“Umutsuzca” Absürtle Yüzleşmek: Harold Pinter’in Git-Gel Dolap Oyununda Sisifosçu Absürdite

Öz

Harold Pinter’ın (1930-2008) the Dumb Waiter (Git-Gel Dolap: 1957) adlı oyunu, iki tetikçi Ben ve Gus’ın etrafında, kapalı bir bodrumda bir sonraki emirlerini beklerken yaşadıkları gerilimleri ana odağa alır. Oyun, bu kapalı alanın getirdiği baskı ve bekleyişin psikolojik etkisini ele alır. Bu karakterlerin karmaşık etkileşimleri, insan varlığının kayıtsız, absürt bir evrende ortaya çıkan varoluş kaygılarını temsil eder. Pinter, bu eserinde karakterler arasındaki diyalog ve sessizlikleri kullanarak, iletişim eksikliğini ve yabancılaşmayı vurgular. Bu tema, Albert Camus’nün (1913-1960) the Myth of Sisyphus (Sisifos Söyleni: 1942) adlı eserinde de işlenir, burada absürdite, intihar ve absürt adam gibi kavramlar açıklandıktan sonra Sisifos’un sonsuz bir döngüde bir kayayı tepeye itip, tekrar aşağı yuvarlanmasını izlemesi anlatılır. Camus, bu miti, insanın varoluşsal mücadelesinin bir metaforu olarak kullanır. Her iki eser de bilinmeyen bir görevi beklemenin ve kayayı itmenin, kayıtsız, tekrarlayan eylemlerle dolu absürt bir evrende insanlığın durmaksızın çabası için bir metafor olarak işlev görür. Bu bağlamda, makale Pinter’ın the Dumb Waiter oyununun, Camus’nün absürdizm ilkelerine uygun ve paralel olduğunu ve Pinter’ın oyununun Camus’nün felsefesinin bir temsil yorumu olduğunu savunur. Ayrıca, bu makale Camus tarafından tanımlanan ‘absürt adam’ kavramı ile Ben ve Gus karakterlerinin nasıl uyumlu olduğunu da incelemektedir. Makale karakterlerin eylemleri ve diyalogları üzerinden bu uyumu detaylandırır. Bu inceleme, her iki eserin paralelliklerini ve insan varoluşunun anlam arayışı temalarını detaylı bir şekilde ele alarak, Pinter ve Camus’nün eserlerinin, insanın absürt evrende yerini ve anlam arayışını betimleyen güçlü örnekler olduğunu vurgular.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Harold Pinter
• Git-Gel Dolap
• Albert Camus
• Sisifos
• varoşçuluk

Facing the Absurd “without Hope”: The Sisyphean Absurdity in Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter

Öz

Harold Pinter’s (1930-2008) The Dumb Waiter (1957) focuses on the tensions experienced by two hitmen, Ben and Gus, as they wait for their next order in a closed basement. The complex interactions of these characters represent the existential anxieties emerging in an indifferent, and absurd universe of human existence. In this work, Pinter emphasizes lack of communication and alienation through the dialogues and silences between the characters. This theme is also explored in Albert Camus’s (1913-1960) the Myth of Sisyphus (1942), where, after explaining concepts such as absurdity, suicide, and the absurd man, the story of Sisyphus endlessly rolling a rock up a hill, only to see it roll back down, is described. Camus uses this myth as a metaphor for the existential struggle of humanity. Both works serve as metaphors for the relentless human effort in an absurd universe filled with indifferent, repetitive actions, exemplified by waiting for an unknown task and pushing the rock. This in mind, this article argues that Pinter’s the Dumb Waiter aligns with and parallels Camus’s principles of absurdism, as Pinter’s play is examined as an interpretation of Camus’s philosophy. This article also explores how Ben and Gus resonate with the concept of ‘absurd man’ defined by Camus. The analysis emphasizes that both works, through their parallels and themes of searching for meaning in human existence represent the place of humanity and search for meaning in an absurd universe.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Harold Pinter
• the Dumb Waiter
• Albert Camus
• Sisyphus
• existentialism

Kaynakça

1. Adamowicz-Pospiech, A. (2018). Harold Pinter’s screenplay of Conrad’s “Victory” and its BBC Radio 4 adaptation. The Conradian, 43(1), 81-93.
2. Ali, Z. (2020). The real and the absurd in Harold Pinter’s the Dumb Waiter. The IUP Journal of English Studies, 15 (2), 89-96.
3. Alkan, H. (2022). A structuralist approach to Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter. Uludağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Journal of Social Sciences, 23(42), 1-15. DOI: 10.21550/ sosbilder.1034570
4. Berlin, N. (2008). Traffic of our stage: Pinter’s “The Homecoming”. The Massachusetts Review, 49 (3), 385-392.
5. Berthold, D. (2013). Kierkegaard and Camus: either/or?. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 73(2). 137-150. DOI:10.1007/s11153-013-9400-y
6. Brosio, R. A. (2000). Existentialist contingency, we may just be on our own-and Camus’s solidarity. Counterpoints, 75, 161-194.
7. Camus, Albert. (1979). The myth of Sisyphus (Trans. Justin O’Brien) Penguin Books.
8. Cohn, R. (1965). The absurdly absurd: Avatars of Godot. Comparative Literature Studies, 2(3), 233-240.

9. Crawford, N. (2003). Stating authorship: Pinter’s No Man’s Land and Shepherd’s True West. The Comparatist, 27, 138-164.
10. Çelik, N. (2013). Cuckoldry as a dramatic motive in much ado about nothing. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(3), 117-126.
11. Dern, J. A. (2004). “Sin without God”: Existentialism and “The Trial”. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 5(2), 94-109.
12. Doğan, B. (2012). Review of Harold Pinter’s the Dumb Waiter. The European Legacy, 17(3), 405-406.
13. Duran, R. (2009). “En attendant Godot” or ‘le suicide philosophique’: Beckett’s Play from the Perspective of Camus’s “Le Mythe de Sisyphe”. The French Review, 82(5), 982-993.
14. Dyer, R. (2015). Class and anticolonial politics in Harold Pinter and Joseph Losey’s the Servant. Journal of Modern Literature, 38(4),147-167. https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.38.4.147
15. Ghasemi, P. and Sara T. (2011). Influence of August Strindberg on Harold Pinter: Entrapment in relationships. CLA Journal, 55(1), 43-69.
16. Greenfield, T. A. and Erin M. C. (2017). Strange stage fellows? Arthur Miller and Harold Pinter. The Arthur Miller Journal, 12(2), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.5325/arthmillj.12.2.0150
17. Hevesi, M. A. (2011). Remembering the present: Ersatz possible worlds as alternative realities in Harold Pinter’s “Theatre of Absence”. Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies, 17(1), 59-70.
18. Illing, S. (2015). Between nihilism and transcendence: Camus’s dialogue with Dostoevsky. The Review of Politics, 77(2), 217-242. DOI:10.1017/S0034670515000042
19. İzmir, S. (2017). The oscillation between dramatic and postdramatic theatre: Mark Ravenhill’s “Shopping and F***ing”. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 41(1), 71-99.
20. Jodar, A. R. (2006). A stranger in a strange land: An existentialist reading of Fredrick Clegg in “The Collector” by John Fowles. Atlantis, 28(1), 45-55.
21. Kingery, E. (2010). Enactments of desire: Examining the text of Harold Pinter’s monologue. The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 43(1),47-55. DOI:10.2307/41756573
22. Lasker, B. (2004). Suicide and the absurd: The influence of Jean-Paul Sartre’s and Albert Camus’s existentialism on Stephen R. Donaldson’s “The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever”. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 14(4), 409-426.
23. Leenaars, A. A. (2003). Suicide and human rights: A Suicidologist’s Perspective. Health and Human Rights, 6(2), 128-148. DOI:10.2307/4065433
24. Marrouchi, M. (2019). Silence in Pinter’s Plays: Silence and the Dumb Waiter. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 1(3),112-125. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v1i3.62
25. Mikics, D. and Robert Zaretsky (2013). From solitude and solidarity: How Camus left nihilism behind. The Virginia Quarterly Review, 89 (2), 201-204.
26. Mrovlje, M. (2019). Rethinking Political Judgement. Edinburgh UP.
27. Nyusztay, I. (2015). Infinite responsibility and the third in Emmanuel Levinas and Harold Pinter. Literature and Theology, 29(2), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/fru035
28. O’Donohoe, B. (2007). Sartre and Camus: “Les Mouches and Le Malentendu”: Parallel Plays. Sartre Studies International, 13(2), 113-125.
29. Owens, C. N. (2010). Mirrored stages: Monologues, split subjects, and the truth of the absurd. The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 43(1),57-67. DOI:10.2307/41756574
30. Paschen, R. V. (2012). Harold Pinter’s the Dumb Waiter in German: What’s missing in translation? ELOPE, 9 (1), 77-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.9.1.77-86
31. Plant, B. (2009). Absurdity, incongruity and laughter. Philosophy, 84(327), 111-134.
32. Prentice, Penelope (2000). The Pinter ethic: The erotic aesthetic. Garland-Taylor & Francis.
33. Quigley, Austin (2001). Pinter, politics and postmodernism (I). In The Cambridge Companion to Harold Pinter. Peter Raby (Eds.) Cambridge UP.
34. Roy, E. (2007). G. B. Shaw’s “Heartbreak House” and Harold Pinter’s “The Homecoming”: Comedies of Implosion. Comparative Drama, 41(3), 335-348. DOI:10.1353/cdr.2007.0037
35. Santoni, R. E. (2008). Camus on Sartre’s “Freedom”: Another “Misunderstanding”. The Review of Metaphysics, 61(4), 785-813.
36. Verhulst, P. (2019). A thing I carry about with me. Samuel Beckett Today, 31(1), 114-129. DOI:10.1163/18757405-03101008
37. Yerebakan, İ. (2014). Explicit language, radical tone: Harold Pinter’s obscene words speak louder than action. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistics und Amerikanistik, 39 (2), 155-173.
38. Wong, J. Y. C. (2013). Affirming the absurd in Harold Pinter. Palgrave Macmillan.