. Technology, Education and Society, 1, 39–55.
  • Vassiliou, M. & Rowley, J. (2008). Progressing the definition of “e-book”. Library Hi Tech, 26(3), 355–368.
  • Walton, E.W. (2007). Faculty and student perceptions of using e-books in a small academic institution. ACRL Thirteenth National Conference, 29 March – 1 April 2007, Baltimore, 92Woody, W.D., Danie, D.B. & Baker, C.A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55, 945–948.
  • Biodata and Contact Address of Author Sakine ÖNGÖZ was born in Trabzon, Turkiye in 1979. She completed her master of education degree on learning management system design at Karadeniz Technical University in August 2005. She completed her doctoral studies (Ph.D.) on interactive electronic book design at the same university in 2011. She has been working as a fulltime faculty member, Assist.Prof. Dr., in the Department of Computer Educaton & Instructional Technologies, Fatih Faculty of Education, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkiye, since 2011. Her research interests are electronic books and instructional animations.
  • Assist.Prof.Dr. Sakine ÖNGÖZ Karadeniz Technical University, Fatih Faculty of Education Department of Computer Education & Instructional Technologies Trabzon, Söğütlü, 61335, TURKIYE Phone:(0462) 3777120
  • Emails: sakineongoz@gmail.com or ssensoy@ktu.edu.tr

Türk Öğretim Üyelerinin Elektronik Kitap Kullanim Durum ve Tercihleri

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 33 - 54, 01.04.2013
https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.84220

Öz

Bu anket çalışmasının amacı Türk öğretim üyelerinin elektronik kitap kullanma durum ve tercihlerini belirlemektir. Veri toplama aracı olarak Neiman Library tarafından hazırlanan anket formu kullanılmıştır. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları yapılarak Türkçe'ye uyarlanan anket formu Türkiye'nin farklı üniversitelerinde görev yapan öğretim üyelerine e-posta yoluyla gönderilmiştir. Verilerin analiz edilmesi ile genellenebilir sonuçlara ulaşılmıştır. E-kitaplar öğretim üyelerinin kullandığı elektronik kaynaklar içinde %74,8 oranıyla üçüncü sırada yer almaktadır. E-kitaplara erişimde en çok tercih edilen yol Google vb. arama motorlarıdır. Öğretim üyelerinin çoğunluğu kendilerine seçme şansı verilmesi halinde bir kitabı basılı formda okumayı tercih edeceği yönünde görüş bildirmiştir. E-kitap okuma tercihi içinde en öne çıkan ise hem ekrandan hem de basılı olarak okumak şeklindedir.

Kaynakça

  • Abdullah, N. & Gibb, F. (2008). Students’ Attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish Higher Education Institute: Part 2 Analysis of e-book usage. Library Review, 57(9) 676–689.
  • Abram, S. (2004). eBooks: Rumors of our death greatly exaggerated, Information Outlook, 8(2), 14–16.
  • Armstrong, C. & Lonsdale, R. (2010). E-book use by academic staff and students in UK universities: Focus Group Report, Retrieved September 23, 2010, from http://www.jiscebooksproject.org/wp-content/JC-IAL_AcademiceBookUseFinal_ Report_v1-01.pdf
  • Anuradha, K. T. & Usha, H. S. (2006). Use of e-books in an academic and research environment: A case study from the Indian Institute of Science Program. Electronic Library and Information Systems, 40(1), 48–62.
  • Ardito, S. (2000). Electronic books: To “e” or not to “e”; that is the question. Searcher, 8(4), 1–
  • Armatas, C., Holt, D. & Rice, M. (2003). Impacts of online-supported resource-based learning environment: Does one size fit all? Distance Education, 24(2), 141–158.
  • Bailey, T.P. (2006). Electronic book usage at a master’s level I university: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 52–59.
  • Bierman, J., Ortega, L. & Rupp-Serrano, K. (2010). E-book usage in pure and applied sciences. Science & Technology Libraries, 29, 69–91.
  • Brewer, S. & Milam, P. (2006). SLJ's Technology Survey 2006: New technologies—like blogs and wikis—are taking their place in the school media center. School Library Journal, 52(6), 45–49.
  • Buzzetto-More, N., Sweat-Guy, R. & Elobaid, M. (2007). Reading in a digital age: E-books are students ready for this learning object? Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Anket geliştirme, Retrieved April 18, 2011, from http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/arsiv/2005_cilt3/sayi_2/133-151.pdf .
  • Camacho, L. & Spackman, A. (2011). Transitioning to e-books: Usage and attitudes among business faculty. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16(1), 33–45
  • Christianson, M. & Aucoin, M. (2005). Electronic or print books: Which are used? Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 29, 71–81.
  • Chu, H. (2003). Electronic books: Viewpoints from users and potential users. Library Hi Tech 21(3), 340–346.
  • Erol, A. (2009). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Elektronik Yayıncılık. Thesis (PhD), Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi.
  • Fernandez, M., 2003. A usage comparison for print and electronic books at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. Thesis (PhD) University of North Carolina.
  • Foote, J.B. & Rupp-Serrano, K. (2010). Exploring e-book usage among faculty and graduate students in the geosciences: Results of a small survey and focus group approach. Science & Technology Libraries, 29, 216–234.
  • Guthrie, R. G. (2002). The e-book: Ahead of its time or a burst bubble? LOGOS: The Journal of a World Book Community, 13(1), 9–17.
  • Gürcan, H. İ. & Bayram, F. (2005). Yerel haberlerin internet ortamında görünümleri- Denizli, Eskişehir ve Erzurum örnekleminde bir değerlendirme. Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 3(4), 53–62.
  • Gregory, C.L. (2008). “But I want a real book” An investigation of undergraduates' usage and attitudes toward electronic boks. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 47(3), 266– 2
  • Hartley, J. (2002). Is judging text on screen different from judging text in print? A naturalistic e-mail experiment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 21–25. Hawkins, D. T. (2000). Electronic books: A major publishing revolution: Part 1: General considerations and issues. Online 24, 4, 14–28.
  • Hernon, P., Hopper, R., Leach, M.R., Saunders, L.L. & Zhang, J. (2006). E-book use by students: Undergraduates in Economics, Literature, and Nursing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(1), 3–13.
  • Jamali, H.R., Nicholas, D. & Rowlands, I. (2009). Scholarly e-books: the views of 16,000 academics- Results from the JISC National E-Book Observatory. New Information Perspectives, 61(1), 33–47.
  • Jung, S-M. ve Lim, K-B. (2009). Leading future education: Development of digital textbooks in Korea. 12th UNESCO-APEID International Conference Quality Innovations for Teaching and Learning, 24-26 March 2009, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Kropman, M., Schoch, H.P. & Teoh, H.Y. (2004). An experience in e-learning: using an electronic textbook. Retrieved June 25, 2012 from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/pdf/kropman.pdf .
  • Letts, M. (2001). E-textbooks test emerging platforms. E-books, 1(1), 25–30.
  • Levine-Clark, M. (2006). Electronic book usage: a survey at the University of Denver. PortalLibraries and the Academy, 6(3), 285–99.
  • Levine-Clark, M. (2007). Electronic books and the humanities: A survey at the University of Denver. Collection Building, 26(1), 7–14.
  • Littman, J. & Connaway, L.S. (2004). A circulation analysis of print and e-books in an academic research library. Library Resources and Technical Services, 48( 4), 256–62.
  • Mahajan, P. & Chakravarty, R. (2007). E-Books as a tool for scholarly communication: Emerging trends and Technologies. Proceedings of 5th International CALIBER, Chandigarh, 554-569.
  • McKnight, C. ve Dearnley, J. (2003). Electronic book use in a public library. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35(4), 235–242.
  • Monopoli, M, Nicholas D., Georgiou P. & Korfiati M. (2002). A user-oriented evaluation of digital libraries: Case study “Electronic Journals” services of the Library and Information Services of University of Patras. Aslib Proceedings, 54(2), 103–117.
  • Neiman Library of Exact Sciences & Engineering eBooks Survey, 2010. Retrieved April 15, 2011 from: http://blog.tau.ac.il/libraries/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/the-NeimanLibrary-eBooks-survey.pdf .
  • Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H.R., & Ollé, C. (2008). UK scholarly e-book usage: A landmark survey. Aslib Proceedings, 60 (4), 311–34.
  • NTVMSNBC (2012). E-kitap Türkiye’de olur mu?, Retrieved June 25, 2012 from: http://www.ntvmsnbc.com/id/25116494/#storyContinued .
  • Oxford Dictionaries (2011). E-book, Retrieved April 11, 2011 from: http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_us124296.
  • Önder, I. (2010). Elektronik kitap olgusu ve Türkiye’deki durum. Thesis (PhD), Ankara Üniversitesi.
  • Perkins, I.M. & Johanson, G. (2009). New texts in old pedagogies; use of electronic books by undergraduate. Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA) 14th Exhibition and Conference, 20-22 January, Sydney.
  • Rao, S. S. (2003). Electronic books: A review and evaluation. Library Hi Tech, 21(1), 85–93.
  • Ray, K. & Day, J. (1998). Student attitudes towards electronic information resources. Information Research, 4(2).
  • Rogers, M. (2001). Survey reveals college students’ growing preference for e-texts. Library Journal, 126(2), 31.
  • Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H.R. & Huntington, P. (2007). What do faculty and students really think about e-books? New Information Perspectives, 59(6), 489–511.
  • Rukancı, F. & Anameriç, H. (2003). E-kitap teknolojisi ve kullanımı. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 17(2), 147–166.
  • Shiratuddin, N., Landoni, M., Gibb, F. & Hassan, S. (2003). E-book technology and its potential applications in distance education. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4).
  • Smith, B.A. (2008). A quantitative analysis of the impact of e-book format on student acceptance, usage and satisfaction. Thesis (PhD), Capella University.
  • Soules, A. (2008). New types of e-books, e-book issues, and implications for the future. The Acquisitions Librarian, 19(3), 367–388.
  • Thurstun, J. (2000). Screenreading: Challenges of the new literacies. Technology, Education and Society, 1, 39–55.
  • Vassiliou, M. & Rowley, J. (2008). Progressing the definition of “e-book”. Library Hi Tech, 26(3), 355–368.
  • Walton, E.W. (2007). Faculty and student perceptions of using e-books in a small academic institution. ACRL Thirteenth National Conference, 29 March – 1 April 2007, Baltimore, 92Woody, W.D., Danie, D.B. & Baker, C.A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55, 945–948.
  • Biodata and Contact Address of Author Sakine ÖNGÖZ was born in Trabzon, Turkiye in 1979. She completed her master of education degree on learning management system design at Karadeniz Technical University in August 2005. She completed her doctoral studies (Ph.D.) on interactive electronic book design at the same university in 2011. She has been working as a fulltime faculty member, Assist.Prof. Dr., in the Department of Computer Educaton & Instructional Technologies, Fatih Faculty of Education, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkiye, since 2011. Her research interests are electronic books and instructional animations.
  • Assist.Prof.Dr. Sakine ÖNGÖZ Karadeniz Technical University, Fatih Faculty of Education Department of Computer Education & Instructional Technologies Trabzon, Söğütlü, 61335, TURKIYE Phone:(0462) 3777120
  • Emails: sakineongoz@gmail.com or ssensoy@ktu.edu.tr
Toplam 52 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Sakine Öngöz Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Öngöz, S. (2013). Türk Öğretim Üyelerinin Elektronik Kitap Kullanim Durum ve Tercihleri. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram Ve Uygulama, 3(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.84220