Interplay between Politics and Institution in Higher Education Reform

Abstract

The advent of the new economy brought university reforms to the limelight, and higher education research concentrated on the study of interactions of multi-level, multi-actor policy reforms, to the detriment of studying policy implementation. The ebbing of implementation analysis in the mid-1980s has probably put researchers off following up policies to the point of delivery, resulting in what critics dubbed a 'missing link'. Policymakers more pronounced need to evaluate the impact of the policies they adopt, inter alia, has led to a renewed interest in bottom-up implementation in other public policy fields, but not as much in higher education research. The article builds on a Network Governance-informed approach for studying policy reform in higher education and adapts it to study of policy implementation with a focus on transition systems. Witte's actor-centered new institutional framework is taken as a springboard, and some of its underlying assumptions are reviewed for that purpose, adding insights from public administration literature (NPM) and Lipsky's street-level bureaucracy (SLBy). Ultimately, it proposes a politics-institutions framework to account for the institutional change entailed to the reforms.

Keywords

• Politics,higher education,reform

Kaynakça

1. Adelman, C. (2008, June 12). The Bologna club: What US higher education can learn from a decade of European reconstruction. Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501332.pdf
2. Allaste, A. A., & Cairns, D. (2016).Youth political participation in a transition society. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 8(2), 1-9.
3. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.
4. Bologna Declaration. (1999, June 19). The European higher education area. Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education convened in Bologna. Retrieved from http://www.upv.es/upl/U0450829.pdf
5. Bowe, R., Ball, S. J., & Gold, A. (1992) Reforming education and changing schools: Case studies in policy sociology. London, UK: Routledge.
6. Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949.
7. Borzel, T. A. (2010). Governance with/out government: False promises or flawed premises? Berlin, Germany: SFB-Governance Working Paper Series.
8. Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: Potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503-517.

9. Clark, B. (1983). The contradictions of change in academic systems. Higher Education, 12(1), 101-116
10. Denzau, A. T., & North D. C. (1994).Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), 3–31.
11. Eggins, H. (2014.). Drivers and barriers to achieving quality in higher education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
12. Ellis, K. (2011). Street‐level Bureaucracy’ revisited: The changing face of frontline discretion in adult social care in England. Social Policy Administration, 45(3), 221-244.
13. Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2009).Evolution of the university’s role in innovation and the new Asia model. In J. Douglass, J. King, & I. Feller (Eds.), Globalization’s muse: Universities and higher education systems in a changing world (pp. 229- 246). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Public Policy Press.
14. Faber, M., & Westerheijden, D. (2011).European Degree Structure and National Reform. In J. Enders, H. J. de Boer & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Reform of Higher Education in Europe (pp. 11-28). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
15. Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2009). The governance of higher education systems: A public management perspective. In C. Paradeise, E. Reale, E. Bleiklie& E. Ferlie (Eds.), University governance: Western European comparative perspective (pp. 1-19). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
16. Frenkel, S. J., Tam, M., Korczynski, M., & Shire, K. (1998).Beyond bureaucracy? Work organisation in call centres. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(6), 957–979.
17. Gaston, P. L. (2010). The challenge of Bologna: what United States higher education has to learn, and why it matters that we learn it. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
18. Gilson L. L. (2015). Michael Lipsky, street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. In M. Lodge, E. C. Page, & S. J. Balla (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199646135.013.19
19. Gornitzka, A., Kyvik, S., & Stensaker, B. (2005). Implementation analysis in higher education. In A. Gornitzka, M. Kogan & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education: Analysing policy implementation (pp. 35-56). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
20. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936-957.
21. Hoareau, C. (2009). Does deliberation matter? The impact of the Bologna process on attitudes and policies in European higher education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
22. Hoyle, L. (2014). ‘I mean, obviously you're using your discretion’: Nurses use of discretion in policy implementation. Social Policy and Society, 13(2), 189-202. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746413000316
23. Hudson, J., & Lowe, S. (2009). Understanding the policy process: Analysing welfare policy and practice (2nd ed.). Bristol, England: Policy Press University of Bristol.
24. Kauko, J. (2013). Dynamics in higher education politics: a theoretical model. Higher Education, 65(2), 193–206.
25. Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., & Purcell, J. (2000). Fun and surveillance: the paradox of high commitment management in call centres. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(5), 967-985. http://doi.org/10.1080/095851900422375
26. Kolster, R., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2014). Employability of professional bachelors from an international perspective: final report. Center of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://ris.utwente.nl
27. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy, 30th ann. ed.: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
28. Marginson, S. (2009, February). Global imaginings and strategies in higher education. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Conference. New York, NY: International Studies Association.
29. Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher education, 43(3), 281-309.
30. Mayntz, R. (1993). Governing failures and the problem of governability: some comments on a theoretical paradigm. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance: New government-society interactions (pp. 9-20). London, UK: Sage.
31. Mikkola, A., Brus, S., Aberg, N. G., Mac Sithigh, D., Tuck, C., & Carapinha, B. (2007). Bologna with student eyes 2007 edition. London, UK: ESIB - The National Unions of Students in Europe.
32. Neave, G. (1988). Education and social policy: Demise of an ethic or change of values? Oxford Review of Education, 14(3), 273-283.
33. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Goastellec, G., & Bleiklie, I. (2009). Universities steering between stories and history. In C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), University governance: Western European comparative perspective (pp. 227-246). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
35. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2) 251–267.
36. Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Sabatier, P. (2005). From policy implementation to policy change: A personal odyssey. In A. Gornitzka, M. Kogan & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education: Analysing policy implementation (pp. 17-34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
38. Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993), Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalitions approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39. Schafer, A. (2006). A new form of governance? Comparing the open method of coordination to multilateral surveillance by the IMF and the OECD. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), 70-88.
40. Scharpf, F. W. (1997) Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
41. Sursock, A. (2015). Trends 2015: Learning and teaching in European universities. Brussels, Belgium: European University Association. Retrieved from http://www.eua.be/Libraries/publications-homepage-list/EUA_Trends_2015_web
42. Taylor, I., & Kelly, J. (2006). Professionals, discretion and public sector reforms in the UK: re-visiting Lipsky. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(7) 629–642.doi: 10.1108/09513550610704662
43. Teichler, U. (2011). Bologna–Motor or stumbling block for the mobility and employability of graduates? In H. Schomburg, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Employability and mobility of bachelor graduates in Europe (pp. 3-41). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
44. Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical Institutionalism in comparative politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 1-32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45. Tolofari, S. (2005). New public management and education. Policy Futures in Education, 3(1), 75-89. http://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.11
46. Tomusk, V. (Ed.). (2006). Creating the European area of higher education: Voices from the periphery. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
47. Tummers, L., Vermeeren, B., Steijn, B., & Bekkers, V. (2012). Public professionals and policy implementation: Conceptualizing and measuring three types of role conflicts. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1041-1059.
48. Vaira, M. (2004). Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher education, 48(4), 483-510.
49. Veiga, A. (2012). Bologna 2010. The moment of truth? European Journal of Education, 47(3), 378-391. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2012.01532.x
50. Veiga, A., & Amaral, A. (2009). Survey on the implementation of the Bologna process in Portugal. Higher Education, 57(1), 57–69.
51. Wastell, D., White, S., Broadhurst, K., Peckover, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Children’s services in the iron cage of performance management: street-level bureaucracy and the spectre of Svejkism. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(3), 310-320. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00716.x
52. Witte, J. K. (2006). Change of degrees and degrees of change: Comparing adaptations of European higher education systems in the context of the Bologna process (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
53. Zedekia, S. (2017). Street level bureaucrats as the ultimate policy makers. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, 5(4), 306. http://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000306
54. Zgaga, P. (2006, May 13). Looking out: The Bologna process in a global setting: On the external dimension of the Bologna process. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. Retrieved from http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Global%20context/Bologna_Process_in_global_setting_finalreport.pdf