Comparision of Two Different Vaccination Shedule for Fight with Infectious Bursal Disease in Layer Hens
Öz
Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV) is one of the most important immunosuppressive diseases of poultry which classified in Avibirnavirus genus belonging to Birnaviridae family. In this study, two different vaccination schedules were compared in the aspect of protectivity. For this purpose, blood serum samples was collected from 6 flocks of layer chickens in the postnatal period on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63 and 70. Samples were randomly selected from 10 chicks in every sampling. Flock 1 was sampled two more times due to acute clinical infection. The total of 680 serum samples was tested for IBDV specific Antibody (Ab) presence and titers using ELISA. Maternal derived antibody (MDA) was found to be protective for 6-8 days. Standard vaccination schedule (one inactive and three live intermediate vaccines) was carried out at three flocks (2, 3 and 5). In other flocks, one live, one inactive and additional more live vaccine were administered to the chicks into water. Despite regular vaccination, IBD epidemic was seen in flocks 1 and 2. In flock 1, an outbreak was reported with 23% mortality in previous breeding period. This proportion was reduced to 4.5% in this enterprise by applying initially live vaccine, and then any sign of clinical infection has not been detected. Antibody titers were entered augmentation trend in flocks 1 and 2 until day 21. probably due to viral load, this turning point was detected on day 14 in other flocks. Statistical analysis clearly showed that MDA titers showed a sharp decrease in the initially live vaccine given flock. In conclusion, to stimulate cellular immune response using initial live dose as soon as possible is more influential. It means, changing standard vaccination schedule was found to be more effective on protection of animals in the critical period of infection, especially in the presence of viral load in the field.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Allan WH, Faragher JT, Cullen GA, (1972). Immunosupression by the infectious bursal agent in chickens immunized against Newcastle disease. Vet Rec. 90, 511-512.
- 2. Babila A, Ası Y, Akçadağ B, Gürel A, (1988). İstanbul ve Trakya Bölgesi kümes hayvanlarında IB, ILT, IBD, EDS, AE ve adenovirus enfeksiyonlarının epizootiyolojik araştırması ve izolasyon çalışmaları. Pendik Hay Hast Arş Enst Derg. 19, 6-77.
- 3. Barnes HJ, Wheeler J, Reed D, (1982). Serological evidence of infectious bursal disease virus infection in Iowa turkeys. Avian Dis. 26, 560-565.
- 4. Baysal T, Bozkır M. (1989). Konya Bölgesi kümes hayvanlarında IBD, ILT, EDS, IBD, AE, ve adenovirus enfeksiyonlarının epizootiyolojik araştırılması ve izolasyon çalışmaları. Etlik Vet Mikrobiyol Derg. 6, 23-30.
- 5. Benton WJ, Cover MS, Rosenberger JK, Lake RS, (1967). Physicochemical properties of the infectious bursal disease agent (IBA). Avian Dis. 11, 430-438.
- 6. Cosgrove AS, (1962). An apparently new disease of chickens- Avian Nephrosis. Avian Dis. 6, 385-389.
- 7. De Wit JJ, (1999). Gumboro disease: optimising vaccination. Int Poult Prod. 7, 19-21.
- 8. Ergün A, (1989). Tavukların bazı viral hastalıklarının epizootiyolojik taramasında kullanılmak üzere antijen ve antiserum hazırlanması. Etlik Vet Mikrobiyol Derg. 6, 35-54.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
15 Aralık 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
29 Eylül 2017
Kabul Tarihi
10 Kasım 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2
APA
Bildir, A., & Gür, S. (2017). Comparision of Two Different Vaccination Shedule for Fight with Infectious Bursal Disease in Layer Hens. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, 28(2), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.35864/evmd.516696
AMA
1.Bildir A, Gür S. Comparision of Two Different Vaccination Shedule for Fight with Infectious Bursal Disease in Layer Hens. Etlik Vet. Mik. Derg. 2017;28(2):76-84. doi:10.35864/evmd.516696
Chicago
Bildir, Ahmet, ve Sibel Gür. 2017. “Comparision of Two Different Vaccination Shedule for Fight with Infectious Bursal Disease in Layer Hens”. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi 28 (2): 76-84. https://doi.org/10.35864/evmd.516696.
EndNote
Bildir A, Gür S (01 Aralık 2017) Comparision of Two Different Vaccination Shedule for Fight with Infectious Bursal Disease in Layer Hens. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi 28 2 76–84.
IEEE
[1]A. Bildir ve S. Gür, “Comparision of Two Different Vaccination Shedule for Fight with Infectious Bursal Disease in Layer Hens”, Etlik Vet. Mik. Derg., c. 28, sy 2, ss. 76–84, Ara. 2017, doi: 10.35864/evmd.516696.
ISNAD
Bildir, Ahmet - Gür, Sibel. “Comparision of Two Different Vaccination Shedule for Fight with Infectious Bursal Disease in Layer Hens”. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi 28/2 (01 Aralık 2017): 76-84. https://doi.org/10.35864/evmd.516696.
JAMA
1.Bildir A, Gür S. Comparision of Two Different Vaccination Shedule for Fight with Infectious Bursal Disease in Layer Hens. Etlik Vet. Mik. Derg. 2017;28:76–84.
MLA
Bildir, Ahmet, ve Sibel Gür. “Comparision of Two Different Vaccination Shedule for Fight with Infectious Bursal Disease in Layer Hens”. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, c. 28, sy 2, Aralık 2017, ss. 76-84, doi:10.35864/evmd.516696.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Bildir, Sibel Gür. Comparision of Two Different Vaccination Shedule for Fight with Infectious Bursal Disease in Layer Hens. Etlik Vet. Mik. Derg. 01 Aralık 2017;28(2):76-84. doi:10.35864/evmd.516696