A strategy of masculinity: Masculine reticence in private sphere

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 130 - 145, 01.06.2015

Atilla Barutçu

https://doi.org/10.1501/Fe0001_0000000137

Cited By: 4

Öz

A strategy of masculinity: Masculine reticence in private sphere In recent years, critical studies of men and masculinities give a chance to examine masculinity in all areas and provide to explore the different relationalities. This article focuses on the relationship between men and home. It first assumed that men probably uses reticence as a tool to position themselves at home, a place that is attributed to women, and to stay stronger as they are in public space. In this context, it is argued that reticence as a masculine and voluntarily attitude is different than silence, and it is a strategy rather than a tactic because it is used by the powerful one. Argument that the men use masculine reticence as a strategy at home is supported by the interviews. The article focuses on the relationship between men, home and talking explored that masculine reticence is an important strategy for men to link themselves with home without losing their masculinity and being feminized

Anahtar Kelimeler

Masculine reticence, strategy, masculinity, home, family

Bir erkeklik stratejisi: Özel alanda eril suskunluk

Öz

Son yıllarda gelişmekte olan erkekler ve erkeklikler üzerine eleştirel çalışmalar, erkekliği her alanda sorgulamaya fırsat tanımış ve erkekliğin pek çok alanda farklı ilişkiselliklerinin keşfedilmesini sağlamıştır. Bu makale bu ilişkiselliğin bir örneği olarak erkeklerin ev ile kurdukları ilişki üzerinde duracaktır. Makale, erkeklerin kadınlara atfedilen bir alan olan ev içinde kendilerini konumlandırabilmek ve kamusal alandaki üstünlüklerini sürdürebilmek için suskun kalmayı bazen bir araç olarak kullandıklarından yola çıkmıştır. Bu bağlamda suskunluğun sessizlikten farklı olarak bilinçli yapılan eril bir davranış olduğu, taktikten farklı olarak ise güçlü olanın uyguladığı bir strateji olduğu savunulmuştur ve erkeklerin eril suskunluğu ev içinde bir erkeklik stratejisi olarak kullandığı yapılan mülakatlarla desteklenmiştir. Erkeklik, ev ve konuşma ilişkisine yoğunlaşan makalede eril suskunluğun erkeğin ev içinde kadınsılaşma tehlikesi yaşamadan ve erkekliğine zarar vermeden mekânsal ilişki kurabilmesi için önemli bir araç olduğu keşfedilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eril suskunluk, strateji, erkeklik, ev, aile

Kaynakça

• Abisaab, Malek Hassan. “Gendered Space in the Lebanese Women Tobacco Workers’ Strike of 1970,” Geograph- ies of Muslim Women: Gender, Religion and Spaceed. Ghazi – Walid Fallah ve Caroline Nagel (The Guilford Press, ), 412-459.
• Ayata, Sencer. “The New Middle Class and the Joys of Suburbia,” Fragments of Culture: The Everyday of Modern Turkey ed. Deniz Kandiyoti ve Ayşe Saktanber (Rutgers University Press, 2002), 25-42.
• Bailey, Joanne. “Masculinity and Fatherhood in England,” What is Masculinity? Historical Dynamics from An- tiquity to the Contemporary World ed. John H. Arnold ve Sean Brady (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 167-186.
• Blankenhorn, David. The Future of the Marriage (New York: Encounter Books, 2009).
• Bondi, Liz ve Domosh, Mona. “On the Contours of Public Space: A Tale of Three Women”. Antipode 30, no. 3 (1998): 270-289.
• Bourdieu, Pierre. “On the family as a realized category”.Theory, culture & society13, no. 3 (1996): 19-26.
• Connell, Robert William. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics (Stanford University Press: ). Connell, Robert William. The Men and the Boys (University of California Press, 2000).
• Connell, Robert William. Masculinities. (University of California Press, 2005, 2.baskı).
• Daly, Kerry. “Family Theory versus the Theories Families Live By”, Journal of Marriage and Family 65, no. 4 (2003): 771-784.
• Datta, Ayona. “Spatialising Performance: Masculinities and Femininities in a Fragmented Field”. Gender, Place and Culture 15, no. 2 (2008): 189-204.
• De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life (University of California Press, 1988).
• Doucet, Andrea. “Gender Roles and Fathering,” Handbook of Father Involvement: Multidisciplinary Perspectives ed. Natasha J. Cabrera ve Catherine S. Tamis-Lemonda (Routlegde, 2013), 297-319.
• Gelber, Steven M. “Do-It-Yourself: Constructing, Repairing, and Maintaining Domestic Masculinity” American Quarterly 49, no.1 (1997), 66-112.
• Ghannam, Farha. “Gender and Struggle over Public Spaces,” Remarking the Modern: Space, Relocation, and the Politics of Identity in a Global Cairo (University of California Press, 2002), 43-66.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Çiğdem. “Intra-family interaction and a model of family change,” Family in Turkish Society (Ankara: Turkish Social Science Association, 1985), 149-165.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Çiğdem. “Cross-cultural Perspectives on Family Change,” Autonomy and dependence in the family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective (2002): 17.
• Kan, Man Yee, Sullivan, Orielve Gershuny, Jonathan. “Gender Convergence in Domestic Work: Discerning the Effects of Interactional and Institutional BarriersFrom Large-Scale Data,”Sociology 45 no. 2 (2011): 234-251.
• Kandiyoti, Deniz. “Bargaining with Patriarchy,” Gender and Society 2, no. 3 (1988): 274-290.
• Korkmaz, Uğur Ferhat. “Parisli Bir Kasabın Erkeklik Halleri,” İlef Dergisi 1, no. 1, (2014): 89-114.
• Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space (Blackwell Publishing, 1991).
• Lefebvre, Henri. Critique of Everyday Life: Foundations for a Sociology of the Everyday Vol. 2, (Verso, 2002).
• Lupton, Deborah ve Barclay, Lesley. Constructing Fatherhood: Discourses and Experiences, (SAGE Publications, ). McDowell, Linda. Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. (University of Minnesota Press, 1999).
• Miller, Tina. Making Sense of Fatherhood: Gender, Caring and Work (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
• Özbay, Cenk ve Baliç, İlkay. “Erkekliğin Ev Halleri ” Toplum ve Bilim 101, (2004): 89-103.
• Sancar, Serpil. Erkeklik: İmkansız İktidar. Ailede, Piyasada ve Sokakta Erkekler (Metis Yayınları, 2011, 2. baskı).
• Sunar, Diane ve Okman Fişek, Güler. “Contemporary Turkish Families” Families in Global Perspectiveed. J. Roopnarineve U. Gielen (Boston: Pearson, 2005), 169-183.
• Thoma, Dieter. Babalar: Modern Bir Kahramanlık Hikayesi (İletişimYayınları, 2011).
• Thompson, Elizabeth. “Public and Private in Middle Eastern Women's History,”Journal of Women's History15, no. (2003): 52-69.