Araştırma Makalesi

The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4 15 Ekim 2013
  • Annika Meyer
  • İnga Meyer-ahrens
  • Matthias Wilde *
PDF İndir
EN

The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education

Abstract

Previous research has found conflicting evidence in studies where students participate in the selection of their course topics in educational settings. Katz and Assor, for example, have argued that the increase in student motivation is probably not due to the mere act of choosing, but to the value of the options with respect to personal interest. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of choice on aspects of motivation during biology lessons. Our sample consisted of five classes with 118 children of whom 63% were female. Their average age was 10.4 years (SD=0.6). One group of students was asked to select one topic out of four in a majority vote during a biology class, while a control group was simply assigned the same topic. Results: Students who chose their topic reported a higher level of intrinsic motivation than students who were not given the option. A surprising result was that the students in the voting group who did not receive their preferred choice reported the same level of motivation as those who did.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students´ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261-278.
  2. Baldwin, T., Magjuka, R., & Loher, B. (1991). The perils of participation: effects of choice of training on trainee motivation and learning. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 51-65.
  3. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
  4. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Self-determination research: Reflections and future directions. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 431-441). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Retrieved December 21, 2010, from Web site:http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/ measures/IMI_scales.php
  6. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of ‘voice’ and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253- 2261.
  7. Iyengar, S. S. & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), 995-1006.
  8. Katz, I., & Assor, A. (2007). When Choice Motivates and When It Does Not. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 429-442.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Annika Meyer Bu kişi benim
Germany

İnga Meyer-ahrens Bu kişi benim
Germany

Matthias Wilde * Bu kişi benim
Germany

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Ekim 2013

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Ekim 2013

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2013 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Meyer, A., Meyer-ahrens, İ., & Wilde, M. (2013). The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education. European Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.2.4.185
AMA
1.Meyer A, Meyer-ahrens İ, Wilde M. The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education. eujer. 2013;2(4):185-190. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.2.4.185
Chicago
Meyer, Annika, İnga Meyer-ahrens, ve Matthias Wilde. 2013. “The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education”. European Journal of Educational Research 2 (4): 185-90. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.2.4.185.
EndNote
Meyer A, Meyer-ahrens İ, Wilde M (01 Ekim 2013) The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education. European Journal of Educational Research 2 4 185–190.
IEEE
[1]A. Meyer, İ. Meyer-ahrens, ve M. Wilde, “The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education”, eujer, c. 2, sy 4, ss. 185–190, Eki. 2013, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.2.4.185.
ISNAD
Meyer, Annika - Meyer-ahrens, İnga - Wilde, Matthias. “The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education”. European Journal of Educational Research 2/4 (01 Ekim 2013): 185-190. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.2.4.185.
JAMA
1.Meyer A, Meyer-ahrens İ, Wilde M. The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education. eujer. 2013;2:185–190.
MLA
Meyer, Annika, vd. “The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education”. European Journal of Educational Research, c. 2, sy 4, Ekim 2013, ss. 185-90, doi:10.12973/eu-jer.2.4.185.
Vancouver
1.Annika Meyer, İnga Meyer-ahrens, Matthias Wilde. The Beneficial Effects of Non-received Choice: A Study on Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Education. eujer. 01 Ekim 2013;2(4):185-90. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.2.4.185