CAN THE GREEN ECONOMY BE A SOLUTION FOR THE ECOLOGICAL CRISIS?

Öz

There has been a widespread consensus on deepening ecological crisis since the early 1970s during which the world economy started to show signals of world economic crisis. Ecological crisis is not independent of economic crisis. As economic crisis deepens, we have been witnessing acceleration in commodification of new facets of nature. Moreover, the approach of incorporation of all life forms and eco systems into the price mechanism is launched with an “environmentalist” discourse as green economy by the prestigious international institutions. They argued in their various reports that there is a harmonious relationship between growth and protection of environment. In this paper it is argued that green economy provides a new field for profitable investments. Thus, ecological crisis deepens instead of being solved. Behind the green economy argument there is not environmental considerations, instead it is seen as a new field for profitable investment opportunities to overcome the economic crisis. Therefore, it can not be a solution for the ecological crisis

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Green Economy,Global Green New Deal,World Economic Crisis

YEŞİL EKONOMİ EKOLOJİK KRİZE ÇÖZÜM OLABİLİR Mİ?

Öz

Dünyada ekonomik kriz belirtilerinin ortaya çıkmaya başladığı 1970’li yıllardan beri giderek derinleşen bir ekolojik kriz olduğu konusunda geniş bir görüşbirliği vardır. Ekolojik kriz ekonomik krizden bağımsız değildir. Ekonomik kriz derinleştikçe doğanın farklı boyutlarının metalaşmasının hızlandığına tanık olunmaktadır. Bunun da ötesinde, bütün yaşam formlarının ve ekosistemlerin fiyat mekanizmasına içerilmesi yaklaşımı, “çevreci” bir söylemle yeşil ekonomi olarak uluslararası prestijli kuruluşlarca dolaşıma sokulmuştur. Bu kuruluşlar, değişik raporlarında büyüme ve çevre koruması arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki olduğunu öne sürmektedirler. Bu çalışmada yeşil ekonominin karlı yatırım fırsatları sunan yeni bir alan olduğu iddia edilmektedir. Dolayısıyla ekolojik kriz çözümleneceğine derinleşmektedir. Yeşil ekonomi tezinin ardında çevreyle ilgili endişelerden çok krizi aşmak için yeni ve karlı yatırım fırsatları sunan bir alan olarak görülmesi yatmaktadır. Dolayısıyla yeşil ekonomi ekolojik krize çare olamaz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yeşil Ekonomi,Küresel Yeni Yeşil Düzen,Dünya Ekonomik Krizi

Kaynakça

1. Bracking, S. (2015). ”Performativity in the Green Economy: How Far Does
2. Climate Finance Create Fictive Economy?”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 12: 2337–2357.
3. Brunnengraber, A. (2007). “The Political Economy of the Kyoto Protocol”
4. Socialist Register, Vo. 43: 213-230. BUKO (2012). Ten Theses of a Critique of the Green Economy, Bundeskoordination Internationalismus. http://rio20.net/en/documentos/ten-theses-of-a-critique-of-the-green- economy/, (Erişim:19.08.2019).
5. Daly, H. (2007). Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development, Selected
6. Essays of Herman Daly, Edward Edgard, Cheltenham ve Northampton. Eckstein, D., Hutfils, L. and Winges M. (2019). Global Climate Risk Index
7. Briefing Paper, Berlin: GermanWatch. file:///E:/financialisation%20of%20nature/Global%20Climate%20Risk%20Index %202019_2.pdf, (Erişim: 27.08.2019).
8. GND Group (2008). A Green New Deal, https://neweconomics.org/uploads/files/8f737ea195fe56db2f_xbm6ihwb1 pdf, (Erişim: 13.08.2019).

9. GSR (2019). Global Status Report, Renewables 2019 (REN21). https://www.ren21.net/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/gsr_2019_full_report _en.pdf(Erişim: 21.08.2019).
10. Harvey, D. (1981). The Urban Process Under Capitalism: A Framework for Analysis. In: Michael D., Scott A. S. (Eds.). Urbanisation and Urban
11. Planning in Capitalist Society, Methuen Co.&Ltd., London, 116-121. Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism
12. Oxford University Press, New York. Harvey, D. (2016). Crisis Theory and the Falling Rate of Profit. In: The Great
13. Financial Meltdown: Systemic, Conjunctural or Policy Created?, Turan Subaşat. Cheltenham (Ed.), Edward Elgar Publishing, UK • Northampton, MA, USA, 37-54. IISD (2019). (International Institute for Sustainable Development, Fossil Fuel to
14. Clean Energy) Subsidy Swaps: How to Pay for an Energy Revolution. Richard Bridle, https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/fossil-fuel-clean- energy-subsidy-swap.pdf, (Erişim: 05.09.2019). Anna Geddes
15. IMF (2019). IMF Working Paper, Global Fossil Fuel Subsidies Remain Large: An
16. Update Based on Country-Level Estimates, David Coady, Ian Parry, Nghia- Piotr Le, and Baoping Shang. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2019/05/02/Global
17. Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-Remain-Large-An-Update-Based-on-Country- Level-Estimates-46509, (Erişim: 08.09.2019).
18. Lohmann L. (2005). “Marketing and Making Carbon Dumps: Commodification
19. Calculation and Counterfactuals in Climate Change Mitigation”. Science as Culture, Vol. 14, No. 3: 203-235. Lohmann L. (2012). “Financialization, Commodification and Carbon: The Contradictions of Neoliberal Climate Policy”, Socialist Register, Vol.48: 85-107.
20. Mainhardt, H. (2019). World Bank Group Financial Flows Undermines the Paris
21. Climate Agreement, Urgewald, https://urgewald.org/sites/default/files/World_Bank_Fossil_Projects_WE B.pdf, (Erişim: 11.09.2019).
22. McAfee K. (1999). “Selling Nature to Save it? Biodiversity and Green
23. Developmentalism”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. , No. 2: 133–154. OECD (2011). Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress: OECD Indicators
24. OECD Green Growth Studies, OECD Publishing, https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/48224574.pdf, (Erişim: 03.08.2019).
25. OECD (2012). Green Growth and Developing Countries Consultation Draft. https://www.oecd.org/dac/greengrowthanddevelopingcountries- consultationdraft.htm, (Erişim: 03.08.20199).
26. Osborne T. (2015). “Tradeoffs in Carbon CommodiŞcation: A Political Ecology of Common Property Forest Governance”, Geoforum, Vol. 67, 64-77.
27. Oxfam (2019). Public Good or Private Wealth? https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/62059
28. /bp-public-good-or-private-wealth-210119-summ-en.pdf, (Erişim: 09.2019).
29. Purkis, S. (2019). Is the Green Economy Appropriate Remedy for the World
30. Economic and Ecological Crises? Paper presented in the VII. International Mediterranean Social Sciences Congress, September 10-12, Budapest. Smith, N. (2007). “Nature as Accumulation Strategy”, Socialist Register, Vol. , 16-36.
31. Stern, N. (2006). Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change. http://mudancasclimaticas.cptec.inpe.br/~rmclima/pdfs/destaques/sternr eview_report_complete.pdf, (Erişim: 12.07.2019).
32. Sullivan, S. (2013). “Banking Nature? The Spectacular Financialisation of
33. Environmental Conservation”, Antipode, Vol.45, No.1: 198-217. Turhan, E. and Gündoğan A. C. (2017). “The Post-politics of the Green
34. Economy in Turkey: Re-claiming the Future”, Journal of Political Ecology, Vol. 24: 200-341. UNEP (2009a). Global Green New Deal: An Update for the G20 Pittsburgh Summit, http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7736, (Erişim: 11.07.2019). UNEP Green Economy Initiative.
35. UNEP (2009b). UNEP 2008 Annual Report, http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7742, (Erişim: 08.07.2019).
36. Unmüßig, B., Fatheuer T., and Fuhr, L. (2016). The Green Economy as a Way
37. Out of the Global Crisis?, Heinrich Böll Stiftung, The Green Political Foundation. https://www.boell.de/en/2016/06/27/green-economy-way-out-global- crisis, (Erişim: 03.07.2019).
38. World Bank (2012). Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable
39. Development. Washington. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTSDNET/Resources/Inclusive_Gre en_Growth_May_2012.pdf, (Erişim: 14.07.2019).