The Language Teaching Methods Scale: Reliability and Validity Studies

Abstract

The aim of this research is to develop a scale to determine the language teaching methods used by English teachers. The research sample consisted of 300 English teachers who taught at Duzce University and in primary schools, secondary schools and high schools in the Provincial Management of National Education in the city of Duzce in 2013-2014 academic Year. Data collected were subjected to Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient was computed. The Exploratory Factor Analysis results showed that the scale consisted of 5 factors. These factors were named as Active Teaching Method, Listening Based Teaching Method, Four Basic Skills Based Method, Speaking Based Method and Grammar Based Method. The total variance explained by the 5 factors was determined to be 54.69%. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis results confirmed the 5-factors structure. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient was computed as .89. It is thought that this scale can be used to identify language teaching methods that English teachers use as a reliable and valid scale.

Keywords

• Language teaching, teaching methods, scale development

Kaynakça

1. Ansin, S. (2006). Cocuklarda Yabancı Dil Ogretimi. D.U. Ziya Gokalp Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 6, 9–20.
2. Buyukozturk, S. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler icin Veri Analizi El Kitabi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi
3. Cokluk, O., Sekercioglu, G.,& Buyukozturk, S. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler için Cok Degiskenli Istatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamalari. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
4. Demircan, O. (1993). Dunden Bugune Turkiye'de Yabanci Dil. İstanbul: Remzi .
5. Demirel, O. (2012). Yabanci Dil Öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
6. DeVellis, R. F. (2014). Olcek Gelistirme. (Trans. T. Totan) Nobel Publishers.
7. Doll, W. J. Weidong, X. & Gholamreza, T. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument, MIS Quarterly, 18 (4), 453-461.
8. Gunbatar, M. S. (2014). Bilgi ve Iletisim Teknolojilerine Yonelik Bir Tutum Olcegi Gelistirme Calismasi, Ahi Evran Universitesi Kirsehir Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 15(1), 121-135.

9. Gunes, F. (2011). Dil Ogretim Yaklasimlari ve Turkce Ogretimindeki Uygulamalar. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 123-148.
10. Gunes, F. (2014). Egitimde Yontem ve Teknik Tartismalari. International Journal of Language Academy, 2(4), 23-35.
11. Guvenc, H. (2010). Ders Calisma Ozyeterlilik Algisi Olceginin Gelistirme Calismasi, Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 7(1), 59-69.
12. Işik, A. (2008). Yabancı Dil Egitimimizdeki Yanlıslar Nereden Kaynaklanıyor?. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2).
13. Jin-fang, S. & Qing-xue, L. (2007). An Analysis of Language Teaching Approaches and Methods- Effectiveness and Weakness, 4(1).
14. Kamhuber, P. (2010). Comparison of grammar in Austrian and Spanish English language teaching textbooks. Vienna: Lehramt Englisch, BewegungundSport.
15. Konakli, T. & Gogus, N. (2013). Aday Ogretmenlerin Sosyal Girisimcilik Ozellikleri Olcegi: Gecerlilik ve Guvenilirlik Calismasi, Gazi Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 33(2), 373-391.
16. Memis, M.R.,& Erdem, M. D. (2013). Yabancı Dil Ogretimde Kullanilan Yontemler, Kullanim Ozellikleri ve Elestiriler. Turkish Studies-International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(9), s:297–318. Retrieved from http://www.turkishstudies.net/Makaleler/321673399_026Memi%c5%9fMuhammetRa%c5%9fit-vd-297-318.pdf
17. Murcia, M. C. (2013). Language teaching methods from Greeks to Gattegno. MEXTESOL Journal 37(2), 1–9.
18. Okur, E. & Yalçın-Özdilek, Ş. (2012). Yapısal eşitlik modeli ile geliştirilmiş çevresel tutum ölçeği, İlköğretim Online Dergisi, 11 (1), 85-94.
19. Salvucci, S., Walter, E., Conley, V., Fink, S., & Saba, M. (1997). Measurement error studies at the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Washington D. C.: U. S. Department of Education.
20. Secer, I. (2013). SPSS ve LISREL ile Pratik Veri Analizi. Ankara: Anı Yayincilik.
21. Secer, I., Halmatov, S. & Gencdogan, B. (2013). Duygusal Tepkisellik Olceginin Turkceye Uyarlanmasi: Guvenirlik ve Gecerlilik Calismasi, Sakarya University Journal of Education, 3(1),77-89.
22. Segars, A. H. & Varun, G. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis, MIS Quarterly, 17 (4), 517-525.
23. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
24. Tanrikulu, T., Kinay, H. & Aricak, O. T. (2013). Siber Zorbaliga Karsi Duyarlilik Olcegi: Gecerlilik ve Guvenilirlik Calismasi, Trakya Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 3(1), 38-47.
25. Yildizlar, M. (2013). Ogretim Ilke ve Yontemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.