Öz
Kaynakça
- Collingwood, "The Nature and Aims of a Philosophy of History", Essays in Philosophy of History by R.G. Collingwood, Ed. William Debbins, Austin, University of Texas Press 1965. s. 34-56.
- , "The Philosophy of History", Essays in Philosophy of History by R.G. Collingwood, Ed. William Debbins, Austin, University of Texas Press 1965. s. 121-139.
- , The Idea of History, Oxford Clarendon Press, London 1946. 2 0 A.g.e., s. 242.
- An Autobiography, Oxford Clarendon Press, London 1991. (İlk baskısı 1939) Dilthey, Wilhelm, Hermeneutik ve Tin Bilimleri, çev. Doğan Özlem, Paradigma, İstanbul 1999.
- Hobsbawm, Eric, Tarih Üzerine, çev. Osman Akınhay, Bilim ve Sanat yayınlan, Ankara 1999.
- Hofstadter, Albert, "The Philosophy in History", Philosophy And History, Ed. Sidney Hook, New York University Press 1963, s. 227-249.
- Özlem, Doğan, Tarih Felsefesi, Ege Üniversitesi Yayınlan, İzmir 1984.
- Rothacker, Erich, Tarihselcilik Sorunu, çev. Doğan Özlem, Ara Yayıncılık, İstanbul 1990.
- Saari, Heikki, "Collingwood'un Mutlak Ön-kabuller Öğretisinin Bazı Yönleri", çev. Kubilay Aysevener, Doğu Batı 1998/3, Sayı 3, s. 161-174.
- Stanford, Michael, An Introduction to the Philosophy of History, Blackwell, Maiden, Massachusetts 1998.
- Tosh, John, Tarihin Peşinde, çev. Özden Arıkan, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınlan, İstanbul 1997.
Öz
In this article, I would like to discuss the importance of philosophical inquiry in the science of history. For this reason, my concern is to make explicit definitions of both philosophy and philosophy of history. At the first glance, it seems that there are two different viewpoints in dealing with history: speculative and critical. The speculative view concentrates on discovering general laws which determine the direction of history. The critical view aims to explore the proper method of history. It tries to compare the method of natural sciences with historical investigations. According to critical view, there is a sharp distinction between a study on nature and a study of history in the sense that history has its own special methodology. If the historians want to be accomplished in their work, they have to understand all of the historical facts with philosophical aspects. The historian has no alternative but to accept their philosophical thinking about human life which a necessary requirement for historical understanding of man.
Kaynakça
- Collingwood, "The Nature and Aims of a Philosophy of History", Essays in Philosophy of History by R.G. Collingwood, Ed. William Debbins, Austin, University of Texas Press 1965. s. 34-56.
- , "The Philosophy of History", Essays in Philosophy of History by R.G. Collingwood, Ed. William Debbins, Austin, University of Texas Press 1965. s. 121-139.
- , The Idea of History, Oxford Clarendon Press, London 1946. 2 0 A.g.e., s. 242.
- An Autobiography, Oxford Clarendon Press, London 1991. (İlk baskısı 1939) Dilthey, Wilhelm, Hermeneutik ve Tin Bilimleri, çev. Doğan Özlem, Paradigma, İstanbul 1999.
- Hobsbawm, Eric, Tarih Üzerine, çev. Osman Akınhay, Bilim ve Sanat yayınlan, Ankara 1999.
- Hofstadter, Albert, "The Philosophy in History", Philosophy And History, Ed. Sidney Hook, New York University Press 1963, s. 227-249.
- Özlem, Doğan, Tarih Felsefesi, Ege Üniversitesi Yayınlan, İzmir 1984.
- Rothacker, Erich, Tarihselcilik Sorunu, çev. Doğan Özlem, Ara Yayıncılık, İstanbul 1990.
- Saari, Heikki, "Collingwood'un Mutlak Ön-kabuller Öğretisinin Bazı Yönleri", çev. Kubilay Aysevener, Doğu Batı 1998/3, Sayı 3, s. 161-174.
- Stanford, Michael, An Introduction to the Philosophy of History, Blackwell, Maiden, Massachusetts 1998.
- Tosh, John, Tarihin Peşinde, çev. Özden Arıkan, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınlan, İstanbul 1997.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Kitap Tanıtımı |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 15 Aralık 2002 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2002 Sayı: 36 |
Felsefe Dünyası Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.