Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND ENERGY SECTORS in TURKEY: AN INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 289 - 305, 13.11.2017

Öz

Energy sector plays a fundamental part (either as a cause or the as a facilitator) in the economic growth process. As known, agricultural sector also plays a strategic role in the process of economic development of a country. Agriculture and energy sector are considered to be important drivers of the economy due to their strong inter-industrial linkages. The purpose of this study is to analyse the structural interdependency of the agriculture, food and energy sectors in Turkey. In this study, it has been discussed whether agriculture, energy and food manufacturing industries can be considered as the drivers of the Turkish economy. For this purpose, the input-output tables constructed by the TurkStat national accounts in 2012 has been employed and several multipliers have been calculated by using input-output tables. According to the multipliers, employment creation capacity of agriculture, energy and food manufacturing sector is relatively weak. However, their income creation impact is remarkably high. Among the others, agriculture is the most income creative sector in case of final demand increase in the economy. Similarly, energy sector has key role in the economy, since it's both direct and indirect income generating effect is quite high. These results ensure useful information for policy makers to stimulate growth via more appropriate investments in the economy.

Kaynakça

  • Atan S. (2011). Türkiye'deki Sektörel Bağlantı Yapısının Girdi-Çıktı Yaklaşımı ile İncelenmesi: Yurtiçi Üretim ve İthal Ara Girdi Araştırması. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 22(8): 59-78.
  • Atan S. and Aslanturk Y. (2012). Tourism and economic growth nexus: an input-output analysis in Turkey.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62: 952 – 956.
  • Aydın S. (2001), Türk İmalat Sanayinin Üretim Yapısı (1973-1990): Girdi-Çıktı Analizi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, https://polen.itu.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11527/11169/935.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, (Access date 04/11/2017).
  • Aydoğuş, O. (2010).Girdi Çıktı Modellerine Giriş. Gazi Kitapevi. Ankara.
  • Çalışkan E.T. and Aydogus O. (2011).Türkiye Ekonomisinde Endüstriyel Büyümenin Kaynakları:Girdi-ÇıktıModeli İle Ampirik Bir Analiz (1985-2002).Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(4): 499-510.
  • Çondur F. and Evlimlioğlu U. (2007).Türkiye'de Madencilik Sektörünün Girdi-Çıktı Analizi Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17: 25-41.
  • Coon R.C., Leistritz F.L., Hertsgaard T.A., and Leholm A.G., (1985). The North Dakota Input-Output Model: A Tool for Analyzing Economic Linkages, North Dakota State University, Agricultural Economics Report, No:187, http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23304/files/aer187.pdf, (Access date 07/11/2017).
  • Dalgaard T., Halberg N., and Porter J.R. (2001).A Model for Fossil Energy Use in Danish Agriculture Used to Compare Organicand Conventional Farming..AgricultureEcosystems&Environment, 87: 51-65.
  • D'Hernoncourt J., Cordier M., and Hadley D. (2011). Input-Output Multipliers Specification Sheet and Supporting Material, Science Policy Integration for Coastal Systems Assessment (SPICOSA), Project No:036992, http://www.coastal-saf.eu/output-step/pdf/Specification %20sheet% 20I_O _final. pdf, (Access date15/04/2017).
  • Deloitte. (2016). Turkish Energy Market Outlook, Achievement, Overview and Opportunities, http://dektmk.org.tr/upresimler/turkish-energy-market-outlook.pdf, (Access date 5/04/2017).
  • Goktolga Z.G. and Özkan M.(2011). 1998-2002 Yılları Türkiye Taşımacılık Sektörü Kilit Sektörlerinin Girdi-Çıktı Analizi.Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, II: 65-8.
  • Gul Z.B. (2017). Construction Industry in Turkey:An Input-Output Analysis Using the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) for the 2002-2011 Periods. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1): 157-174.
  • Haeussler , F.F., and Paul R.S. (1987).Introductory Mathematical Analysis for Business Economics and the Life and Social Sciences. Prentice-Hall International Inc., London,UK. IEEFA. (2016). Turkey at a Crossroads:Invest in the Old Energy Economy or the New?, Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), http://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Turkey-Crossroads-Invest-in-the-Old-Energy-Economy-or-the-New_June-2016-v2.pdf, (Access date: 11/04/2017).
  • Ilhan B. and Yaman H. (2011). A Comparative Input-Output Analysis of the Construction sector in Turkey and EU Countries.Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(3): 248-265.
  • Jones L.L.(1997). Input-Output Modeling and Resource Use Projection. Faculty Paper Series, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23993/files/fp97-10.pdf, (Access date 04.04.2017).
  • Karkacier O. and Goktolga Z.G. (2005). Input-output Analysis of Energy Use in Agriculture. Energy Conversion&Management, 46: 1513-1521.
  • MFA.(2017). Turkey's Energy Profile and Strategy, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), htt://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energy-strategy.en.mfa, (Access date:5/04/2017).
  • Miller R.E. and Blair P.D. (1985).Input-Output Analysis:Foundations and Extensions. Prentice-Hall Inc.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.
  • Ozkan B., Akcaoz H., and Fert C. (2004). Energy Input-Output Analysis in Turkish Agriculture. Renewable Energy, 29:39-51.
  • Özdil T. Turdalieva A. (2014). Girdi-Çıktı Analizi Yaklaşımıyla Türkiye ve Kazakistan Ekonomilerinin Karşılaştırılması, Ege Akademik Bakış,14(3):383-393.
  • Singh H., Mishra D. and Nahar N.M. (2002).Energy Use Pattern in Production Agriculture of a Typical Village in Arid Zone, India––part I.Energy Conversion&Management, 46: 1513-1521.
  • Surugiu C. (2009). The Economic Impact of Tourism. An Input-Output Analysis, National Institute for Research and Development in Tourism, http://www.revecon.ro/articles/2009-2/2009-2-8.pdf, (Access date15/04/2017).
  • Şatıroğlu K. (1981). Planlama ve Programlama Teknikleri, Ankara Üniversitesi, SBF Yayını, No:492, Ankara.
  • Tasci K. (2013). Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Sektörünün Girdi-Çıktı Analizi Yöntemiyle Türkiye Ekonomisi Açısından Önemi, Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 34:1-20.
  • Tunç G.İ. (2004).Türkiye Ekonomisinde Yapısal Değişim: Bir Girdi-Çıktı Analizi, Economic Research Center, ERC Working Paper in Economic 04/07,
  • http://erc.metu.edu/menu/series04/0407.pdf, (Access date 10/09/2017). TurkStat.(2016). Main Statistics, Agriculture, www.turkstat.gov.tr, (Access date:10/04/2017).
Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 289 - 305, 13.11.2017

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Atan S. (2011). Türkiye'deki Sektörel Bağlantı Yapısının Girdi-Çıktı Yaklaşımı ile İncelenmesi: Yurtiçi Üretim ve İthal Ara Girdi Araştırması. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 22(8): 59-78.
  • Atan S. and Aslanturk Y. (2012). Tourism and economic growth nexus: an input-output analysis in Turkey.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62: 952 – 956.
  • Aydın S. (2001), Türk İmalat Sanayinin Üretim Yapısı (1973-1990): Girdi-Çıktı Analizi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, https://polen.itu.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11527/11169/935.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, (Access date 04/11/2017).
  • Aydoğuş, O. (2010).Girdi Çıktı Modellerine Giriş. Gazi Kitapevi. Ankara.
  • Çalışkan E.T. and Aydogus O. (2011).Türkiye Ekonomisinde Endüstriyel Büyümenin Kaynakları:Girdi-ÇıktıModeli İle Ampirik Bir Analiz (1985-2002).Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(4): 499-510.
  • Çondur F. and Evlimlioğlu U. (2007).Türkiye'de Madencilik Sektörünün Girdi-Çıktı Analizi Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17: 25-41.
  • Coon R.C., Leistritz F.L., Hertsgaard T.A., and Leholm A.G., (1985). The North Dakota Input-Output Model: A Tool for Analyzing Economic Linkages, North Dakota State University, Agricultural Economics Report, No:187, http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23304/files/aer187.pdf, (Access date 07/11/2017).
  • Dalgaard T., Halberg N., and Porter J.R. (2001).A Model for Fossil Energy Use in Danish Agriculture Used to Compare Organicand Conventional Farming..AgricultureEcosystems&Environment, 87: 51-65.
  • D'Hernoncourt J., Cordier M., and Hadley D. (2011). Input-Output Multipliers Specification Sheet and Supporting Material, Science Policy Integration for Coastal Systems Assessment (SPICOSA), Project No:036992, http://www.coastal-saf.eu/output-step/pdf/Specification %20sheet% 20I_O _final. pdf, (Access date15/04/2017).
  • Deloitte. (2016). Turkish Energy Market Outlook, Achievement, Overview and Opportunities, http://dektmk.org.tr/upresimler/turkish-energy-market-outlook.pdf, (Access date 5/04/2017).
  • Goktolga Z.G. and Özkan M.(2011). 1998-2002 Yılları Türkiye Taşımacılık Sektörü Kilit Sektörlerinin Girdi-Çıktı Analizi.Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, II: 65-8.
  • Gul Z.B. (2017). Construction Industry in Turkey:An Input-Output Analysis Using the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) for the 2002-2011 Periods. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1): 157-174.
  • Haeussler , F.F., and Paul R.S. (1987).Introductory Mathematical Analysis for Business Economics and the Life and Social Sciences. Prentice-Hall International Inc., London,UK. IEEFA. (2016). Turkey at a Crossroads:Invest in the Old Energy Economy or the New?, Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), http://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Turkey-Crossroads-Invest-in-the-Old-Energy-Economy-or-the-New_June-2016-v2.pdf, (Access date: 11/04/2017).
  • Ilhan B. and Yaman H. (2011). A Comparative Input-Output Analysis of the Construction sector in Turkey and EU Countries.Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(3): 248-265.
  • Jones L.L.(1997). Input-Output Modeling and Resource Use Projection. Faculty Paper Series, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23993/files/fp97-10.pdf, (Access date 04.04.2017).
  • Karkacier O. and Goktolga Z.G. (2005). Input-output Analysis of Energy Use in Agriculture. Energy Conversion&Management, 46: 1513-1521.
  • MFA.(2017). Turkey's Energy Profile and Strategy, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), htt://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energy-strategy.en.mfa, (Access date:5/04/2017).
  • Miller R.E. and Blair P.D. (1985).Input-Output Analysis:Foundations and Extensions. Prentice-Hall Inc.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.
  • Ozkan B., Akcaoz H., and Fert C. (2004). Energy Input-Output Analysis in Turkish Agriculture. Renewable Energy, 29:39-51.
  • Özdil T. Turdalieva A. (2014). Girdi-Çıktı Analizi Yaklaşımıyla Türkiye ve Kazakistan Ekonomilerinin Karşılaştırılması, Ege Akademik Bakış,14(3):383-393.
  • Singh H., Mishra D. and Nahar N.M. (2002).Energy Use Pattern in Production Agriculture of a Typical Village in Arid Zone, India––part I.Energy Conversion&Management, 46: 1513-1521.
  • Surugiu C. (2009). The Economic Impact of Tourism. An Input-Output Analysis, National Institute for Research and Development in Tourism, http://www.revecon.ro/articles/2009-2/2009-2-8.pdf, (Access date15/04/2017).
  • Şatıroğlu K. (1981). Planlama ve Programlama Teknikleri, Ankara Üniversitesi, SBF Yayını, No:492, Ankara.
  • Tasci K. (2013). Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Sektörünün Girdi-Çıktı Analizi Yöntemiyle Türkiye Ekonomisi Açısından Önemi, Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 34:1-20.
  • Tunç G.İ. (2004).Türkiye Ekonomisinde Yapısal Değişim: Bir Girdi-Çıktı Analizi, Economic Research Center, ERC Working Paper in Economic 04/07,
  • http://erc.metu.edu/menu/series04/0407.pdf, (Access date 10/09/2017). TurkStat.(2016). Main Statistics, Agriculture, www.turkstat.gov.tr, (Access date:10/04/2017).
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Konular Ekonomi
Bölüm Mevcut Sayı
Yazarlar

Osman Karkacıer Bu kişi benim

Gülden Bölük

Yayımlanma Tarihi 13 Kasım 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Kasım 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Karkacıer, O., & Bölük, G. (2017). THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND ENERGY SECTORS in TURKEY: AN INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL. Al Farabi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 289-305.

The open access statement