Deprem Felaketlerinin İş Yaşamı Sürdürülebilirliği Üzerindeki Etkisi: Antakya’dan Yansımalar

Öz

Bu çalışma, depremzedelerin ekonomik hayatta kalma stratejilerine odaklanarak depremlerin çalışma hayatının sürdürülebilirliği üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. 2024 yılında Türkiye’nin Hatay ilinin Antakya ilçesinde nitel araştırma yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilen çalışma bu kapsamda depremzedelerin çalışma koşullarını, günlük yaşam zorluklarını ve bu zorlukların üstesinden gelmek için kullandıkları yöntemleri anlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Afetler, sosyal, ekonomik, kültürel ve politik yapılar üzerinde olumsuz etkiler yaratabilirler. Özellikle depremler, can kaybı, mal kaybı, yerinden edilme ve altyapı yıkımı gibi büyük kayıplara yol açarak geniş çaplı yıkımlara neden olurlar. Bu bağlamda, araştırmanın temel amacı, deprem koşullarındaki çalışma hayatının sürdürülebilirliğini araştırmaktır. Çalışma, depremzedelerin finansal hayatta kalma stratejilerini, çalışma hayatlarındaki süreklilik ve kopuş deneyimlerini, kırılganlıklarını ve bu koşulların hane içi ilişkiler ve geleceğe dair beklentiler üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Ayrıca, çalışma, bireylerin iş ve günlük yaşam koşullarıyla ilgili genel deneyimlerini ve duygularını anlamayı hedeflemektedir. Çalışma, sosyal ve ekonomik güvenliğin, deprem sonrasında günlük yaşamın sürdürülmesi, kültürel direncin güçlendirilmesi ve hayatta kalanların maddi ve duygusal yıkımla başa çıkmasında önemli olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• afet
• deprem
• kırılganlık
• sürdürülebilirlik
• finansal dayanıklılık

The Impact of Earthquake Disasters on Work Life Sustainability: Reflections from Antakya

Öz

This study examines the impact of earthquakes on the sustainability of working life, focusing on the economic survival strategies of earthquake survivors. Conducted through qualitative research in 2024 in the Antakya district of Hatay province in Türkiye, the study aims to understand the working conditions, daily life challenges, and the methods employed by survivors to overcome these difficulties. Disasters can exert adverse effects on social, economic, cultural, and political structures. Earthquakes, in particular, cause extensive devastation resulting in substantial losses, such as loss of life, property damage, displacement, and infrastructure destruction. Within this context, the primary objective of this research is to explore sustainability in work life under the conditions of earthquakes. The research examines the financial survival strategies of earthquake survivors, their experiences of continuity and discontinuity in their work life, their vulnerabilities and the implications of these conditions on household relationships and future prospects. Furthermore, the study aims to comprehend the overall experiences and emotions associated with individuals’ work and daily life conditions. The study reveals that social and economic security are crucial for sustaining daily life, enhancing cultural resilience after an earthquake, and addressing the material and emotional devastation experienced by survivors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• disaster
• earthguake
• vulnerability
• sustainability
• financial resilience

Kaynakça

1. Aguirre, B. E., Dynes, R. R., Kendra, J. & Connel, R. (2005). Institutional resilience and disaster planning for new hazards: insights from hospitals. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2(2), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1156
2. Aldrich, D. P. (2010). The power of people: Social capital’s role in recovery from the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Natural Hazards, 56(3), 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9492-5
3. Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press.
4. Bacon, P. & Hobson, C. (Eds.). (2014). Human security comes home: Responding to Japan’s triple disaster. Routledge, pp. 1–22.
5. Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.
6. Xu, B. & Lo, M. M. (2022). Toward a cultural sociology of disaster: Introduction. Poetics, 93, 101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101682
7. Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny?. Zed Books.
8. Cosson, C. (2020). “Build back better”: Between public policy and local implementation, the challenges in Tohoku’s reconstruction. Architecture and Urban Planning, 16(1), 1–4. https:// doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0001

9. Cresswell, T. (2013). Geographic thought: a critical introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
10. Doğruel, F. (2005). Hatay’da çoketnili ortak yaşam kültürü: “İnsaniyetleri benzer...”. İletişim Yayınları.
11. Duignan, R. (2013). Has 11 March 2011 ushered in a new sense of fiscal responsibility? In D. Al-Badri and G. Berends (Eds.), After the Great East Japan Earthquake: Political and policy change in postFukushima Japan (pp. 67-88). NIAS Press. Erkan, B. B., Karancı, A. N., Kalaycıoğlu, S., Özden, A. T., Çalışkan, I., & Özakşehir, G. (2015).
12. From emergency response to recovery: Multiple impacts and lessons learned from the 2011 Van earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 527-540.
13. Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O., Rockström, J., Öhman, M. C., Shyamsundar, P. & Noble, I. (2013). Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495(7441), 305–307. https:// doi.org/10.1038/495305a
14. Guo, Y. & Matsuda, T. (2023). Study on the multi-criteria location decision of wide-area distribution centers in pre-disaster: Case of an earthquake in the Kanto district of Japan. Asian Transport Studies. https://doi.org/10.22260/ATS.2023.01.01
15. Hewitt, K. (2016). Foreword. In E. Enarson and B. Pease (Eds.) Men, masculinities and disaster Routledge, pp. xvii-xxi.
16. Ishiwatari, M. (2020). Evolving concept of resilience: Soft measures of flood risk management in Japan. Connections QJ, 19(3), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.19.3.07
17. Kasapoğlu, A. (2024). Analysis of the 6 February 2023 Turkey earthquake as a challenge in disaster sociology under the guidance of Bruno Latour and Terrestrial. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8), 6382. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6382
18. Kendra, J. M., Clay, L. A. & Gill, K. B. (2018). Resilience and disasters: Social capital in disaster research. In H. Rodriguez, W. Donner & J. E. Trainor (Eds.) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, pp: 87-108.
19. Marmot, M. & Wilkinson, R. (Eds.). (2005). Social determinants of health. Oxford University Press.
20. McManus, S., Seville, E., Vargo, J. & Brunsdon, D. (2008). Facilitated process for improving organizational resilience. Natural Hazards Review, 9(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9: 2(81)
21. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons. Meyer, M. A. (2018). Social capital in disaster research. In H. Rodriguez, W. Donner and J. E. Trainor (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research Springer. pp: 263-288.
22. Milliyet. (7 November 2023). Konteyner kentte korkunç olay: Kayınbiraderini öldürüp eşini ağır yaraladı. https://www.milliyet.com.tr/gundem/konteyner-kentte-korkunc-olay-kayinbiraderinioldurup-esini-agir-yaraladi-7042566
23. Ministry of Industry and Technology of the Republic of Türkiye. (2023). Deprem bölgelerinde sanayi yeniden canlanacak. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/medya/haber/deprem-bolgelerinde-sanayi-yenidencanlanacak
24. Murakami, M., Takebayashi, Y., Ono, K., Kubota, A. & Tsubokura, M. (2020). The decision to return home and well-being after the Fukushima disaster. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 47, 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101538
25. Nagai, M., Hikichi, H., Shiba, K., Kondo, K., Kawachi, I. and Aida, J. (2022). Long-term trend in the association between disaster damage and happiness before and after the Great East Japan Earthquake. International Journal of Public Health, 67, 1604901. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2022.1604901
26. Narayan, D. (1999). Bonds and bridges: social capital and poverty (Policy Research Working Paper 2167). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4526-1
27. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
28. Novikova, N., Gerster, J and Hartwig, M. G. (Eds.). (2023). Japan’s triple disaster: pursuing justice after the Great East Japan earthquake, tsunami, and Fukushima nuclear accident. Routledge.
29. Official Gazette. (2023). 32364. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2023/11/20231109.htm
30. Özden, A. T. (2007). Constituting a sustainable community after disasters: The role of architect(ure). Alam Bina, 3(9), 1-17.
31. Perry, R. W., Lindell, M. K. & Tierney, K. J. (Eds.). (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Joseph Henry Press.
32. Pelling, M. (2003). The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan Publications Ltd.
33. Pisano, U. (2012). Resilience and sustainable development: Theory of resilience, systems thinking, and adaptive governance. ESDN Quarterly Report, 26, 1-20.
34. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
35. Sharif, M. B. A. (2021). The impact of natural disasters on small and medium enterprises (SME) in Bangladesh. Open Access Library Journal, 8(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107303
36. Şengün, H. (2007). Afet yönetimi sistemi ve Marmara depremi sonrasında yaşanan sorunlar [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis] Ankara University.
37. Tachiya, H. (2015). Dealing with disasters of unprecedented magnitude: The local government’s tribulations and the road to reconstruction. In Agricultural and forestry reconstruction after the Great East Japan earthquake: Tsunami, radioactive, and reputational damages (pp. 3-18). The Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University.
38. Taib, Z. M. & Jaharuddin, N. S. (2019). Disaster preparedness and community resilience: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity, 10(1), 171- 182. https://doi.org/10.21467/ijdrcb.10.1.171-182
39. Theis, T. & Tomkin, J. (2015). Sustainability: A comprehensive foundation. OpenStax CNX
40. Tierney, K. J., Lindell, M. K. & Perry, R. W. (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Joseph Henry Press.
41. Tierney, K. (2007). Businesses and disasters: Vulnerability, impacts, and recovery. In H. Rodriguez, E. L. Quarantelli, R. Russell and R. Dynes (Eds.) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, pp. 275–296.
42. UNDRR. (2023). GAR special report 2023: Mapping resilience for the sustainable development goal. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.undrr.org/gar/gar2023-specialreport
43. Varol, N., & Kırıkkaya, E. B. (2017). Afetler karşısında toplum dirençliliği [Community resilience in the face of disasters]. Dirençlilik Dergisi, 1(1), 1–9.
44. Webb, G. R. (2018). The cultural turn in disaster research: Understanding resilience and vulnerability through the lens of culture. In H. Rodriguez, W. Donner and J. E. Trainor (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research. Springer, pp. 109–122.
45. Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 11-17.
46. Woolcock, M. & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
47. Yeni Şafak (6 November 2023). Fabrikalar ayakta ama göç yıkabilir: Antakya OSB’deki işletmeler düşük kapasiteyle üretime başladı. https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/fabrikalar-ayakta-amagoc-yikabilir-antakya-osbdeki-isletmeler-dusuk-kapasiteyle-uretime-basladi-4510976.