‘It Is Not Our Fault; It Is Our Professors’ Fault!’ Preservice Teachers’ Perspectives on Their Own Experiences in Teacher Education Classrooms
Abstract
Teacher education programs are often accused of failing to prepare preservice teachers for real life classroom situations. In the case of research on classroom management, the focal point is often classroom teachers and their educational and behavioral goals rather than students’ experiences. This study aims to explore the perspectives of preservice teachers on their attitudes and behaviors in the university classrooms. For this purpose, 40 preservice teachers, who studied in the Early Childhood Education department at a state university in Turkey, were selected. The interview was chosen as the data collection method. The interview questions were based on the questions that Cothran, Kulinna and Garrahy (2003) used in their study with the secondary physical education students. The collected data were analyzed by the constant comparison method (Glaser & Strauss, 1967) and common themes were constructed through the analytic induction method (LeCompte & Preissle, 1993). In this study, the findings indicated that incompatible behaviors served different functions in teacher education classrooms. The preservice teachers perceived punitive teacher responses to students’ negative behaviors as compelling, ineffective and mostly humiliating practices. The preservice teachers provided three main elements that affect their attitudes, behaviors and experiences in a teacher education classroom. These elements were related to students, teachers, and the context of the classroom. The preservice teachers perceived their positive or negative behaviors mostly as reactions to the behavior of the teacher and the classroom environment.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Allen, J. D. (1986). Classroom management: Students' perspectives, goals, and strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 437-459.
- Allen, J. (1995). Friends, fairness, fun, and the freedom to choose: Hearing student voices. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10(4), 286-301.
- Anderson, J. A. (1999). Faculty responsibility for promoting conflict-free college classrooms. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 77, 69-76.
- Balli, S. J. (2011) Pre-service teachers’ episodic memories of classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 245-251.
- Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36(4), 391-409
- Caner, H.A. & Tertemiz, N. (2015). Beliefs, attitudes and classroom management: A study on prospective teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 155–160.
- Cerit, Y. (2011). The relationship between pre-service classroom teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and classroom management orientations. Dokuz Eylul University, Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 30, 156-174.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Mustafa Yasar
*
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
15 Ocak 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
12 Ekim 2018
Kabul Tarihi
15 Aralık 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1