Akademik Personelde Tükenmişliğin İncelenmesi: Demografik Faktörlerin Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, akademisyenlerin tükenmişlik düzeylerinin demografik değişkenlere göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını incelemektir. Tükenmişlik; kişisel tükenmişlik, işle ilgili tükenmişlik ve öğrenciyle ilgili tükenmişlik olmak üzere üç alt boyutta ele alınmıştır. Araştırma verileri akademik personelden anket yöntemiyle toplanmış ve IBM SPSS Statistics 23 programı kullanılarak betimsel istatistikler, bağımsız örneklem t-testi ve çok değişkenli varyans analizi (MANOVA) ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, akademisyenlerde tükenmişliğin özellikle kişisel tükenmişlik boyutunda yoğunlaştığını göstermektedir. Kadın, bekâr, genç ve kariyerinin erken aşamalarındaki akademisyenlerin daha yüksek tükenmişlik düzeylerine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Araştırma, yükseköğretim bağlamında akademisyenlerin tükenmişlik düzeylerindeki demografik farklılıklara ilişkin ampirik kanıtlar sunarak literatüre katkı sağlamakta ve tükenmişliğin azaltılmasına yönelik politika ve uygulamaların geliştirilmesine ışık tutmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tükenmişlik
• Akademik personel
• Demografik özellikler

Examining Burnout Among Academic Staff: The Role of Demographic Factors

Öz

The purpose of this study is to examine whether academics’ burnout levels differ according to demographic variables. Burnout was examined across three dimensions: personal burnout, work-related burnout, and student-related burnout. Data were collected from academic staff through a survey and analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) in IBM SPSS Statistics Version 23. The findings indicate that burnout among academics is most pronounced in the personal burnout dimension. Female, single, younger, and early-career academics were found to have higher levels of burnout. The study contributes to the burnout literature by providing empirical evidence on demographic differences in academics’ burnout levels within the higher education context and offers insights for the development of policies and practices aimed at reducing burnout.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Burnout
• academic staff
• demographic factors

Destekleyen Kurum

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Etik Beyan

The study was conducted in accordance with general ethical principles for research. Participation in the study was voluntary and anonymous. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their participation in the study, and no personally identifying information was collected. However, ethical approval was not obtained prior to the commencement of the study. Following editorial assessment, during which the study was considered low risk in nature, the authors were requested to obtain retrospective ethical approval, consistent with the advice provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in Case 16-06. Accordingly, retrospective ethical approval was subsequently obtained from the Nakhchivan State University Ethics Committee (Approval No. 06/26; Date: 7 September 2026).

Teşekkür

The authors would like to thank all academic staff who voluntarily participated in this study.

Kaynakça

1. Aloe, A. M., Amo, L. C., & Shanahan, M. E. (2013). Classroom management self-efficacy and burnout: a multivariate meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9244-0
2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
3. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
4. Bakker, A. B., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). Burnout contagion among intensive care nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51(3), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03494.x
5. Barkhuizen, N., Rothmann, S., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Burnout and work engagement of academics in higher education ınstitutions: effects of dispositional optimism. Stress and Health, 30(4), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2520
6. Brewer, E. W., & Shapard, L. (2004). Employee burnout: a meta-analysis of the relationship between age or years of experience. Human Resource Development Review, 3(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484304263335
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

9. Demir, R., Türkmen, E., & Doğan, A. (2015). Examination of burnout level of academics in terms of demographic variables. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 1(4), 986–1008. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.279111
10. Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff Burn‐Out. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x
11. García-Arroyo, J. A., Osca Segovia, A., & Peiró, J. M. (2019). Meta-analytical review of teacher burnout across 36 societies: the role of national learning assessments and gender egalitarianism. Psychology & Health, 34(6), 733–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1568013
12. Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
13. Khan, F., Rasli, A. M., Yusoff, R. M., & Ahmad, A. (2015). Do demographic make a difference to job burnout among university academicians? International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1), 229-237. https://izlik.org/JA25CK45BC
14. Koruklu, N., Feyzioglu, B., Ozenoglu-Kiremit, H., & Aladag, E. (2012). Teachers' Burnout Levels in terms of Some Variables. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 1823-1830.
15. Kristensen, T. S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E., & Christensen, K. B. (2005). The copenhagen burnout ınventory: a new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress, 19(3), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500297720
16. Lackritz, J. R. (2004). Exploring burnout among university faculty: incidence, performance, and demographic issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(7), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.07.002
17. Lin, K.-H., Hsu, C.-C., & Lin, K.-Y. (2025). Job stress and burnout among hospital administrative staff: a cross-sectional study. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17209-5
18. Lin, Q.-H., Jiang, C.-Q., & Lam, T. H. (2013). The relationship between occupational stress, burnout, and turnover ıntention among managerial staff from a Sino‐Japanese Joint Venture in Guangzhou, China. Journal of Occupational Health, 55(6), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.12-0287-oa
19. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
20. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
21. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
22. Purvanova, R. K., & Muros, J. P. (2010). Gender differences in burnout: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.006
23. Rothmann, S., & Barkhuizen, N. (2008). Burnout of academic staff in South African higher education institutions. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v22i2.25796
24. Scarfone, D. (1985). Le syndrome d'épuisement professionnel (burnout): y aurait-il de la fumée sans feu? [Professional burnout syndrome: is there smoke without fire?]. Annales medico-psychologiques, 143(8), 754–761.
25. Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A. (2007). Burnout en bevlogenheid. In: Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A. (eds) De psychologie van arbeid en gezondheid. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6556-2_17
26. Schaufeli, W., & Enzmann, D. (1998). The burnout companion to study and practice: a critical analysis (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003062745
27. Shirom, A., & Melamed, S. (2006). A comparison of the construct validity of two burnout measures in two groups of professionals. International Journal of Stress Management, 13(2), 176–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.13.2.176
28. Spence Laschinger, H. K., Wong, C. A., & Grau, A. L. (2012). The influence of authentic leadership on newly graduated nurses’ experiences of workplace bullying, burnout and retention outcomes: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(10), 1266–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.05.012
29. Sünbül, A. M. (2014). Burnout of university academic staff in Turkey. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Postgraduate Research 2014 (ICPR 2014) (pp. 1–7).
30. Toker, B. (2011). Burnout among university academicians: an empirical study on the universities of Turkey. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 12 (1), 114-127.
31. Winefield, A. H., Gillespie, N., Stough, C., Dua, J., Hapuarachchi, J., & Boyd, C. (2003). Occupational stress in Australian university staff: Results from a national survey. International Journal of Stress Management, 10(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.10.1.51
32. World Health Organization. (2019, May 28). Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases.
33. Yıldırım, B., & Şenel, E. (2023). The relationship between work-life balance and academic burnout levels of academic staff. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(3), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.3.1168