ESKİDEN YENİYİ YARATMAK: TÜRK CAMİİ VE KONUTLARINDAKİ GELENEKSEL/OSMANLI VE MODERN MİMARİ TASARIMLARIN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz

Mimarideki gelişmeler, sadece pratikte var olan değişimlere değil ayrıca belirli bir zamanda değişen hayat tarzı ihtiyaçlarına da açıklık getirmektedir. Dolayısıyla mimarideki gelişme, eğilim ve yönelimler de bu değişim ve ihtiyaçlara paralel olarak ilerleme göstermektedir. Mimarinin hayat tarzı, kültür, sosyal düzen ve çeşitli alanlardaki özel ihtiyaçlarla doğrudan ilişkisi vardır. Türkiye’nin mevcut mimari anlayışı, Roma ve Yunanistan da dahil dünyanın birçok yerinde olduğu gibi, peyzaj gelişimin yanı sıra, tarihi, dini, kültürel ve konut ile ilgili alanlarda Osmanlı mimari anlayışının belirgin kurallarını yansıtır. Modern mimari oluşumlar genellikle şehir bölgelerinde konumlaşmışken, geleneksel mimari oluşumlar, Türkiye mimarisinin ayrılmaz bir parçası olan dini yapılarda sıklıkla karşımıza çıkar. Bu araştırmada batılılaşma ve laikleşmeyi ortaya koyan Avrupa kübizmi ve modernizminden etkilenmiş Türkiye’nin Osmanlı dönemi ve çağdaş klasik stilinin çeşitli mimari parçaları ele alınıp, değerlendirilecektir. Dolayısıyla, bu makalede, tarihi yakınlık ve mimari kaynağı kültürün parçası olan günümüz değişimlerinin perspektifinden, Osmanlı zamanı ve günümüz mimarisinin sınırlarının kesişimi gösterilmeye çalışılacaktır. Bu yapılırken, günümüz Türkiyesinde mimarlık kavramının ne anlama geldiği örnekleri üzerinde durularak bazı çağdaş sanat eserleri incelenecektir. Çalışmamızda, aynı zamanda günümüzün modern olarak nitelendirilen bazı camilerinde mevcut olan Osmanlı tasarım unsurlarına da işaret etmektedir. Bu unsurlar, bunlar olmaksızın camiye gelenlerin islamik sembollerle olan bağlantısını kaybetmesine yol açacak olan süregelen cami yapısı karakteristiklerini belirlemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Geleneksel mimarlık, Osmanlı Mimarisi, Çağdaş Mimari , Türkiye Dönemi Mimarisi, Türkiye’deki Konutlar ve Camiler

CREATING NEW FROM THE OLD: COMPARISON BETWEEN MODERN AND OTTOMAN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS IN TURKISH MOSQUES AND DWELLINGS

Öz

The developments in architecture make a statement not only in practicality but also in lifestyles needs for a particular period. There is also a direct association with the architecture with a link to lifestyle, culture, social order, and specific needs within the various areas. The current architecture in Turkey, like most parts of the world including Rome and Greece indicates the development of the landscape as well as the historical, religious, cultural, and home areas reflects understanding of architecture, evident in ottoman rule. Modern development ment is often one based on urban spaces while the traditional means created with religious formations that were a part of Turkey. The research will examine the different pieces of architecture associated with Turkey’s Ottoman era and contemporary classic-style influenced by European cubism and modernism and introducing westernization and secularization. Consequently, this paper intercepts the ottoman rule with contemporary architecture using literature on architecture from the perspective of historical affiliations and contemporary changes as a part of culture. The concept of architecture in contemporary times in Turkey then will look examine the contemporary artefacts. The paper also examines Ottoman architecture design elements present in modern day mosques. One such element is the dome that has continually characterized the structure of mosques and without which this Islamic symbol loses contact with the audience.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ottoman Architecture, Contemporary or Turkey Republic Architecture, Dwellings and Mosques in Turkey

Kaynakça

1. all about Turkey. (2013). Traditional Turkish Houses. retrieved June 19, 2014, from all about Tur- key: http://www.allaboutturkey.com/turkish-houses.htm
2. asya. 2011. “Ottoman heritage.” retrieved november 17, 2011 from: http://www.wayfaring. info/2011/06/10/ottoman-heritage/
3. beautiful Mosque. (2013, May 4). Şakirin Mosque Istanbul – Turkey. retrieved June 22, 2014, from The beautiful Mosque gallery: http://www.beautifulmosque.com/sakirin-mosque-istanbul-turkey/
4. bhramachari, r. 2011. “democracy: The Trojan horse of ıslamization” Faith Freedom. retrieved november 17, 2011 from: http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/op-ed/democracy-the-trojan- horse-of-islamization-part-1/.
5. Cammann, Schuyler. 1976. “religious Symbolism in persian art.” History of Religions 15 (3).
6. Cerasi, Maurice. 1988. “late – Ottoman architects and Master builders.” Muqarnas (5).
7. erzen, Jale. 1991. “aesthetics and aisthesis in Ottoman art and architecture.” Journal of Islamic Studies 2 (1).
8. Freely, J., & baker, e. a. 2010. A history of Ottoman architecture. Southampton: WıT press.

9. goodwin, g. 1971. A History of Ottoman Architecture. london: Thames and hudson.
10. hillenbrand, robert. 1989. “Traditional architecture in the arabian peninsula.” Bulletin: British Society for Middle Eastern Studies.16 (2).
11. kafadar, gulru. 1985. “The Suleymaniye Complex in ıstanbul: an ınterpretation.” Muqarnas. (3).
12. karasozen, r. 2000. “Sustainable aspects of Traditional Ottoman neighborhoods in Modern Turkish Settlements.” Sustainable Development and Planning. new york: WıT press.
13. Minana, r. 2005. Saving arnavutkoy: The Contemporary Cultural politics of Turkey. Macalester International, 15, 241-249.
14. nalbantoglu, gulsum. 1993. “between Civilization and Culture: appropriation of Traditional dwell- ing Forms in early republican Turkey.” Journal of Architectural Education 47 (2).
15. Ozasalan, n, aakalin. 2011. “postmodernism and Consumer Culture: ımage production via resi- dential architecture in post 1980s Turkey.” African Journal of Business 52 (1).
16. Ozyurek, esra. 2007. Nostalgia for the Modern: State Secularism and Everyday Politics in Turkey. new york: duke university press.
17. pecar, M. 2005. “ıntegration of Multi – Family housing using Open building Methods in Turkey.” IRB Direct (41).
18. risbero, bill. 2005. Modern Architecture and Design: An Alternative History. new york: the MıT press.
19. Sacred destinations. 2011. “Suleymaniye Mosque, ıstanbul.” Sacred Destinations. retrieved no- vember 17, 2011 from: http://www.sacred-destinations.com/turkey/istanbul-suleiman-mosque.
20. Shechter, relli, haim yacobi. 2005. “Cities in the Middle east: politics, representation and his- tory.” Cities 22 (3).
21. Sozen, Mujgan, gulaygedik. 2007. “evaluation of Traditional architecture in Terms of building physics: Old diyarbakir houses.” Building and Environment 42 (4).
22. Taylor, paige. 2011. “ıstanbul: a Combination of Modern and Tradition in Turkey.” retrieved november 17, 2011 from: http://travel.ezinemark.com/istanbul-a-combination-of-modern-and- tradition-in-turkey-77365c1b4878.html.
23. Tuncay, a. C. 2007. “Comfort to be ınformed from Traditional buildings: Traditional diyarbakir houses”. retrieved June 19, 2014, from bioClimatic archircture and Traditional houses diyarba- kir: http://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa06p465.html
24. urey, O. 2010. “use of Traditional elements in Contemporary Mosque architecture in Turkey.” The Muslim World 52 (1).
25. Wolper, ethel. 1995. “The politics of patronage: political Change and the Construction of dervish lodges in Sivas.” Muqarnas (12).
26. yavuz, hakan. 2003. “Opportunity Spaces, ıdentity, and ıslamic Meaning in Turkey.” Islamic Activ- ism: A Social Movement Theory Approach. ındiana: ındiana university press.
27. Zurcher, erik. 2000. Turkey: A Modern History. london: ıb Tauris.