A Study on the Mothers of Roma Children Who Are a Risk Group

Abstract

This study aims to define Roma mothers’ views regarding their children’s education and their tendency towards crime. The study is based on an illustrative case study method. The participants of this study are mothers of Roma children between the ages of 4 and 6 who live in Konya, Turkey—more specifically in the Yenimahalle neighborhood in the town of Karatay—and who do not attend any preschool programs. As a data collection tool, a questionnaire prepared by the researchers is employed, while in data analysis, descriptive analysis is used. The Roma mothers articulated that they want their children to have education and jobs; that they do not want their children to suffer in the same way they did; that the Roma culture prevents children’s education and therefore the mothers prefer to send their children to private schools, boarding schools or to schools far away from their neighborhoods by taking school buses; that they want their children to be judges, lawyers, nurses and teachers. The mothers stated that they meet the basic needs of their children; that they watch TV together and/or do housework together with their children. They also said that when their children commit a crime, they beat their children; they get angry with them and scold and/or complain to their fathers. They finally added that they can take measures for the children’s not committing a crime by talking to the children or by scolding them. Additionally, Roma mothers state that by taking the case to the fathers they can prevent their children from committing crimes.

Keywords

• Roma mothers, Roma children, preschool period, education and crime

Kaynakça

1. Akgun, S. (2004). Ilkogretim sekizinci sinifta ogrenim gormekte olan roman cocuklarin bir ust ogrenime devam etmelerini etkileyen faktorler (Antalya Zeytinkoy Ornegi). Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi. Konya: Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu.
2. Akkan, B. E., Deniz, M. B. ve Ertan, M. (2011). Sosyal dislanmanin roman halleri. Istanbul: Punto Baski Cozumleri.
3. Aspy, C. B., Oman, R. F., Vesely, S. K., McLeroy, K., Rodine, S., and Marshall, L. (2004). Adolescent violence: The protective effects of youth assets. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 269-277.
4. Askin, U. (2011). Kuresellesme surecinde Turkiye’de yasayan romanlarin sosyo-ekonomik durumlari ve beklentileri: Izmir Ili orneginde bir alan arastirmasi. Yayinlanmamis doktora tezi. Ankara: Ankara Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu.
5. Aylar, E. (2006). Gorki toplulugu uzerine bir arastirma. Egitimde Kalite Yaklasimlari Dersi. Ankara: Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu.
6. Bayraktar Akkaya, O. (2011). Cingeneler: "Baska bir dunyanin insanlari". Global Media Journal. 1 (2), 121-136.
7. Bedmar, V. L. and Leon, N. T. (2012). Lifelong learning of gypsy women in Spain. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3119-3123.
8. Cigez, A. S. and Lopez, R. G. (1999). Gypsy children's schooling and intercultural attitudes in Spain. European Journal of Intercultural Studies, 10 (2), 207-217.

9. Cozma,T., Cucos, C., and Momanu, M. (2000). The education of Roma children in Romania: description, difficulties, solutions. Intercultural Education, 11 (3), 281-288.
10. Cagdas, A. ve Secer, Z. (2011). Anne-baba egitimi. Ankara: Egiten Kitap.
11. Dominguez, S. P. (1999). Teachers' attitudes about the integration of Roma: The case of Spain. Intercultural Education, 10 (2), 219-231.
12. Enache, R. (2012). Educational intervention for a group of socially disadvantaged pre-schoolers from Constanta, Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4995-4999.
13. Erdeniz, G. (2005). Risk altindaki cocuklar egitim atolyesi-I. Istanbul. Retrieved on 11.10.2010, from http://erg.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/erg.sabanciuniv.edu/files/BETAMRapor.pdf
14. Eren, Z. C. (2008). Imagining and positioning gypsiness a case study of gypsy/roma from Izmir, Tepecik. Unpublished thesis. Ankara: Middle East Technical University. http://academos.ro/sites/default/files/biblio-docs/837/index_2_0.pdf (12.28.2013).
15. Fraser, N and Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition?: A political-philosophical exchange. Translated by Joel Golb, James Ingram and Christiane Wilke. London: Verso.
16. Gokcen, S. ve Oney, S. (2008). “Turkiye’de Romanlar ve Milliyetcilik”, Ebru Uzpeder, Savelina Danova/Roussinova, Sevgi Ozcelik ve Sinan Gokcen (Eds.). Biz Buradayiz! Turkiye’de Romanlar, Ayrimci Uygulamalar ve Hak Mucadelesi. Istanbul: Mart Matbaacilik.
17. Karabacak, N. (2013). “Turk Egitim Sisteminde suc sorunu ve sucun psiko-sosyal boyutlari”. 5. Uluslararasi Risk Altinda ve Korunmasi Gereken Cocuklar Sempozyumu, Antalya: Bildiri Ozet Kitabi.
18. Kaplan, B., Isik Caliskan, Z., Gurbuz, D., Goktas, N., ve Ozdil, K. (2013). Nevsehir Il Merkezinde suca suruklenen ve suc magduru olan cocuklara genel bir bakis. 5. Uluslararasi Risk Altinda ve Korunmasi Gereken Cocuklar Sempozyumu, Antalya: Bildiri Ozet Kitabi.
19. Koptekin, D. (2013). Roman cocuklarin kendi kimliklerini tanimlama bicimleri: Izmir Tepecik Ornegi. Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi. Izmir: Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu.
20. Kuguoglu, I. (2013). “Suc isleyen cocuklarin algilamasina gore toplumdaki sosyal kurumlarin suca yonelmede etkililik duzeyi”. 5. Uluslararasi Risk Altinda ve Korunmasi Gereken Cocuklar Sempozyumu, Antalya: Bildiri Ozet Kitabi.
21. Kyuchukov, H. (2000). Transformative education for Roma (Gypsy) children: an insider's view. Intercultural Education, 11(3), 273-280.
22. Lovrich, N., Thomas, A., and Marshall, W. (2013). “Insights from the history of U.S. Efforts to legislate, adjudicate and enforce protections against child abuse”. 5. Uluslararasi Risk Altinda ve Korunmasi Gereken Cocuklar Sempozyumu, Antalya: Bildiri Ozet Kitabi.
23. McDonald, C. (1999). Roma in the Romanian Educational System: Barriers and leaps of faith. European Journal of Intercultural Studies, 10 (2), 183-200.
24. MEB, (2013). 0-36 Ay cocuklari icin egitim programi ile butunlestirilmis aile destek egitim rehberi (Ebader), Egitimci kitabi, Ankara.
25. Ozdemir, S., Sezgin, F., Sirin, H., Karip, E. ve Erkan, S. (2010). Ilkogretim okulu ogrencilerinin okul iklimine iliskin algilarini yordayan degiskenlerin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 38, 213-224.
26. Ozkan, A. R. (2013). Turkiye cingeneleri. http://www.turkiyecingeneleri.8m.com/ (05.27.2013).
27. Smith, T. (1997). Recognising Difference: the Romani 'Gypsy' child socialization and education process. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18 (2), 243-256.
28. Suntekin, C. (2008). Roman cocuklarin gozuyle ailelerin islevselligi: Tarlabasi Ornegi. Yayinlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi. Ankara: Hacettepe Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu.
29. Sahinli, K. (2013). “Familial factors affecting entrainment child crime”. 5. Uluslararasi Risk Altinda ve Korunmasi Gereken Cocuklar Sempozyumu, Antalya: Bildiri Ozet Kitabi.
30. Trentin, R., Monaci, M. G., De Lume, and Zanon, O. (2006). Scholastic integration of gypsies in Italy teachers’ attitudes and experience. School Psychology International, 27 (1), 79-103.
31. Ugurlu, O. (2013). Donusen kentlerde Cingene olmak: Izmit ornegi. Mulkiye Dergisi. 37 (1), 71-104.
32. UNICEF, (2009). Retrieved on 11.10.2009, from http://www.unicef.org/turkey /pc/ge17.html
33. UNICEF, (2012). Kent ortamlarinda Roman cocuklar. Retrieved on 07.12.2012, from http://www.unicef.org.tr/tr/content/detail/53/children-in-the-population.html
34. Yildirim, A. ve Simsek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastirma Yontemleri. (Altinci Baski). Ankara: Seckin Yayinevi.
35. Yilmaz, H. (2007). Sevgili Anne ve Babacigim, Lutfen Bu Kitabi Okur musunuz!. (27. Baski). Konya: Cizgi Kitabevi.