Satisfaction from Academic Activities among Medical Students in Malaysia

Abstract

There is a lack of data about the levels of satisfaction among medical students in regards to their academ- ic activities in Malaysia. Therefore, the objective of this study was to fill the gap in the existing knowledge. A cross sectional study was carried out at the International medical school, the Management and Science University of Malaysia, from December 2011 to February 2012. A total of 200 medical stu- dents were participated in this study through random sampling. The questionnaires used in this study consisted of socio-demographic questions and questions about the existing academic system. The study found that, despite there was the satisfaction by medical students from some academic aspects, improve- ments in other areas, such as providing digital library and career counseling, are urgently needed. The present study provides the world community with factual information about the current situation in medi- cal education in Malaysia. The results of the study might assist Malaysian administrators and authorities in better decision making.

Keywords

• medical students, academic activities, satisfaction

Kaynakça

1. Abeykoon P, Mattock N(1996). Medical education in South-East Asia New Delhi: regional office for South-East Asia. Geneva; World Health Organ.
2. Abraham RR, Upadhya S, Torke S, Ramnarayan K (2005). Student perspectives of assessment by TEMM model in physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 29, 94-97.
3. Association of American Medical Colleges (2006). Graduation Questionnaire. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/download/90062/data/gq-2006.
4. Bandaranayake R(1989). Implementing change in medical education in developing countries. Med Teacher 11, 39-45.
5. Bokken L, Rethans JJ, van Heurn L, Duvivier R, Scherpbier A, van der VIeuten C (2009). Students' views on the use of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med 84, 958-963.
6. Chessman AW, Bellack JP, Lahoz MR, White AW, Kennedy B, Slaughter SC, Cleghorn GD (1998). Students add value to learning organizations: the Medical University of South Carolina experience. Qual Manag Health Care 6, 38-43.
7. Coles CR, Grant JG (1985). Curriculum evaluation in medical and health-care education. Med Educ 19, 405-442.
8. Costa ML, van Rensburg L, Rushton N (2007). Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopedic undergraduate teaching. Med Educ 41, 214-217.

9. Distlehorst LH (2000). What graduate follow-up studies can tell us. Med Educ 34, 976-977.
10. Farida H, Lubna B, Farah AM (2006) Opinion of medical students regarding problem based learning. J Pak Med Assoc 56, 430-432.
11. Fischer RL, Jacobs SL, Herbert WNP (2004). Small-group discussion versus lecture format for third-year students in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 104, 349-353.
12. Grant J, Gales R (1989) Changing medical education. Med Educ 2, 252-257.
13. Hashmi NR, Daud S, Manzoor I. (2010). Medical Education: Views and Recommendations by Final Year MBBS Students of a Private Medical College in Lahore. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 20, 93-97.
14. Jalili M, Mirzazadeh A, Azarpira A (2008). A survey of medical students' perceptions of the quality of their medical education upon graduation. Ann Acad Med 37, 1012-1018.
15. Manzar B, Manzar N (2011). To determine the level of satisfaction among medical students of a public sector medical university regarding their academic activities. BMC Res Notes 4, 380.
16. Martens MJ, Duvivier RJ, van Dalen J, Verwijnen GM, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP (2009). Student views on the effective teaching of physical examination skills: a qualitative study. Med Educ 43, 184-191.
17. Nandi PL, Chan JN, Chan CP, Chan P, Chan LP (2000).Undergraduate medical education: comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching. Hong Kong Med J 6, 301-306.
18. Oyebola DD, Adewoye OE, Iyaniwura JO, Alada AR, Fasanmade AA, Raji Y (2000). A comparative study of students' performance in preclinical physiology assessed by multiple choice and SEQs. Afr J Med Sci 29, 201-205.
19. Roff S, McAleer S, Harden R, Al-Qahtani M, Ahmed AU, Deza H, Groenen G, Primparyon P (1997). Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Med Teacher 19, 295-299.
20. Rooney S, Cullivan R, Kelly G (1999). Irish students and medical education. Irish J Med Sci 168:271-5.
21. Trevena L (2003) What medical student's value in a population health tutor: characteristics for consideration in staff recruitment and development. Educ Health 16, 51-58.
22. Yawar A, Shah SS (2003). Faculty and students survey: methods of imparting knowledge suitable for undergraduate medical students. Pak J Med Res 42, 116-119.