The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on "de Broglie Matter Waves" Subject

Abstract

The object of this study is to determine the conceptual understanding that prospective Science teachers have relating "de Broglie: Matter waves" and to investigate the effect of the instruction performed, on the conceptual understanding. This study was performed at a state university located in the western part of Turkey, with the Faculty of Education-Science Teaching students (2nd year / 48 individual) in the academic year of 2010-2011. The study was planned as a single group pretest-posttest design. A two-step question was used in the study, prior to and after the instruction. Lessons were conducted using the 7E learning model in the instruction process. When all these results are evaluated, it can be said that the conceptual understanding of the prospective teachers regarding "de Broglie; matter waves" has been taken place. In general, when all the sections are examined, it has been observed that the prospective teachers have more alternative concepts prior to the instruction and more scientific concepts after the instruction.  In this process, besides instruction, the prospective teachers have not taken any place in a different application regarding the basic concepts of quantum physics. Therefore, it has been determined that the 7E learning model used in the research and the activities included in the 7E learning model are effective in conceptual understanding.

Keywords

• 7E learning model,matter waves,conceptual understanding

Kaynakça

1. Akarsu, B., Coskun, H., & Kariper, A. I. (2011). An investigation on college students’ conceptual understanding of quantum physics topics. Journal of Mustafa Kemal University Institute of Social Sciences, 8(15), 349–362.
2. Bybee, R. W. (2003). Why the seven E's. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from: http://www.miamisci.org/ph/lpintro7e.html.
3. Bethge, T., & Niedderer, H. (1995). Students' conceptions in quantum physics. Submitted to American Journal of Physics (AJP).
4. Caliskan, S. (2002). Quantum physics lesson teaching programme proposal: Oscillator example (Unpublished Master's Thesis). 9 Eylul University, Institute of Social Sciences, Izmir, Turkey.
5. Cepni, S. (2010). Introduction to research and project studies (Revised copy). Trabzon: Celepler Pressing.
6. Cohen, L. and Manian, L. (1994). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
7. Cushing, T. J. (2003). Philosophical concepts in physics-1. Istanbul: Sabanci University Publications.
8. Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expandingthe 5E model. Science Teacher, 70(6), 56-59.

9. Ejigu, M. A. (2014). An investigation into physics students’ depictions of the basic concepts of quantum mechanics, (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of South Africa, South Africa.
10. Eryilmaz, O. (2014). Comparison of the learning status of high school modern physics subjects taught in line with two different teaching programs (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
11. Eryilmaz, O., & Sen, A. I. (2010). Determination of concepts of 12th grade students of secondary education by concept maps relating modern physics. IX. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Book of Abstracts, 36, Izmir.
12. Fletcher, J. (1997). How students learn quantum mechanics (Unpublished Master Thesis). University of Sydney, Australia.
13. Fletcher, P., & Johnson, I. (1999). Quantum mechanics: Exploring conceptual change. Paper present at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Retrieved March 22, 2010, from: https://jrm.phys.ksu.edu/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf#page=22.
14. Hewitt-Taylor J. (2001). Use of the constant comparative analysis in qualitative research. Art & Science Research Methods, 15, 39–42.
15. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodogy methods and techniques (Second Edition). New Delhi: New age International Publishers.
16. Mashadi, A., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Insights into students' understanding of quantum physics: visualizing quantum entities. European Journal of Physics, 20(6), 511-516.
17. Mcevoy, P. J., &  Zarate, O. (2010). Quantum theory (N. Catli, Trans.). Istanbul: NTV Publications.
18. Ireson, G. (1999). A multivariate analysis of undergraduate physics students’ conceptions of quantum phenomena. Europen Journal of Physics, 20(3), 193-199.
19. Muller, R., & Wiesner, H. (1999). Students’ conceptions of quantum physics. Paper present at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from: https://jrm.phys.ksu.edu/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf#page=22.
20. Olsen, R. V. (2001). Introduction quantum mechanics in the upper secondary school: A study in Norway. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 565-574.
21. Patton M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (M. Butun, S.B. Demir, Trans.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
22. Sackes, M. (2010).  The role of cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational variables in conceptual change: preservice early childhood teachers’ conceptual understanding of the cause of lunar phases (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).  Graduate Program in Education, The Ohio State University, The Ohio State, USA.
23. Steinberg, R. Wittman, M. C., Bao, L., & Redisch, E.F. (1999). The influence of student understanding of classical physics when learning quantum mechanics. Paper present at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from: https://jrm.phys.ksu.edu/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf#page=22.
24. Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 633–655.
25. Trundle K., Atwood R., & Christopher J. (2006). Fourth grade elementary students’ conceptions of standards based lunar concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 595-616.
26. Ucar, S. (2007). Using inquiry-based instruction with web-based data archives to facilitate conceptual change about tides among preservice teachers (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Ohio State University, The Ohio State, USA.
27.  Yalcin, O., & Emrahoglu, N. (2017). Examining the high school students’ transfer levels of modern physics topics to daily life. Pegem Education and Training Journal, 7(1), 115-158.
28. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.