TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI

Okan Koç

doi:10.62666/eujmr.1544278

TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI

Öz

Eğitim alanında, teknolojinin ve teknolojiye dayalı öğretim yöntemlerinin kullanımı, öğretim yöntemlerini önemli ölçüde geliştirmektedir. Ancak, öğretimde kullanılan yöntemler genellikle karmaşık olup, konuya derin bir anlayış gerektirmektedir. Öğretim yöntemlerinde teknolojinin kullanımı, öğretim yöntemi türü, eğitim seviyesi ve sağlanan destek seviyesi gibi çeşitli faktörlerden etkilenmektedir. Öğretim yöntemlerinde teknolojinin kullanımı, kişisel bilgisayarlar, sınıftaki bilgisayarlar, robotlar veya sohbet botları gibi öğretim yönteminin türlerinden de etkilenmektedir. Teknolojinin eğitimde kullanımı, öğretim sürecini geliştirmektedir. Bu çalışmada yapay zeka uygulamalarının ne olduğu, özellikleri, amacı ve kullanımı ele alınmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda yapay zeka ve teknolojik gelişmelerin, eğitim başta olmak üzere çok sayıda alanı etkilediği ve yakın gelecekte bu etki alanının genişlemesi beklenmektedir. Yapay zeka uygulamalarının çok önemli olduğu ve öğretmenlerin ve öğrencilerin kontrollü bir şekilde bu uygulamalarını teşvik etmesi gerektiği söylenebilir. Yapay zeka uygulamalarının en büyük faydasının, öğrencilerin yeteneklerine ve öğrenme hızlarına göre öğrenmelerine olanak sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Afzal, S., Dempsey, B., D'Helon, C., Mukhi, N., Pribic, M., Sickler, A., ... & Wilde, L. (2019). The personality of AI systems in education: experiences with the Watson tutor, a one-on-one virtual tutoring system. Childhood Education, 95(1), 44-52.
Ajlouni, A., Almahaireh, A., & Whaba, F. (2023). Students’ perception of using ChatGPT in counseling and mental health education: the benefits and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(20), 199-218.
ALEKS (2024). [Online]. Available: https://www.aleks.com/?_s=7523922934237147 Accessed: Feb. 2024 (in English).
Ali, S., Williams, R., Payne B., Park H. & Breazeal C. (2019). Constructionism, ethics, and creativity: Developing primary and middle school artificial intelligence education. In International Workshop on Education in Artificial Intelligence K-12, EDUAI ’19, 1–4.
Alkhatlan, A., & Kalita, J. (2018). Intelligent tutoring systems: A comprehensive historical survey with recent developments. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.09628
Annuš, N. (2024). Educatıonal Software And Artıfıcıal Intellıgence: Students'experıences And Innovatıve Solutıons. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 101(3), 200.
Arslan, K. (2020). Eğitimde yapay zeka ve uygulamaları. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 71-88. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/baebd/issue/55426/690058
Bahçeci, F., & Gürol, M. (2010). Eğitimde Akıllı Öğretim Sistemleri Uygulamalarına Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi. Engineering Sciences, 5(2), 121-128.

Choi, S. (2019). Review of domestic literature based on system mapping for computational thinking assessment. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 22(6), 19–33.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Some ethical issues and regulatory challenges. Technology and Regulation, 2019, 31–34.
Cosyn, E., Uzun, H., Doble, C., & Matayoshi, J. (2021). A practical perspective on knowledge space theory: ALEKS and its data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 101, 102512.
Coursera (2024). About Coursera. 1 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde https://about.coursera.org/ adresinden erişildi.
Craig, S. D., Anderson, C., Bargagloitti, A., Graesser, A. C., Okwumabua, T., Sterbinsky, A., & Hu, X. (2011). Learning with ALEKS: The impact of students’ attendance in a mathematics after-school program. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: 15th International Conference, AIED 2011, Auckland, New Zealand, June 28–July 2011 15 (pp. 435-437). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Edmentum, (2024). 01 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde https://www.edmentum.com/intl/about/newsroom/ adresinden erişildi. edX (2024). About edX. https://www.edx.org/about-us Foster, M. E. (2024). Evaluating the Impact of Supplemental Computer-Assisted Math Instruction in Elementary School: A Conceptual Replication. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 17(1), 94-118.
Hakkal, S., & Lahcen, A. A. (2022). An Overview of Adaptive Learning Fee-based Platforms. 01 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2021/107314/107314.pdf adresinden erişildi.
Han, H., Kim, K., & Kwon, H. (2020). The analysis of elementary school teachers’ perception of using artificial intelligence in education. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(7), 47–56.
Han, J. (2020). Changes in attitudes and efficacy of AI learners according to the level of programming skill and project interest in AI project. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education., 24, 391–400.
Han, J. (2020). Changes in attitudes and efficacy of AI learners according to the level of programming skill and project interest in AI project. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education., 24, 391–400.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Hong, S., Cho, B., Choi, I., Park, K., Kim, H., Park, Y. & Park, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and edu tech in school education. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. RRI, 2.
Kaharuddin, K. (2021). Assessing the effect of using artificial intelligence on the writing skill of Indonesian learners of English. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 288–304.
Kang, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence and its influence in adult learning in China. Higher Education. Skills and Work-Based Learning, 13(3), 450–464. doi:10.1108/HESWBL-01-2023-0017
Karlgren K. (2005). Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS). http://www.dsv.su.se/klas/Learn/ITS/its.html
Khan Academy (2024). About Khan Academy. 1 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde https://www.khanacademy.org/about adresinden erişildi.
Khazanchi, R. (2021, June). Impact of Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) on mathematics achievement using ALEKS. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 471-475). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Kim, S. (2020). Development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based maker education program using physical com puting. Korean Technology Education Association, 20(3), 76–95.
Kim, S. (2021). Research trends in elementary and secondary school artificial intelligence education using topic modeling and problems in technology education. Korean Technology Education Association, 21(1), 106–124.
Kim, S., & Lee, Y. (2020). Attitudes toward artificial intelligence of high school students in Korea. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 11(12), 1–13.
Kim, T., & Han, S. (2020). A study on elementary and secondary teachers’ perceptions on AI education. Gyeongin National University of Education Education Research Institute, 40(3), 181–204.
Koh, H. (2020). A study on development of school mathematics contents for artificial intelligence (AI) capabil ity. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 23(2), 223–237.
Krishnan, S. D., Norman, H., & Md Yunus, M. (2021). Online gamified learning to enhance teachers’ competencies using classcraft. Sustainability, 13(19), 10817.
Lee, A. (2018). Domestic research trends analysis of software education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 24(2), 277–301.
Lee, G., & Lee, Y. (2021). Development of artificial intelligence education program based on core concept of artificial intelligence in middle school. Korean Technology Education Association, 21(1), 68–88.
Lee, J., Lee, Y., & Yoo, H. (2019). Developing teaching-learning program to improve the Interlocking technol ogy literacy in the 4th industrial revolution for middle school students in technology education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 32(3), 63–84.
Lee, S. (2021). Convergence education of elementary school teachers and pre-service teachers. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 34(1), 1–17.
Lim, M. (2020). A study on the direction of technology education in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 33(4), 81–102.
Liu, J., Kong, X., Xia, F., Bai, X., Wang, L., Qing, Q., & Lee, I. (2018). Artificial intelligence in the 21st cen tury. IEEE Access, 6, 34403–34421.
Liu, Y., Chen, L., & Yao, Z. (2022). The application of artificial intelligence assistant to deep learning in teachers' teaching and students' learning processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 929175.
Ma, M. (2019). “How does CENTURY’s AI work?,” [Online]. Available: https://www.century.tech/news/how does-centurys-ai-work/]. (in English).
Min, J., & Shim, J. (2021). A study on domestic research trends in secondary school computer education. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 24(1), 29–36.
Minsky, M., & Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons
Pane, J. F., Griffin, B. A., McCaffrey, D. F., & Karam, R. (2014). Effectiveness of cognitive tutor algebra I at scale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(2), 127-144.
Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2018). Using gamification for supporting an introductory programming course. The case of classcraft in a secondary education classroom. In Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation: 6th International Conference, ArtsIT 2017, and Second International Conference, DLI 2017, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, October 30–31, 2017, Proceedings 6 (pp. 366-375). Springer International Publishing.
Peres, R. S., Jia, X., Lee, J., Sun, K., Colombo, A. W., & Barata, R. (2020). Industrial artificial intelligence in industry 4.0-systematic review, challenges and outlook. IEEE Access, 8, 220121–220139.
Ritter, S. (2011). The research behind the Carnegie Learning math series. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Learning.
Rivera-Trigueros, I., & del Mar Sánchez-Pérez, M. (2020). Classcraft as a resource to implement gamification in English-medium instruction. In Teacher Training for English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education (pp. 356-371). IGI Global.
Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65(6), 386.
Ruiz-Real, J., Uribe-Toril, J., Torres, J., & De Pablo, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence in business and economics research: Trends and future. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(1), 98–117.
Shin, D. (2020). An analysis prospective mathematics teachers’ perception on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 215–234.
Sipone, S., Abella-García, V., Rojo, M., & dell’Olio, L. (2021). Using ClassCraft to improve primary school students’ knowledge and interest in sustainable mobility. Sustainability, 13(17), 9939.
SMART Learning Suite, (2024). 01 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde https://support.smarttech.com/server-error?aspxerrorpath=/docs/software/smart-learning-suite/en/about/default.cshtml adresinden erişildi.
Sung, E. (2018). Theoretical foundation of the maker movement for education: Learning theories and pedagogy of the maker movement. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 21(2), 51–59.
Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019). Envisioning AI for K-12: What should every child know about AI? In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence., 33(01), 9795–9799.
Udemy (2024). About us. 1 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde https://about.udemy.com/ adresinden erişildi.
Van-Vaerenbergh, S. & Pérez-Suay, A. (2021). A Classification of Artificial Intelligence Systems for Mathemat ics Education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06015.
Wang, Y. F., & Petrina, S. (2013). Using learning analytics to understand the design of an intelligent language tutor–Chatbot lucy. Editorial Preface, 4(11), 124–131.
Wong, G., Ma, X., Dillenbourg, P., & Huan, J. (2020). Broadening artificial intelligence education in K-12: Where to start? ACM Inroads, 11(1), 20–29.
Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). Active learning is about more than hands-on: a mixed reality AI system to support STEM education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 74–96.
Yilmaz, B. (2017). Effects of adaptive learning technologies on math achievement: A quantitative study of ALEKS math software. University of Missouri-Kansas City.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Bilgi Sistemleri Eğitimi

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Okan Koç ^*
0000-0002-5356-5940
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

30 Aralık 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Eylül 2024

Kabul Tarihi

19 Eylül 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 15

DOI

https://doi.org/10.62666/eujmr.1544278

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA28KM66WP

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Koç, O. (2024). TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI. EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR), 8(15), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.62666/eujmr.1544278

AMA

1.Koç O. TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI. Turkçe ve İngilizce. 2024;8(15):19-36. doi:10.62666/eujmr.1544278

Chicago

Koç, Okan. 2024. “TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI”. EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR) 8 (15): 19-36. https://doi.org/10.62666/eujmr.1544278.

EndNote

Koç O (01 Aralık 2024) TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI. EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR) 8 15 19–36.

IEEE

[1]O. Koç, “TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI”, Turkçe ve İngilizce, c. 8, sy 15, ss. 19–36, Ara. 2024, doi: 10.62666/eujmr.1544278.

ISNAD

Koç, Okan. “TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI”. EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR) 8/15 (01 Aralık 2024): 19-36. https://doi.org/10.62666/eujmr.1544278.

JAMA

1.Koç O. TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI. Turkçe ve İngilizce. 2024;8:19–36.

MLA

Koç, Okan. “TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI”. EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR), c. 8, sy 15, Aralık 2024, ss. 19-36, doi:10.62666/eujmr.1544278.

Vancouver

1.Okan Koç. TEKNOLOJİ EĞİTİMİNDE YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI. Turkçe ve İngilizce. 01 Aralık 2024;8(15):19-36. doi:10.62666/eujmr.1544278