Investigation of the Effect of the Integration of Arduino to Electrical Experiments on Students' Attitudes towards Technology and ICT by the Mixed Method

Abstract

In this research, After I have realized some technological applications in the course of general physics laboratory II of the science teacher program, this research aims to examine the effects of the students' attitudes towards technology and the information of the communication technology (ICT) with the mixed method. For this application, after the introduction of Arduino was done, it was used as a measuring instrument in the laboratory; it also used the Fritzing program for circuit diagrams and the e-support system for sending poster studies. The research was carried out with the 50 first-year students of the department of science education at Kocaeli University. In this study, the attitude scales toward technology and ICT were used to collect the quantitative data, and a semi-structured interview form was used to collect the qualitative data. For the quantitative analyses in the study, “t-Test for Dependent Groups” and “A Two-Way ANOVA was used for Complex Measurements”, for the qualitative analyses, “Descriptive Analysis” was used. The two analyses were combined according to the mixed method research model and interpreted. The results of the research showed that technological applications in the physics of the laboratory such as using arduino, fritzing program, and poster studies have a significant effect on the attitudes of students in the study group toward technology and ICT, and it was supported by the qualitative research.

Keywords

• Arduino,students of the science education program,physics laboratory,fritzing program

Kaynakça

1. Ak, B. (2014). Verilerin duzenlenmesi ve gosterimi [Arrangement and representation of data]. Kalayci S. (Ed.), SPSS uygulamali cok degiskenli istatistik teknikleri [SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques] (3-47) (6th ed.). Ankara: Asil Publication.
2. Aktamis, H., & Arici, V. A. (2013). Sanal gerceklik programlarinin astronomi konularinin ogretiminde kullanilmasinin akademik basari ve kaliciligina etkisi [The effects of using virtual reality software in teaching astronomy subjects on academic achievement and retention]. Mersin University Faculty of Education Journal, 9(2), 58-70.
3. Arakliotis, S., Nikolos, D. G., & Kalligeros, E. (2016). Lawris: A rule-based Arduino programming system for young students. 5th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies. doi: 10.1109/MOCAST.2016.7495150.
4. Arduino. (2017). Arduino (Version 1.8.7) [Software]. Retrieved from http://arduino.cc/en/.
5. Ayas, A. (2006). Fen bilgisi ogretiminde laboratuar kullanimi [Laboratory use in science teaching]. Retrieved 20 April 2017 from http://www.aof.edu.tr / kitap/IOLTP/2283 / unite07.pdf.
6. Aydin, F., & Kara, F. N. (2013). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknolojiye yonelik tutumlari: olcek gelistirme calismasi [Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward technology: scale development study]. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(4), 103-118.
7. Barrera, A. H. (2014). Teaching introduction to robotics: using a blend of problem and Project-Based Learning Approaches. IEEE Southeastcon. doi:10.1109/SECON.2014.6950686.
8. Bozkurt, E., & Sarikoc A. (2008). Fizik egitiminde sanal laboratuvar, geleneksel laboratuvarin yerini tutabilir mi? [Can the virtual laboratory replace the traditional laboratory in physics education?] Selcuk Universitesi Ahmet Kelesoglu University Faculty of Education Journal, 25, 89 -100.

9. Buyukozturk, S. (2009). Sosyal bilimler icin veri analizi el kitabi [Manual of data analysis for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
10. Cameron, R. G. (2005). Mindstorms robolab: developing science concepts during a problem based learning club (Master’s thesis). Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, the University of Toronto, Canada.
11. Can, A. (2017). SPSS ile bilimsel arastirma surecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the process of scientific research with SPSS]. (8th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
12. Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Tekin, N., & Karahan, E. (2016, 31 May-3 Jun). Ogretmen adaylarinin fen laboratuvarlarinda qr kodlarla zenginlestirilmis poster kullanimlari [The use of posters enriched with qr code in science labs of teacher candidates]. 3.International Eurasion Educational Research Congress, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla.
13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications: Los Angeles.
14. Cayir, E. (2010). Lego-Logo ile desteklenmis ogrenme ortaminin bilimsel surec becerisi ve benlik algisi uzerine etkisinin belirlenmesi [Determining the effect of learning environment supported by Lego-Logo on scientific process skills and sense of self] (Unpublished master’ thesis). Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.
15. Cepni, S., & Ozmen, H. (2010). Kuramdan uygulamaya fen ve teknoloji ogretimi [Teaching science and technology from theory to practice]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
16. Cetin, O., Caliskan, E., & Menzi, N. (2012). Ogretmen adaylarinin teknoloji yeterlilikleri ile teknolojiye yonelik tutumlari arasindaki iliski [The relationship between technological competencies and attitudes of pre-service teachers towards technology]. Ilkogretim Online, 11(2), 273–291.
17. Cinici, A., Ozden, M., Akgun, A., Ekici, M., & Yalcin, H. (2013). Sanal ve geleneksel laboratuvar uygulamalarinin 5. sinif ogrencilerinin isik ve ses unitesiyle ilgili basarilari uzerine etkisinin karsilastirilmasi [To compare the effects of traditional laboratory activities and virtual laboratory implementations on fifth grade students achievement regarding “light and sound” unit]. Bayburt University Faculty of Education Journal, 8(2), 92-106.
18. Dokmetas, G. (2016). Arduino egitim kitabi [Arduino education book]. Istanbul: Dikeyeksen.
19. El-Abd, M. (2017). A review of embedded systems education in the arduino age: lessons learned and future directions. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 7(2), 79-93.
20. Fritzing. (2017). Fritzing (Version 0.9.3b) [Software]. Retrieved from http://fritzing.org/home/.
21. Gupta, N., Tejovanth, N., & Murthy, P. (2012). Learning by creating: interactive programming for Indian high schools. National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, India. doi: 10.1109/ICTEE.2012.6208643.
22. Gul, S., & Yesilyurt, S. (2011). Yapilandirmaci ogrenme yaklasimina dayali bir ders yaziliminin hazirlanmasi ve degerlendirilmesi [Preparing and evaluating a course software based on constructivist learning approach]. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 1(40), 19-36.
23. Gunbatar, M. S. (2014). Bilgi ve iletisim teknolojilerine yonelik bir tutum olcegi gelistirme calismasi [The Study on development of information and communication technology attitude scale]. Kirsehir Ahi Evran University Faculty of Education Journal, 15(1), 121-135.
24. Herger, M. L., & Bodarky, M. (2015). Engaging students with open source technologies and Arduino. 5th IEEE Integrated STEM Conference, Princeton, New Jersey. doi: 10.1109/ISECon.2015.7119938.
25. Hoffer, B. M. (2012). Satisfying STEM education using the Arduino Microprocessor in C Programming. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Retrieved 10 May 2017 from https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1472/.
26. Jamieson, P. (2018). Arduino for teaching embedded systems are computer scientists and engineering educators missing the boat? Retrieved 1 September 2018 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.217.7157&rep=rep1&type=pdf,
27. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Towerd a definition of mixed methods research, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133.
28. Maharaj-Sharma, R., Sharma, A. S. A., & Sharma, A. (2017). Using ICT-based instructional technologies to teach science: perspectives from teachers in Trinidad and Tobago. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(10), 23–35. doi:10.14221/ajte.2017v42n10.2.
29. MEB. (2017). Ilkogretim kurumlari (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) fen bilimleri dersi (4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. siniflar) ogretim program [Primary education institutions (primary schools and secondary schools) science courses (4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 grades) curriculum]. Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Baskanligi.
30. Medin, G. L., & Petric, M. (2015). Embedded lab: Arduino projects in science lessons, 4th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing. doi: 10.1109/MECO.2015.7181924.
31. Metin, M., Birisci, S., & Coskun, K. (2013). Ogretmen adaylarinin ogretim teknolojilerine yonelik tutumlarinin farkli degiskenler acisindan incelenmesi [Investigation of prospective teachers’ attitudes towards instructional technology in terms of different variables]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 21(4), 1345-1364.
32. Merino, P. P., Ruiz, E. S., Fernandez, G. C., & Gil, M. C. (2016). Robotic educational tool to engage students on engineering. XII Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching Conference. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757417.
33. Onal, N. (2014). Ortaokul matematik ogretmenlerinin egitimde bilisim teknolojileri kullanimina iliskin yeterlik ve goruslerinin arastirilmasi [Investigation of secondary school mathematics teachers' competencies and opinions on the use of information technologies in education] (Published Doctoral Thesis). Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
34. Ozcan, M. (2011). Bilgi caginda ogretmen egitimi, nitelikleri ve gucu: bir reform onerisi [Teacher education, teacher's qualifications and power in the information age: a reform proposal]. Ankara: TED.
35. Ozdener, N. (2005). Deneysel ogretim yontemlerinde benzetisim (simulation) kullanimi [Using simulation in experimental teaching methods.]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 93-98.
36. Semerci, A., & Aydin, M. K. (2018). Examining high school teachers’ attitudes towards ICT use in education. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(2), 93–105. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.139.7.
37. Senol, K. A. (2012). Robotik destekli fen ve teknoloji laboratuvar uygulamalari: robolab [Robotic-assisted science and technology laboratory applications:robolab] (Unpublished master’ thesis). Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
38. Shim, J., Ko, J., & Shim, J. (2014). A Study on training courses development and analysis for improving the creativity using Arduino. Journal of Korea Multimedia Society, 17, 514-525. doi: 10.9717/kmms.2014.17.4.514.
39. Soriano, A., Marin, L., Valles, M., Valera, A., & Albertos, P. (2014, August 24-29). Low cost platform for automatic control education based on open hardware. Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Cape Town, South Africa.
40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
41. Tanel, Z., & Onder, F. (2010). Elektronik laboratuvarinda bilgisayar simulasyonlari kullaniminin ogrenci basarisina etkisi: diyot deneyleri ornegi [Effect of computer simulatons on students’ achievement at electronics laboratory: example of diode experiments]. Dokuz Eylul University, Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 27, 101-110.
42. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J W. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 3-7. doi: 10.1177/1558-6898.062.9.3042.
44. Yavuz, S., & Coskun, E. (2008). Sinif ogretmenligi ogrencilerinin egitimde teknoloji kullanimina iliskin tutum ve dusunceleri [Attitudes and perceptions of elementary teaching through the use of technology in education]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34, 276-286.
45. Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seckin Publication.