KANT'IN ÖDEV SINIFLANDIRMASININ FELSEFİ ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE

Öz

Kant'ın Ödev Sınıflandırmasının Felsefi Etkisi Üzerine

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Etik
• Ödev
• Kant
• Sosyal ve Ekonomik Haklar
• Nozick.

ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL IMPACT OF KANT'S DUTY CLASSIFICATION

Öz

Kant's general taxonomy of duties includes substantial claims that normatively and theoretically differentiates it from other moral theories. Basing his moral theory on a conception of Right, he also made a general classification of several duties with their corresponding moral worth. The general aim of this study is to identify the basic principles and criteria that determine Kant's classification of duties. Another aim is to trace some implications and effects of Kant's conception of duties in the contemporary discussion of social and economic rights. We argue that the normative basis of the argument against social and economic rights is very similar to that of the principles Kant uses in his classification of duties. However, from the responsibility of the state, Kant imposes legitimate obligations over individuals, albeit indirectly.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ethics
• Duty
• Kant
• Social and Economic Rights
• Nozick.

Kaynakça

1. Aristoteles, (1997). Nikomakhos’a Etik. Çeviren: Saffet Babür, Ayraç: Ankara.
2. Baron, Marcia W. (1995). Kantian Ethics Without Apology, Cornell University Press: Ithaca.
3. Beetham, David. (tarihsiz). Demokrasi ve İnsan Hakları, Türkçesi: Bilal Canatan, Liberte: Ankara.
4. Berlin, Isaiah (1969). “İki Özgürlük Kavramı”, Four Essays on Liberty içinde, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
5. Hill, Thomas E. (1992). Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory, Cornell University Press: Ithaca and London.
6. Kant, I. (1982). Ahlak Metafiziğinin Temellendirilmesi. Türkçesi: İonna Kuçuradi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları: Ankara.
7. Kant, I. (1991). The Metaphyics of Morals, translated by Mary Gregor, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
8. Nell, Onora (1975). Onora (1975). Acting On Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics, Columbia University Press: New York.

9. Nozick, Robert (2007). Anarşi, Devlet ve Ütopya, Türkçesi: Alişan Oktay, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları: İstanbul.
10. Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press: MA.
11. Rawls, John (2007). Siyasal Liberalizm, Türkçesi: M. F. Bilgin, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları: İstanbul.
12. Schaller, W. E. (1987). “Kant’s Architectonic of Duties” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48 (2), s. 299-314.
13. Sherman, N. (1997). Making A Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant On Virtue, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
14. Uygun, Oktay, (2001). “Küreselleşme ve Özgürlük”, Felsefe Tartışmaları, 28, s. 91-104.
15. Yazıcı, Aslı, (2005). An Inquiry Concerning the Place of Emotions in Virtue Ethics (A Comparison Between Aristotle and Kant), ODTÜ Felsefe Bölümü, yayınlanmamış doktora tezi.
16. Yazıcı, Sedat, (2003). “Atina, İsparta ve Libarel Cumhuriyetçilik”, Liberal Düşünce, 29, s. 115-129.