Sığır Vebası Hastalığına Karşı Aşılanmış Analardan Doğan Buzağılardaki Maternal Antikorların, Competitive Elisa ile Kontrolu ve Buzağılarda İlk Aşılama Zamanının

Yıl 2002, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 1 - 14, 01.06.2002

Arife Ertürk İbrahim Burgu

Öz

Bu çalışmada aşılı analardan doğmuş ve kolostrum almış buzağılarda, sığır vebası
materrial atikor varlığı .ve antikor seviyeleri, araştırılmış ve dolayısıyla doğum sonrası, ilk
aşılamanın yapilabileceği en uygun dönemin belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir.
Bu amaçala 69 gebe sığırlardan, doğumdan önce serum alma zamanına bağlı olarak 1-
7 gün önce; 8-15 gün önce, 16-23 gun önce, 24-31 gün önce, 32-47 gün önce, 48-63 gün önce,
64-'94 gün önce ve üzeri; 69 buzağıdan da 1. aydan başlayarak 3. aya kadar birer aylık, 3 - 5
ay arasında 15 günlük periyotlarla ve 6.ayda kan serum örnekleri sağlanmıştır
. Gebe sığırlardan ve bunlardan doğan buzağılardan periyodik aralıklarla alınan toplam
337 adet kan serum örneği RP C-ELISA ile test edilmiştir. Denemeye alınan 69 gebe sığır
serum örneğinden, bir gebe sığır dışında diğer 68 gebe sığır serum örneğinde koruyucu
düzeyde RPV antikoni bulunmuştur. Buzağılarda maternal antikor seviyelerinin yaşa bağlı
olarak azalma· göstermesi ve 6.ayda denemeye alınan bütün buzağılarda maternal antikorların
koruyucu seviyenin altına düşmesi nedeniyle, 6. aya kadar olan sürede kan serum örneği alınmıştır.
Analarından kolostrum almış 69 buzağıdan 1. ayda 68 buzağıda, 2. ayda 68 buzağıdan
60 buzağıda, 3. ayda 60 buzağıdan 40 buzağıda, 3,5. ayda 40 buzağıdan 20 buzağıda, 4. ayda
20 buzağıdan 6 buzağıda, 4,5. ayda 6 buzağıdan 2 buzağıda ve 5. ayda 2 buzağıdan 1 buzağı- da koruyucu seviyede; 6. ayda ise 1 buzağıda koruyucu seviyenin altında antikor saptanmıştır.
Elde edilen verilere göre; aşılı analardan doğan kolostrum almış buzağıların ilk 3,5 aylık
sürede rriateı'nal arttikotlarla korunduğu ve bu buzağılara ilk aşının 3-3,5 aydan sonra yapılmasının uygun olacağı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Arife ERTÜRK, İbrahim BURGU, maternal antikor, Sığır vebası, ELISA, Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi

The Determination of the First Vaccination Time and the Control of the Ma ternal Antibodies Using Competitive Elisa of the Calves Born From the Mothers That Have Been Vaccinated Against Rinderpest Disease

Öz

In tliis study, the anti~ody levels and Rinderpest maternal antibody existance of the
calves born from the vaccinated mothers and received the colostrum were investigated and
therefore the d etermination of the most apprepricate vaccinate time was targeted.
For this purpose, blood serum specimens were taken from 69 pregnant cattle ı-7 days
before, ı6-23 days before, 24-3ı days before, 32-47days before, 48-63 daysor more before the
parturition and from 69. caives beginning from the fırst month end of 6th month.
Totally 337 blood sera Which were periodically collected from the pregnant cattle and
the calves that had been born from these cattle were tested using RP-Competitive ELISA.
Antibodies at the protective level against RPV were detected in 68 of the 69 blood sera of the
pregnant cattle. Due to the facts that the maternal antibody levels decrease with the age and
. the maternal aıi.tibody levels decline under the protictive level in all calves at the 6. month, the
blöod sera specimens were collected in the period to the 6th month. The antibodies were
detected under the protective level in 68 of the 69 calves which received the colostrum from
the mothers at the ı st month, in 60 of the 68 calves at the 2nd month, in 40 of the 60 calves at
the 3rd month, in 20 of the 40 calves the at the ı 05th day, in 6 of the 20 calves at the 4th month,
2 of the 6 calves at the ı35th day and ı of the 2 calves at the 5th month and in ı calfat the 6th
month . .
It was found from the data obtained that the calves born from vaccinated mothers and
fed with colostrum from these mothers had been protected for 3.5 months (ı 05 days) against
rinderpest by maternal antibodies. Therefore it was concluded . that th.e fırst vaccination to
these calves should be applied after the age of 3 - 3.5 months.

Kaynakça

• AKHTAR S, IQBAL N, ANJUM AD (1984). Clinical response of calves against rinderpesi diseases vaccination. Pakistan Vet J, 4(2): ı 29- ı 3 ı.
• ANDERSON EC (1995). Morbi/livirus infections in wi/d/ife in relations to their population bio/ogy and disease control in domestic animal s. Vet Microbioı, 44: 3 ı 9- 332.
• ANDERSON EC, HASSAN A, BARRETT T, ANDERSON J (ı990) . Observations on the pathogenicity for sheep and goals and transmissibi/ity of the strain of virus iso/ated during the rinderpest outbreak in Sri Lanka in 1987. Vet Microbiol, 21: 309-3 1 8.
• ANDERSON EC, JAGO M, MLENGEYA T, TIMMS C, PAYNE A, HlRSI K (1990). A serological survey of rinderpest antibody in wildlife and sheep and· goals in Northern Tanzania. Epidemiol lnfect, 105: 203-214.
• ANDERSON J, ANDERSON E C, CHIDUO F, JOSHUA G E, LORETU K, MPELUMBE I E, KAVISHE TE, (ı991). The seromonitoring of rinderpest throughout Africa, phase one. IAEA TECDOC-623, 87-101.
• BARRETT T (1994). Rinderpest and distempe r viruses. In: Encyclopaedia of Virology. Academic Press Ltd. p.: 1260-1268.
• BARRETT T, BLIXENKRONE-MOLLER M, DI GUARDO G, DOMINGO M, DUIGNAN P, HALL A, MAMAEV L, OSTERHAUS ADME (1995). Morbi/liviruses in aquatic mammals: report on raund tab/e discussion. Vet Microbiol, 44: 26 I -265.
• BROWN RO (1958). Rinderpest immunity in calves. I. The acquisition and persisten ce of ınatermilly derived antibody. Hyg, 56(4): 427-434.
• BROWN RO (1958). Rinderpest immunity in calves. II. Active imınunization Hyg, 56(4): 435-444.
• BUXTON A, FRAİSER G (1977). Rinderpest in Animal Microbiology; Blackwell Scientific Publications Philadelphia pp. 539-546.
• CROWTHER JR (1997). Rinderpest: at war with the disease ofwar. Sci Prog, 80 (1): 21- 43.
• DIALLO A (I 988). Rindei·pest and pes te des petits ruminants; constant threats to animal forming in many deve/aping countries. lll)pact Sc i Society, 150: I 79- I 92.
• EL HAG ALI B (1974). The isolation of rinderpest virus from an oribi and red buck in an outbreak involving wild animals. Sudan J Vet Sci Aniın Husb, 15: 1-10.
• EL HAG ALI B, TAYLOR W P (1988). An investigation on rinderpest virus transmission and mainfenance by sheep, goals and cattle. Bull Anim Hlth Prod Afr, 36: 290- 294. ERK N, AKKERMAN NC (1969). Türkiye'de Sığır Vebası Salgınları ve Eradikasyon Tarihi. AÜ Vet Fak Yay, No.242.
• GIBBS EP J, TAYLOR W P, LAWMAN M J P, BRYANT J (I 979). Classi(ication of peste des petit; ruminan/s virus as the fourth member of the genus morbillivirus. Intervirology, Il: 268-274.
• GÜRTÜRK S, FİNCİ E, BURGU İ(I974). Yurdumuz sığırlarında sığır vebası üzerinde araştırmalar. AÜ Vet Fak Derg, XXI (1-2) 102-Jıı.
• İYİGÖREN B, ÜNLÜ M, YONGUÇ AD, (1972). Sığır vebasına karşı buzağılarda aktif ve pasif bağışıklık üzerinde denemeler. Etlik Veteriner Bakteriyoloji Enst Derg, 4(1- 2)59-73 .
• İYİGÖREN B, ÜNLÜ M, YONGUÇ AD, (1973}. Doku kültürü sığır vebası uygulanan bölgelerdeki sığırların . bağışıklık durumu üzerinde araştırma. İbid, 4:(3-4), I
• İYİGÖREN B, ÜNLÜ M, YONGUÇ AD, (1974-1975-1976). Sığır vebasına karşı aşılı inek/erde doğumdan önce ve doğumdan sonra faktasyon devresindeki antikor seviyeleri üzerinde araştırma/m: Etlik Veteriner Bakteriyoloji Enst Derg, 4(5- I O) ı 3-36.
• MURPHY FA, FAUQUET C M, BISHOP D HL, GHABRIAL SA, JARVIS A W,· MAETELLI G P, MAYO MA, SUMMERS M. D. (1995). Paramyxoviridae . . In: Virus Taxonomy Classification and Nomenclature. Springer Verlag Wien Newyork p. 268-274.
• MURTY DK, SHARMA SK (1974). Studies on reactogenicity and immunogenicity of ce// culture rinderpest vaccine in different species. ofruminants. Indian J Anim Sci, 44(6): 359- 365.
• NORRBY E, SHESHBERADARAN H, Mc CULLOUGH K C, CARPENTER W C, ORVELL, C (1985). ls rinderpest virus archivirus of the morbillivirus genus ? Intervirology, 23: 228-232.
• PLOWRIGHT W (I 968). Rinderpest virus. In: Monograph in Virology 3. Springer Verlag, Wien, New York p.: 25-110.
• PLOWRİGHT W(l984): The duralian of immunity in cattle fallawing inoculation of rimjerpest ce// culture vaccine. J Hyg Caınb, 92: 285-296
• PLOWRIGHT W, TAYLOR WP (1967). Long-term studies of the immunity in East African cattle fallawing inoculation with rinderpest culture vaccine. Rec Vet Sci, 8: 118-128.
• PLOWRIGHT W, FERRIS R D (1962). Studies with rinderpest virus in tissue culture. The use of attenuated culture virus as a vaccine for cattle. Res Vet Sci, 3: 172-182.
• PROVOST A (1980). Queries about rinderpest in African wild animals. In: Wildlife Disease Research and Economic Development. Eds. L. Kerstad, B. Nestel, G. Graham. Proc. Workshop, Kabete, Kenya, September, 1980, p.: 19-20.
• RAMANI K, CHARLES Y S, RAMACHANDRAN S (1974) . Further studies on rinderpest vir"ıts of sheep origin. Indian Vet J, 51: 129-138.
• RAMESH BABU, N. G., RAJASEKHAR, M. ·(1988). Prevalence of rinderpest antibodies in sheep and goals in Southern India. Vet Record, 123: 595-597.
• REDDY YK (1991 ). lnterference of maternally derived antibodies on the response of calves to rinderpest vaccination. Indian J Ani m Res, 25(2): 106-108.
• REDDY YK, RAJASEKHAR M (1994). Estimetion of rinderpest nıaternal antibodies in calves by A-B EL/SA, Int J Anim Sci, 9: 173-175
• SCOTT GR (1981). Rinderpest and peste des pet i ts rum inants. In: Virus Diseases of Food AniınaL Disease Monographs Vol. Il, Edd: . EPC Gibbs, Acadeınic Press. p.: 401-432.
• SCOTT GR (1990). Rinderpest. In: Virus Infections of Ruminants. Edd: Z. Dinter, B. Morein, Elsevier Science Publisher, Aınsterdaın , Oxford, New York, Tokyo, chapter, 32 p.: 341-361
• SCOTT GR, TAYLOR W P, ROSSITER PB (1986). Manual on the Diagnosis of Rinderpest. FAO Anim Prod and Health Series, No: 23 , Rome.
• SHANTHIKUMAR SR, ATILOLA MAO ( 1990). Outbreak of rinderpest in wild and domestic animal in Nigeria. Vet Record, 126: 306-307. 14
• SHANTHIKUMAR SR, MALACHI SA, MAJJYAGBE KA (1985). Rinderpest outbreak in freeliving wildlife in Nigeria. Vet Record, 117: 469-470.
• SING KV (1971). Rinderpest cell culture vaccine (LIVE) laboratory protocol NEHAHI. Handbook No.3, Beirut.
• SJNG KV, ATA F (1967): Experinıental rinderpest in came/s a preliminary report. Bull Epizoot Dis Afr, 15: 19-23.
• SOKAL RR, ROHLF FJ (1981). Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, USA.
• SROUR E, EL-ZEIN A ( 1986). Humoral immune response fallawing rinderpest vaccination in cattle and sheep. J Vet Med, 33(3): 180-187 (Abstract)
• TAYLOR W P ( 1968). The susceptibility of the one-humped camel (camelus dromedarius) to infeelian with rinderpest virus. Bull Epizoot D is Afr, 16: 405-41 O.
• TAYLOR WP( 1986). Epidemiology and control of rinderpest. Rev Sc i Tech Off Int Ep iz, 5: 407-410.
• WAMWAYI H M, NDUNGU E K, MWENZIA J, WAMVAY J, KARÇK R, ROSSITER, P B, BARRETT T ( 1995). Canfirmation diagnosis of rinderpest in Tsuva national park. Workshop on rinderpest in wildlife. Joint DAU/IBARIPARC/KWS Meet.25-27. October. 1995, Kilaguni, Tsuva West.
• ZWART D, MACADAM (1967). Transmission of rinderpest by contact from callle to sheep and goals. Res Vet Sci, 8: 37- 47.
• ZWART D, MACADAM (1967). Observations on rinderpest in sheep and goats and transmission to cattle Res Vet Sci, 8: 53-57
• ZWART D, ROWE L W (1966). The occurrence of rinderpest antibodies in the sera of sheep and goals in Northern Nigeria. Res Vet Sci, 7: 504-511