BİREYSEL HANE MEMNUNİYETİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER: BİR YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELİ

Öz

Individual housing satisfaction is a variable concept according to the relative meaning and importance attributed to the dwelling. It expresses a subjective feeling according to the perception and desires of the individuals. Housing satisfaction shows the extent to which the ideal residence that the owner or user lives with and the current residence that he / she lives with. In this study, the satisfaction of the residents of Erzincan center was investigated using many variables. Horizontal cut data obtained from 383 surveys conducted in 2018 with individuals residing in Erzincan center were analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Model results showed that the “Demographic Structure” variable had a positive low level effect (γ = 0.19; t = 3.25) on housing satisfaction. The “Housing Location” variable affects the satisfaction of the house positively and at a high level (γ = 0.83; t = 13.93). The variable “Housing Environment” has a positive and high level effect on housing satisfaction (γ = 0.90; t = 10.69). The “Housing Architecture” variable affects the housing satisfaction (γ = 0.95; t = 14.02) positively and at a very high level. Again, the "Housing Characteristics " variable affects the satisfaction of the house at a high level and positively (γ = 0.90; t = 17.22). There was no interaction between the variable "Socioeconomic Structure" and housing satisfaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Housing Satisfaction
• Housing Location
• Housing Environment
• Structural Equation Modeling
• Erzincan

FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUAL HOUSING SATISFACTION: AN ANALYSIS OF A STRUCTURAL EQUALITY MODELING

Öz

Kaynakça

1. AIGBAVBOA, C., & THWALA, W. (2018). Residential Satisfaction and Housing Policy Evolution. Routledge.
2. ARGYLE, M. (1987). The Psychology of Happiness. New York, NY: Methuen.
3. BENTLER, P., & YUAN, K. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate behavioral research, 34(2), 181-197.
4. BORDENS, K., & ABBOTT, B. (2011). Research design and methods: A process approach. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
5. CAMPBELL, A., & CONVERSE, P. (1972). The human meaning of social change. Russell Sage Foundation.
6. CARVALHO, M., GEORGE, R., & ANTHONY, K. (1997). Residential satisfaction in condominios exclusivos (gate-guarded neighborhoods) in Brazil. Environment and Behavior, 29(6), 734-768.
7. CHEUNG, G., & RENSVOLD, R. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
8. CLARK, W., & ONAKA, J. (1983). Life Cycle And Housing Adjustment As Explanations Of Residential Mobility. Urban Studies,, 20, 47-57.

9. DIENER, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. In The science of well-being, 11-58.
10. FRANCESCATO, G. (1998). Residential Satisfaction. Encyclopedia of Housing. W.V Vliet (Ed.). (s. 484-486). içinde London: Sage.
11. FRANCESCATO, G., WEIDEMANN, G., & ANDERSON, J. (1974). Evaluating Residents’s Satisfaction In Housing For Low And Moderate Income Famıly: A Multi Method Approach. Washington.
12. FRANCESCATO, G., WEIDEMANN, S., & ANDERSON, J. (1987). Residential Satisfaction: it uses and limitations in housing research, Housing and neighborhoods. New York: Greenwood Press.
13. GALSTER, C. (1987). Identifying the Correlates of Dwelling Satisfaction: An Empirical Critique. Environment and Behavior,, 19, 539-568.
14. GALSTER, C., HESSER, G., & GARRY, W. (1981). Residential Satisfaction. Environment And Behavior, 13(6), 735-758.
15. GE, J., & HOKAO, K. (2006). Research on Residential Lifestyles in Japanese Cities from the Viewpoints of Residential Preference, Residential Choice and Residential Satisfaction. Landscape Urban Plan,, 78(3), 165-178.
16. GÜR, M., & ŞENKAL SEZER, F. (2018). Popularity in house preference-A research on user satisfaction: Bursa Balat Sample. International Refereed Journal of Architecture and Design, 14(1), 1-27.
17. HERSHBERGER, S. L. (2003). The growth of structural equation modeling: 1994-2001. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 35-46.
18. İLHAN, M., & ÇETIN, B. (2014). Comparing the Analysis Results of the Structural Equation Models (SEM) Conducted Using LISREL and AMOS. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 5(2), 26-42.
19. JÖRESKOG, K., & SÖRBOM, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
20. KAHN, J. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 684-718.
21. KARADAĞ, A., GÜLTEKIN, Y., & MUTLU, S. (2019). A Scale Development Study Based on Determining the Effect of Open and Green Areas on Housing Choice. Düzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 7(1), 223-238.
22. KARADUMAN, İ., & YILMAZ, N. (2015). Factors Influencing Customer Preferences On Residence Sales And The Application Of Conjoint Technique İn Market Share Analysis. Giresun University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 1(2), 65-82.
23. KELLEKÇI, Ö., & BERKÖZ, L. (2010). The factors that increase dwelling and environmental quality satisfaction. ITU Journal/a, 5(2).
24. LAWRENCE, J. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role Of The Behavioral Sciences In Environmental Design. New York: Van Nostrant Reinhold.
25. LOMAX, R., & SCHUMACKER, R. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. psychology press.
26. LOO, C. (1986). Neighbourhood Satisfaction And Safety: A Study Of A Lowİncome Ethnic Area. 18, 109-131.
27. LU, M. (1999). Determinants Of Residential Satisfaction: Ordered Logit Vs Regression Model. Growth and Change, 30(2), 264-276.
28. MICHELSON, W. (1977). Environmental Choice, Human Behavior And Residential Satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. MORTADA, H. (2008). Post-Occupancy Evaluation (Poe) of Jeddah. Journal of Engineering Sciences, Assiut University, 36(1), 251- 283.
30. MULAIK, S. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
31. NIEZABITOWSKI, A. (1987). Study of Residental Environment and Psychological Needs. Design Studies,, 8(2), 109-117.
32. ÖZGÜR, E. M. (2009). Residential satisfaction and intra-urban residential mobility . Journal of Geographical Sciences, 7(2), 111-127.
33. RAYKOV, T., & MARCOULIDES, G. (2006). On multilevel model reliability estimation from the perspective of structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(1), 130-141.
34. ROTH, L. (2015). The history of architecture: its elements, history and meaning. İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi.
35. SAVASDISARA, T. (1988). Residents’ satisfaction and neighborhood characteristics in japanese urban communities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 201-210.
36. SAYGILI, M., ONAY, Ö., & AYHAN, M. (2017). Study on Life Satisfaction in the Context of Personality Traits. Comment Management Method Journal of International Management Economics and Philosophy, 5(2), 61-72.
37. SCHREIBER, B., STAGE, F., KING, J., NORA, A., & BARLOW, E. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337.
38. SÖNMEZ, A. (2010). The Socio-cultural Sustainability Dimension Of High-rise Residences In Terms Of User: A Case Study For Levent Loft. Istanbul: Thesis (M.Sc.) -- İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology.
39. ŞEKEROĞLU, M. (2018). Investigating Factors That Effects Families Residence And Enviromental Quality Satisfaction. Master's thesis, Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences.
40. TABACHNİCK, B., & FİDELL, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
41. THEODORİ, G. L. (2001). Examining the Effects of Community Satisfaction and Attachment on Individual Well-being. Rural Sociology, 66(4), 618-628.
42. TOGNOLİ, J. (1987). Residential Environments. Handbook Of Environmental Psychology (Cilt 1). New York:: Plenum Publication.
43. TÜRKOĞLU, H. (1997). Resident’s Satisfaction Of Housing Environments: The Case Of İstanbul, Turkey. Landscape and Urban Planning, 39, 55-67.
44. VARADY, D., & PREİSER, W. (1998). Scattered-Site Public Housingand Housing Satisfaction: Implications For The New Public Housing Program. Journal of American Planning Association, 6(2), 189-207.
45. VARADY, D., WALKER, C., & WANG, X. (2001). Voucher Recipient Achievement of Improved Housing Conditions In The US: Do Moving Distance And Relocation Services Matter. Urban Studies, 38(8), 1273-1305.
46. WEİDEMANN, S., & ANDERSON, J. (1985). A Conceptual framework for residential satisfaction. a. C. I. Altmann içinde, Home Environments. New York: Plenum Press.
47. WETSON, R., & GORE JR, P. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation model. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719-751.
48. YAMANE, T. (1976). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. New York: Harperand Row.
49. YILDIRIM, K., AKALIN, A., YEŞİLKAVAK, F., & HİDAYETOĞLU, M. (2007). Effect of Dwelling Kitchens’ Spatial Quality on Functional and Perceptual Performance of its’ Users: TOKİ Eryaman 7. Stage Apartments . Politeknik Journal, 10(4), 423-431.
50. YILMAZ, V. (2005). Effects of Consumer Satisfaction and Needs on Brand Loyalty: Aplication on the Cigarette Brand. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 257-271.