Cooperative Learning in Acquisition of the English Language Skills

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to reveal the effect of cooperative learning on language skills in an English course. The study was carried out for 5 weeks with 66 students studying at the 10th grade at an Anatolian high school in the district of Karadeniz Eregli in Zonguldak during the fall term of the 2015-2016 academic year. The design of the study was ‘nonequivalent control groups pre-test post-test’ which is one of quasi-experimental designs. Data were gathered using an achievement test measuring students’ vocabulary knowledge, grammar knowledge, reading comprehension and listening skills. Results showed that cooperative learning had a larger effect on vocabulary knowledge, grammar, listening and reading skills compared to traditional method.

Keywords

• Cooperative learning,vocabulary knowledge,grammar,listening,reading comprehension,English Course,high school

Kaynakça

1. Acikgoz, K. (2003). Aktif ogrenme [Active learning]. Izmir: Egitim Dunyasi.
2. Almanza, T. (1997). The effects of the D.R.T.A. and cooperative learning strategies on reading comprehension (M.A. Dissertation). Kean College of New Jersey.
3. Bandura, A. (1989). Social foundations of thought and action: A Social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
5. Batdi, V. (2013). Isbirlikli ogrenmenin yabanci dil ogretimindeki onemine iliskin ogretmen gorusleri [Teachers’ views towards the significance of cooperative learning in foreign language teaching]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(1), 1-14.
6. Bejarano, Y. (1987). A cooperative small-group methodology in the language classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 21(3), 483-504.
7. Bibi, A. (2002). The comparative effectiveness of teaching English Grammar with the help of textbook and by using Group work Activities (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad.
8. Bozavli, E. (2012). Isbirligine dayali ogrenme yontemiyle yabanci dil ogretimi [Teaching foreign language through cooperative learning method]. Amasya University Education Journal, 1(1), 31-40.

9. Buyukozturk, S., Cokluk, O. & Koklu, N. (2014). Sosyal bilimler icin istatistik [Statistics for social sciences] (14th. Edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
10. Cohen, E. (1986). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Celebi, M. D. (2006). Turkiye’de anadili egitimi ve yabanci dil ogretimi [Mother tongue education and foreign language teaching in Turkey]. Social Sciences Institution Journal, 21(2), 285-307.
12. Cetintas, B. (2010). Turkiye’de yabanci dil egitim ve ogretiminin surekliligi [Stability of foreign language education and teaching in Turkey]. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 6(1), 65-74.
13. Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2001). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
14. Endeshaw, A. D. (2015). The effect of cooperative learning on students’ EFL reading comprehension: Meshentie grade nine high school students in focus. Education Journal, 4(5), 222-231.
15. Fekri, N. (2016). Investigating the effect of cooperative learning and competitive learning strategies on the English vocabulary development of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 6-12.
16. Fetsco, T., & McClure, J. (2005). Educational psychology: An integrated approach to classroom decisions. Boston: Allyn-Bacon Longman.
17. Ghaith, G., (2003). Effects of the learning together model of cooperative learning on English as a foreign language reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of school alienation. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 451-474.
18. Ghaith, G., & Malak, M. (2004). Effect of jigsaw II on literal and higher order EFL reading comprehension. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 105-115.
19. Gillies, M. R., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teacher’s reflections on cooperative learning: issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education 26(4), 933-940.
20. Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
21. Guneyli, A., & Demirel, O. (2006). A new concept in language learning; application of European language development. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(2), 110-118.
22. Green, S., & Salkind, N. (2003). Using SPSS for windows and macintosh: analyzing and understanding data (3rd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
23. Hadyan, R. (2013). Implementation of the cooperative learning method in teaching reading comprehension. Journal of English and Education, 1(2), 57-64.
24. Hampton, D. & Grundnitski, G. (1996). Does cooperative learning mean equal learning?. Journal of Education for Business, 72(1), 5-7.
25. Hancock, D. (2004). Cooperative learning and peer orientation effects on motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 159 - 166.
26. Hsiung, C. (2012). The effectiveness of cooperative learning. Journal of Engineering Education January, 101(1), 119–137.
27. Isik, A. (2008). Yabanci dil egitimimizdeki yanlislar nereden kaynaklaniyor? [What are the reasons of the errors in foreign language training?]. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2), 15-26.
28. Jalilifar, A. (2009). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students’ reading comprehension. System Volume, 38(1), 96-108.
29. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R.T. & Smith, K. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report, No. 4, Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
30. Johnson, D. W. & Johnson R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. (5. ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
31. Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative learning in the classroom putting it into practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
32. Kauchak, D. P., & Eggen, P. D. (2003). Learning and teaching research based methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Khan, S. A. & Ahmad, R. N. (2014). Evaluation of the effectiveness of cooperative learning method versus traditional learning method on the reading comprehension of the students. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 8 (1), 55 -64.
34. Klimovienė, G., & Statkevičienė, S. (2006). Using cooperative learning to develop language competence and social skills. Studies About Languages, 8, 77-83.
35. Krauss, R. M., & Chiu C.Y. (2016). Language and social behavior. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindsey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4h ed.), 2, 41-88. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
36. Marzbana, A., & Alinejadb, F. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning on reading comprehension of iranian EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3744 – 3748.
37. Meng, J. (2010). Cooperative learning method in the practice of English reading and speaking. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(5), 701-703.
38. Nejad, S. G., & Keshavarzi, A. (2015). The effect of cooperative learning on reading comprehension and reading anxiety of pre- university students. Article in Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research. 2(8), 169-180.
39. Olsen, R., & Kagan, S. (1992). About cooperative learning. In C. Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative language learning: A teacher’s resource book (1-30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40. Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Essentials of educational psychology. Ohio: Pearson Prentice Hall.
41. Ozdemir, A. E. (2006). Turkiye’de Ingilizce ogreniminin yayginlasmasinin nedenleri [The reasons of the spread of learning English in Turkey]. Mersin University Journal of Education, 2(1), 28-35.
42. Ozdemir, E. (2014). Yabanci dil ogretiminde oz duzenlemeli jigsaw IV tekniginin universite ogrencilerinin basarilarina ve tutumlarina etkisi [The effect of self-regulated Jigsaw IV technique on the achievements and attitudes of university students in foreign language teaching]. (Master’s Thesis). B.E.Ü. Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Zonguldak.
43. Ozden, Y. (2004). Ogrenme ve ogretme [Learning and teaching]. Ankara: Pegem A.
44. Pala, A. (1995). Isbirlikli ogrenmenin yabanci dil ogretimindeki etkililigi [The effect of cooperative learning in foreign language teaching]. Unprinted MA dissertation, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir.
45. Phiwpong, N. & Dennis, N. K. (2016). Using cooperative learning activities to enhance fifth grade students’ reading comprehension skill. International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah, 4(1), 146-152.
46. Pinkeaw, P. (1993). Students’ views on interaction and learning acheivement through cooperative learning method in upper-secondary English classess. M.A. Dissertation, Chiangmai University.
47. Saban, A. (2005). Ogrenme ogretme sureci yeni teori ve yaklasimlar [The new theories and approaches in learning teaching process]. Ankara: Nobel.
48. Seetape, N. (2003). Effects of cooperative learning on English reading achievement and learning behaviors of mathayomsuksa three students in Kanchanaphisekwittayalai Uthaithani School. M.A. Dissertation, Kasetsart University.
49. Siriratana, P. (1999). A comparison of matayomsuksa students English reading comprehension, writing ability, cooperative learning ability through instruction using top level structure with CIRC and the teachers manual. M.Ed. Dissertation, Srinakharinwirot University, Prasarnmitr.
50. Sittilert, W. (1994). Effects of cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) on English reading comprehension and opinions about classroom atmosphere of mathayomsuksa five students. M.A. Dissertation, Chiangmai University.
51. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
52. Slavin, R. E. (1984). Students motivating students to excel: cooperative incentives, cooperative tasks and student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 85, 53-63.
53. Stadjkovic, A. D. & Luthans, F. (1998). Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Going beyond traditional motivational and behavioral approachers. Organizational Dynamics, 26(4) 62-75.
54. Stahl, R. J. (1994). The essential elements of cooperative learning in the classroom. Retrieved from https://www.ericdigests.org/1995-1/elements.htm
55. Steams, C. J. (1999). A middle school venture into cooperative learning: successes and dilemmas. Theory into Practice, Building Community through Cooperative Learning, 38(2), 100-104.
56. Sahin, S. (2010). 0-6 Yas arasi cocuklarin temel gelisimsel ozellikleri: fiziksel ve sosyal- duygusal gelisim [Basic developmental characteristics of children between 0-6 years: physical and social-emotional development]. I.H. Diken. (Ed). Erken cocukluk egitimi [Early childhood education]. 1st Edition. Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.
57. Tang, H. (2000). Using cooperative concept mapping skill to teach ESL reading. PASSA, 30, pp. 77-89.
58. Thupapong, J. (1996). Effects of student team achievement devision learning (STAD) on English reading achievement and cooperation of mathayomsuksa students. M.A. Dissertation. Chiangmai University.
59. Tsay, M., & Brady, M. (2010). A case study of cooperative learning and communication pedagogy: Does working in teams make a difference?. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(10), 78–89.
60. Tuan, T. L. (2010). Infusing cooperative learning into an EFL classroom. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 64-77.
61. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The United States of America.
62. Vygotsky, L.S. (1998). The Collected works (Ed. Rieber, R.) New York: Plenum Press.
63. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small group. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.
64. Wichadee, S. (2005). The effects of cooperative learning on English reading skills and attitudes of the first-year students at Bangkok University. BU Academic Review, 4(2), 22-31.
65. Yastrebova, L. N. (2007). Teaching vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation in complex to students learning English as a second foreign language (after German). 4(67), 117-120.
66. Yildirim, Y. (2016). Egitim sosyolojisi perspektifi ile Piaget ve Vygotsky’nin bilissel gelisim kuramlari uzerine sosyolojik bir analiz denemesi [A sociological analysis of Piaget and Vygotsky's theories of cognitive development with an educational sociology perspective]. Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 5(2), 617 – 628.
67. Zarrabi, F. (2016). A study on cooperative language learning: the impact of CLL approach on English language proficiency of EFL learners. European Journal of Education Studies, 1(2), 119-132.
68. Zhang, Y. (2010). Cooperative language learning and foreign language learning and teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 81-83.