Öz
Education prospect of opening multiple values is a step towards fully
justified since they are best individual insertion in a polymorphic and
dynamic spiritual world. This approach formative meets the aspirations of
both the individual by valuing some particular, unique trait that deserves to
be recognized or amplified, and the profit of the company, ensuring a degree
of coherence, solidarity and functionality. A culture is high not only in itself,
through its own (self)contemplative or (self)reproductive mechanisms but
also the “metabolism” of growth and its transformation. The main objective
of intercultural education consists of preparing people to perceive, accept,
respect and experience otherness. The aim is smoothing the land of meeting
with the other. Intercultural education aims at developing education for
all in the spirit of recognizing the differences that exist within the same
society and refers less to achieve education for different cultures, implying
staticism and isolation of cultural groups. Intercultural education favors
interaction and dialogue, the courage to come out of oneself and the desire
in the other’s projection. The main empirical data collection methods that
are used in this paper are: observation and social documents analysis.
Style research approach uses both qualitative and quantitative perspective.
Quantitative research highlights the numerical measurements of specific
aspects of the phenomena studied with the aim of testing causal hypotheses
whereas qualitative research paradigms are based on a kind of postmodern,
post-rationalist or post-positivist views. This paper, presents some of the
theoretical considerations on the development of intercultural education in
Romania as well as offering a global perspective. Although Romania, as in
fact the entire Balkan area, has always been an ethnic and cultural mosaic, the
concern for intercultural education is recent, considering politics practiced
by the regime, which was one social, ethnic and cultural leveling despite
discursive affirmation of equality between Romanian and “nationalities”.
Thus, intercultural education history, or at least the commitment to interculturalism.
After 1989, Romania’s ethnic minorities have assumed an
active role in affirming their cultural identity different from that of the
majority. This paper aims to outline a picture of contemporary intercultural
education through a general analysis and point some prospects regarding
this subject.